Guest guest Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 Page 8 of 9 -- They brought along executives from teaching hospitals in swing states in the presidential election, Pennsylvania and Ohio. Among their key points: Hospitals had been hit hard by cuts in funding in 1997, and the money needed to be restored. To set up the White House meeting, Zane called an acquaintance whom she had met while serving on the Stonehill College board of trustees, Bush Chief of Staff Andrew Card. The meeting occurred within days after the phone call, Zane said. " We were constantly putting the pressure on everywhere we could, " said Dick Knapp, executive vice president for the Association of American Medical Colleges, who coordinated the lobbying effort. " Once CEOs get engaged with their senators, it gets there. " Details Lawmakers secured a plethora of smaller expenditures for pet programs, local reimbursement increases, and home-state demonstrations. Democrat Harry Reid of Nevada, who voted against the bill, pushed for and won a $200 million construction loan program for cancer institutes that will benefit an institute that is being built in Las Vegas, a spokeswoman confirmed. The loans will be forgiven for institutes with Native American outreach programs, such as the one at the planned Nevada facility. The Reid spokeswoman, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Nevada institute is not alone. In all, 10 to 12 other cancer institutes around the country will qualify for forgiven loans under the Native American provision. Alaska doctors, thanks to that state's powerful Republican senator, Ted Stevens, will receive a 50 percent increase in their reimbursement rates, worth about $53 million for the first two years. Brian Gavitt, an aide to Alaska's other Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski, suggested Alaska's delegation was able to wrest the money for their doctors because the expected close vote gave them leverage to make financial demands on Congressional leaders. " They were counting votes, and the Alaska delegation was pretty set on it, " he said. A $100 million pilot program for placing computerized patient records systems in doctors' offices emerged in the bill. It said the demonstrations should be set up in four states, and that " one shall be in a state with a medical school with a Department of Geriatrics that manages rural outreach sites and is capable of managing patients with multiple chronic conditions, one of which is dementia. " Arkansas is the only state that fits that description. The provision was tailor-made for Democratic Arkansas Senator Blanche Lincoln, a member of the Senate Finance Committee whose support was crucial to the Medicare bill's passage. Other states in line to receive money under the computerization provision are California, Massachusetts, and Utah. Lincoln declined to comment on the program, a spokesman said. Back-room deals Key members of Congress negotiated details of the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 -- as the 415-page bill was called -- behind closed doors in the joint House-Senate conference committee. Page 9 of 9 -- The committee operated like the proverbial back room, with heavy-hitting members of Congress determining who got what. Republicans, led by Thomas from the House and Grassley from the Senate, controlled the proceedings. In its first weeks of deliberations in August and September of 2003, Republicans and Democrats on the committee agreed on many provisions, including creation of a Medicare drug discount card in 2004 to give seniors cheaper prescriptions until full drug coverage begins in 2006. But they sharply disagreed on critical provisions, including whether to permit Americans to import prescriptions from abroad and to what extent private insurance companies should be encouraged to compete with the government to cover Medicare recipients. As disagreement grew, the Republicans barred five of the seven Democratic conferees from the room, including all three House Democrats who had been named to the panel, and two senators, Minority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia. That left the lineup on the committee 10 Republicans and two Democrats. It also cleared the way for negotiations on one of the most costly and controversial provisions of the Medicare bill: more money for private health plans. The vast majority of Medicare business is " fee-for-service, " in which providers like hospitals and physicians are reimbursed by the government for treatments. The Bush administration wanted to encourage greater participation by HMOs and preferred-provider organizations, or PPOs, based on the conviction that private enterprise and competition would drive down costs. To make that happen, insurance lobbyists insisted, their reimbursement rates would have to be increased. At the old Medicare HMO rates, the industry claimed, insurance companies could not make programs attractive enough for doctors or patients to participate. To emphasize their message, health insurance companies and lobbying organizations (now combined under the name America's Health Insurance Plans) spent $27.8 million lobbying Congress in 2003, according to the Globe's analysis. They hired lawyers and flew insurance industry executives to Washington to meet with members of Congress and their staffs. One part of the effort was a trip by a delegation of health insurance executives from Massachusetts, who met with Kennedy: Charles D. Baker, CEO of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc.; Nancy L. Learning, CEO of Tufts Associated Health Plans Inc.; and Fallon Community Health Plan CEO Eric H. Schultz. " It was mostly around spending levels and reimbursement, " Baker said. Baker said he also participated in a second trip to Washington with insurance executives, providing background information to large groups of reporters and government officials, including a briefing at the White House. Learning said the additional money was important to provide lower premiums for the elderly and higher reimbursements for doctors. Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, declined to describe details of the association's lobbying effort, other than to say CEOs of major health plans from around the country met " one-on-one " with congressional staff and key decision-makers. In the end, the conference committee gave a big boost to Medicare rates for insurance plans in 2004 and beyond, by an amount now estimated by the administration to be worth $34 billion over 10 years. Republicans also added a $12 billion fund for the administration to offer additional incentives to attract insurance companies to Medicare in regions where they otherwise would show no interest. Republicans called it at " stabilization fund. " Democrats led by Kennedy branded it a " slush fund. " The Republican efforts to enhance Medicare rates for insurance plans have come at great cost. The Bush administration has identified the extra money for private health plans as accounting for 23 percent of the difference between the original $400 billion estimate on the bill and the $534 billion price tag that was revealed this year. Closed-door deals by the conference committee, Ignani said in a telephone interview, should not shock anyone. " All the major issues are settled not necessarily in the open forums, but by leaders in conference committee, when they get together and decide what they are going to do, " Ignagni said. " It's pretty standard operating procedure for the Congress. " This report was prepared with the assistance of Marc Shectman of the Globe library, freelance research manager Maud S. Beelman, and researchers Kevin Baron and Samiya Edwards. Christopher Rowland can be reached at crowland. © Copyright 2004 Globe Newspaper Company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.