Vaccination and Chest Xrays will reduce your lifespan

[Guest guest]

p

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:19:56 -0000

 

 

Warning: Vaccination and Chest Xrays

will reduce your lifespan

 

There was an email about a child having autism and might also consider

giving the child vaccination. One bioterrorism U.S. doctor once

mentioned as he comments on extermination of U.S. people that if the

body is exposed to a lot of toxins (chemtrails) and vaccination will

caused the body's immune system to be severely compromised and the

body will no longer be immuned and will die very quickly. A majority

of old people die of a compromised immuned systems from either

pneumonia, cancer, etc.

 

THIS IS VERY TRUE, but the doctor did not elaborate as to why getting

vaccinations will severely compromised your immune system. Will I

found the answer. It turns out that there is a critical size of the

thymus glands. And the REASON why thymus gland size are reduced at age

20 is because of vaccinations, not age, as those who remain

unvaccinated, the thymus size is normal! With vaccination, once the

thymus get small to that of an 80 year old man, you lifespan will be

as same as him when it comes to dying of infection. One life insurance

company know this fact and not telling you when they ponder whether to

insure your life or not.

 

With this fact it is clear that the U.S. policy to forced vaccination

to military and the population and regular chemtrails is definitely a

clear policy to exterminate U.S. people by severely compromising the

immune response. I remember reading somewhere that the body only have

a limited number of immune response, if you exceed that through

vaccinations the body will no lo

 

nger responds and dies from

vaccination. This was a military research.

 

Here is one email I respond to the parent on autism:

 

Please understand that if the child is overvaccinated it not only

causes autism from mercury and toxins, it will also shrink the thymus

gland and thus shortening the lifespan of your child. The thymus gland

is the body's immune system. Once the thymus glands reaches a size of

1 ounce, it will no longer responds to infections, and immune system

will no longer work and will die. Keep vaccination to a minimum.

Thymus size determines the lifespan of your child.

 

Avoid chest x-rays as this causes thymus glands to appreciably reduce

size and the immune system will be severely compromise.

 

Some doctors use x-rays on your child seeing that thymus glands is too

large. This is very wrong to do. Don't allow your child to be exposed

to chest xrays. Large thymus glands indicates healthy child. When

thymus glands (located in chest) xrays are exposed, many children will

get throat cancer or dies from sudden infant death if exposed to

xrays. This is the reason why some people die after vaccination. Some

babies are exposed to xrays to reduce thymus size. Then they are given

vaccination. Once the thymus size are reduced, the baby no longer

responds to vaccinations either dies from it or get autism. In your

case, your child is lucky.

 

Americans who get yearly vaccination will soon find out life may be

shortened severely (worse than cigarette smoking) as their immune

system WILL NO LONGER WORK, once the thymus glands stop functioning.

 

I have attached two links sources that explains about not compromising

YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM. FIRST THE VACCINATION, SECOND THE CHEST XRAYS.

Women who get breast cancer examination using the chest xrays are

WARNED! Thymus is located on the upper chest. Exposure to xrays WILL

CAUSE THYMUS GLANDS TO REDUCE, COMPROMISING THE IMMUNE SYSTEM AND WILL

CAUSE CANCER AFTER THE CHEST XRAYS!!!!! Very few know this fact!

 

Here is some additional info from rense.com on this matter:

 

source: http://www.rense.com/health/vaccinationfacts.htm

 

SIGHTINGS

 

 

 

Vaccinations:

The Facts!

http://www.alanlam.demon.co.uk/vac2.htm

 

 

Immune System

 

 

FACT: Vaccines trick the body into focusing on only one aspect,

antibody production, of the many normally available to the immune

system. When the vaccine virus is injected directly into the blood

stream, it gains access to all of the major tissues and organs of the

body without triggering a normal immune response. 5 & #221; Antibodies that

do respond to the invading vaccine germs become committed to those

germs and are unable to react to other viruses. 6,7

 

FACT: The immune system is designed to help the organism discriminate

" self " from potentially dangerous " nonself " . Alien viruses injected

into the body fuse with healthy cells, and continue to replicate along

with those cells. 8 & #221; Under these circumstances, the immune system is

likely to either invade its own cells (cancer), or ignore danger signs

all together, leaving the body vulnerable. 9 & #221;

 

FACT : The thymus gland plays an essential role in the immune response

against germs and non-human proteins, making T-cells, protecting

against diseases. When autopsies were performed on vaccinated

Americans, it was found that the thymus gland had shrunk after

puberty, while there was little deterioration in the thymus gland of

adults in poorly vaccinated countries. Thymus gland abnormalities are

associated with many diseases and tumours. 10 & #221;

 

 

Contamination

 

 

FACT: The Simian monkey kidneys, used as the bases for the polio

vaccine in the 1950's and 1960's, were found to be contaminated with

the SV-40 virus. 11 & #221; SV-40 is a powerful immunosuppressor and trigger

for HIV - the name given to the AIDS virus. Researchers consider it to

be a cancer-causing virus. 12,13,14 & #221; The greatest spread of HIV

coincides with the most intense and recent smallpox vaccination

campaigns, which activated the dormant contaminated polio vaccine.

15 & #221;

The polio vaccine today can still be contaminated with an undetected

strain of monkey virus. 16 & #221;

 

 

Side Effects

 

 

FACT: The principle cause of encephalitis in the USA and other

industrialised countries, is the childhood vaccination programme. 17 & #221;

Encephalitis is the inflammation of the brain affecting the central

nervous systems. Subtle and often overlooked reactions to the vaccine

(a slight fever, fussiness, drowsiness) can be a case of encephalitis

which is capable of causing severe neurological complications months

or even years later. 18 & #221;

 

FACT: Medicine accepts that the rubella vaccine can cause long or

short-term arthritis. Wellcome notes in The Datasheet Compendium that

the rubella vaccine causes arthritis in 3% of the children and 12-20%

of adult women who receive it. 19 & #221; As many as 26% of children

receiving rubella vaccinations in national testing programs developed

arthritis. Some were hospitalised to test for rheumatic fever and

rheumatoid arthritis. 20 & #221;

 

 

Non-Efficacy

 

 

FACT: In the Philippines, the largest smallpox epidemic occurred

between 1917 and 1919, in which there were 162,503 cases and 71,453

deaths. All cases were vaccinated. 21 & #221;

 

FACT: In England, smallpox vaccinations were made compulsory in 1853.

Between 1863 and 1865, the population rose 7% and the death rate rose

by 41%. Between 1870 and 1872, the population rose 9% and the death

rate from smallpox rose 123%. 22 & #221;

 

FACT: Following the introduction of compulsory immunisation, the

incidence of diphtheria increased by 30% in France, 55% in Hungary,

200% in Switzerland and 625% in Germany. In Sweden, diphtheria

virtually disappeared without immunisation. 23 & #221;

 

FACT : Germany began compulsory diphtheria vaccinations in 1939. After

that country was thoroughly vaccinated, cases of the disease

skyrocketed to 150,000. 24 & #221; France initially rejected diphtheria

vaccinations because of the disasters she witnessed in other countries

due to its use. But after the German occupation, France was forced

into submitting to the shots. By 1943, cases of diphtheria in that

country had soared to nearly 47,000. 25 & #221; At the same time in nearby

Norway, which refused vaccinations, there were only 50 cases. 26 & #221;

 

 

Children

 

 

FACT: Toxic materials (vaccines) injected into the infants bloodstream

at only two months old, destroy critical nutrient stores and can

catastrophically damage the baby & #237;s still developing central nervous

system. 27 & #221; By the mid-1970 & #237;s, Japanese officials realised

early DPT

shots were in fact killing babies. 28 & #221;

 

FACT: Cot Death or SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), has been

linked to the DPT vaccine. 29 & #221; Dr William Torch, of the Nevada School

of Medicine, issued a report showing that two-thirds of 103 children

who died of SIDS had been immunised with DPT vaccine in the 3 weeks

before their deaths, many dying within a day of the vaccine. 30 & #221;

 

 

Cholera

 

 

FACT: It is generally recognised that there is no satisfactory cholera

vaccine. The product available up to the present has been largely a

public relations gambit. So distrusted is the current vaccine that the

medical authorities didn & #237;t bother to rush the drug to Peru during the

outbreak there in 1991. 31 & #221;

 

FACT: Certain vaccine such as that given to cholera are known to be of

no value, and the emphasis in general practice should really shift

more towards proper advice, which can often be more time consuming

than injections. 32 & #221;

 

 

Bad Medicine

 

 

FACT: In England, the National Health Service pays a " bonus " to

doctors with documented vaccination rates above specified percentages.

33 & #221; Doctors who vaccinate the largest percentage of patients on their

books stand to gain the most, whilst those who exercise greater

discretion in the administration of vaccines, or who are willing to

support parents who do not wish their children to be immunised are

financially penalised. 34 & #221;

 

FACT: Scientific literature recommends not giving the pertussis

vaccine if i) the child is ill with anything, including a runny nose,

cough, ear infection, diarhea, or has recovered from an illness within

one month before a scheduled DPT shot, ii) the child has a personal or

family history of severe allergies (i.e., cow & #237;s milk, asthma,

eczema).

36 & #221;

 

FACT: The Department of Health admitted that if a person has been

vaccinated, it determines the diagnosis of subsequent diseases. This

means that a person vaccinated against has been vaccinated, it

determines the diagnosis of subsequent diseases. will be diagnosed as

something else (examples include chickenpox, pustular eczema,

varioloid and monkeypox). 36 & #221;

 

 

For More Shocking Information

http://www.alanlam.demon.co.uk/vac2.htm

 

 

 

References

 

1.Neil Z Miller, " Vaccines: Are They Really Safe And Effective? " , (New

Atlantean Press, 1994), ISBN 1-881217-10-8 2.Randeall Neustaedter,

" The Immunization Decision " , (North Atlantic Books, 1990), ISBN 1-

55643-071-X 3.Leon Chaitow, " Vaccination And Immunisation: Dangers,

Delusion and Alternatives " , (The C.W. Daniel Co. Ltd. 1994), ISBN 0-

85297-191-4 4. Trevor Gunn, " Mass Immunisation, A Point in Question " ,

(Cutting Edge Publications, 1992), ISBN 0-9517657-1-X 5.Walene, James,

" Immunisation: The Reality Behind the Myth " , (Bergin & Garvey, 1988),

pp. 14-15. 6.Drs Kalokerinos and Dettman, " A Supportive Submission " ,

The Dangers of Immunisation, (Warburton, Victoria, Australia:

Biological Research Institute, 1979), p.49. 7.Harold E Buttra, MD and

John Chriss Hoffman, " Bringing Vaccines Into Perspective " , Mothering,

(Winter 1985), p.32 8. Richard Moskowitz, MD, " The Case Against

Immunizations " , (Washington, DC: The National Centre for Homeopathy,

1983), p.15. 9.See Note 5, p.32. 10.See Note 5, pp. 16-17 11.B.L.

Horvath, et al., " Excretion of SV-40 virus after oral administration

of contaminated polio vaccine, " Acta Microbiologica Hungary, 11, pp.

271-275. And others. 12.See Note 5, p. 101. 13.Tom Curtis, " The Origin

of AIDS: A Startling New Theory Attemps to Answer the Question

& #235;Was it

an Act of God or an Act of Man, & #237; " Rolling Stone, (March 19, 1992), p.

57. 14.Robert Mendelsohn MD, " How To Raise a Healthy Child ... In

Spite of Your Doctor " , (Chicago: Contemporary Books, 1984), pp. 73,

79. 15.London Times, (May 11, 1987), p. 1. 16.See Note 13, pp.58-59.

17.Harris L. Coulter, " Vaccination, Social Violence, and Criminality:

The Medical Assault on the American Brain " , (Berkely, CA: North

Atlantic Books, 1990), p. xiv. 18.See Note 17, pp. 120-121. 19.See

What Doctors Don't Tell You, " The WDDTY Vaccination Handbook " , The

Wallace Press 1991, pp. 6-7. 20.Science, 26 March 1977. 21.See Note 4,

p 15. 22.See Note 1, p 45. 23.P. Airola N.D., PhD. " Everywomans Book " ,

Health Plus, Phoenix, Arizona. 24.Eleanor McBean, PhdD., " Vaccinations

Do Not Protect " , (Manachaca, TX: Health Excellence Ssytems, 1991), p.

8. 25.Eleanor McBean, " The Poisoned Needle " , (Mokelumne Hill, CA:

Health Research, 1974), p. 142. 26.See Note 24. 27. Scientific

American, April, 1955, p.98. 28.See Note 5 29.H.L. Coulter and B.L.

Fisher " DPT - A Shot in the Dark " 30.See Note 14. 31.See Note 19, p.

27. 32.See Note 19, p. 27. 33.Richard Moskowitz, MD, " Vaccination: A

Sacrement of Modern Medicine. " Presented in a speech at the Annual

Conference of the Society of Homeopaths, (Manchester, England,

September 1991). 34.See Note 4, p. 23. 35.Whooping Cough, the DPT

Vaccine and Reducing Vaccine Reactions (Viena, VA., National Vaccine

Information Centre 1989), pp. 7-10. 36.See Note 5.

 

 

 

Email eotl

 

Second link source: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PBC/chp11F.

html

 

Next | ToC | Prev

 

CHAPTER 11

Ending of the Era of Radiation Therapy for Enlarged Thymus

 

 

 

Part 1. Why Did It Stop?

Views of Dr. Dewing (1965), Scholar of Radiotherapy

 

It is not totally clear why the era of radiation therapy for

enlarged thymus ended by about 1960. There have been speculations on

this subject. In his very readable 1965 book entitled Radiotherapy of

Benign Disease, Dr. Stephen Dewing ventured an interesting opinion on

the " coup de grace " for this practice. It is succinct and to the

point. We quote from p.149:

 

" The Thymus: Radiotherapy of the thymus in infancy and

early childhood is a matter of historical interest only at the present

time. Its rationale rested on associating thymic enlargement or

" hyperplasia " (as seen in the chest radiograph) with a clinical

picture of respiratory stridor. The known sensitivity of lymphoid

tissue and the experimentally demonstrable shrinkage of the irradiated

thymus permitted use of very low doses. These were usually of the

order of 100-300 R total tissue dose, spread over one to three weeks,

the clinical response being the chief guide to therapy. " And:

 

" Nowadays responsible clinicians feel that thymic

enlargement is almost never related to tracheal compression, even

though theoretically there might be a connection in a rare case.

Status lymphaticus, or thymico-lymphaticus, has also diappeared from

modern concepts of pathology. The coup de grace [emphasis in original]

, however, was the recent alarm raised over possible late carcinogenic

effects --- particularly thyroid carcinoma. It would take a bold

radiologist indeed --- or a very stupid one --- to undertake therapy

of an infant mediastinum today no matter how huge the thymus might

appear. Furthermore, the `proof of the pudding' is that infants are

recovering from croup and stridor just as well now as they did in the

days when radiation therapy was most in vogue. " And:

 

" One could speculate --- idly --- that the therapy acted as

much to quell the inflammation of a tracheo-bronchitis as to shrink

the thymus. In this area the modern antibiotics are now doing the same

job, and possibly much better. " We return to Dr. Dewing in our Chapter

36. He was, in 1965, Associate Clinical Professor of Radiology at New

York University Postgraduate Medical School.

 

Pitfalls in the Words " Very Low Dose " ... and in Dose-Comparisons

 

Readers may note that Dr. Dewing, in 1965, regarded a dose

of 100 to 300 Roentgens as a " very low dose. " Today, such doses are

commonly referred to as high doses.

 

Even though a dose of 300 R is not in the ballpark of the

thousands of Roentgens used in cancer therapy for specific targets, a

dose of 300 R far exceeds the " kerma " gamma-ray doses received by most

of the irradiated survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (details in

Gofman 1990, Table 9-B).

 

However, whenever readers attempt to compare doses, they

must keep at least three distinctions in mind. First is the quality of

the radiation --- for instance, bomb radiation versus medical

irradiation, which is usually more serious (see Chapter 3). Second is

the difference between partial-body exposure and whole-body exposure,

which is always more serious per rad. And third is the difference

between the entrance dose and the dose which actually reaches a

particular part of the body (such as the breasts) or an internal

organ. For example, the average internal organ-dose received by the

irradiated A-bomb survivors was less than 50 rads of whole-body

exposure --- and less than 20 rads for most of them (Gofman 1990,

Table 13-A). Expressed as " medical rads " (see Chapter 3), those values

would be less than about 25 rads and 10 rads, respectively.

 

 

Part 2. Don't Blame the Thymus:

A Strong Opinion in a Famous Textbook (1950)

 

In 1950, the Fifth Edition of Mitchell-Nelson (the famous

textbook of pediatrics edited by Dr. Waldo E. Nelson) emphatically

made several assertions to its readers about the thymus story. Its

chapter on " The Thymus Gland " was written by Dr. Nelson himself.

 

Thymus-Size: Accidental Deaths vs. Unexplained Deaths in Infancy

 

At page 1164, Dr. Nelson described the controversy about

" normal " and " abnormal " thymus-size. We quote: " Weight or size of

the thymus has been accorded considerable significance in relation

both to the production of respiratory obstruction and of sudden death.

The data of Hammar and Boyd, in particular, indicate that the weights

which had been considered to be those of normal glands have, in

actuality, been those of glands reduced in size by inanition and

disease. Thymic tissue is extremely sensitive to the general

nutritional status of the body. According to Boyd, severe

undernutrition or disease (hyperthyroidism and leukemia are

exceptions) will reduce the weight of the thymus by one-third within

three days. When the weights of the thymus in well-nourished infants

dying suddenly from such adequately explained causes as falls from

high structures and automobile accidents are compared with those in

well-nourished infants dying suddenly from unexplained causes, there

are no significant differences. "

 

Difficult Breathing, Sudden Death: " No Relationship " to the Shadow

 

At page 1165, Dr. Nelson expressed a very negative opinion

about obstruction of respiration by the thymus gland. We quote:

" Whether the thymus is ever responsible for obstruction of respiration

of any significant degree is a controversial point. Once considered as

the most frequent cause of laryngeal and tracheal stridor, many

clinicians of wide experience now think it is never a factor. It has

been shown that laryngeal stridor and attacks of apnea and cyanosis

can be explained otherwise in the majority of instances if a careful

study is made. The strongest arguments that a thymic enlargement is

responsible for respiratory obstruction are the bronchoscopic

observations of Jackson and the roentgenologic studies of Pancoast.

However, there may well be some doubt that the thymus causes

compression of the trachea in any significant number of instances.

There is no doubt that the thymus may cause a widening of the upper

mediastinal shadow, which may be eliminated by shrinkage of the thymic

tissue by roentgen therapy. It is of considerable moment, however,

that the size of this shadow bears no relationship to the occurrence

of symptoms of respiratory obstruction or to sudden death... "

 

Pre-Surgical Thymus-Evaluation: " Not Indicated " in Asymptomatic

Cases

 

At page 1165, Dr. Nelson asserted: " The routine

roentgenographic examination of infants and small children for

evidence of an enlarged thymus as a preliminary to a surgical

procedure is now rarely practiced and is not indicated. When there are

symptoms of laryngeal stridor, apnea, or cyanosis, a complete

examination including laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, and roentgenologic

study of the chest should be obtained. In the majority of instances

some condition other than an enlarged thymus, such as a laryngeal or

tracheal lesion, congenital heart lesion, valvular ring, chronic

pneumonic infection, or tetany will be found to be the causative

mechanism ... Though one cannot say that there are no instances in

which an enlarged thymus is the causative factor, it is obvious that

it is rarely so, and the instances in which roentgen treatment is

indicated are exceedingly rare. "

 

Unexplained Deaths: " Incrimination of the Thymus " Not Justified

 

Also at page 1165, Dr. Nelson stated: " Lymphatism as a

cause of sudden unexpected death is discussed on page 374. It may be

stated here that the evidence available does not justify incrimination

of the thymus as a cause of sudden unexpected and otherwise

unexplained death. The term `status thymicolymphaticus' and its

implication of thymic death should be discontinued because of its

inhibiting effect on a more exhaustive search for the real cause of

death. "

 

A Lack of Consensus to the Bitter End

 

At about the same time --- just a few years apart in a

fifty-year controversy --- Professor Jesse Carr (1945) was lobbing

shells in the general direction of Dr. Waldo Nelson's position in

these matters. (See Chapter 7, Part 5.)

 

 

Part 3. Is Some Useful Knowledge Buried in an Avalanche of

Criticism?

 

As a life-long researcher in medicine, I feel unsatisfied by

the many writers on this entire thymus story.

 

Let us not rush to judgment on an earlier era. We are

profoundly aware of the danger of self-deception which we as

physicians can create when medical studies are conducted without

double-blinding and the other safeguards integral to the rules of

research. And without doubt, much self-delusion goes on right now

concerning some problems in medicine, so we can hardly be too

judgmental about the period of 50 to 100 years ago.

 

Also, we note that many of the statements made by Dr. Nelson

in 1950 had already been made, over and over again, during the height

of the controversy in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s. How did the

physicians who believed in roentgen therapy maintain their faith, if

there were no real benefits at all? The enigma endures, we said at the

end of Chapter 7.

 

Dr. Nelson acknowledged that the change in thymus-size as a

result of irradiation was a reality --- he just questioned its medical

significance. Dr. Nelson said at page 1165, " There is no doubt that

the thymus may cause a widening of the upper mediastinal shadow, which

may be eliminated by shrinkage of the thymic tissue by roentgen

therapy. " That is an admission of a central feature of all that has

been claimed by the proponents. Then Dr. Nelson assured us, " It is of

considerable moment, however, that the size of this shadow bears no

relationship to the occurrence of symptoms of respiratory obstruction

or to sudden death. "

 

I simply do not think that Dr. Nelson --- or anyone else

whose writings I have read --- really has a basis for the sweep

implied by the Nelson statement. I have not seen it reconciled with

equally emphatic reports, such as the two below from earlier chapters.

How did the following statements, for instance, come to be made?

 

- Drs. Kerley and Graves, in their Third Edition (1924) of

Practice of Pediatrics, stated at page 471:

 

" It is well proved by a long series of cases, carefully

studied by competent observers, that the condition known as status

lymphaticus is an entity and is characterized clinically by a lowered

vitality or an unstable equilibrium of the vital forces, so that

accidents or disturbances, otherwise unimportant, such as some slight

injury or a light anesthesia, may precipitate failure of the heart and

respiration. "

 

- Dr. George Pfahler, one of the early and great

roentgenologists, wrote a paper on this subject in 1924 in which he

made the following statement concerning roentgen therapy of enlarged

thymus (Pfahler 1924, p.44):

 

" There is probably nothing in radiotherapy that gives such

uniformly brilliant results. The younger the child, the more prompt

are the results. "

 

" Sleeping Dogs " and " Baby's Bath-Water "

 

Perhaps it is right for everyone to " let sleeping dogs lie "

--- on a story that is long ago dismissed. After all, no one would

think of resuming such uses of roentgen therapy today. The health

price would be enormous. However, resumption is not the issue we are

raising. The issue is " throwing out the baby with the bath-water! "

 

We are warning that some items of knowledge which might be

useful may well be buried in the avalanche of criticism of the

" enlarged thymus episode " in medical history.

 

 

Part 4. Everything Is Connected to Everything,

in Medicine as in Ecology in General

 

The thymus story is a fascinating one --- as a piece of

major medical history. What it teaches us, once again, is that ideas

have consequences, actions have consequences which are often

unintended, and everything is connected to everything else in

medicine, as in ecology in general.

 

 

 

 

 

An idea developed that the thymus gland might be enlarged and cause

respiratory difficulty, even sudden death of infants ---

 

Roentgen's discovery of x-rays made it possible for the idea to be

tested both as to diagnosis and treatment ---

 

The idea is now long dead, with many saying the marvelous results seen

by physicians were never really seen ---

 

Many thousands of women, whose breasts intercepted some of the x-rays

used in this idea's lifetime, are now dead of breast-cancer, others

are dying, and more will still die --- unintended consequences of an

idea.

 

 

 

 

# # # # #