Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Terminator Trees

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

2 Mar 2005 13:54:01 -0000

 

Terminator Trees

press-release

 

 

 

 

The Institute of Science in Society Science Society

Sustainability http://www.i-sis.org.uk

 

General Enquiries sam Website/Mailing List

press-release ISIS Director m.w.ho

========================================================

 

 

 

 

 

ISIS Press Release 02/03/05

 

Terminator Trees

************

 

Sterile GM trees cannot contain transgenes, instead, they

raise special safety concerns for health and biodiversity

Prof. Joe Cummins and Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

 

A fully referenced version of this article is posted on ISIS

members' website

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/full/TerminatorTreesFull.php.

Details here

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/membership.php

 

Transgenic or genetically modified (GM) trees have been

tested extensively in large open plots with little concern

over the spread of transgenes. Studies on the dispersal of

pollen and seeds from forest trees have shown that gene-flow

can be measured in kilometres. It is clear that the

transgenes from GM trees cannot be contained once released

into the environment. For that reason, a great deal of

effort has been devoted to developing genetic modifications

– commonly referred to as terminator techniques - that

prevent flowering or pollen production.

 

In view of the serious threats posed by GM forest trees to

the forest ecosystems of the world (see " GM forest trees –

the ultimate threat " , this series

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/GMFTTUT.php),

commercial release of transgenic trees is widely rejected

unless strict containment of transgenes can be assured, it

is hoped, through engineering such `terminator trees'.

 

For the most part, the methods used to control flowering or

pollination involved interfering with the genetic programme

for floral development or for deleting cells involved in

floral development. A group of genes - MADS-box genes - code

for the protein transcription factors that recognize DNA

binding domains (See " View from MADS house " , this series

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/VFMH.php). The plant MADS genes are

related to the extensively studied animal homeotic (HOX)

genes that regulate developmental pathways. Unraveling the

functions of MADS genes has allowed flower development to be

manipulated.

 

Flowering is prevented by anti-sense genes, or small

regulatory RNA to prevent active gene products such as the

MADS box transcription factor from being formed. Also

deployed is a kind of genetic abortion using a suicide gene.

The preferred suicide gene is the barnase ribonuclease from

the soil bacterium Bacillus amylolquefaciens. The

ribonuclease is placed under the control of a promoter

specific to floral or pollen development. When activated,

the gene product effectively kills the cells in which the

gene is expressed. Another suicide gene used is the

diphtheria toxin from the bacterium Cornyebacterium

diphtheria or related ADP-Ribosyltransferase toxins from

other bacteria; but these toxin genes are less commonly used

than the barnase gene. The preferred barnase gene is a part

of the genetic construction that first attracted the label

" terminator " for engineered sterility, designed to place

seed production under corporate control.

 

Professor Steven Strauss of Oregon State University

pioneered flower and pollen control in poplar. He and his

colleagues have led in the area of flowering control in

forest trees. Strauss pointed out that when complete floral

sterility is achieved, the plant would require vegetative

propagation. Floral sterility has begun to be extended from

poplar to shade trees. Strauss has argued that management of

GM poplar is comparable to conventional poplar even though

he is well aware of the seed and pollen dispersal with

transgenic poplar. Along with the exploration of floral

sterility, Strauss has investigated speeding flower

development (trees normally take years to develop sexually)

to allow rapid breeding and selection cycles. Of course the

rapid breeding cycle is fraught with uncertainty regarding

the subsequent development of the mature tree. Strauss has

pioneered the use of the poplar homologue to the floral MADS

box genes, the poplar promoter gene PTD. The PTD promoter

was combined with the diphtheria-toxin gene, DTA, to produce

sterile polar without the detrimental effects on yield

encountered earlier. The problem of somaclonal variation is

hardly mentioned in the discussion of flower control in

poplar even though the problem was discussed in a report on

a four-year field trial of herbicide tolerant poplar carried

out by the Strauss group. Somaclonal variation results from

the cell culture technique used to select and propagate

transgenic plants. It results in extremely high levels of

mutation and chromosome instability, which could reverse

floral sterility. Earlier reports showed that poplar cell

culture resulted in extremely high levels of somaclonal

variation.

 

In Finland, investigators from Sopanen University have

studied the control of flowering in silver birch. Those

investigators identified the MADS box genes controlling

flowering in the birch tree. When a flower specific birch

promoter gene BpMADS1 was used to drive the barnase gene,

floral cell ablation prevented flowering but there were

marked side effects affecting leaves and branching. The side

effects were likely a pleiotropic effect of the gene

insertion but could, as well have been affected by

somaclonal variation from cell culture. A recent report

altered the name of the MADS box gene from BpMADS to

BpFULL1. As in the previous study flowering was prevented

but the gene modification affected leaves and branching. The

pleiotropic effects observed may extend into areas not yet

detected and they require more extensive study.

 

Ecological and health hazards of terminator trees

 

Trees that do not flower and fruit will provide no food for

the multitude of insects, birds and mammals that feed on

pollen, nectar, seed and fruit, and will inevitably have

huge impacts on biodiversity. The ablation toxins used to

create sterile trees are themselves an additional hazard.

Barnase ribonuclease proved toxic to the kidneys of rats.

Barnase was cytotoxic in mice and in human cell lines.

Animals may not find the GM forests welcoming. Diphtheria

toxin has been associated with anaphylactic response. As the

song goes: " If you go down in the (transgenic) woods today,

You're sure of a big surprise. "

 

Even if these trees are sterile, they can still spread by

asexual means and certainly, the genes can spread

horizontally to soil bacteria, fungi and other organisms in

the extensive root system of the forest trees, with

unpredictable impacts on the soil biota and fertility. There

is a remote chance that such genes could also spread

horizontally to other forest trees, making those also

infertile.

 

As transgenic traits tend to be unstable, they could break

down and revert to flower-development, thereby spreading

transgenes to native trees, or create pollen that poison

bees and other pollinators as well as causing potential harm

to human beings.

 

Finally, the effect of preventing sexual reproduction is to

drastically reduce genetic recombination that generates

genetic diversity and evolutionary novelty in nature. The

sterile monocultures are much more likely to succumb to

disease or senescence, which could potentially wipe out

entire plantations.

 

 

========================================================

This article can be found on the I-SIS website at

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/TerminatorTrees.php

 

If you like this original article from the Institute of

Science in Society, and would like to continue receiving

articles of this calibre, please consider making a donation

or purchase on our website

 

http://www.i-sis.org.uk/donations.

 

ISIS is an independent, not-for-profit organisation

dedicated to providing critical public information on

cutting edge science, and to promoting social accountability

and ecological sustainability in science.

 

 

========================================================

CONTACT DETAILS

 

The Institute of Science in Society, PO Box 32097, London

NW1 OXR

 

telephone: [44 1994 231623] [44 20 8452 2729] [44 20

7272 5636]

 

General Enquiries sam Website/Mailing List

press-release ISIS Director m.w.ho

 

MATERIAL ON THIS SITE MAY BE REPRODUCED FOR ANY PROFIT FREE

PURPOSES WITHOUT PERMISSION, ON CONDITION THAT IT IS

ACCREDITED ACCORDINGLY AND CONTAINS A LINK TO http://www.i-

sis.org.uk/.

ANY COMMERCIAL USE MUST BE AGREED WITH ISIS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...