Opponents of 'Clear Skies' being investigated

[Guest guest]

http://story.news./news?tmpl=story & cid=2026 & e=2 & u=/latimests/opponentso\

fclearskiesbillexamined

 

Opponents of 'Clear Skies' Bill Examined

 

By Alan C. Miller and Tom Hamburger Times Staff Writers

 

WASHINGTON — The chairman of a Senate committee that oversees environmental

issues has directed two national organizations that oppose President Bush (news

- web sites)'s major clean-air initiative to turn over their financial and tax

records to the Senate.

 

 

Sen. James M. Inhofe (news, bio, voting record) (R-Okla.), who heads the

Environment and Public Works Committee, asked for the documents 10 days after a

representative of the two groups criticized Bush's " Clear Skies " proposal before

a Senate subcommittee. Inhofe is the leading sponsor of the administration bill,

which is deadlocked in his panel.

 

 

The executive director of the two organizations, which represent state and local

air pollution control agencies and officials, charged that the request was an

attempt to intimidate critics of the measure.

 

 

Democratic senators on Inhofe's committee also were dismayed by his action, but

declined to say so publicly because they were in the midst of sensitive

negotiations with the chairman on the legislation, staffers said.

 

 

The committee's majority staff director, Andrew Wheeler, said the request for

the groups' documents did not stem from their criticism of the legislation. He

said the panel wanted to determine whether the groups represented only

regulators' views or whether they also were subsidized by outside interests,

including environmentalists or foundations.

 

 

The funding, Wheeler said, " goes to who they're speaking for. "

 

William Becker, the executive director of both groups — the State and

Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators, which represents 48 state air

pollution control agencies, and the Assn. of Local Air Pollution Control

Officials, which represents more than 165 local agencies — said they received no

money from environmental activists or other private interests.

 

 

The administration has proposed the " Clear Skies " initiative as part of its

effort to overhaul the way the Clean Air Act forces power plants to cut

emissions.

 

 

The measure would set new emission standards for three major pollutants and

introduce a market-based approach favored by industry. Proponents say it would

reduce sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury emissions by 70%. Opponents

say reductions could be achieved faster through tighter restrictions or other

approaches, including existing Clean Air Act regulations.

 

 

Inhofe delayed a vote on the bill this week after he determined that he did not

have the numbers to send it to the full Senate. The panel's 18 members are

split, largely along party lines.

 

 

On Jan. 26, John Paul, an environmental regulator from Ohio, testified on behalf

of both pollution control organizations. He told the Senate subcommittee that

" Clear Skies " " fails on every one of our associations' core principals, " was

" far too lenient " on polluters and would undermine " states' abilities to protect

air quality. "

 

After the testimony, several senators sent a letter to Paul with follow-up

questions; Inhofe included a request for financial statements, membership lists

and tax returns for the last six years for both groups. Paul is the vice

president and incoming president of the local air pollution group. Inhofe's

request was first disclosed by Cox News Service on Friday.

 

 

The Senate committee asked for the information because it had long-standing

concerns about the decision-making process of the state air pollution group, and

was pursuing those questions as part of its oversight responsibility, Wheeler

said.

 

 

" It has nothing to do with 'Clear Skies,' " he said. " If we wanted to intimidate

them, we would have done it before they testified, not after. "

 

Wheeler said there also were concerns about whether the state group purported to

speak for all its members when some disagreed with its positions.

 

The two groups represent the views of the state and local regulators before the

Environmental Protection Agency (news - web sites) and Congress. They also do

training, surveys and publish newsletters.

 

 

" We have a limited constituency — the 50 states and local agencies, " Becker

said. " These are the only ones for whom we can work. "

 

 

 

 

 

Becker said Inhofe's request appeared to be " some sort of retaliation against

some very legitimate criticism of [bush's] 'Clear Skies' proposal. "

 

Although the membership often is not unanimous on the state group's positions,

Becker said, " We go to great pains to try to reach an overwhelming majority, not

just a simple majority, and we succeed. "

 

Rep. Henry A. Waxman (news, bio, voting record) of Los Angeles, the senior

Democrat on the House Government Reform Committee (news - web sites), said:

" There is not even any subtlety about this. This is a blatant attempt at

intimidation and bullying so that experts will be afraid to speak out about a

bill that rolls back air pollution protections for all Americans. "

 

A Republican who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004, Paul gained prominence in

March 2004 when he told the Los Angeles Times that an EPA advisory committee he

co-chaired had been abruptly shelved after it requested comparative data on the

administration's proposal to control mercury emissions from power plants. The

EPA never produced the information.

 

He said he was " deeply disappointed " by Inhofe's request.

 

 

http://www.blueaction.org

" Better to have one freedom too many than to have one freedom too few. "

http://www.sharedvoice.org/unamerican/