Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

FDA said aspertame or nutra sweet does not have to be on the labels

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Original sender's name: James D. Bowen, MD Original sender's address: bowendrjim Aspartame's extreme, and highly fatal: Carcinognesis! I am one of the only few “Nutra Sweet Dissidents” to ever see the first (original) pre-marketing Aspartame toxicity studies. It has to be strongly emphasized! These first studies were done at only 1/1000th the legally required Aspartame dosage levels. (And for only sixty days!) The law specifies that one hundred times the “greatest possible maximum human consumption” must always be used in pre-marketing testing of animals. This law is entirely conservative, because it only allows for only a ten fold species to species variation of effect, and only a ten fold variation of individual effect within a given species: In order to protect all humans who may ever ingest a given chemical! Only 3 cans of pop per day (level) scaled down the weight of each given animal species, was ever used, in spite of the thousands of ways Aspartame is presently dosed into us, even being “sneaked” in with yogurts, chewing gums, etc! (The FDA recently got a law enacted that “ASPARTAME” does not now even have to be at all mentioned on the product label itself!) The phenyl alanine isolate poisoning from Aspartame is exemplary of why this legally mandated testing standard, (even if followed,) is inadequate protection for human beings. PKU (phenylketonuria) is a human enzyme deficiency, leading to severe brain damage even if even a small amount of a balanced mix of proteins containing significant phenyl alanine content is consumed! Moreover, all the tested animals metabolize phenyl alanine outside the brain, while the human being metabolizes it inside the brain, and at its brain enzyme sites, with extreme damages resulting, (even in non PKU “normal” humans) from the bolus of Phenyl alanine isolate obtained from a single can of Aspartame pop! Both concepts are inadequate in the case of Aspartame because: 1. Aspartame is a highly synergized methyl alcohol poisoning, and all the test animals used have the proper enzyme channels to harmlessly break down methanol without processing it through the Methanol> formaldehyde> formic acid> carbon monoxide toxic axis. This entire toxic axis is the only way methanol, from Aspartame, can be at all metabolized in humans. The “hangover” after drinking alcoholic beverages, (which contain only small traces of methanol,) is a small example of this toxicity, (even though the ethyl alcohol itself, is a specific, and the most highly effective antidote known, for methyl alcohol toxicity.) “Excitotoxins” also markedly increase the severity of their poisonings, as the two indicated factors of greater molecule size, and other incorporated toxic chemistries increase in their molecular makeup! Moreover in methyl esters like Aspartame, the larger the ester, and the more highly toxic its other components, the far worse will be the poisoning from each methyl ester. Aspartame maximizes these two extreme toxicities! 2. Because the Aspartic acid is a dicarboxylic amino acid, (and therefore a powerful neural excitoxin!) Aspartame then will also form its own diketopiperazine entity while sitting in solution, or even while being digested. This DKP form is an extremely far more highly chemically reactive, and an even far greater and stronger polymerization agent, than the parent chemical in every case. DKPs therefore, are the major substrate class used in synthesizing plastics! The DKP form of Aspartame was (in even that minuscule dose, and for only 60 days) found to be number one chemical ever identified to cause brain cancers in rats! (Even when the other chemicals tested were used at maximal dosages, and over lifetime test periods, in the animals tested.) Just 1/1000th the legally mandated dose of Aspartame, ingested for only 60 days, caused the highest incidence of brain tumor in rats, that any chemical ever tested at any dose, ever caused! The Aspartame “dicarboxlic amino acid neural excito toxicity” is also molecularly maximized, when given the two factors mentioned above, (which also maximize the methyl alcohol toxic axis toxicity.) Medically well known examples of the extreme damage from these two factors and chemical classes, are “Guam Parkinson disease,” and “Prince Edward Island shell fish: Domoic Acid” poisoning, both of which have caused extreme neurological disease epidemics in Guam (And all around the World's Oceans), and Prince Edward Island, with lifelong neural sequelae, and also additional disease generations, occurring in those epidemic's victims!( Just as Aspartame also always does!) For a clearer presentation of the even greater picture of Aspartame's extreme toxicity, Plz get Ch 7 of “Sweet Mystery in The Present Darkness: What Ever Happened to We Scientists Who First Spoke Out Against Aspartame?” from wnho.net, www.aspartame.ca, or dorway! (It is freely available, for free!) Billions of Victims”is also “free” on those sites! While I was driving cab in Denver: Upon hearing this, one of my fares screamed out: “Doc! You are sure right! Within a year of the time we started drinking Aspartame pop, three of my immediate family members experienced brain tumors, even though there had never before even been a single brain tumor in our entire known family tree. Moreover, all three then were dead within the year following, in spite of all which medicine, surgery, and radiation had to offer them!” (This is because Aspartame so damages and defocus es the entire immune system!) The first six months after they put “Nutra Sweet” into our “diet” pop and soft drinks, the US brain cancer occurrence rate jumped 10%, and the US diabetes “new case” rate 30%! In those first low dose Aspartame: FDA pre-marketing studies the infant monkeys ONLY showed up with a 100% incidence of Grand Maul epilepsy! Those human subjects then tested at only “three cans of Aspartame pop” level per day for just sixty days, also showed an immediate 250% increase of “all physical complaint” incidence. Two of the sixty people used as Aspartame test subjects, then immediately developed highly malignant cancers: One Breast carcinoma, and One Bone sarcoma. Both test subjects were dead within the year following, in spite of all which medicine, surgery and radiation had to offer them! The Food and Drug Death Association (FDA) comment: “Well, that's all just insignificant!” When they then went ahead and marketed Aspartame under the influence of Reagan, Rumsfeld, and Dr Arthur Hull Hayes!(Hayes refused, but was, at that time, BLACKMAILED into approving Aspartame, by godfather Rumsfeld!) These names, along with the Bushes, who are the primal New World Order force, amongst all this human “Aspartame devastation” should live in Infamy! Sincerely, James D. Bowen MD --- Jagannath Chatterjee < jagchat01 wrote: E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN #8122 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * "Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982." BL Fisher Note: Since 1982, the National Vaccine Information Center, founded by parents of vaccine injured children, has been calling for research into the biological mechanisms and genetic factors involved in vaccine-induced brain and immune system dysfunction, including autism. Katie Wright is right - the anti-autism research stance taken by the American Academy of Pediatrics is shameful. The American Academy of Pediatrics and Centers for Disease Control have a long history of taking the uncompromising position that all children should be forced to use multiple vaccines without individualizing use to accomodate for biological differences. They embrace the utilitarian "greater good" argument, which allows for sacrifice of the well being of a minority of individuals in service to a majority of individuals. That stance can lead to a tragic denial of the magnitude of the harm done by those creating and implementing the policy resulting in that harm. http://news.monstersandcritics.com/lifestyle/consumerhealth/article_1154848. php/The_Age_of_Autism_Christian%60s_mom_speaks Monsters and Critics.com Apr 12, 2006, 20:17 GMT The Age of Autism: Christian`s mom speaks By Dan Olmsted WASHINGTON, DC, United States (UPI) -- A small earthquake rumbled through the autism world shortly after 7:30 a.m. on April 11, and the aftershocks are going to be felt for a long time. That`s when Katie Wright, daughter of NBC Universal Chairman Bob Wright, said she is concerned her young son Christian`s autism might be related to vaccines he received, that he is getting better through treatments that include biomedical interventions, and that it`s time for parents to follow their own 'common sense' when they get their kids vaccinated. Big deal? Yes, big deal. It`s hard to overstate the buzz circulating through the autism community over the past few months as it became known that Katie Wright was among those with concerns about vaccines playing a role in her child`s autism -- and that she was trying to help him recover accordingly. 'I think it`s a huge story,' one autism activist e-mailed me in February. 'This child triggered a weeklong series on NBC and the most well-funded autism organization on the planet (Autism Speaks),' not to mention the high-profile heft of the Wrights in lobbying for more money, more research and more awareness of a disorder that afflicts 1 in every 166 American kids. Thousands of parents with concerns just like Katie Wright`s have been all but ostracized, as have the small but growing minority of doctors trying to help them. I know two MDs who lost faculty appointments shortly after I wrote about them, and I hear story after story about pediatricians rolling their eyes when they hear vaccine-related health concerns of any kind from parents. Many ban families who balk from their practices. Sitting right next to Katie Wright on 'Imus in the Morning' on MSNBC was her father, who also is vice chairman and executive officer of GE, one of the world`s biggest corporations. His comments were understandably more general -- nobody knows what causes autism, he said; vaccines are in the mix of possibilities that need urgent research; as are other environmental issues, as are genetic factors. But does anybody think he would have been there if he vehemently objected to his daughter expressing her concerns? (For that matter, does anybody think Katie Wright would have been there? After all, he runs the joint.) After Christian`s diagnosis, Bob Wright and his wife, Suzanne, founded Autism Speaks, an advocacy group. Some longtime autism activists consider it a bit namby-pamby, but after Tuesday that impression may be due for an update. Regardless, what Katie Wright had to say extends a thoroughly bad spell for the nation`s health bureaucrats and medical trade associations in their efforts to stamp out discussion of a possible vaccine link to autism. Major newspapers such as the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the Los Angeles Times, which has been the best by far on this topic, published articles on such groups` relentless opposition to banning thimerosal -- the mercury-based preservative some believe triggered a huge rise in autism diagnoses in the 1990s -- from childhood vaccinations. Last week 22 health organizations sent a letter to every member of the U.S. Congress putting themselves on record that such bans are a danger to public health -- yes, banning mercury from childhood vaccines is dangerous, keeping it in is not. Several states have banned it anyway, including heavyweights Illinois, California and New York. Meanwhile, Katie Wright said, the American Academy of Pediatrics has not endorsed a pending bill in Congress called Combating Autism -- backed by Autism Speaks and numerous other organizations -- which includes funding for research into possible causes of the epidemic, not excluding vaccines. Some apparently take that as a threat to the third rail of public-health policy: the U.S. childhood immunization schedule. Katie Wright zinged `em on that one -- she called the AAP`s stance 'shameful and disgraceful.' And she said that whatever caused Christian`s autism, she wishes she hadn`t let her doctor give him six vaccines on one day at age 2 months. Parents need to use 'common sense,' she said -- would you, an adult, want six vaccines in one day? Then she raised the stakes. Parents should insist that doctors 'separate the vaccines.' You know, give them over several office visits rather than all at once to minimize chances of a bad reaction. That doesn`t sound terribly threatening to public health, does it? Yet it`s heresy -- completely contrary to the position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 'Use of licensed combination vaccines ... is preferred to separate injection of their equivalent component vaccines,' says the CDC`s authoritative Pink Book of vaccine-preventable diseases. And they should all be administered 'as soon as the child becomes eligible for vaccination.' And they should contain mercury, if we say so. By putting her foot down, Katie Wright joins thousands of other parents putting the 'father-knows-best' branch of medicine on notice that it`s not nutty to use common sense when your child`s health is at stake. Others will differ, but that`s what I call a public service announcement. E-mail: dolmsted ============================================= News is a free service of the National Vaccine Information Center and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect your informed consent rights http://www.nvic.org Become a member and support NVIC's work https://www.nvic.org/making%20cash%20donations.htm To sign up for a free e-mail subscription http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htm To from this list, please go to http://nvic.org/emaillistunsub.htm or send an email to news-request and type UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the email. NVIC is funded through individual membership donations and does not receive government funding. Barbara Loe Fisher, President and Co-founder. NOTE: This is not an interactive e-mail list. Please do not respond to messages. "Our ideal is not the spirituality that withdraws from life but the conquest of life by the power of the spirit." - Aurobindo. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are d to the Google Groups "MedicalConspiracies" group. To post to this group, send email to: MedicalConspiracies (AT) googl (DOT) com To to this group, send email to: MedicalConspiracies- (AT) googl (DOT) com For more options, visit this group at: http://groups.google.comMedicalConspiracies Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion, If health related always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...