Guest guest Posted February 14, 2005 Report Share Posted February 14, 2005 t Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:12:40 -0000 Domestic Quagmire of Iraq Proportions Looms In Healthcare If a monopolistic bottleneck in the healthcare, health insurance, and drug industries wasn't enough to bankrupt the system, there are the chickens of years of non-regulation by the federal government that have come back to roost in the Bush Administration's corporate barn for lobbyists. Monopolies and their kissing cousins, oligopolies like to roost and breed in the infra- structure industries, where they can merge, buy out or legislate their competitors out of business. Each year there are fewer and fewer drug providers, insurance companies, and health care providers. For years and especially during the Bush Administration these anti-market corporations have garnered more and more control over the economy's GNP to the point where they actually control about 20% of the value of all goods and services produced. For corporations who must compete in the world marketplace this bottle-neck squeeze by the health industries has helped to increase the cost of maintaining the health of their laborforce to a point that out- sourcing competitive production facilities becomes increasingly necessary to remain in business and turn a profit. Meanwhile this oligopolistic cabal has levied what is in effect a private monopolistic " tax " on all health care items and they lobby against any source of competition, foreign or domestic. They oppose re-importation of drugs (even when made in the USA), government interference or regulation of insurance rates, or even self-insurance pools by competitive businesses who try to provide their own insurance . Wherevever possible they outlaw any competive enterprise which might want to provide healthcare, insurance, or generic drugs. They are in favor of perpetual patents and copyrights and government financing of medical research-- as long as new products are awarded on a no-bid basis to existing drug producers. The latest cash cow they want to milk is liability. Contrary to english common law and American traditions, they want to transform corporations into quasi-governmental entities--impervious to lawsuits or redress by average citizens The latest crusade against " frivolous " lawsuits (by which they mean lawsuits against corporations by individuals) simple ignores the fact that lawsuits by corporations against individuals (ie the much more common legal action) is anywhere from 20 to 400 times more common . Even if they got exactly what they want on this agenda--95% or more of lawsuits would remain . Another aspect of this push for unlimited corporate irresponsibility, is that the average life-span of Americans is dropping like a rock. From near the top of the list 30 years ago, the average US life-span today has been exceeded by several 3rd world countries. While illegal and generic drugs are closely regulated in order to secure a steady profit stream for US drug companies--food additives in animal and human food products are routinely added with virtually no federal oversight . Instead of the mandatory jail time for illicit drug possesssion , poison food additives are only retro-actively regulated. Even fines for producing poison food are rare and jail time unheard of. The Bush regime has effectly nullified through executive order practically all regulation in this field. The chickens coming home to roost may solve the social security actuarial problem after all. Baby boomers may not live long enough to collect. If tobacco use was indentified almost a generation ago now as a major cost to the entire social and business cost structures, then additives such as the hydrogenated oils produced by Monsanto and ADM have been traced as the primary reason for the extra large butt size and clogged arteries now prevalent in the US population. It is simple to trace this problem yourself. When European countries adopted these oils in line with the NAFTA trade rules, their butts spread out like Americans. Those countries which do not allow such additives (most Islamic countries eg) are thin like Americans used to be 30-40 years ago. Health officials have known about this wide-ass syndrome since this chemicalized oil first appeared in the early 70's. The extent of this fat epidemic is already registering itself in greatly increased incidence of heart disease, stokes, and diabetes. Why do the food producers use these oils? Merely because it extends the shelf life of products. And contrary to corporate propaganda, the oils drastically reduce the taste of the foods that it is used in--rather than adding to it. The cost of the fat epidemic may be a mutiple of the cost of the tobacco pandemic. The oils are now routinely added to even many meat products to extend shelf life. Added to the feed products of animals which has turned all hoofed animals into cannibals, the toxic runoff from oil-based fertilizers, and pesticides mutating bacteria into flesh eating preditors in our waterways, and the monopolistic stranglehold of the oil industry in promoting climate change-- the root cause of these epidemics is corporate irresponsibility. When Teddy Roosevelt attacked the concentration of industry in the infra- structure he introduced a modicum of regulation in the economy which was long overdue. Like FDR's social security program the very idea that the people have right to control their own destiny is at stake. It should be abundantly clear that the goal of the Bush government is to replace democratic government with a new industrial feudalism--where corporate barons decide what, how , where and at what price production occurs. Their foreign policy is in reality a series of wars to be fought to extend this system of private government through-out the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.