Guest guest Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 J Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:42:57 -0800 (PST) Michigan Preparing To Let Doctors Refuse To Treat Gays http://www.proudparenting.com/page.cfm?Sectionid=65 & typeofsite=snippetdetail & ID=\ 1204 & snippetset=yes (Lansing, Michigan) Doctors or other health care providers could not be disciplined or sued if they refuse to treat gay patients under legislation passed Wednesday by the Michigan House. The bill allows health care workers to refuse service to anyone on moral, ethical or religious grounds. The Republican dominated House passed the measure as dozens of Catholics looked on from the gallery. The Michigan Catholic Conference, which pushed for the bills, hosted a legislative day for Catholics on Wednesday at the state Capitol. The bills now go the Senate, which also is controlled by Republicans. The Conscientious Objector Policy Act would allow health care providers to assert their objection within 24 hours of when they receive notice of a patient or procedure with which they don't agree. However, it would prohibit emergency treatment to be refused. Three other three bills that could affect LGBT health care were also passed by the House Wednesday which would exempt a health insurer or health facility from providing or covering a health care procedure that violated ethical, moral or religious principles reflected in their bylaws or mission statement. Opponents of the bills said they're worried they would allow providers to refuse service for any reason. For example, they said an emergency medical technicians could refuse to answer a call from the residence of gay couple because they don't approve of homosexuality. Rep. Chris Kolb (D-Ann Arbor) the first openly gay legislator in Michigan, pointed out that while the legislation prohibits racial discrimination by health care providers, it doesn't ban discrimination based on a person's sexual orientation. " Are you telling me that a health care provider can deny me medical treatment because of my sexual orientation? I hope not, " he said. " I think it's a terrible slippery slope upon which we embark, " said Rep. Jack Minore (D-Flint) before voting against the bill. Paul A. Long, vice president for public policy for the Michigan Catholic Conference, said the bills promote the constitutional right to religious freedom. " Individual and institutional health care providers can and should maintain their mission and their services without compromising faith-based teaching, " he said in a written statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 How sick is this? I thought doctors swore an oath that puts life above all else? If I were a doctor I couldn't give a damn what that person did behind closed doors or what church they go to. It shouldn't even be brought into consideration? Where is the united States going if we can now euthanize on demand or refuse someone medical treatment because of their lifestyle? Next doctors will be refusing to treat lung cancer patients because they smoked or liver patients because they drank... where will this maddness end? " Born and raised by hypocrites, hearts recycled but never saved, from the cradle to the grave. We are the kids of war and peace from Anaheim to the Middle East. We are the stories and disciples of the Jesus of Suburbia... " I beg to dream and differ from the hollow lies... " Another protester has crossed the line to find the money's on the other side, can I get another Amen? There's a flag wrapped around a score of men... " -- Words written by Billie Joe Armstrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.