Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

EU health foods crackdown 'wrong'

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4411929.stm

 

EU health foods crackdown 'wrong'

 

A plan to tighten rules on the sale of vitamins and food supplements

should be scrapped, a European judge says.

 

European Court of Justice Advocate General Leendert Geelhoed said the

EU health foods directive infringed guidelines in his opinion.

 

But he said he was not opposed to the legislation in principle -

opening the way for officials to redraw it.

 

The court has to make a final decision on the rules, which critics say

will ban thousands of health foods.

 

Judges do not have to agree with the advocate general, although in the

majority of cases they do.

 

The Food Supplements Directive, approved by EU governments in 2002, is

designed to tighten controls on the growing market in products sold

under the health food heading - natural remedies, vitamin supplements

and mineral plant extracts.

 

 

Under the new rules, only vitamins and minerals on an approved list

can be used in supplements. There will also be restrictions on the

upper limits of vitamin doses.

 

The case was brought by industry groups the British Health Food

Manufacturers Association (HFMA), National Association of Health

Stores (NAHS) and Alliance for Natural Health (ANH) ahead of the law

change in August.

 

The industry had argued the legislation threatened 5,000 products,

containing more than 200 nutrients, including some vitamin C products.

 

'Encouraging'

 

UK companies were supported by the Conservative Party and actress

Jenny Seagrove, star of the TV mini-series Woman of Substance.

 

Andrew Lockley, head of public law at Irwin Mitchell and legal adviser

to the HFMA and NAHS, said the advocate general's decision was

encouraging.

 

" What the advocate general was saying was that the law was

disproportionate and unfair.

 

" It is good news for British consumers and companies, and hopefully

the final ruling will reflect what he has said. "

 

ANH executive director Dr Robert Verkerk said: " All that we are

campaigning and working cooperatively for is the right for consumers

to have access to safe natural healthcare and for legislation to be

based on good science and good law. "

 

And Shadow Health Minister Chris Grayling added: " This is not the

final ruling, but I am confident we are in a position where we're

close to winning the battle to scrap this controversial measure, which

would have banned hundreds of vitamins from our shelves. "

 

The advocate general said the directive as it stands infringed the

principles of proportionality, legal protection, legal uncertainty and

sound administration.

 

Philip Tod, a spokesman on health and consumer protection at the

European Commission, said the advocate general's opinion would be

noted, but added no further comment could be made until the final ruling.

 

The court is expected to reach a final decision by July.

 

The legal action was initially started in the UK courts, and last year

the High Court ruled it could be referred to the European Court of

Justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...