MORE ON FOOD AID SCANDAL IN CENTRAL AMERICA/Starlink still in the food supply

[Guest guest]

GMW: MORE ON FOOD AID SCANDAL IN CENTRAL AMERICA/Starlink

still in the food supply

 

 

" GM WATCH " <info

 

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:31:20 GMT

 

 

MORE ON FOOD AID SCANDAL IN CENTRAL AMERICA/Starlink still in the food

supply

http://www.gmwatch.org

------

 

 

 

" The WFP must take seriously our demands and assume its

responsibilities. The WFP must buy any needed food locally, and stop

using food aid to

introduce GMOs. " - Julio Sanchez from Nicaragua (item 2)

 

Three years after StarLink corn was banned for human consumption, U.S.

government still finds it in more than 1% of samples tested. (item 3)

 

1.WFP and US in the wrong - GM Watch

2.THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME AND THE UNITED STATES ACCUSED OF NOT

LISTENING TO THE CONCERNS OF THE CENTRAL AMERICAN SOCIETY

3.StarLink Genetically Engineered Corn in the Food Supply

------

1.WFP and US in the wrong - GM Watch

 

It's interesting to contrast the failure, detailed below, of the World

Food Programme to listen to concerns about GM food aid, and its years

of failing to even label GM grain, with the statement on the subject of

the Nuffield Council on Bio-ethics in their report, " The use of

genetically modified crops in developing countries " (2004)

 

It's important to remember when reading this that the Nuffield working

party who drew up this report was dominated by people known to be

fervently pro-GM and who argue elsewhere in the report that developing GM

for poorer countries is a " moral imperative " :

 

" With regard to donations of GM crops as food aid, we note that the

preferences of developing countries dependent on emergency food aid *must

be taken seriously*. A genuine choice between GM and non-GM food should

be offered, where this is possible. It will therefore be necessary to

provide full information about whether or not donated food is derived

wholly or in part from GM crops. " (paragraph 5.41 - emphasis added)

 

Compare and contrast this with the stonewalling response of the WFP's

representative for Latin America: " the issue of GM food is an old

controversy in which the WFP is not going to enter. "

 

They're " not going to enter " means, as can be seen below, that they are

not going to listen, that they are going to deny any problem, that they

are not going to label and that they are not going to provide any

choice.

 

Of course, the WFP's situation is not assisted by the US's insistence

on only providing US grain and its continuing refusal to do what other

leading donors do and provide financial assistance. (see:

http://ngin.tripod.com/forcefeed.htm)

 

The lessons from Zambia need to be learned. Here the WFP Country said in March 2004, " Buying food locally is an effective way

for WFP

to boost the domestic economy, while also reducing our own transport

costs and delivery time. We have been buying from everyone - farmers,

millers and the government - in the hope that this will assist local

markets and promote food production, which will ultimately contribute

to the

longer-term development of Zambia's agriculture. "

http://allafrica.com/stories/200403170439.html

 

But that has never been part of the US agenda. Indeed, there is even a

US law to prevent the US rendering assistance in such a form: " I have

heard . . . that people may become dependent on us for food. I know that

was not supposed to be good news. To me that was good news, because

before people can do anything they have got to eat. And if you are

looking

for a way to get people to lean on you and to be dependent on you, in

terms of their cooperation with you, it seems to me that food dependence

would be terrific. " - Senator Hubert H. Humphrey, in naming US Public

Law 480 which ensures that food aid never interferes with US " domestic

production or marketing " . http://ngin.tripod.com/forcefeed.htm

------

2.THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME AND THE UNITED STATES ACCUSED OF NOT

LISTENING TO THE CONCERNS OF THE CENTRAL AMERICAN SOCIETY

http://www.humboldt.org.ni/transgenicos/denuncia_english.htm

 

Organizations of the civil society in Central America are presenting

today irrefutable proofs of the presence of StarLink – a genetically

modified maize banned for human consumption in the US - in food aid

sent to

Centralamerica. The proofs presented contradict earlier declarations

from the World Food Programme (WFP ) and the United States Department of

Agriculture (USDA), which questioned the existence of StarLink in food

aid distributed by the WFP.

 

February 18. Managua, San Jose, Tegucigalpa, San Salvador, Guatemala.

An alliance of environmental, consumer, farmers, human rights, and

Unions of five CentralAmerican countries have accused the WFP and USDA of

not listening to the concerns of the Centralamerican society about the

potential risks of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). At the same

time they have publicly denied laboratory results that show with

precision

presence of StarLink in food aid in Centralamerica.

 

The organizations expressed outrage about the lack of seriousness of

the WFP and USDA and their response to revelations presented on the 16th

of February by the civil society Alliance in Central America.

Representatives of the WFP have stated that the introduction of GMOs

is already

an old issue that does not deserve any discussion.(1)

 

" The WFP must take seriously our demands and assume its

responsibilities. The WFP must buy any needed food locally, and stop

using food aid to

introduce GMOs " , said Julio Sanchez from Centro Humboldt/Friends of the

Earth Nicaragua.

 

At the same time the organizations have publicly presented irrefutable

proof from the independent laboratory Genetic ID, which certificates

the presence of StarLink in food aid, in response to the statements from

WFP and USDA representatives denying the veracity of the assertions of

the Centralamerican organizations. Representatives from WFP and USDA

have declared that in the US all food aid is tested for StarLink in order

to guarantee that it is not sent to any food aid recipient, and

continued denying the distribution of this maize in the region. (2)

 

" The presence of StarLink was verified in food aid already in 2002 in

Bolivia and now it comes up again two years later in Guatemala. The USDA

and the WFP do not have any excuse to ignore our demands, either they

are deliberately misleading us, or they simply do not care " , said

Mariano Godinez of Ceiba/Friends of the Earth Guatemala.

 

For more information visit: http://www.humboldt.org.ni

 

For more information - contact details for media:

http://www.humboldt.org.ni/transgenicos/denuncia_english.htm

 

Note

 

(1) According to Associated Press reports from the 16th of February.

World Food Program spokeswoman in Rome, Anthea Web did not give

importance to the fact that GM food was sent to those countries. She

said that

" They're eaten safely by millions of people everyday from Boston to

Brussels to Buenos Aires, " she said.

 

Given that many world authorities including the National Academy of

Sciences in the United States have called for more safety testing of

GMOS,

it is not possible to declare whether GMOs are safe or not safe.

 

Alejandro Lopez, representative from the regional office of the WFP for

Latinamerica said, according to IPS report from the 16th of February

that " the issue of GM food is an old controversy in which the WFP is not

going to enter. "

 

(2) The spokesperson for the USDA Ed Loyd, according to Associated

Press Reports from the 16th of February, said the United States requires

that any food aid be tested to make sure it doesn't contain StarLink. He

added that " we have never had an incident in which there has been a

positive test for any food aid shipment. "

 

Mr. Loyd ignored findings of US food aid to Bolivia that was found to

be contaminated by StarLink, widely reported in media such as CNN, and

presented in writing to U.S. government officials by Friends of the

Earth in 2002.

 

The representative of WFP in El Salvador Jaume Valldaura, according to

IPS, said that he is " certain " that StarLink is not used in the region

and that " there is no doubt that we do not distribute StarLink " .

------

3.StarLink Genetically Engineered Corn in the Food Supply

http://www.humboldt.org.ni/transgenicos/docs/starlink_genetically_engineered.pdf

 

Date Event

18 Sep. 2000 StarLink corn discovered in Kraft Foods " Taco Bell " brand

taco shells. Approved only for animal consumption in April 1998, the

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refused

to approve StarLink for human consumption due to scientific concerns

that it could trigger food allergies (Washington Post)

 

22 Sep. 2000 Kraft Foods recalls millions of boxes of

StarLink-contaminated taco shells (Washington Post)

 

12 Oct. 2000 Safeway Inc., one of America's largest supermarkets,

recalls Safeway brand taco shells contaminated with StarLink corn

(Washington Post)

 

21 Oct. 2000 Kellogg USA, maker of Kellogg's Corn Flakes, shuts down

factory due to StarLink

contamination (Washington Post)

 

30 Oct. 2000 Japan's Agriculture Ministry asks U.S. government to

ensure Japanese corn imports free of

StarLink contamination (Wall Street Journal)

 

03 Nov. 2000 300 varieties of StarLink-contaminated taco shells,

tortillas and snack chips made by Mission Foods recalled (Washington Post)

 

10 Nov. 2000 The Korean Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) recalls

14,528 kilogrammes of tortillas contaminated by StarLink corn and asks

U.S. to stop shipping contaminated corn (Reuters)

 

18 Mar. 2001 Aventis CropScience – developer of StarLink corn –

announces that 430 million bushels of U.S. corn are contaminated with

StarLink

(Washington Post)

 

04 Apr. 2001 100 groups worldwide call on President Bush to stop

exporting GMO-contaminated food. " The U.S. should not be exporting

genetically contaminated food to other countries, " said Ricardo

Navarro, Chair of

Friends of the Earth International and a resident of El Salvador. " If

it is not approved for people to eat in the U.S. then it should not be

sent elsewhere. "

 

04 July 2001 StarLink detected for first time in product made from

white corn (tortilla chips); previously, it had been thought that only

yellow corn was contaminated (Washington Post)

 

09 July 2001 EPA warns doctor who believes he experienced allergic

reactions to StarLink not to eat the corn at a hearing on the matter,

citing concern for his safety (Wall Street Journal)

 

28 July 2001 Allergy experts tell the U.S. government that tests for

allergies to StarLink were deeply flawed, and that StarLink corn is still

a potential cause of allergic reactions (New York Times)

 

07 Mar. 2002 U.S. judge says he will approve a $9 million settlement of

a lawsuit against major U.S. food companies that sold products

contaminated with StarLink corn (Wall Street Journal)

 

12 June 2002 A Bolivian group – el Foro Boliviano para el Desarrollo ye

el Medio Ambiente – criticizes the U.S. Agency for International

Development for shipping food aid contaminated with StarLink

to Bolivia (El Diario, La Paz, Bolivia).

 

27 Dec. 2002 Japan once again detects StarLink corn in shipment bound

for Tokyo's food supply (Reuters)

 

01 Dec. 2003 Three years after StarLink corn was banned for human

consumption, U.S. government still finds small amounts of StarLink in

more

than 1% of samples tested (San Jose Mercury News)

 

 

 

--------