New Chapela interview - Chapela starts to name names

[Guest guest]

GMW: New Chapela interview - Chapela starts to name names

" GM WATCH " <info

 

 

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:47:42 GMT

 

 

New Chapela interview - Chapela starts to name names

http://www.gmwatch

------

 

 

Chapela says he has been pressured and threatened by many, including

officials of the Mexican government under President Vicente Fox...

 

" Normally the evaluation that I requested in order to be granted a

tenured professorship would take six months, but in my case it has taken

years, and it is possible that they'll fire me. All because of pressure

from the transnational corporations and from Mexican researchers who are

in favour of genetic modification, like Luis Herrera... "

------

'They Want Transgenic Crops, Whether They Are Good or Bad'

Diego Cevallos*

Inter Press Service

http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=27393

 

MEXICO CITY, Feb 10 (IPS) - Ignacio Chapela, a Mexican biologist who

rose to fame in 2001 when he discovered that native Mexican maize had

been contaminated by transgenic corn varieties, announced in a

Tierramerica interview that he is going on the offensive in a war that

he says

biotechnology transnational corporations have been waging against him.

 

After what he describes as " three years of attacks against my

reputation, " which have him on the verge of losing his job as

microbial ecology

professor and researcher at the prestigious U.S. University of

California-Berkeley, Chapela, 45, says he will turn to the U.S. courts to

protect himself.

 

Chapela says he has been pressured and threatened by many, including

officials of the Mexican government under President Vicente Fox, in

attempts to convince him not to publish a report in the British magazine

Nature on the contamination of local Mexican corn varieties by

genetically

modified varieties of this food crop.

 

The genetic contamination that he found, and which was later

acknowledged by the Mexican government, occurred despite the fact that

Mexico --

the birthplace of corn -- bans cultivation of transgenic maize.

 

Chapela says the biotech transnationals that are leading the campaign

to discredit him are the same ones that are lobbying for what he

describes as a weak bill on biosafety that Mexico's lower house of

Congress

approved last year, and which could become law in the next few weeks if

it makes it through the Senate.

 

The biologist, who says he feels like a " persona non grata " in Mexico's

scientific circles, spoke with Tierramerica by phone from his offices

at the University of California-Berkeley.

 

Q: You claim that because of your stance against transgenics you are on

the verge of losing your job at the university, where you have worked

since 1997. Do you blame the biotech corporations?

 

A: My job has been on tenterhooks for at least three years, during

which I have suffered many attacks on my reputation. Normally the

evaluation that I requested in order to be granted a tenured

professorship would

take six months, but in my case it has taken years, and it is possible

that they'll fire me. All because of pressure from the transnational

corporations and from Mexican researchers who are in favour of genetic

modification, like Luis Herrera (considered one of the founders of

transgenic technology).

 

Q: All of this happened because you published your findings on the

genetic contamination of Mexican corn?

 

A: There are really two motives. One is for having denounced the

presence of transgenic corn in Mexico, for which I received threats

even from

some officials of the Mexican government, who said my study hurt the

country; the other is that in 1998 I

spoke out against the proposals for the biotech firm Novartis to take

control of our department (Environmental Sciences) at Berkeley.

 

Q: What will you do to avoid getting dismissed by the university?

 

A: The battle we are waging is through an internal complaint in the

university, and we are about to file a lawsuit in (U.S.) courts about the

coercion and threats. The lawsuit is against the university regents,

but it will also target the transnationals and some Mexicans. Also, in

November we created the Pulse of Science Foundation, to study the role of

big corporations.

 

Q: There are several Mexican scientists, among them Luis Herrera, who

don't share your ideas, and who support transgenic research. Do you

think there are shadowy interests behind these scientists?

 

A: What do exist are obvious reasons like money. Much of the money they

receive comes from those same companies, so it is not convenient that

there are people like me who question what they are doing. Another

reason is that many of these people have been staking their bets on

biotechnology for more than 20 years and they want it to work, good or

bad.

 

Q: Are transgenic crops really that bad?

 

A: Biotechnology is a series of genetic manipulations that hold great

potential, of that there is no doubt. The problem is the potential

effect of the massive scale release of transgenic organisms, which should

not be allowed as long as their environmental safety is not clear, and as

long as other cheaper and acceptable alternatives have not been

evaluated.

 

Q: What do you think of the biosafety law on transgenics that could

take effect this year in Mexico?

 

A: You can see the problem in the name itself. It is a law that is

going to declare these organisms as biologically safe. It is a law that

legalises transgenic contamination and prevents holding anyone

responsible

if problems occur, if there are accidents or damages caused by

releasing transgenics into the environment. I hope that in the end the

law is

not passed.

 

(*Originally published Jan. 29 by Latin American newspapers that are

part of the Tierramerica network. Tierramerica is a specialised news

service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations

Development

Programme and the United Nations Environment Programme.)

 

(END/2005)

 

 

 

------------