Guest guest Posted February 13, 2005 Report Share Posted February 13, 2005 http://mparent7777.blog-city.com/read/1065336.htm Mother Lode: Bush lied. He stole. He murdered. In broad daylight. And he got away with it., by Chris Floyd Mother Lode By Chris Floyd Published: February 11, 2005 The hoary adage that " there are none so blind as those who will not see " should be carved in stone at the National Press Club in Washington. Surely there can be no better motto for the cozy clubhouse of America's media mavens, who seem preternaturally incapable of recognizing the truth -- even when it stands before them, monstrous and unavoidable, like a giant Cyclops smeared with blood. For just as they botched the most important story of our time -- the Bush Administration's transparently deceptive campaign to launch a war of aggression against Iraq -- the clubby mavens are now missing the crowning achievement of this vast crime: the mother of all backroom deals, a cynical pact sealed by murder, unfolding before our eyes. The Administration's true objective in Iraq is brutally simple: U.S. domination of Middle East oil. This is no secret. Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz began writing about this " strategic necessity " in 1992, as Alternet reminds us; and in September 2000, a group led by Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld openly called for a U.S. military takeover of Iraq -- even if the regime of Saddam Hussein was no longer in power. At every point in their savaging of Iraq, the Bushists have pressed relentlessly toward this oily goal. The objective was revealed -- yet again -- in a recent Washington appearance by Iraqi Finance Minister Adil Abdel-Mahdi. Standing alongside a top State Department official, Abdel-Mahdi announced that Iraq's government wants to open the nation's oil fields to foreign investment -- not only the pumped product flowing through the pipes, but the very oil in the ground, the common patrimony of the Iraqi people. The minister said plainly that this sweet deal -- placing the world's second-largest oil reserves in a few private hands -- would be " very promising to the American investors and to American enterprise, certainly to oil companies, " InterPress reports. These are the spoils for which George W. Bush has killed more than 100,000 human beings. The American media completely ignored Abdel-Mahdi's declaration, but this is not surprising. After all, it occurred in the most obscure venue imaginable: an appearance before oil barons and journalists at the, er, National Press Club. Where better to hide open confessions of war crimes than in the very midst of the Washington hack pack? Yet here was a story of immense importance. For Abdel-Mahdi is not only a functionary in the discredited collaborationist government now in its last days. He is also one of the leading figures in the United Iraqi Alliance (UIA), the Shiite faction that has been swept to somewhat more legitimate power by the national election that was forced on George W. Bush by Islamic fundamentalist Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. In fact, Abdel-Mahdi is frequently mentioned as a leading choice for prime minister in the new government; whatever happens, he will certainly play a primary role. So we have a top official -- perhaps the top official -- in the incoming government offering American oilmen ownership rights in Iraqi oil. We have top American officials -- such as Cheney and Rumsfeld this week -- taking a benign view of the UIA's demand that the new Iraqi state be based solely on Islamic law, with crippling restrictions on women's rights, free expression, free association, plus, if Sistani has his way, Talibanic bans on music, dancing and even playing chess, Newsweek reports. What we have, in other words, is the making of a monstrous, Cyclopean deal: not just " Blood for Oil, " as the anti-war critics have said all along, but also " God for Oil. " The Shiite clerics -- who eschew direct control but whose precepts can be translated into state power by secular representatives like Abdel-Mahdi -- seem willing to trade a goodly portion of Iraq's oil wealth in exchange for establishing a de facto " Islamic Republic " in the conquered land, with tacit American approval. Sistani's word could move millions into the street to hamstring U.S. forces; but despite his notional disapproval of the occupation, he has stayed his hand, waiting for power to fall like a ripe fruit into the Shiite basket. Like Bush, he is apparently willing to countenance mass slaughter by the U.S.-led " Coalition " to achieve his objectives; but then, like Bush, Sistani is not an Iraqi either: He's an Iranian. Now these two foreigners are rolling dice to settle the nation's fate. But there's yet another glaring truth that's escaped the media mavens, and most of the war's opponents as well. Even if the grand objective of oil control slips away somehow -- through a falling-out with Sistani, say, or civil war -- Bush has already won the game. The war has transferred billions of dollars from the public treasuries of the United States and Iraq into the coffers of an elite clique of oilmen, arms dealers, investment firms, construction giants and political operatives associated with the Bush family. And this goes beyond the official, guaranteed-profit contracts to favored firms; Bush's own inspector general reported this month that $8.8 billion in unaccounted " reconstruction " funds have simply vanished -- much of it in bribes for Bush officials and corporate kickbacks, the BBC reported. This blood money will further entrench the Bushist clique in unassailable power and privilege for decades to come, regardless of the bloody chaos they cause, or even the occasional loss of political office. The American power structure has been permanently altered by the war -- just as American society has been immeasurably corrupted by Bush's proud embrace of aggression, torture, lawlessness and militarism as national values. Bush lied. He stole. He murdered. In broad daylight. And he got away with it. That's the story. But you'll never hear it at the Press Club. Annotations Of Oil And Elections AlterNet.com, Jan. 27, 2005 US to Take Bigger Slice of Iraq's Economic Pie InterPress News, January 2005 Al-Sistani to Have Detailed Involvement in Iraq's Political Process Knight-Ridder, Feb. 6, 2005 Abdel Mahdi: Maoist Turned Free Marketer Emerges as Consensus Candidate Agence France Presse, Jan. 29, 2005 American Dominance Bergen Record, Feb. 23, 2003 The Republicans' Iraq and the Islamic Republic of Iraq Informed Comment, Feb. 7, 2005 What Sistani Wants Newsweek, Feb. 14, 2005 issue Iraq Shiite leaders demand Islam be the source of law Agence France Presse, Feb. 6, 2005 What They're Not Telling You About the Election OccupationWatch, Feb. 1, 2005 Sistani Begins on His True Agenda Asia Times, Feb. 8, 2005 Fraud and Corruption The Guardian, Feb. 8, 2005 Two Front-Runners Vie for Iraqi PM Post Knight-Ridder, Jan. 28, 2005 Iraq Reconstruction Funds Missing BBC, Jan. 30, 2005 Officials Lose Track of $8.8 Billion in Reconstruction Funds The Age, Jan. 31, 2005 Army Won't Withhold Halliburton Payments Despite Dispute Reuters, Feb. 3, 2005, Leading Shiite Clerics Push Islamic Constitution in Iraq New York Times, Feb. 6, 2005 United and Divided: Shiites in Power Salon.com, Feb. 8, 2005 Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming President Glasgow Sunday Herald, Sept. 15, 2002 Rebuilding America's Defenses Project for a New Century, September 2000 Statement of Principles Project for a New American Century, June 3, 1997 National Security Strategy of the United States The White House, September 2002 Uncle Sugar: How the WMD Scam Put Money in Bush Family Pockets CounterPunch, March 5, 2004 http://context.themoscowtimes.com/print.php?aid=139988 posted Thursday, 10 February 2005 A visitor made this comment, Last April I stood in the National Press Club with Military Families Speak Out as we presented reporters with stories and photos of our family members deployed or already dead in Iraq and Afghanistan. My photo was of my 19 year old nephew who died a year ago today driving an unarmored Humvee on night patrol in Baghdad. I was so nervous but encouraged by the nods and understanding comments of the journalists I met with. They really seemed to know the truth and almost all were very sympathetic. They laughed with me about the inane State of the Union address the night before and the Libyan Turkey Farm weapons! I don't think the truth escapes them, I think it's far more sinister than that. I think when they get back to their desks and start typing, they are told just what will be allowed to appear in print and on air. I don't know how they continue to work and call themselves journalists, but I suppose some folks will do whatever it takes. Annette Pritchard [harpy] comment added :: 13th February 2005, 00:00 GMT-07 Leave a comment to this blog-entry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.