A MUST READ: Toxic Sky Update from Rosalind (Includes Our Water)

[Guest guest]

http://health.Chemtrail_Illness_Research/message/3560?l=1 Fwd: A MUST READ: Toxic Sky Update from Rosalind (Includes Our Wate Message #3560 of 3568 < Prev | Next > This is long, but please take the time to read it. QUITE "enlightening".June 9, 2006The picture of a fairly common circumhorizon arc or "vibrant spectrum", "Rainbow that set the sky on fire", from BARRY WIGMORE, which was published in the Daily Mail on June 8, 2006, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=389689, is a fairly common example of man-made clouds being used to highlight one type of atmospheric testing program. In order for our atmospheric testing programs to be seen from satellites or earth toxic chemicals like barium, lithium ions, (NASA CRRES Atmospheric Testing Program), http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/astro/textdoc/news/crres.txt, Stimulated electron precipitation to produce auroras will provide the visual data. Barium ions can be seen glowing in sunlight and will produce a clear visual picture of the artificial man-made magnetic substorm creation and its behavior (NASA Press Kit 1990). Calcium and strontium (another toxic) will be released during this process. What impact do these atmospheric heating and testing programs have on our weather and do they exacerbate global warming? Vibrant Spectrums are very common in Los Angeles and Northern California. We have video tape and pictures of many of them over San Francisco, Sonoma, Mendocino and Lake Counties. The latest one was video taped on June 8, 2006, in Lake County.(Also check TMA or Trimethyl Aluminum (another toxic chemical) Atmospheric Heating and Testing Programs.) http://www.californiaskywatch.com/MoreInfo/index.html or http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2003/20jun_TMAclouds.htmhttp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/astro/textdoc/news/crres.txtContact Vice President Al Gore: Conference Call opportunity with Al Gore this Sunday, here is a link to the event: http://tinyurl.com/prh8h for full details. Sunday June 11, 2006. We have no idea what the synergistic effects all of these atmospheric tests are having on the earth or the earths climate. We do know however that toxics like barium, aluminum, and calcium are unusually spiking in EPA required drinking water tests in California (see information below).I hope that you will find this information helpful and I hope that it will add some insight into your research on this subject.Respectfully,Rosalind PetersonPost Office Box 499Redwood Valley, California 95470(707) 485-7520E-Mail: info@californiaskywatchcomWebsite: californiaskywatch.comAGRICULTURE ALERT – June 9, 2006EXPERIMENTAL WEATHER MODIFICATION BILL FAST TRACKING FOR PASSAGE IN U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESBy Rosalind PetersonU.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995, a bill that would allow experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implement a national weather modification policy, does not include agriculture or public oversight, is on the "fast track" to be passed in 2006. This bill is designed to implement experimental weather modification. The appointed Board of Directors established by this bill does not include any agricultural, water, EPA, or public representatives, and has no provisions for Congressional, State, County, or public oversight of their actions or expenditures. Weather Modification may adversely impact agricultural crops and water supplies. If the weather is changed in one state, region or county it may have severe consequences in another region, state or county. And who is going to decide the type of weather modification experimentation and who it will benefit or adversely impact? This experimental weather modification bill will impact residents across the United States not just in California and Arizona. Many current and ongoing weather modification programs (80 listed by NOAA in 2005), including the one in Wyoming that is designed to increase the snowpack, may be diverting rainwater away from Arizona, Oklahoma, and Texas, three states that have recently been impacted by fires and drought. We have no idea what the unintended consequences of the Wyoming action or other experimental weather modification programs might be now or in the future. In addition to the experimental weather modification programs listed by NOAA, there are both private and ongoing government sponsored atmospheric testing and heating programs underway in Alaska and across the United States. Alaska Senator Stevens recently received $50 million in funding for Alaska's atmospheric heating program. All of these unregulated, private, government, and public weather modification programs, may also have unintended synergistic effects. Senate Bill 517 does not address these issues but intends to implement more experimental weather modification programs without a national debate or public oversight.Artificial weather modification can impact all of us by reducing water supplies, changing agricultural crop production cycles, reducing crop production, and water availability. Since most experimental weather modification programs use chemicals released into the atmosphere the public could be subjected increasingly toxic or unknown substances that could adversely impact agricultural crops and trees. Trimethyl Aluminum (TMA) and barium are just two of the toxic chemicals used in recent atmospheric heating and testing programs according to NASA. The Alaska H.A.A.R.P. atmospheric heating program may have the capability of changing the Jet Stream which could also change our weather.Many private weather modification companies admit that precipitation effects may be positive or negative. Fog dispersal programs, using dry ice, liquid nitrogen, liquid propane or silver iodide may improve visibility while adversely impacting Redwood Trees along the California coast by depriving them of needed water they derive from the fog.The increasing use of varied chemicals like aluminum (coupled with increasing air pollution), can severely impact tree health by depriving trees of water and nutrients normally absorbed through their root systems. The December 2005 Popular Science Magazine discussed a plan to use an oil slick to stop hurricanes without noting the adverse environmental impacts of the oil used to cover the ocean.Popular Science also noted that a private company, Dyn-O-Mat, plans to purchase jets to drop thousands of pounds of a water absorbing chemical powder (unknown substance), into hurricanes to absorb moisture that may dissipate hurricanes. There is no agriculture oversight or public hearings to determine the consequences of this and other actions or to monitor or prevent adverse impacts of this chemical once it falls on the surface of the ocean or on land. Alaska and other areas across the United States are beginning to feel the impacts of climate change. Enormous changes are being seen in the declining health of native plant and tree communities in many areas across the United States.NASA noted in an October 2005 newsletter that increasingly persistent contrails are "…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…" NASA goes on to note that: "…Any increase in global cloud cover will contribute to long-term changes in Earth's climate. Likewise, any change in Earth's climate may have effects on natural resources…" Global dimming and the persistent contrails, that produce man-made clouds, may have serious impacts on crop production. A recent corn crop study in Illinois shows that cloud cover reduces corn crop production while direct sunlight increases production. In addition, increasing man-made clouds may reduce the effectivenesslar of solar panels.Gil Smolin, an Avian Bird Flu expert, noted on the Ron Owens Show on KGO Radio (January 5, 2006), that the flu was spread more quickly in the winter when there was a "lack of sunlight". Would man-made clouds be contributing to the lack of sunlight which might cause the Avian Bird flu to spread more quickly at other times of the year? Experimental weather modification programs could also exacerbate this problem by changing climate patterns, increasing man-made cloud cover, and changing our weather and climate patternsSenate Bill 517 does not address any of these important issues. Its sole purpose is to establish an experimental weather modification policy without any agriculture or public oversight of private, military, and government programs. Without oversight or public hearings agriculture, our natural resources, and watersheds may be negatively impacted. And who will be responsible to determine the synergistic effects of these programs or pay for unintended disasters created by this experimentation. If these programs change growing seasons and interrupt the pollination process crop losses could be substantial exacerbating economic losses.Please contact all of your elected local, state and federal officials to stop this bill in its present form. This bill needs to have appropriate agriculture and public oversight, with public hearings included, prior to any more experimental projects. We need a national dialogue on this subject before more experimentation takes place.For more information please contact:Rosalind PetersonPost Office Box 499Redwood Valley, California 95470(707) 485-7520E-Mail: infoWebsite: californiaskywatch.comFor Information on our Educational Forums Please Contact: Bridget ConroyAgriculture Defense CoalitionP.O. Box 54297Phoenix Arizona 85078(602) 404-0847 E-Mail: bcolemanconroy8In 1995, Rosalind became a certified U.S.D.A. Farm Service Agency Crop Loss Adjustor working in more than ten counties throughout California. Many crop losses throughout the State can be attributed to weather related causes.Rosalind has a BA degree from Sonoma State University in Environmental Studies & Planning (ENSP), with emphasis on agriculture and crop production. Rosalind Peterson was born and raised on a working farm in Redwood Valley, California. The weather was the foremost factor in determining whether or not our tree crops produced fruit and nuts.Between 1989 and 1993 Rosalind worked as an Agricultural Technologist for the Mendocino County Department of Agriculture. After leaving Mendocino County she took a position with the USDA Farm Service Agency as a Program Assistant in Mendocino, Sonoma, and the Salinas County Offices. *******The first successful protest rally against U.S. Senate Bill 517 was held in Los Angeles, California on March 23, 2006. The second successful educational forum and demonstration rally opposing U.S. Senate Bill 517 was held in Phoenix, Arizona on Saturday, April 29, 2006. The Agriculture Defense Coalition is now moving their message east across the United States toward Washington, D.C. Concerned grassroots citizens are involved in this educational protest movement to protect agriculture from unwise experimental weather modification programs. "We, the people, simply will not accept this reckless experimenting on our weather and are fighting the passage of this bill in order to protect agricultural crop production and our water supplies."Recommended Book: The Dying of the Trees, by Charles Little 1995Associated Reference Articles http://www.asp.bnl.gov/http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=36105#http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2005-12-19-wyoming-cloud-seeding_x.htmhttp://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/c955700641f87010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd.html http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p1.pdfhttp://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p2.pdfhttp://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p3.pdfhttp://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p4.pdfhttp://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p6.pdfhttp://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p7.pdfhttp://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/Count/Oct2005/ConEdNews_p8.pdfTELEVISION NEWS ALERT EXPERIMENTAL WEATHER MODIFICATION(INCLUDES A SEGMENT ON MENDOCINO COUNTY, CA)http://www.nbc4.tv/news/9155725/detail.htmlWatch: "Toxic Sky?"NBC4 TV – Los Angeles, California News Program – Tuesday, May 23, 2006 11:00 P.M.There is a WEB report on NBC4.tv at 9:00 A.M. on May 24, 2006.CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DRINKING WATER TEST RESULTS1984 - 2006The California State Department of Health, Drinking Water Division, Sacramento, California, collects all of the water test data from every public drinking water source in the State of California.These tests are required by the EPA and the State of California, due to possible health effects, when various metals, herbicides, pesticides and other substances are found above state or federal standards in drinking water sources. 1) A review of all water tests in the State of California between 1984 and 2006 from results on this CD was conducted over a six-month period. Every water test result over -0- was analyzed and checked to find any unusual water contaminant data. The results of this search yielded some unusual statistics here in Mendocino and several other Northern California Counties.2) It was discovered that Barium, Magnesium, Lead, Manganese, Aluminum, Iron, Sodium, and Specific Conductance (the ability of water to conduct a charge), were being found under unusual circumstances in our drinking water supplies. Unusual spikes were occurring in almost all drinking water sources in Mendocino County and in other counties throughout the State of California.Prior to 1990, these spikes were not evident in drinking water tests results (most tests results were -0-), unless there were historic levels in the water shown by test results each year from 1984. The test results do show that in non-spike years these contaminants were not found in most water sources. Why? 3) These specific spikes started in 1991, and have continued in certain specific years through 2006. The interesting part of these water spikes is that these contaminants almost always spike at the same time and in the same year. If, for example, Specific Conductance is high, then all or almost all the other test results are high at the same time. (Other test results revealed that Boron, Silver and sometimes Zinc were also present during these spikes in some water tests.)The Albion Mutual Water Company East Well, used as only one example, shows Specific Conductance spiking in 1995, along with Magnesium and Lead. Again in 2001, Specific Conductance spikes and so does Magnesium and Manganese. The years prior to and in between these dates show -0- results. The Albion Mutual Water Company West Well, for example shows all -0- readings until 1998, when Specific Conductance, Magnesium, Sodium and Aluminum all spike.The Calpella County Water District has definite spike patterns of Magnesium,Barium, Iron and Manganese in the years 1995, 1998 and 2001. The Covelo EelRiver Charter School Well 01, shows Magnesium, Barium, Iron, Manganese, Zinc and Specific Conductance spikes in 1999 and 2001, with Specific Conductance reaching a high of 5,390.In 1999, the Fort Bragg CSP-Mackerricher State Park Lake Cleone Intake Supply Raw, water tests show spiking in 1999 for Specific Conductance (1290), Magnesium (20), Chloride (325), Barium (54) and aluminum (64). Note that test results are in parts per billion. What is interesting is that Iron(1600 ppb) spikes in 2001, along with Manganese (2200 ppb), in this raw water supply.The unusual part is that these water test results are consistent in almost every single public drinking water source in all of Mendocino County, whether in Ukiah, Fort Bragg, Hopland, Laytonville or Willits. The spikes are consistent in some years, vary in parts per billion (ppb), but show that something unusual is happening to the air in Mendocino County which is impacting the quality of our water. Since these diverse water sources are not connected it is believed that air pollution is the major source of these contaminants in our drinking water supplies.4) Why are these spikes only found since 1994? Why do these contaminants only spike as a group and not, in the majority of cases, independently of one another? And why is every single public drinking water source showing some form of this spike pattern? The California Air Resources Board Statewide Summary for Iron, Aluminum, Iron, Zinc, Manganese and Barium, also show positive air test results between 1989 and 2001. Our water test spikes appear to correlate strongly with California Air Quality test results. Why?5) What is causing these water spikes in Mendocino County? How is this impacting the quality of the water we drink? What impact do these spikes have on public health, the quality of our water, our air, soil and trees? What is the source of these pollutants? Industry, jet fuel emissions…what is happening in Mendocino County and in other counties throughout California? There are many questions and few answers. Why are the California Air Resources Control Board Air Testing Results correlating in some respects with our positive water test results?(In an article in the Sunday, February 23, 2003, edition of the Sacramento Bee, written by Chris Bowman, it was noted that Tungsten (not normally tested for in public drinking water supplies), was found in Elk Grove, Sacramento, in drinking water supplies, and in tests conducted on trees rings in that area as well. Similar results were found in Fallon, Nevada and Sierra Vista, Arizona. The trees tested in this pilot project included Redwood trees and showed huge increases in Tungsten in the past ten years in tree ring tests. It would be interesting to determine whether Tungsten, a potential carcinogen may be found in Mendocino County trees, air or public drinking water supplies.6) Why hasn't the California State Department of Health or the EPA taken action to find out why we are having these water test results in Mendocino County, especially when some of the test results are above both state and federal standards? If these contaminants are being found in public wells in Mendocino County. Does this mean that contaminants are also being found in private wells? Are similar patterns found in Humboldt, Lake, Sonoma, Napa and other Northern California Counties? I believe that the answer is yes! Why?There are many unanswered questions about these test results, this unusual spiking pattern and the variation in test results. If you would like more information please contact your local, state or federal elected public representatives and/or the California State Department of Health or the California State Air Quality Control Board in Sacramento. If you would like copies of these graphs or the data results please contact Rosalind Peterson, (707) 485-7520 or E-Mail: infoThe California State Department of Health CD (1984-2006) may be obtained by calling the California State Department of Health Drinking Water Division at (916) 449-5568 or by sending $100.00 to Drinking Water Program, Post Office Box 942732, Sacramento, California 94234-0732. (A CD containing all of this data is available to the public upon payment of a fee to the California State Department of Health Drinking Water Division in Sacramento.)If you are interested in an inexpensive and fast way to obtain these results for your individual water supply please contact your local water district, like the City of Ukiah, or your county water district or drinking water supplier. They order the tests, which are subsequently sent to the California State Department of Health, Drinking Water Division, Sacramento, CA, to be recorded on their CD. These historical and current water test data results are available to the public in California under the California Public Records Act. These test results are available to the public in every state under EPA Rules and Regulations.