Guest guest Posted June 2, 2006 Report Share Posted June 2, 2006 LEST WE FORGET Reposted from Nov...NOTE: item #3 Bioshield now on books item #5 might translate as "smiling population control guys" /////////////////////////////////////////// We've had a couple other posts re: Jon Rappoport; I agree with theconsensus; he is among the world's best investgative reporters. Regards,UncBobhttp://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2864WHAT DOES A BIRD-FLU HOAX ACCOMPLISH?2005-10-21www.nomorefakenews.comOCTOBER 21, 2005. I've written several articles pointing out theobvious scientific hoaxes surrounding the current bird-flu pandemicnonsense.And I'll have more coming soon on that score.Meanwhile, let's review WHO BENEFITS scaring the pants off everyonefor no good reason.First, the government(s) gets to put troops on the streets. Again.This continues the conditioning operation, in which private citizensbecome accustomed to military presence in civilian locales.This is big. Posse Comitatus continues to erode. The military is hypedas the only institution that can really protect the population againstall sorts of disasters.Second, there is the opporunity, at some point, to declare emergenciesand QUARANTINES. "Stay home. Don't go out. If you do, you'll bearrested."Third, the government can begin to take action against any criticism of the medical authorities and their manipulations. We are now seeinga Bill working its way through Congress, and this Bill will outlaw anylegal action taken against government or drug companies for injuriessustained from medical drugs or vaccines given during a state ofemergency---such as an epidemic.Fourth, there will be vaccines forced on the population, to "fend off"the epidemic. This re-enforces the practice of mandatory medicaltreatment.Fifth, vaccines always contain the seeds of toxicity. I'm not justtalking about mercury. There are formaldehyde, aluminum, and otherchemicals in the vaccines. Many vaccines are made by passing germsthrough animal products, such as chicken eggs, which already contain awide variety of other germs. And of course, the vaccines are injecteddirectly into the body, bypassing a number of the usual immune defenses.Vaccines, via this toxicity, and by their very nature, SUBSTITUTE forthe body's own natural defense systems. In other words, the vaccinesweaken the body's habit of defending itself.With all this toxicity, the population is weakened under the paradigmof vaccines. This is obviously good for authoritarian rule. The weakerthe people, the harder it is for them to think and act clearly andfeel the confidence necessary to live as independententities.Yes, Virginia, you can achieve all of the above goals merely by hypinga non-existent pandemic that, at the most, has klled 60 people aroundthe world in the last several years.Don't forget drugs given for the flu, either. Medicines like Tamifluare toxic. They can bring on all sorts of severe adverse effects.The massive propaganda machines of various governments and healthagencies have already achieved a stunning coup. Their hammeredwarnings of imminent pandemic have penetrated so far into thecollective consciousness, globally, that even with a suddenpronouncement of no more than 20 human bird-flu cases in a small townin the US or England, the people of those countries would agree andconsent to all sorts of draconian measures.Very few people would stop and think about the science or thepolitics. People would trample each other to get a flu shot. Peoplewould stay indoors. Businesses would close. Airports around thecountry could be shut down with barely a murmur of protest.That's the effect of really good propaganda. You don't need casenumbers that amount to anything. You don't need science. You just needofficial liars and the press and the government.That's right. It DOES look a lot like the basic scenario of 1984. Youdon't need a real war. You only need the pretense of one.And why would anyone want to so weaken and control a nation like theUS? Because, under the rubric of globalism, every country has to bereduced and brought down to a lower level of economic and individualfunctioning, so that "share and care" elites can continue their movestoward the rule of the many by the few.Look at a slice of history. Wasn't the dismal human period called theMiddle Ages just the thing for the Roman Church? Didn't that authority(the few over the many) thrive in such an atmosphere? And when theRenaissance reared its head with an accompanying mercantilism---whenthe individual human being rose up---didn't the iron control of theChurch begin to wane?JON RAPPOPORTwww.nomorefakenews.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.