Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

WEEKLY WATCH 110

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

WEEKLY WATCH 110

G

 

 

Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:17:15 GMT

 

 

 

---------------------------

WEEKLY WATCH number 110

---------------------------

---------------------------

from Claire Robinson, WEEKLY WATCH editor

---------------------------

 

Dear all:

 

The Center for Science in the Public Interest, since taking money from

the pro-biotech Rockefeller Foundation, has generally adopted a

position supportive to GM foods. So we have to take notice when even this

group recognises biotech industry stagnation and that GM is " withering on

the vine " . This conclusion is backed by GeneEthics, which has totally

demolished industry body ISAAA's recent claims of growing GM uptake

(INDUSTRY NEWS).

 

Don't miss a startling new profile of pro-GM lobbyist Doug Powell, who

attracts extensive biotech industry funding and is allowed to roam the

world promoting GM and acting as a biotech 'attack dog', despite

accusations of biasing research, of abusing his role as a faculty

advisor, of

being responsible for Orwellian-style disinformation, and of

" aggressive if not vicious attacks on other scientists " . Even criminal

behaviour

appears to have been glossed over. (LOBBYWATCH).

 

Claire claire

www.gmwatch.org / www.lobbywatch.org

 

-------

CONTENTS

-------

LOBBYWATCH

INDUSTRY NEWS

EUROPE

THE AMERICAS

ASIA

AUSTRALASIA

FOOD SAFETY

REGULATION

MIDDLE EAST

 

---------------------------

LOBBYWATCH

---------------------------

 

+ GM WATCH " ANNOYING LIKE HELL " SAYS EX-SYNGENTA LOBBYIST

Pro-GM lobbyist and former Syngenta man Shanthu Shantharam has told

AgBioView's readers, " I to GM Watch. It is annoying like

hell to

see all the nonsensical, diabolical and scheming spin put on every

story. "

 

He also says that these days he only reads the first sentence of

anything we put out, which is fortunate because otherwise he'd have to

read

the truly " nonsensical, diabolical and scheming spin " reported at

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4861

- his own!

 

Dr Shantharam told India's science and environment magazine, Down to

Earth, that " gene contamination is a bogus issue " and that it is

irrelevant to the case of the Canadian farmer, Percy Schmeiser,

because, " Court

records clearly establish that Schmeiser had planted GM canola which he

had purchased illegally. "

 

Court records, in fact, establish the exact opposite!

Even Monsanto's principal investigator stated under oath that they had

no evidence Schmeiser had ever illegally purchased GM canola.

 

Perhaps Dr Shantharam sees " nonsensical, diabolical and scheming spin "

in our bulletins because we're holding up a mirror.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4861

 

+ GM ATTACK DOG: DOUG POWELL

Dr Doug Powell has been called the " darling of the pro-biotech lobby

and its chief attack dog " in Canada. From his Food Safety Network base at

the University of Guelph, Powell's pro-GM communication activities

attract funding from around the globe, not least from the biotech

industry.

 

In an article entitled Rude Science in the Manitoba Cooperator

(58(46):4 21 June 2001), editor John Morriss reviews Powell's

performance as a

science communicator, describing him as a 'tenured Assistant Professor

at a Canadian university' who at some point 'morphed into a full-blown

apologist for biotechnology, while still operating under his " food

safety " umbrella'. For Morriss, even more serious than Powell's role as a

biotech apologist, is his 'aggressive if not vicious attacks on other

scientists who dare to challenge his views' .

 

Morriss takes as an example Powell's attacks on the Royal Society of

Canada, after they raised quesions about the safety of GM foods and

called for mandatory labelling. Powell dismissed their report as " a

document

that more resembled a Greenpeace hatchet job than a reasoned analysis

of the science surrounding GM issues " .

 

Powell's notoriety for " aggressive if not vicious attacks " extends

beyond his " attack dog " defence of GMOs. In autumn 2004 he made the front

page of Guelph's local paper when he pleaded guilty to assault. He was

ordered by the judge to take counselling for domestic violence. It also

emerged in court that Powell had two prior convictions for serious

criminal offences, for which he had been sentenced to 17 months in jail.

 

A curious aspect of the case was that the judge was asked to give

Powell a discharge - something normally only granted to first offenders -

despite the fact Powell already had a criminal record. However, the judge

was advised that Powell - " an expert in his field of food science who

travels extensively " - had a travel waiver that allowed him to enter the

United States despite his previous convictions. A criminal conviction

for domestic violence might, however, prevent Powell from crossing the

border. The judge indicated that he was only agreeing to the discharge

reluctantly as " every abusive man needs to get the message " that they

would not just get a slap on the wrist from the court.

 

Powell has run research on consumer responses to GM (Bt) sweet corn and

non-GM (conventional) sweet corn and has repeatedly claimed the

research shows 'consumers voting with their wallets' for the GM

produce. But

photographic evidence shows that the label on non-GM sweetcorn refers to

its contents as 'Wormy Sweet Corn', while the wording on the Bt-sweet

corn bin refers to 'Quality Sweet Corn', with the fact that it is

Bt-corn only shown on a separate sign. What's amazing is that despite

such

clear experimental bias many consumers were still keen to buy the non-Bt

corn.

 

As well as biasing research, Powell also stands accused of abusing his

role as a faculty advisor.

Read on at: http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4851

 

+ IRRI AND CIMMYT ALLIANCE TO SUPPORT GM RESEARCH

An alliance, which has amongst its aims providing information to

support researchers developing GM maize, wheat and rice, has been formed

between the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and the

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Both

institutes are

part of the CGIAR network of agricultural institutes.

 

For more on IIRI, its corporate backers and its disturbing agenda,

including details of the Monsanto executive running its Golden Rice

network: http://www.gmwatch.org/profile1.asp?PrId=296 & page=I

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4846

 

+ OUTFOXED: MOVIE WORTH WATCHING

In December 2004, we reported on a new film, The Corporation, which

features alleged attempts by Fox TV to suppress a report by journalists

Jane Akre and Steve Wilson exposing unsavory facts about Monsanto's GM

bovine growth hormone, rbGH.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4715

 

If you're interested in this film, you might also want to see another

film along similar lines. The film, Outfoxed, uses Fox clips and

interviews with former Fox journalists to show how Rupert Murdoch's

Fox TV

network (motto: " Fair and Balanced " ) allegedly distorts and invents the

facts in pursuit of a far-right corporatist and pro-Bush agenda. It also

shows how such 'news' first appears on Fox, to be blindly repeated by

other networks without any awareness or mention of the source.

 

A few startling snippets from the movie:

 

***Today Murdoch owns: 175 newspapers, 40 TV stations, 100 cable

channels, 9 satellite TV networks, 40 book imprints and 1 movie studio.

 

***Fox's US TV network reaches 280 million people; its Asian satellite

network reaches 300 million; its cable channels reach 300 million

homes; its magazines reach 28 million people. Fox's total audience is 4.7

billion people, or three-quarters of the population.

 

***Far more people who watch Fox TV than people who watch other

channels believe blatant untruths such as: Weapons of Mass Destruction

were

found in Iraq; Iraq was responsible for 9/11, etc.

www.outfoxed.org

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4715

 

-------

INDUSTRY NEWS

-------

 

+ GM CROPS INDUSTRY HAS STALLED

The Australian organisation, GeneEthics has refuted claims by the

industry-backed International Service for the Acquisition of

Agro-biotechnology Applications (ISAAA) that the global area of GM

crops increased

rapidly from 2003 to 2004, pointing out that the evidence in fact

suggests

that the GM crop industry remains stalled.

 

" GM crops are only 1.4% of global agricultural area and are not taking

the world by storm, " GeneEthics Network Director, Bob Phelps notes. " GM

crops are also less productive than the best conventional varieties and

cannot feed the world as industry constantly claims. "

 

Phelps points out that, " The ISAAA's own figures show commercial GM

crops are not a global industry, as 98% of GM crops are grown in just six

countries - USA 59%; Argentina 20%; Canada 6%; Brazil 6%, China 5%, and

Paraguay 2%. 93% is in the Americas.

 

" The GM industry's crop product range has also stalled, with only four

broadacre commercial crops - soy, corn, canola and cotton, " he says.

" And these GM crop plants have only two commercial traits - tolerance to

being oversprayed with toxic weedicides, and producing insecticide

toxins. Both traits add more chemicals to our environment and foods.

 

" The ISAAA report offers no evidence that the GM industry can keep its

promises of more nutritious foods, longer shelf life products, drought

and salt tolerant crops, " he says. " Other crops with new traits being

field tested in many places are at least ten years away from commercial

reality, and most will fail. "

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4845

 

+ AG BIOTECH FIRMS FAIL TO DELIVER ON PROMISES - ASSOCIATED PRESS

REPORT

A new report by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI)

says that the biotechnology industry has failed to deliver on promises to

revolutionize agriculture with plants genetically engineered to be

healthier, drought resistant and tastier. CSPI reached the conclusion

after

analyzing publicly available data provided by the US Department of

Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration.

 

" Despite glowing pronouncements from the agricultural biotechnology

industry, the regulatory data suggests that the industry is stagnating,

not thriving, " CSPI report author Greg Jaffe was quoted as saying in

press reports.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4863

 

+ GM " WITHERING ON THE VINE " , SAYS NEW REPORT

The number of GM crops going through the regulatory review process

dropped sharply between the late 1990s and the early 2000s, according to

the new CSPI report. CSPI report in full at:

http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/withering_on_the_vine.pdf

 

CSPI, by the way, is pro-GM, as is clear from its demands in the report

for more public investment in GM crops and a loosening of regulation

for some GM crops.

 

As Craig Winters of The Campaign has noted, " Some people have suggested

that CSPI's objectivity about genetically engineered crops may have

been weakened by the large amount of grant money they continue to receive

from the pro-biotech leaning Rockefeller Foundation.

 

" Most recently, on May 18, 2004, CSPI received $250,000 from the

Rockefeller Foundation. According to the Rockefeller Foundation web

site, the

CSPI grant money goes 'Toward the costs of a project to inform the

international debate around scientific and regulatory issues related to

biotechnology, and to put forward a middle ground on biotechnology in

that

debate.' "

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4862

 

+ CSPI " SIMPLY WRONG ON THE SCIENCE " SAYS ITS FORMER SCIENCE DIRECTOR

 

Dr Doug Gurian-Sherman takes CSPI to task for having " forgotten basic

biology in its new report " and for being " simply wrong on the science "

when it argues in its new report for shorter regulatory reviews of some

GM crops. What makes Dr Gurian-Sherman's criticisms so embarrassing for

CSPI is that he was previously their science director for their

biotechnology project which he also co-founded.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4867

 

+ MONSANTO GETS GM VIRUS-RESISTANT CROPS FROM SEMINIS

Arguments continue over both Monsanto's motives in its acquisition of

the seed company Seminis and the merits of the deal.

 

Prof Joe Cummins suggests that people have focused too heavily in their

analysis of motives on the expansion of the GM giant into the fruit and

vegetable seed market as a result of the acquisition, while ignoring or

dismissing what Seminis has to offer Monsanto on the GM front.

 

Prof Cummins considers this a mistake, particularly in relation to

Seminis work on GM virus resistant crops for which he has identified

relevant patents. Prof Cummins points out, " Prior to the Seminis

acquisition

Monsanto did not have much activity in virus resistance and gains a

major input in that area from Seminis. "

 

Arguments over the wisdom of the deal also continue. Monsanto not only

paid approximately $1.4 billion for Seminis but also assumed about $400

million in debt - for a company that has a record of substantial

losses.

 

Monsanto's share price has fallen by 6% in response, apparently

reflecting investor unease over the high purchase price, plus wariness at

Monsanto's growing level of debt. Fitch Ratings has given Monsanto a high

debt rating and warned of a negative financial outlook. This is based

partly on the bankruptcy of Solutia, Monsanto's old chemical wing, which

has left Monsanto with as yet undetermined liabilities.

 

The pro-GM Economist magazine has said that not rushing into GM may be

the real advantage of the deal: " given the hassle that Monsanto's

present GM crops have met, [a] slow approach may be wise. "

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4850

 

-------

EUROPE

-------

 

+ MAJORITY OF EU RETAILERS SAY NO TO GM

The EU market is worth over 1 thousand billion Euros in annual food and

drink sales. It is effectively closed to GM-labelled ingredients

according to the policies of leading retailers and food producers, as

revealed in the Greenpeace EU Markets Report, published 3 February.

http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=732640

 

-------

THE AMERICAS

-------

 

+ WORLD SOCIAL FORUM PROTESTS GM FOODS

A hundred environmental groups, including Brazil's Landless Peasant

Movement, protested GM foods outside Monsanto offices in Porto Alegre,

Brazil on 28 January. A female theater troupe, Loucas de Pedra Lilas,

from

Recife, Brazil, clowned in Uncle Sam outfits to protest US promotion of

transgenic foods.

 

" The families of farmers are denouncing the devastation Monsanto is

producing with transgenic soya, " said Paul Nicholson, a member of

international peasants organization Via Campesina.

 

The protest took place during the annual World Social Forum, billed as

a counter to the World Economic Forum, of world leaders currently

meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4849

 

+ GM CROPS THREATEN ORGANIC INDUSTRY

Contamination from GM crops threatens Vermont's growing organic farming

industry, advocates say. The number of certified organic acres has more

than doubled in the past five years, from 15,967 in 1999 to 35,826 in

2004, according to a report by the Vermont Public Interest Research

Group. The number of organic farmers has more than tripled from 90 in

1994

to 332 in 2004, the report said. But the growing use of GMOs threatens

to contaminate organic crops, potentially increasing costs for organic

growers, the report said.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4847

 

-------

ASIA

-------

 

+ PHILIPPINES: CATHOLIC LEADERS VOW TO CONTINUE OPPOSING GM CORN

Despite claims made by pro-GM lobbyists that the Vatican has allegedly

" endorsed " the propagation of transgenic crops, Catholic leaders here

vowed to continue opposing Bt corn.

 

The lobbyists had sought to promote GM crops by using a quotation from

the recently released Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church

which says nature isn't sacred. But Fr. Romeo Catedral, director of the

Social Action Center (SAC) in the Diocese of Marbel, said the Diocese

would not waver in their anti-Bt corn stance and he accused the

lobbyists of misleading people by selective quotation, pointing out

that they

had ignored the documents endorsement of the precautionary principle.

 

The Diocese of Marbel, headed by Bishop Dinualdo Gutierrez, has been a

noted hotbed for Bt corn opposition in the country. In August 2001,

anti-Bt corn advocates stormed and uprooted a Bt corn field trial of

Monsanto in the diocesan territory of Tampakan, South Cotabato.

 

Guttierez, who is based in this city, has brought the battle against Bt

corn in the national level. He is the chair of the National Secretariat

for Social Action-Justice and Peace, the social action arm of the

Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines.

 

Fr Catedral has said that Gutierrez " did not show any hint of reversing

his position against Bt corn. "

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4858

 

+ RICE UNDER THREAT

Rice, the principal source of sustenance of much of Asia, is under

threat from multinational companies that are patenting GM varieties,

reports India's Frontline magazine.

 

EXCERPTS from an excellent article:

... Syngenta, in collaboration with Myriad Genetics Inc of the US, has

beaten Monsanto in the game by sequencing more than 99.5 per cent of the

rice genome. Syngenta has made it clear that it will restrict access to

the genomic map and expects proprietary control over any research

carried out with the information.

 

... In this International Year of Rice, the UN has called upon different

stakeholders to promote the sustainable future of rice. Says Sze Pang

Cheung of Greenpeace China: " If we are to promote the sustainable future

of rice farming, GE rice is simply not the answer. " Despite what the

biotech cheerleaders say, alleviating poverty and feeding the world

requires more than a technological solution. GE rice does not solve these

problems.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4865

 

+ INDIA: FARMERS LAUNCH MASSIVE AGITATION AGAINST NEW PATENT LAW

Several farmers' organisations and trade unions have announced February

26 as a day of countrywide agitation with a march to Parliament

followed by a " Beej Satyagraha " [seed protest, or, more literally, the

force

born of truth about seeds] to oppose the new " anti-people " patent law.

 

Flaying the new law which came into effect from January 1, Dr Vandana

Shiva, the Director of Research Foundation for Science, Technology and

Ecology said, ''it sneaked in through an ordinance dated December 26

last year and it totally introduces seed totalitarianism at the hands of

the big multinationals.

 

" It jeopardises every farmer of this country who has for centuries used

a part of his crop as seed and exchanged it as the new law does not

differentiate that seed with a genetically modified one. In other words,

the farmer will have no right to sow his own seed on his own land as

some trait of his seed could be a patented one for which he can be sued, "

she said.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4860

 

+ INDIA: CLARIFICATION NEEDED

From an article in India's Financial Express newspaper reporting the

above story: " Ram Kalspurkar of Vidharbha Organic Farmers' Association

alleged that sterile seeds sold by companies have led to suicides by

farmers. He also complained about proliferation of a virus called CaMV

which has damaged the crops. " The CaMV 'promoter', a construct

genetically

engineered from a plant virus, is used in most GM crops.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4860

 

+ DIRTY TRICKS AND BROKEN PROMISES - MONSANTO'S LEGACY IN INDONESIA

A GM WATCH summary on the topic is at

http://www.gmwatch.org/p1temp.asp?pid=58 & page=1

 

EXCERPTS:

Monsanto achieved commercial approval of its GM cotton in Indonesia

faster than in any other Asian country. The company was able to use this

success, in commercialising its first GM crop in Asia, as a lever to

promote GM crop commercialisation elsewhere in the continent.

 

By December 2003, however, the Indonesian Minister of Agriculture had

announced that Monsanto had pulled its GM cotton out of the country.

Monsanto has left behind it a legacy of broken promises and illegality.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4854

 

-------

AUSTRALASIA

-------

 

+ NEW ZEALAND: ARRESTS AT ROTORUA GM PROTEST

Four people were arrested at a protest in Rotorua over GM pine trees.

Police say about 40 protesters marched to the Forest Research Institute,

where two field trials of the trees are being carried out.

 

Two protestors have been charged with trespass and another with

disorderly behaviour. A fourth person has been charged with

obstructing police

and resisting arrest. Felicity Perry of The People's Moratorium

Enforcement Agency, the group responsible, says they want the trials

ended

because they are akin to starting a bushfire to find out how badly it

burns.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4849

 

-------

FOOD SAFETY

-------

 

+ US PUSHES INTERNATIONALLY FOR LAX SAFETY TESTING OF GM FOODS

Gene Campaign, The German Church Development Service and the Institute

for Agriculture and Trade Policy from the US have protested to the US

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about the new guidelines that are

being proposed to test for the safety of GM foods.

 

In a letter sent to the Commissioner of the FDA, Dr Suman Sahai, Dr

Rudolf Buntzel and Dr Steve Suppan have called the proposed guidelines

irresponsible and with the potential to jeopardise the health of people

across the world. The guidelines, which will be voluntary (not mandatory)

in the US, are proposed as an international model to be implemented by

other countries. Given the aggressive track record of the US in

influencing regulatory systems in developing countries, if these

guidelines

are not opposed in the US, there is a strong chance of their being

implemented worldwide.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4852

 

+ CONSEQUENCES OF MILK FROM GM HORMONE-TREATED COWS

Monsanto's GM cattle drug rBGH is banned in Canada and the EU but was

pushed through in the US in extraordinary circumstances. Monsanto claims

that milk from rBGH-treated cows is the same as that from untreated

cows. But scientists, including some from the National Institutes of

Health, disagree.

 

Here are some of their findings:

" Recombinant rbGH treatment produces an increase in the concentration

of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in cow's milk. "

 

" Levels of IGF increase in milk after cows are treated with rbGH. "

National Institutes of Health, Assessment of Bovine Somatotropin,

December, 1990

 

" The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system is widely involved in

human carcinogenesis. A significant association between high circulating

IGF-I concentrations and an increased risk of lung, colon, prostate and

pre- menopausal breast cancer has recently been reported. "

International Journal of Cancer, 2000 Aug, 87:4, 601-5

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4855

 

-------

REGULATION

-------

 

+ FORMER EPA SCIENTIST CRITICISES US REGULATORY SYSTEM

A scorching letter in India's Frontline magazine from Doug

Gurian-Sherman, formerly a scientist with the US Environmental

Protection Agency,

explains why " The vaunted regulatory system in the United Stated that is

often put forth as a model for assessing the safety of GE crops is

seriously flawed. "

 

EXCERPT:

... the US Food and Drug Administration does not even approve the safety

of GE foods, but instead has a voluntary system of review that is

cursory at best, and where the food safety tests are designed and

performed

by the companies that stand to benefit from the commercialisation of GE

crops.

 

Perhaps the biggest problem for both farmers and the environment is

that GE crops are designed to be used in oversimplified industrial

agriculture systems that do not promote sound agroecological principles.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4866

 

+ FAO CALLS FOR ALL-ROUND CONTROL OF GM CROPS

A group of agricultural experts herded together under the UN-backed FAO

has recommended that control over GM crops needs to comprise the whole

technology development process, from the pre-release risk assessment,

to biosafety considerations and post release monitoring.

 

It's not clear if such a move would result in genuine safety testing or

just another layer of 'bought bureaucracy' not least as the pro-GM

lobby group ISAAA is said to be involved.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4859

 

-------

MIDDLE EAST

-------

 

+ IRAQ SEED SCANDAL

An interesting article by Jeremy Smith published in the Ecologist

expands on recent reports that the US has enacted laws in occupied

Iraq to

make seed saving illegal if Iraqi farmers use proprietary seed from US

corporations. This is especially worrying both because Iraq is the

genetic birthplace of wheat and it is likely that the US will use Iraq

as a

dumping ground for its unwanted GM seed varieties.

 

EXCERPTS:

Under the guise of helping get Iraq back on its feet, the US is setting

out to totally re-engineer the country's traditional farming systems

into a US-style corporate agribusiness. They've even created a new law -

Order 81 - to make sure it happens.

*

Worldwide, thousands of traditional varieties developed over millennia

were forsaken in favour of a few new hybrids, all owned by even fewer

giant multinationals. As a result, Mexico has lost 80 per cent of its

corn varieties since 1930. At least 9,000 varieties of wheat grown in

China have been lost since 1949. Then in 1970 in the US, genetic

uniformity resulted in the loss of almost a billion dollars worth of

maize

because 80 per cent of the varieties grown were susceptible to a disease

known as " southern leaf blight " .

*

An article in the Land and Livestock Post reveals that thanks to a

project undertaken by Texas A & M University's International Agriculture

Office there are now 800 acres of demonstration plots all across Iraq,

teaching Iraqi farmers how to grow 'high-yield seed varieties' of crops

that include barley, chick peas, lentils - and wheat.

 

The leaders of the $107 million project have a stated goal of doubling

the production of 30,000 Iraqi farms within the first year. After one

year, farmers will see soaring production levels. Many will be only too

willing to abandon their old ways in favour of the new technologies.

Out will go traditional methods. In will come imported American seeds

(more than likely GM, as Texas A & M's Agriculture Program considers itself

'a recognised world leader in using biotechnology'). And with the new

seeds will come new chemicals - pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, all

sold to the Iraqis by corporations such as Monsanto, Cargill and Dow.

http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=4856

 

 

 

 

---------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...