Guest guest Posted August 9, 2006 Report Share Posted August 9, 2006 http://www.thecompounder.com/splendakills.html SPLENDA (Sucralose) Another Chemical that Can Kill RETURN to The Compounder HOME Page Basic Information Multiple Sclerosis Hormones Bones and Joints Healthy Choices Avoid These Things Alternatives to Drugs Other Popular Topics Our Catalogs Splenda, also known as sucralose, is artificial sweetener which is a chlorinated sucrose derivative. Facts about this artificial chemical follows: Pre-Approval ResearchPre-approval research showed that sucralose caused shrunken thymus glands (up to 40% shrinkage) and enlarged liver and kidneys. The manufacturer put forth two arguments in an attempt to claim that sucralose is not toxic: The dose of sucralose in the experiments was high. However, for chemicals that do not have generations of safe use, the dosage tested must be adjusted for variations in potential toxicity within the human population and between humans and rodents. In order to this, toxicologists estimate a variation of effects in the human population of 10 times. In other words, one person may not have effects until a dose of 10 mg per kg of body weight (10 mg/kg) is reached, while another person may have chronic toxicity effects at 1 mg per kg of body weight (1 mg/kg). In addition, it is well known that many chemicals are much more toxic in humans than in rodents (or even monkeys). For example, the chemicals that the sweetener aspartame breaks down into vary from 5 to 50 times more toxic in humans than in rodents. Therefore, toxicologists estimate a further 10 times the dose for differences between human and rodent toxicity for a total of 100 times (10 * 10). In order to estimate a potential safe dose in humans, one must divide the lowest dose in given to rodents that was seen to have any negative effects on their thymus glands, liver or kidneys by 100. That dose is then known as the maximum Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for lifetime use. Keep in mind that the TDI is just an estimate. Some chemicals are much more than 10 times more toxic in humans than in rodents (or will cause cancer in humans in low-dose, long-term exposure and do not cause cancer in rodents at all). A person ingesting the TDI for some chemical may find that it causes cancer or immune system or neurological problems after many years or decades of use. So, if the manufacturer claims that the dose was equivalent to 50 diet sodas, then the TDI would be one half (1/2) of a diet soda, and even that dose may or may not be safe The manufacturer claimed that the sucralose was unpleasant for the rodents to eat in large doses. They said that starvation caused the shrunken thymus glands. From the New Scientist (23 Nov 1991, pg 13): [Toxicologist Judith] Bellin reviewed studies on rats starved under experimental conditions, and concluded that their growth rate could be reduced by as much as a third without the thymus losing a significant amount of weight (less than 7 percent). The changes were much more marked in rats fed on sucralose. While the animals' growth rate was reduced by between 7 and 20 percent, their thymuses shrank by as much as 40 percent. Recent ResearchA possible problem with caecal enlargement and renal mineralization has been seen in post approval animal research.Sucralose Breaks DownDespite the manufacturer's mis-statements, sucralose does break down into small amounts of 1,6-dichlorofructose, a chemical that has not been adequately tested in humans.Independent, Long-Term Human ResearchNone. Manufacturer's "100's of studies" (some of which show hazards) were clearly inadequate and do not demonstrate safety in long-term use.Chlorinated PesticidesThe manufacturer claims that the chlorine added to sucralose is similar to the chlorine atom in the salt (NaCl) molecule. That is not the case. Sucralose may be more like ingesting tiny amounts of chlorinated pesticides, but we will never know without long-term, independent human research.ConclusionWhile it is unlikely that sucralose is as toxic as the poisoning people are experiencing from Monsanto's aspartame, it is clear from the hazards seen in pre-approval research and from its chemical structure that years or decades of use may contribute to serious chronic immunological or neurological disorders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 The Splenda warning is primarily innuendo and speculation propagated by agenda writer Betty Martini and her ilk; opinion pieces such as this one supply no data to speak of, and liberally use sleight-of hand to associate the product with unrelated products in your mind (aspartame and DDT). Well, they have to to make a good story out of it, I suppose. A Splenda dose is tiny, and practically all of it is quickly purged. Until the concerns of toxicity are proven, the agendists can only attract people who prefer unscientific dogma in a manner akin to attracting those who prefer religious dogma. When you're getting to the truth, instead of supporting and promoting any dogma for little valid reason, you should at least know there is a difference. I'm cautious, yet I still expose myself to Splenda a few times a week. Beware the agenda sites Duncan Crow > Posted by: " Eagle " nweagle mm121elaine > Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:12 pm (PDT) > > http://www.thecompounder.com/splendakills.html > > SPLENDA (Sucralose) > Another Chemical that Can Kill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.