Guest guest Posted April 11, 2005 Report Share Posted April 11, 2005 " HSI - Jenny Thompson " <HSIResearch HSI e-Alert - Yo-Yo...Naa Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:04:03 -0400 HSI e-Alert - Yo-Yo...Naa Health Sciences Institute e-Alert **************************************************** April 11, 2005 Dear Reader, For people who struggle to manage their weight, the problem of yo-yoing between weight loss and weight regain may have met its match. By now many HSI members are familiar with the dramatic health benefits of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), a fatty acid that's shown promise as an anticancer agent. In the e-Alert " Beef 'n' Butter " (4/20/04), I looked at CLA studies and testimonials that showed how CLA may also help replace body fat with lean body mass. But some important questions linger amid these benefits. Last September, the New York Times carried an in-depth article that reviewed the pros and cons of supplementing with CLA. The primary problem cited: Although CLA has been researched for many years, no studies have examined the potential adverse effects in the long-range use of the supplement. Until now, that is. ----------- So nice, they tested twice ----------- This month, the Journal of Nutrition published a study conducted by a team of scientists from several medical centers in Norway. More than 150 overweight subjects participated in a one-year trial that compared the effects of CLA to a placebo. At the end of the year 134 subjects agreed to sign on for an additional year of open testing, with each subject receiving 3.4 grams of CLA daily. This second phase was specifically designed to assess the safety of CLA in two ways; with clinical chemistry analysis and reports on adverse events from the subjects. Changes in body fat mass (BFM), lean body mass (LBM), body weight and other factors were also tracked. Overall, the subjects had no change in fasting blood glucose. Total cholesterol and LDL were reduced overall, while triglycerides and HDL remained the same. LBM was generally unchanged. Subjects who started out with the highest BFM lost the most body fat during the first year of the study. Significantly, these subjects did not regain any of the fat over the full two-year testing period, avoiding the yo-yoing effects of weight loss and regain. Subjects who took CLA only during the second year lost an average of 3.5 pounds while also reducing body fat. As for safety issues, the researchers found CLA to be well tolerated. A small percentage of mild reactions (mostly gastrointestinal) were reported, and the rate of adverse events decreased during the second year of the study. ----------- Short of a miracle ----------- There are a few caveats concerning this study that should be noted. First: The funding came from Cognis, a company that produces a popular CLA supplement called TONALIN. Second: CLA is not a replacement for the two things that will help people lose weight; regular exercise and a balanced diet free of highly processed foods. You may have noticed the detail above about the subjects who took CLA only during the second year of the study and lost an average of 3.5 pounds overall. That's not an impressive weight loss by any standard. But those subjects did show a body fat reduction. So while CLA isn't a miracle diet pill, some people will find it helpful in addressing body fat. This aspect of CLA is nicely described by Michael W. Pariza, Ph.D., who discovered CLA. Dr. Pariza told WebMD Medical News that people who take CLA in an attempt to lose weight will be disappointed if they don't improve their diet and exercise patterns. Finally, the safety record in the Norway study was generally good, but a few inconsistencies developed that should be noted by dieters (and their doctors) before using CLA. For instance, cholesterol changes were generally positive, but some subjects increased lipoprotein levels. Meanwhile, other subjects had an increase in white blood cells and blood platelet counts. This is a red flag that signals possible inflammation, which could complicate blood vessel health over time. So even though this trial provides safety reassurances, the researchers noted in their conclusions that the association between CLA and heart health is still unclear. ----------- Eating & supplementing ----------- As I've mentioned in previous e-Alerts, dietary sources of CLA include butter, beef and whole milk, but only when these foods come from grass-fed cattle. CLA levels drop when cattle are fed grain and hay. And for optimum nutrition from dairy products, raw unpasteurized milk is always far preferable to the pasteurized milk you'll find on most grocery shelves. When Jonathan V. Wright, M.D., wrote about CLA in the November 2000 issue of his Nutrition and Healing newsletter, he noted that supplements of CLA should be taken with a broad range of other fatty acids, such as flaxseed oil, which contains a majority of omega-3 fatty acids, but also omega-6 and omega-9 fatty acids. In addition, vitamin E (as alpha-tocopherol along with other tocopherols) should be taken with any fatty acid supplement to help keep the acids from oxidizing and forming free radicals. A quick side note: Remember that men who are at high risk of prostate cancer should avoid using flaxseed oil, which may encourage growth of prostate cancer cells. In this case, freshly ground flaxseed provides a safe alternative. **************************************************** ....and another thing " A fantastic day for health freedom! " That was the leadoff sentence of an e-mail I received from the Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) last week. And while the news in the e-mail was certainly good, I think it's premature to uncork the champagne just yet. In several e-Alerts over the past couple of years I've told you about the European Union (EU) Directive on Dietary Supplements that aims to reclassify vitamin and herbal supplements as medical drugs, mandate low dosage levels, and outlaw many supplement ingredients that are currently widely available. This directive is scheduled to go into effect this coming August. But now...maybe not. The ANH and several other European organizations challenged the directive in the European Court of Justice, and last week an advocate general ruled that the directive infringes on " basic principles of Community law. " He recommended that the directive should not become law. The court will issue a final decision on the recommendation in June or July. ANH officials are confident that the court will decide in their favor because the court's judges tend to agree with advocate general's rulings in most cases. So for the next three months the fate of the directive will hang in the balance. But even if the court gives the OK to the advocate general's recommendation, EU commissioners may rework and soften the directive and give it another try. So in spite of the celebratory tone of the ANH, this is, unfortunately, not a done deal by any means. I'll continue to watch this situation and keep you posted. To Your Good Health, Jenny Thompson Health Sciences Institute **************************************************** Sources: " Supplementation with Conjugated Linoleic Acid for 24 Months Is Well Tolerated by and Reduces Body Fat Mass in Healthy, Overweight Humans " The Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 135, No. 4, April 2005, nutrition.org " No More Yo-Yo Dieting " Cognis Nutrition & Health Press Release, 4/1/05, biz. " Supplement Shows Promise for Body Fat Loss " Salynn Boyles, WebMD Medical News, 4/1/05, my.webmd.com " Clinical Tip 79: Preventing Cancer with Ground Beef and Butter?! " Jonathan V. Wright, M.D., Nutrition and Health Newsletter, November 2000, wrightnewsletter.com " Advocate General Finds Food Supplements Directive Invalid Under EU Law " Alliance for Natural Health, Press Release, 4/5/05 " EU Health Foods Crackdown 'Wrong' " BBC News, 4/5/05, news.bbc.co.uk ************* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.