Guest guest Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 SSRI-Research@ Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:04:51 -0500 [sSRI-Research] Senator Says FDA Asked Canada NOT to Suspend Adderall, Drug used for ADHD Senator Says FDA Asked Canada NOT to Suspend Adderall, Drug used for ADHD - NYT Fri, 11 Feb 2005 http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/02/11.php The New York Times reports that not only has the FDA failed to act to protect children and adults from a drug that has been linked to about 20 sudden deaths, but the FDA attempted to stop Health Canada from withdrawing the drug, Adderall, an amphetamine, from the Canadian market. Canadian officials were guided in their decision to withdraw the drug, by the evidence (fatalities): " It's very difficult to generate a benefit-to-risk balance when the risk is sudden and unexpected death. " FDA officials, by contrast, repeatedly demonstrate greater concern for industry's interests than safety considerations. The NYT quotes Dr. Robert Temple of the F.D.A. " There is little evidence that the drugs caused any of the deaths. " Dr. Temple always seems to side against the cautionary principle of medicine-- " First, do no harm. " FDA officials always seems to find arguments against linking evidence of deadly events to the drug in question: " There is a tendency to believe that sudden death doesn't occur in children. That is wrong. " Dr. Temple added: " Psychiatrists say that these drugs are needed. " The reason " psychiatrists say these drugs are needed " is that psychiatry has failed to develop non-drug treatment alternative options. Psychiatrists have become 100% dependent on psychotropic drugs. This dependency has led to a disturbing symbiotic relationship between the psychotropic drug manufacturers and the prescribers of these drugs. Both psychiatry and the drug industry have a primary stake in promoting the extensive use of drugs - even when the scientific evidence shows the drugs pose unjustifiable risks of harm. Senator Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, in the letter Thursday to the F.D.A. wrote that reports given to his staff suggested that the agency was not acting with scientific integrity. Indeed, that lack of scientific integrity was also demonstrated when the FDA stilthily changed its recently issued warning (October 15, 2004) on antidepressant drug labels - without any scientific justification. Dr. Steve Romano, Pfizer vice-president announced during court proceedings in which the antidepressant Zoloft figures prominently, that the FDA had rescinded the statement acknowledging: " A causal role for antidepressants in inducing suicidality has been established in pediatric patients. " That clear statement of causality reflects a deliberative, scientifically arrived at conclusion. FDA's recsinding of the agreed upon language (issued on October 15) blurs the clarity and reduces the impact of the Black Box warning. Once again, FDA officials demontrate an unconscionable disregard for safety issues in an effort to accommodate the drug industry sustain its profit margins - even if children's health and lives are sacrificed. Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav 212-595-8974 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.