Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Internet /radio interview with Sen RON PAUL ...TONITE! Nat. Mental Health Screening

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Internet /radio interview with Sen RON PAUL ...TONITE! Re: Nat. Mental Health

Screening

 

THERE IS MORE AT STAKE HERE THAN ONE CAN IMAGINE!!!

 

Tonight's Show March 24, 2005:

AAL Series - Dangers of Psychiatric Drugs Part 10

Featured Guest: CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL

 

YOU DEFINITELY DON'T WANT TO MISS THIS SHOW!

 

http://www.anniearmenlive.org/psychiatric_drugs.htm

 

AAL Press Release:

http://www.anniearmenlive.org/AALPressRelease032105.htm

 

For details, please visit

http://www.anniearmenlive.org/psychiatric_drugs.htm

 

********************************************************************************\

*****

URGENT: SUPPORT H.R. 181 - Parental Consent Act of 2005

introduced in the House by Congressman Ron Paul and Tom Feeney.

http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/pcapetition.htm

 

H.R. 181 would prohibit the use of federal funds for any universal or mandatory

mental-health screening program. For those of you with websites, please post

this petition on your sites and have valued members of your networks sign the

petition in support of H.R. 181. You will also find this petition on my " linx "

page at http://www.anniearmenlive.org/annie_linx.htm

 

So that you have a greater sense of what is at stake, below are two related

items:

--\

------------------

 

 

NOW, EVEN PARENTS LOST RIGHTS!!! Children's Mental Health in the 108th

Congress

 

This is just ONE example that illustrates our current state of

affairs...MAINLY, THAT THIS IS NO LONGER a government of the people for the

people - DESPITE tireless efforts by so many...including most in Congress!

--\

------------------

 

THE BAD - Sadly, despite media coverage by Dr. Laura, G. Gordon Liddy, World Net

Daily, News Max, (my note: ALL REPUBLICANS!) many talk radio interviews across

the country, and thousands of calls and emails to Congress, grants to fund the

New Freedom Commission (NFC) recommendations, which include universal mental

health screening and treatment with ineffective and dangerous medications, were

not stopped. $20 million was appropriated for state grants to implement the NFC

recommendations. Physician and Congressman Paul’s excellent language that

required parental consent for screening before these programs were funded was

not included. Dr. Paul wrote a letter signed by more than twenty Members urging

the parental consent language. House leadership, including Speaker Hastert,

Majority Leader DeLay, and Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Regula accepted

the Paul language. All of these House Members and those that voted for the

original amendment in September deserve our thanks.

Sadly, that language protecting the basic right of parental consent was dropped

in the Senate.

 

The Department of Education is spending $5 million on “Mental Health Integration

in Schools” that we are still investigating, as well as $1 million for Senator

Kennedy’s disastrous early childhood mental health program called Foundations

for Learning. (See our update.)

 

The stand-alone bill passed the US House 425-1, but was stalled in the Senate by

Senator Edward Kennedy.

 

And some though that the Democratic Party were our saviors!

 

" FORUM FOR DISCLOSURES " rs can see Andrea's entire post here: Fw:

Children's Mental Health in the 108th Congress

 

--\

------------------

 

The second item, is that Pharmaceutical companies got their bases covered with

Senate Bill S - 3 in case there is any harm brought about to our children

because of prescription drugs, such as antidepressants, prescribed during this

Mental Health Screening debacle!

S.3

Title: A bill to strengthen and protect America in the war on terror.

Sponsor: Sen Gregg, Judd [NH] (introduced 1/24/2005) Cosponsors (8)

Latest Major Action: 1/24/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice

and referred to the Committee on Finance.

 

What is further hypocritical is how a hidden intent for this bill is camouflaged

in its title:

" A bill to strengthen and protect America in the war on terror " .

 

With this bill, in essence, Pharmaceutical companies or government agencies are

no longer required to disclose harmful effects on things such as vaccinations

and drugs NOR may the public be awarded punitive damages!!!

 

In the audio clip excerpt below, I will provide the portion of the interview

that is pertinent to this Senate Bill. The complete interview can be heard at

the following link to learn on whose behalf portions of this bill aims to

protect....NOT THE PUBLIC'S!!!

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/03/21.html

 

PLEASE TURN YOUR COMPUTER VOLUME UP AND CLICK ON THE LINK TO LISTEN

http://PlayAudio-123.com/play.asp?m=160164 & f=CVXGXG & ps=13 & p=1 (1 minute)

 

Senate Bill S- 3 (portions highlighted):

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c109:2:./temp/~c109TyIkZ7:e45042:

 

(If link above does not work, go to http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html and

enter " Bioshield " in the Search Box.

 

`SEC. 762. WARNING UNIFORMITY.

`(a) IN GENERAL- Except as provided in this section, no State or political

subdivision of a State may, directly or indirectly, establish or continue in

effect under any authority any notification requirement for a drug, vaccine, or

other biological product intended for use by humans that provides for a warning

concerning the safety of the drug, vaccine, or biological product or any

component or package thereof, unless such notification requirement has been

prescribed under the authority of this Act and the State or political

subdivision notification requirement is identical to the notification

requirement prescribed under the authority of this Act.

 

`(b) DEFINITIONS- In this section:

 

`(1) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT- The term `notification requirement' includes any

mandatory disclosure requirement relating to the dissemination of information

about a drug, vaccine, or biological product in any manner, such as labels,

labeling, posters, public notices, advertising, or any other means of

communication.

 

 

`(2) WARNING- The term `warning' with respect to a drug, vaccine, or other

biological product means any statement, vignette, or other representation which

indicates, directly or by implication, that the drug, vaccine or biological

product presents or may present a hazard to human health or safety.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IT GETS WORST!!!

`SEC. 319F-3. LIABILITY PROTECTIONS FOR PANDEMICS, EPIDEMICS, AND

COUNTERMEASURES.

`(2) SPECIAL RULES- In an action brought under this section for damages the

following provisions shall apply:

 

 

`(A) PUNITIVE DAMAGES- No punitive damages intended to punish or deter,

exemplary damages, or other damages not intended to compensate a plaintiff for

actual losses may be awarded, nor shall any party be liable for interest prior

to the judgment.

 

 

 

`(B) NONECONOMIC DAMAGES-

 

 

 

`(i) IN GENERAL- Noneconomic damages may be awarded in an amount not to exceed

$250,000 against a defendant only in an amount directly proportional to the

percentage of responsibility of such defendant for the harm to the plaintiff,

and no plaintiff may recover noneconomic damages unless the plaintiff suffered

physical harm.

 

 

 

 

`(ii) DEFINITION- For purposes of clause (i), the term `noneconomic damages'

means damages for losses for physical and emotional pain, suffering,

inconvenience, physical impairment, mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of

enjoyment of life, loss of society and companionship, loss of consortium,

hedonic damages, injury to reputation, and any other nonpecuniary losses.

 

 

 

 

`(3) COLLATERAL SOURCES- Any recovery by a plaintiff in an action under this

section shall be reduced by the amount of collateral source compensation, if

any, that the plaintiff has received or is entitled to receive that result or

may result in loss to the manufacturer, distributor, or health care provider.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jack

FORUM_FOR_DISCLOSURES/

 

" The REVISED EFFECT Network " Blog http://effectnetwork.blogspot.com/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.blueaction.org

" Better to have one freedom too many than to have one freedom too few. "

http://babyseals.care2.com/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...