THE MYTH OF AIDS

[Guest guest]

THE WRITING BELOW IS IN PROGRESS………

 

A LITTLE BIT IS ADDED HERE AND THERE AS I FIND TIME……..

 

SUGGESTIONS ARE WELCOME…………

 

Meanwhile check out the following sites:

 

www.virusmyth.com

 

http://www.duesberg.com/index.html

 

The Myth Of AIDS

 

LAST ADDITION DECEMBER 18, 2001

 

NOTE: This essay is an assault on the practice of orthodox medicine,

much of which this author considers to be (and can prove beyond a

reasonable doubt) criminal behavior. The criminal behavior has been

performed for so long and has crept into use so slowly and

underhandedly that the public is unaware of the danger it presents to

them and their loved ones. The behavior of the medical doctor is so

abusive, outlandish and outrageous that those who decipher and attack

it are called quacks in disbelief! The charges against the practice

of orthodox medicine are simply too horrific for the average person

on the street to accept. It is too much of a challenge to their

belief system. This is the power of mind control! The level of

medical abuse tolerated by the sleeping public today boggles the mind

of anyone familiar with the gruesome facts – the reader should keep

in mind that crisis medicine saves thousands of lives of accident

trauma victims, helps to alleviate the effects of birth deformities

and relieves a great deal of pain and suffering. The ability to

differentiate between the life saving crisis medicine that takes

place in emergency rooms and the operating room from what goes on in

most doctor's offices on the street is a critical necessity due to

the lethal nature of the latter. We mustn't throw the baby out with

the bath water.

 

 

 

 

 

AIDS: This is the story of a myth.

 

I have lived during the time the myth was being generated. I

witnessed its conception, gestation, birth, growth and development,

and anxiously await its death. As I reenter this article on May 10,

2003 to update it, I am witnessing a repeat of the AIDS myth – it is

called SARS and it's birth and growth is even more ridiculous than

AIDS.

 

WARNING! You will never come to understand that AIDS is a myth,

generated by criminals in the CDC if you do not learn the history of

how it was conceived, was born and grew into adulthood.

 

This is especially true if you come to this article having already

unconsciously, without investigation and validation, accepted the

notion that there really is an epidemic of AIDS and that you really

do have to be careful about certain things such as blood transfusions

etc.

 

WARNING! If, when you are through reading this article, you still

believe there is an AIDS myth and you reject what is written herein,

you're in big trouble. You are under mind control. Someone else is

controlling your opinions. You are not forming your own. You need

help of a very special kind.

 

If you have been medically trained there is a good chance that you

will read this article and ridicule it by bringing up all the tired

old support arguments, none of which are valid. If this be the case,

you are crystallized and will forever remain under the spell of

medical propaganda. Go back about your business and try to have a

happy life.

 

If you are awakened and hence, enraged by what you read. Join us.

Begin passing the word to your neighbors, friends and loved ones.

Most of them will reject what you say. Don't worry about that. It's

the nature of the beast. Just keep moving and educating. Every now

and then someone will stop and listen and you will have saved another

soul and they in turn will go about doing the same thing. When enough

people do the right thing, things change for the better. It takes

millions of little people doing the right thing to change the system.

It doesn't happen overnight.

 

The activity generated by the AIDS myth that I am about to describe

is deadly. It kills people. It has already killed thousands of

Americans and is, as this is written, poisoning hundreds of thousands

more, preparing them for premature graves. It is even poisoning

fetuses in the womb. Fetuses of unborn children whose parents are

allegedly " infected " by HIV are being subjected to killer drugs such

as AZT, DDI and the newer drugs designed to replace them which are

no less dangerous.

 

The AIDS myth is the product of a complex society under the spell of

political medicine.

 

The myth was, and is, totally dependent upon the linear, cause-

effect, straight line thinking of reductionistic medical researchers.

The straight line reductionist method is essential to the life of the

drug industry and its effort to maintain the Germ Theory of Disease

(GTOD).

 

Every effort is made by orthodox medicine (under the direction of the

pharmaceuticals) to shore up the failed GTOD, a prime example of

which is the emergence of the virus as the new villain and when that

fails to bring in the latent virus, the stealth virus and lately, the

prion.

 

When the bacterial cause of disease began to fail to fulfill the

requirements of the reductionist method, the virus replaced it. When

even the viral theory began to fail the latent period was brought in

and we were asked to stretch our imagination a bit and advised that

some viruses could lie dormant for years! Above all others, the

suggestion of a latent period strongly supports this writer's opinion

that diseases attributed to viruses are actually periodic conditions

of malnutrition producing specific signs and symptoms which are then

blamed on the cellular metabolic debris associated with the specific

signs and symptoms. In other words, the patient becomes malnourished,

cellular function begins to fail and go awry, and the effects of the

metabolic failures are presented as causes rather than what they are,

effects.

 

The virus and its alleged " latent periods " were feeble excuses that

were converted into powerful propaganda tools to be used by the drug

industry in its control of medical research and treatment protocols.

 

Without some sort of bug to blame, there is no use for a drug. The

bug begets the drug. A drug for every bug became the war cry of the

pharmaceuticals and political medicine paved the way. The true causes

of disease were set aside and the public was hoodwinked.

 

But that was not enough, we were then advised to set aside the

antibody as evidence of immunity. In a total, incredible reversal, we

now look at the presence of antibodies, formerly identified as

evidence of a healthy immune system doing its job, as signs of an

active infection requiring medical intervention! This boggles the

mind of anyone still in touch with the real world!

 

However outrageous the 20th century theories of reductionist

medicine, they were and are now, readily accepted by innocent

students seeking knowledge at the university level. Any professor

failing to fall in line with the establishment position is

immediately eliminated. The consensus of medicine tolerates no

dissent.

 

The classical example of what befalls those who indulge in dissent is

the case of Peter Duesberg, eminent microbiologist at the university

of California who was slandered and removed from his teaching

position. The pressure brought to bear against Duesberg was so great

that there are signs that even he began to yield to the pressure.

 

The Duesberg case is the quintessential example of the power of

medical quackery in an organized society, once it has taken on the

mantle of " government authority " .

 

The combination of medicine and government authority is the greatest

threat to the health and welfare of the public in the entire recorded

history of mankind.

 

Government is your worst enemy, it is never your friend. Government

medicine multiplies that threat infinitely. The recent examples of

the mindboggling damage that can be caused by government controlled

medicine is seen in the Hoof and Mouth and Mad Cow fiascos. Neither

of which were are diseases. Neither of which are transmissible. Both

of which the true causes have been known since the early 1900s

following carefully controlled testing by the US department of

Agriculture. Since the 1920s, Hoof and Mouth has been known to be a

condition described by veterinarians as similar to the human " cold " .

It is not transmissible, clears up by itself, and has no effect on

milk or meat.

 

Government controlled medicine does not tolerate whistle blowers –

the individual who speaks the truth is immediately eliminated from

the group.

 

IT IS FOR THIS REASON THAT THIS WRITER DEMANDS THAT A DEVIL'S

ADVOCATE COMMITTEE BE INCORPORATED INTO EVERY GOVERNMENT BUREACRACY.

 

Until we set up systems that allow open dissent, our republic will

not survive. We are now in the hands of self perpetuating criminals

and the system will be unable to correct itself without ultimately

resorting to physical violence. History demonstrates this to be so.

 

Presently, no public dissent with the consensus of medicine is

allowed. The " consensus of orthodox medicine " is not a scientific

consensus – it is a political consensus.

 

The consensus of medicine is the propagandized version of the facts

delivered by a small number of politically motivated people in

control positions that are driven by drug money – billions per year

are taken in on single drugs – one can only imagine the amount of

power generated by such huge amounts of money.

 

In the path of such monetary power, ethical conduct falls by the

wayside.

 

Vulnerable people who can be controlled by fame and fortune are

always available. It begins at the freshman level in the universities

as drug companies give away medical bags, stethoscopes, otoscopes

etc. to vulnerable students. Later the doctors are given free trips,

seminars, high paying jobs etc. Once caught in the system with a

developed life style and bills to pay, the ethics begin to suffer.

The higher up the scale, the less effect personal ethic has on the

behavior.

 

No one in highly placed medical positions today is in the possession

of an ethic – unless of course one would insist that they are totally

stupid and unaware of what is really going on.

 

Positions of medical authority and ethics are incompatible.

 

The present failed theory upon which orthodox medicine rests its case

is quite similar to the failed theory of the Ptolemaic system of the

universe that reigned for fifteen hundred years. The truth was known

to a very small number of people when Ptolemy first presented his

false ideas. Authority, not truth, ruled. And mankind suffered in

ignorance for fifteen centuries until Copernicus came along with the

truth. Even Copernicus was unable to get the truth out. His work was

kept secret until he died. At the time Ptolemy published his false

theory describing the earth centered universe, Aristarchos of Samos

had already published the truth. The failures of the Ptolemaic theory

of the universe were propped up by one excuse after another, each

becoming more ridiculous than the last, but always readily accepted

by the already dumbed-down recipients functioning under the myth of

authority..

 

Strict controls are always necessary to keep such failed theories in

place. In our day and age, those strict controls are maintained by

political medicine through the use of government power [NIH, CDC,

FDA].

 

Society, like the human body, is a wide open system, being impinged

upon by multifactorial stimuli from multiple sources. The stimuli are

infinite in number and most are unknown.[1] Society is no more

amenable to reductionist analysis than the human body – both being

open-ended systems.

 

20th century medical research was focused by the cell-based mechanics

of Virchow, favoring the reductionist approach.

 

First, cells were divided into the different types found in the

different parts of the bodies. Each cell was considered as a

functioning whole. Therefore e.g., a malfunctioning pancreatic cell

was isolated from all other cells, analyzed and approached

independently, ignoring other cells and more importantly, central

controls. Then the cell was dissected and the parts subjected to the

same straight line thinking. Each part of the inner cell was

considered separately: nucleus, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum etc.

Improved lab equipment and testing techniques then began to bring

forth analysis of the infinitely complex molecules of metabolism.

 

The ultimate result of Virchow's approach was to take a single

molecule out of a single cell and attack it or its metabolic pathway

with a drug, antibiotic, or vaccine – each of the latter of which was

deadly to the system as a whole. The part was examined by itself,

ignoring the whole setting the stage for the present day approach, a

drug for every bug.

 

Anyone familiar with the real history of the 20th century is aware

that a total elimination of doctors throughout the 20th century would

have resulted in fewer deaths and a much healthier society. True,

some would have died who could have been saved, but the relative

number of those lost would be a tiny fraction of those eventually

killed, injured, poisoned or mutilated by treatments based upon the

reductionist methods. The sleeping public, like most members of the

medical profession itself, is totally unaware of the real situation.

 

Rewritten to this point on December 19, 2003

 

In order to insure a steady stream of tightly controlled propaganda,

certain controls are necessary. This was achieved by " the consensus

of medical opinion. " The " consensus " kept everyone in line and

pharmaceutical profits paid the bills. The consensus was used to

supply the steady stream of propaganda that would then be transmitted

by government sources so as to identify medicine with what the public

viewed as bonafide authority. The members of the media, profiting

themselves by millions of dollars in advertising revenues fell into

lockstep with the rest of the criminals.

 

Freedom of speech is meaningless when those in charge of reporting

the shenanigans of government and commerce fail to tell the truth.

 

Because of the lack of external controls [i.e., honest government

officials elected to stand watch over and protect the public

interest] on the " mischief of medicine " [MOM], by the end of the 20th

century, the practice of orthodox medicine was ranked as the third

ranking cause of unnecessary deaths in the USA.

 

If the actual truth was reported, medicine would be so far out in

front of the rest that it would require a totally different category

all by itself. Comparatively, there is no single force in history

that can compete with the destructive effect of organized medicine.

 

As with government, the danger of political medicine is directly

proportionate to the amount of control it has over its member's

ability to indulge in critical speech.

 

By giving a small amount of thought to the above remarks, one can

prepare oneself for the debunking contained herein. It is almost

impossible to bring someone to the truth of a myth. Some readers will

turn away forever from the truths herein, others will continue to

investigate and require as long as two or three years to finally

accept the truth. Some will see it instantly. That's the reason why,

the myth of AIDS has to be debunked one step at a time. Failure to do

this fails to get the point across in an acceptable, believable

manner to the average recipient.

 

The intelligent, relatively unbiased reader will come to the

conclusion that AIDS is not a transmissable disease and accept the

fact that you can't even " catch " AIDS from a blood transfusion

because it is not caused by a little critter (bacteria or virus),

much less from the harmless passenger virus called HIV.

 

They will also learn that there was never an " epidemic " of AIDS, only

clusters, and –

 

clusters are not epidemics –

 

therefore there is no such thing as an AIDS epidemic anywhere else in

the world EXCEPT BY REDEFINITION since that is all based upon the

original myth.

 

The world wide AIDS epidemic is an invention of the CDC and the NIH

in collusion with the FDA all of which are driven by pharmaceutical

profits.

 

The intelligent reader will also be able to transfer the new

knowledge gained herein to other myths presently being invented by

the CDC and NIH such as EBOLA and many of the bacterial " infections "

allegedly caused by food that we hear about on an almost daily basis.

The result of this medical mischief wreaks havoc on our economic

system. Every " infection " known to man will yield to megadoses of

intravenous vitamin C as reported earlier by Klenner (`40s, `50s).

 

The reader should come to a fuller and more reasonable understanding

of everyday " infections " and what can be done about them. Antibiotics

are almost NEVER necessary according to Cathcart and NEVER necessary

in my opinion when proper steps are taken at the proper time.

 

Criminals operating in orthodox medical circles continue to stifle

the growth and proliferation of these life saving, side effect free

methods.

 

There is no question about the effects of antibiotics on specific

bacteria and that many lives have been saved by antibiotics that

would have otherwise been lost, my own included.

 

So to lay out the history of the myth, we will number the steps for

clearer referencing. Each step must be understood and accepted to

eliminate the faulty belief.

 

1. AIDS was originally called GRIDS. Victims were all

homosexuals and usually also suffered from Kaposi's Sarcoma, a

condition known to be caused by " poppers " . A " popper " was a vial of

nitrites used by coronary patients to dilate coronary blood vessels.

Because " poppers " caused a relaxation of muscle it was incorrectly

assumed that homosexuals used them to facilitate anal intercourse

however certain homosexuals have reported that they were used because

of the " rush " they provided.

 

2. GRIDS stands for Gay Related Infectious Disease.

 

3. The name was used to describe the cause of death of male

homosexuals between the ages of 20-45 of a type of pneumonia that

usually only killed elderly people.

 

4. GRIDS was only found in two groups of male homosexuals in NY

and LA.

 

5. The homosexuals involved were spending long periods of time

in the bathhouses where they would (admittedly) indulge in hundreds

of sexual contacts per week.

 

6. The body cannot supply enough male hormone to stimulate and

facilitate hundreds of sexual encounters a week – hence the use of

intravenous recreational drugs.

 

7. The use of the recreational drugs literally " burned out " the

immune systems of the homosexuals, allowing overgrowth of the

pneumocystis carinii bacteria, a " bug " that can usually be found in

the lung of the average healthy person. The overgrowth killed the

homosexual drug users. IF YOU MISS THIS POINT, YOU MISS THE

MYTHOLOGICAL BASIS OF AIDS AND WILL NOT GRASP THE CONCLUSION.

 

8. The CDC, always on the lookout for such " clusters "

of " diseases " , jumped at the opportunity to discover a " new " disease,

a new cause-effect relationship - so they dispatched their " virus

hunters " to the scene, hoping to discover the cause of

these " mysterious " deaths. If they could add another disease to their

list they could apply for more tax supported funding to support

further searches to further insure the security of their government

jobs. Looking for a bacterial/viral cause of an illness in a group of

people indulging in such abusive life styles is a testimony to the

stupidity of the investigators. It also gives testimony to their

total ignorance of medical history. To think otherwise would be to

accuse them of criminal negligence. They are either criminally

negligent or just plain criminal. They either know exactly what they

are about or they are totally stupid to history and to cause-effect

relationships – there is no third possibility in the dualistic world

of cause-effect – the idea of multifactorial does not enter except as

associated sequela swept up in the tide flowing from the destructive

activity.

 

9. One has to question the mentality and intent of the original

investigators who managed to overlook the obvious life style related,

cause-effect factors involved in the original two clusters that were

limited strictly to homosexuals. However the pharmaceutically driven

focus - a drug for every bug and a pill for every ill allows only for

an extremely coned down view of the possibilities in any situation

and disallows speculation not leading towards desired results. Life

style causes of a disease will not produce the material necessar for

drug/bug oriented research and are strictly frowned upon if not

openly forbidden by those in charge of running such GTOD based

programs.

 

10. The initial label applied to the " disease " , GRIDS, posed an

immediate problem. No disease can be considered " infectious " unless

it attacks all and sundry. Calling it GRIDS gave it a gender bias.

 

11. So the initial name for AIDS was a misnomer - it had to be

changed. To anyone able to read between the lines, the GRIDS label

exposed the ignorance and bias of the original CDC virus hunters.

 

12. The condition suffered by the original groups of homosexuals

aged 20-45, dying of pneumonia, originally called GRIDS, was changed

to AIDS.

 

13. Enter Robert Gallo, seeking fame and fortune at someone else's

expense (tax money). Gallo arrogantly bypassed all the usual

safeguards of the scientific community without subjecting his views

to critique and scientific analyses before announcing them publicly

alongside the secretary of HHS in April of 1984. This act ushered in

the era of avoiding the watchful eye of scientific critique thus

removing the final safeguard against MOM's abuse of the (always)

sleeping public, financed directly by drug industry bribery – the

bribe money keeps the criminals in place in high places while the tax

money supports the army of dumb downed lab workers in white coats all

over the country, doing useless and nonsensical research to shore up

useless and nonsensical methods of a totally shored up, failed system

of belief, the GTOD. [MOM = mischief of medicine]

 

14. The same day that Gallo and HHS secretary Margaret Heckler made

the fraudulent announcement of the discovery of the cause of AIDS,

Gallo applied for a patent for a urine test to demonstrate the

presence of the AIDS virus in order to make a diagnosis which was

then used to prescribe AZT, the deadliest quack medicine ever

prescribed in the entire history of mankind Gallo identified HIV as

the cause of AIDS in 1984 and retracted the statement very quietly in

1994, ten years later. The correction went unnoticed by the press and

the scientific community. A similar occurrence concerning the PSA

also went unnoticed. [see article on PSA – it is not prostate

specific and does not indicate what everyone thinks it does. The

originator of the idea of PSA and it's significance recently said in

a published article, " I took out a lot of prostates that I wish I

hadn't.]

 

15. Gallo's urine test was recorde positive findings fifty per cent

of the time.. This meant that today, you would be positive, tomorrow

you would be negative. Based upon the results of this test, patients

were given AZT, a chain terminator of DNA synthesis which killed

every lab animal it was ever used on and is incompatible with life.

The medical community began killing people with AZT.

 

16. If you absorb AZT you will die, if you happen to be a non

absorber and pass it off in your urine and at the same time change

your life style you might survive and your survival will then be

credited to the use of the deadly drugs that you are lied to about.

The drugs you are told, that will cure you. Other drugs acting

similarly to AZT such as ddI and ddC were added later to the

armamentarium of the deadly medical mischief associated with the AIDS

myth.

 

17. Predictions to alarm the public and influence the congress were

designed and delivered by the CDC to help turn loose more research

funds for the " coming epidemic " (that never materialized). This

propaganda was preached on a daily, sometimes hourly, basis by the

HHS/CDC/NIH/FDA/AMA conspiracy.

 

18. Celebrities were paraded before the cameras, bravely suffering

out their death sentences. Cases such as Rudolph Nureyev, Randy

Shilts (author: And The Band Played On), Alison Gertz, Arthur Ashe

and the Kimberly Bergalis case especially - all stand out in my

memory and are recounted in detail by Duesberg. All presumed by this

writer to have been killed by AZT in government organized genocide.

 

19. Kimberly Bergalis was killed by her doctor via government edict.

She was a direct victim of the CDC criminals – anyone reading her

history, with knowledge of the myth and its mechanisms immediately

concludes that the CDC was directly responsible for the unnecessary

and untimely death of Kimberly Bergalis and the rest of her group.

The description of the events can be found in Duesberg's book,

Inventing The AIDS Virus. Every American, nay, every human being,

should be familiar with the contents of that book.

 

20. The Bergalis case exemplifies the results of government

intervention into areas in which government has absolutely no

business. The last place for any government influence is in the area

or personal health. Dr Benjamin Rush was one of the makers of our

constitution and a medical doctor familiar with the idiosyncrasies of

medicine and medical doctors. He begged his fellow statesmen to

include a clause in the constitution that protected the public from

the shenanigans of medicine. His advice was ignored. We are now

suffering because of that error.

 

21. Alison Gertz was killed by her government. Her story parallels

the Kimberly Bergalis story.

 

22. Arthur Ashe was killed by his government. His story parallels

the Bergalis story. Ashe was almost saved by the efforts of Gary Null

but was unable to shake off the belief system in time for Gary Null

to save his life.

 

23. Soon though, the dire predictions of the CDC failed to come

true, and in fact, HIV positive people in the general public actually

took a small dip.

 

24. The GTOD and the virus was beginning to lose the interest of the

public in the `80s when the AIDS myth possibility surfaced. Virus

hunters were hungry for new avenues to explore. The AIDS myth gave a

shot in the arm to the pharmaceutical industry.

 

25. The next significant era of AIDS was the failure of the dire

predictions of the virus hunters to materialize. AIDS did not explode

in the population. Action had to be taken to shore up the failed

predictions.

 

26. When the predictions failed to materialize in the late 80s and

early 90s, medical " experts " added over twenty five old diseases

under the heading of AIDS to shore up the failing myth, just as they

shored up the failing GTOD with the virus, just as the Ptolmaics

shored up the failed earth centered universe theory with the many

complicated astronomical excuses. IF YOU FAIL TO GET POINT #26 YOU

WILL NOT UNDERSTAND THE MECHANISM AND YOU WILL NOT GET THE POINT.

 

27. The addition of 25 old diseases under the umbrella of AIDS also

solved the problem of gender bias afflicting the original label of

GRIDS while helping to protect the myth against the growing body of

evidence [systematically ignored and kept from public dissemination

and public critique and discussion] disproving it.

 

28. Elimination of gender bias was absolutely essential to the life

of the myth. It would have died a natural death without it. No

infectious disease can show a gender bias. If it does, it is

not " infectious " . In the medical model, " infectious " means,

transmissible, something you can " catch " from someone else. An idea

driven by the straight line thinking required for belief in the GTOD.

 

29. Gender bias surfaced immediately as explained above and was the

initial, and most obvious clue to any investigator (without an

agenda) who was looking for cause effect relationships rather than

excuses to solicit more tax money to use for medical research " for

the public good " .

 

30. Again, the knotty gender bias problem was the fact that the

original cases of AIDS, involved ONLY young homosexual men between

the ages of 20 and 45. These homosexuals were dying of pneumocystis

carinii " infections " , the pneumonia known as " old man's disease " ,

caused by immune system failure, said failure being caused by use of

recreational drugs that burned out the immune system. No bacteria or

virus was involved in the causative mechanism but was present only as

an effect. Over 90% of the original cases occurred in homosexual

males. In fact, ALL of the original problems were male homosexuals as

far as I can determine – the only other common cause of immune system

failure was the use of cancer drugs. The picture of bald cancer

victims comes quickly to mind.

 

31. Another very important point regarding percentages in the

population was the use of the presumptive diagnosis in AIDS cases –

diagnoses that were never scientifically confirmed. A male

homosexual presenting with needle marks, a ring in their ear or nose,

low cell counts, the usual skin lesions associated with the use

of " poppers " [nitrates] etc. and the doctor would make a presumptive

diagnosis.

 

32. The fact is that HIV has never been scientifically demonstrated

and a war continues to rage over that fact. One website continues to

offer a large reward for the first person to scientifically

demonstrate HIV. The average person is not aware of how much is left

to conjecture in these high blown theories and how much is actually

in demonstrable evidence. E.g., the West Nile Virus

was " demonstrated " using a filter that was 550 times the size of the

virus!

 

33. HIV, as Duesberg insisted, is a harmless " passenger virus " and

the percentage in the population has remained fairly stable for as

long as it has been measured.

 

34. Since AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) is a condition

of a failed immune system and is, as the name implies, " acquired " , it

is not " caught " from one another and is not therefore transmissible.

 

35. Since no " infection " is involved, you cannot even " catch " AIDS

from a blood transfusion.

 

36. The discoverer of the cause of Pellagra injected himself, his

family members, and fourteen members of his staff with body fluids

and material from patients dying of Pellagra early in the last

century to prove that Pellagra was not an infectious disease that

could be " caught " from someone else. He was totally ignored by

medical authorities - In our day and time another physician did the

same thing. A highly trained, well qualified MD with a PhD traveled

about the USA during the `90s, doing the same thing with material

from victims dying of AIDS. This MD injected himself with blood taken

from AIDS patients dying of AIDS. When he arrived in Cleveland, Ohio,

the political influence of the Cleveland Clinic was brought to bear

illegally to forbid him to perform the self injection in Cleveland.

 

37. AIDS is a failure of the immune system, not an " infectious "

disease. You cannot " catch " AIDS. The dire predictions of the CDC and

the NIH of the spread of AIDS were failing by the late 1980s and

something had to be done to shore up the failing theory. That was

taken care of by adding over two dozen old diseases under the heading

of AIDS. Suddenly there was an increase in the AIDS " epidemic " . YOU

MUST UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT THIS OR YOU WILL FAIL TO BENEFIT FROM THIS

ARTICLE.

 

38. All of the drugs to treat AIDS will kill you if you take enough

of them for a long enough period of time and none of them will cure

AIDS.

 

39. Most cases of AIDS can be cured by nutritional supplementation,

diet and life style changes.

 

40. The original AIDS cases were only seen in cancer patients.

Cancer drugs kill people by destroying their immune systems – those

are the patients who lose their hair and fall apart as the body

proteins give way to the drugs. Kimberly Bergalis is the most

sensationally portrayed example in history. At each public

appearance, the effects of the AZT she was taking for her " fictitious

infection " was slowing killing her - an inch at a time. Every symptom

she displayed was caused by the AZT – particularly the muscle

wasting, weakness and lack of energy. Her original complaint was a

simple yeast infection suffered commonly by college kids her age who

live on lousy diets while under the stress of school.

 

41. At latest count [May 10,2003], 29 old conditions are now listed

under AIDS, including herpes, TB, pneumonia and even diarrhea! A T

cell count of less than 200 will also give you the label of AIDS. No

wonder " AIDS " is on the increase!

 

42. More nine out of ten AIDS deaths occurred AFTER the introduction

of AZT and protease inhibitor type drugs. MOST PEOPLE TREATED WITH

PROTEASE INHIBITORS DIE OF LIVER DISEASE!

 

43. Dr David Rasnick, who helped dismantle Gallo's

misrepresentations, claims that when you're " infected " by a virus,

almost a third of the specific tissue has to be destroyed before any

symptoms arise. At that time a titer of the infected area will

contain viruses under a microscope [see article in Boston Dig, May 7,

2003]. While Dr Rasnick is on the right track methinks he is still

under the spell of the GTOD as he describes viruses as " living " and

of course no virus has life. I would describe what he describes as

the result of cell death due to cellular malnutrition and what he

is " seeing " is the cellular debris of death by malnutrition. [titer

is number of cells per unit volume]

 

44. Retroviruses are part of normal cell function, have been known

to exist for almost a century, are found in humans and all animals,

are passed from mother to child during gestation and are inert,

lifeless molecules that are acted upon by living cells. They don't

have any more " life " than a glucose molecule. They are not toxic.

Duesberg calls HIV a harmless passenger retrovirus. A retrovirus is

simply something that was found in cells and named retro by

imaginative pseudoscientific goofballs and honest scientists who have

been misled their entire lives and who spend all their time in labs

studying mechanisms that are not found in the real world in living

cells that are part of, and under the control of, the nervous system

of a larger organism. The reason they were called retro is that they

are RNA strands that the body copies into its own DNA by using an

enzyme called reverse transcriptase. Retroviruses are part of the

stuff of cellular metabolism - nuts and bolts of ordinary cellular

aggregations. When found in the blood, they represent metabolic

debris – nothing more, nothing less. It is impossible for anyone

grounded in the germ theory of disease to view cellular products in

any other fashion. Considering the function of a retrovirus one could

conceivably think the same of any protein, essential fatty acid or

other molecule of nutrition that the cell takes up and incorporates

into its metabolism in the same manner. The transmission of

retroviruses has nothing to do with sexual activity. They cannot be

transferred that way any more than vitamin C or an essential fatty

acid or any other nutritive molecule can. There is absolutely no

evidence of a retrovirus ever having a harmful effect on a human

being.

 

45. A virus is not gender linked, they can appear wherever there are

living cells. If a specific virus was found in large amounts in any

area of the body, one can assume that there is a

malnutrition/aberrant metabolism and the cell is lacking a nutrient

required for normal functioning. Since viruses and retroviruses

contain DNA and RNA respectively, they can only come from a living

cell. Retroviruses contain RNA which is found mainly in the cellular

cytoplasm with limited amounts in the nucleus while DNA is restricted

to the nucleus where it is involved in replication and genetic

reproduction. Viruses are nothing more than fragments, pieces of the

stuff that makes up living cells, dead, lifeless and inert. They

cannot be said to be able to " do " anything any more than a vitamin or

mineral or " does " anything. None of these items " do " anything, they

are " done to " by the living cell that takes them up and uses them for

good or ill just as the living cell will take up a poison that can

kill it. Duesberg claims that retroviruses are transcribed into the

DNA where they remain as harmless parts of the genome. However tax

supported pseudoscientists continue to pursue these items as possible

causes of cancer.

 

46. The reason different viruses are found in different disease

conditions in different parts of the body is due to the different

malnutrition and the different functioning of the body part involved.

 

47. During the 70s Gallo insisted that he found a cancer retrovirus

in a leukemia patient and labeled it HL23V. In fact he didn't find

anything. He " proved " his find by the presence of antibody activity

and certain enzymes – he never identified any virus or retrovirus or

any solid piece of evidence that was named HL23V. HL23V is a non-

existent phantom that has never been demonstrated to exist except by

hypothesis and theory. Hypothesis and theory are not fact. His claim

was refuted within five years by Sloan Kettering and the NCI.

 

48. Gallo's next fictitious claim was made in 1980 with another

[falsely alleged] cancer related retrovirus labeled HTLV-1, which

supposedly caused a leukemia that involved T-cells. Less than one per

cent of patients showing positive to HTLV-1 became leukemic.

 

49. Gallo then became involved with AIDS, xxxxx

..

 

More to come in the future…………..it is now May 15, 2003

 

Reprinted from the Boston Dig, May 7, 2003

 

 

 

Experts state that viral epidemics spread rapidly early on and kill

those unable to cope however what are put forth as epidemics are in

fact clusters. A cluster is not an epidemic. The cluster phenomenon

is the first simple proof against the stupid theory but it ignored.

AIDS never followed the predicted pattern. This was the reason that

over two dozen old diseases were included under the umbrella of AIDS.

The recent SARS fiasco is a good example of how the growing tyranny

of medicine can use their stupid theories to incite public panic,

demoralize entire countries and bring sudden economic ruin to

specific areas of the economy. All based on a few deaths from

pneumonia. One of the most common causes of death known to man.

 

 

 

HIV is allegedly a retrovirus. Retroviruses were well described back

in the 70s by Duesberg who is considered to be a leading investigator

in the field of retroviruses.

 

 

 

Over a quarter century ago, in lab tests totally divorced from real

life, a researcher claimed to have found a retrovirus in a cancer

cell that allegedly " infected " other cells. The pseudoscientific

goofballs who were looking for the cause of cancer in test tubes

quickly championed this discovery as supporting their whacko

theories. The upshot of this would be that cancer could be " caught "

from a retrovirus so the subject was pursued vigorously. The

researcher who made the discovery was hailed as a genius and

immediately became successful and famous in the world of cancer

research. In fact the original discoverer later claimed that it was

nothing more than a laboratory artifact and had no relationship with

the real world and nothing to do with the cause of cancer.

 

 

xxxxx

Rasnick: In the early '80s, gay men were showing up in emergency

rooms with a variety of simultaneous illnesses and infections. At the

time, medical journals speculated that the diseases were drug-

related. Gay men had been abusing toxic, immune suppressing and even

carcinogenic drugs like poppers, cocaine and amphetamines on a daily

basis for the better part of the '70s.

 

In 1983, Luc Montagnier, a French scientist at the Pasteur Institute,

claimed to have found a new retrovirus in AIDS patients. But nobody

paid attention, because he hadn't isolated a virus, and he hadn't

found a single viral particle in the blood - remember the titer was

zero, undetectable.

 

Seeking some academic support, Montagnier sent a cell sample to

Robert Gallo at the NIH. Gallo took the cell-line Montagnier sent him

and modified it slightly. Then he did something strange. He stole it.

 

In 1984 Gallo called an international press conference and together

with Margaret Heckler, the head of the Department of Health and Human

Services, announced that he'd discovered the 3probable cause2 of

AIDS. It was a new retrovirus called HTLV-III, (later re-named HIV).

Later that same day, he patented the modified cell-line he'd

originally gotten from Montagnier. He hadn't published a single word

of his research. Gallo, a government-backed scientist, simply

announced that a retroviral-epidemic was on its way.

 

He sold the cell-line to Abbot Labs, a pharmaceutical company that

makes HIV tests. The French government asked that all patent rights

be returned to Montagnier. Gallo refused, claiming it was all his

work. In 1987, Gallo and Montagnier were forced by President Reagan

and French Prime Minister Chirac to meet in a hotel room to work out

the HIV patent rights. In 1992, Gallo was officially convicted of

theft by a federal scientific ethics committee.

 

Rodney Richards: At first Gallo claimed he invented the whole

process. Now he claims his sample might have been 3contaminated2 by

Montagnier's. Duesberg: The NIH itself ran a two-year investigation

of Gallo's HIV claim, and they couldn't come up with any convincing

evidence that he came up with it on his own.

 

What did Abbot labs do with Gallo's cell line?

 

 

Rasnick: Abbot labs makes HIV-antibody tests out of it. Abbot's made

billions selling HIV tests, and Gallo's made millions from his

patent. So when we're given an HIV-antibody test, we're tested based

on what Gallo and Montagnier claim to have found. How did Luc

Montagnier find HIV?

 

Richards: First he looked in his patients' blood, but he couldn't

find it there. In fact, no one has ever found HIV in human blood.

 

Right, the titer was zero - so where did he look?

 

Richards: Montagnier took tissue from the swollen lymph node of a gay

man who was a suspected AIDS patient. In an infected person, the

lymph tissue will presumably be littered with infected cells.

 

Montagnier attempted to perform a cell culture with that tissue. This

is the lab technique used to isolate viruses like herpes and

mononucleosis. In a cell culture, infected cells are mixed with

uninfected cells in a petri dish. Separated from the body's immune

system, viruses that are being

suppressed can surface. The virus travels from the infected cell to

the uninfected cell through the liquid in the dish. The scientist

collects this liquid, concentrates it, and spins it through a sucrose

density gradient to isolate the virus.

 

A sucrose density gradient is a tube of layered sugar solutions of

specific densities. The layers become thicker from top to bottom. The

cell liquid is gently placed on top of the sugar solution. This is

spun in a centrifuge for many hours to force the viral particles to

descend through the density

layers. Cellular particles, including retroviruses, have known

densities. The known density corresponds to a layer in the test tube.

The descending particles stop when they find a density equal to

their own. This layer is photographed with an electron microscope. In

cultures from virally-infected patients, the photo plate is filled

with millions of identical viral particles.

 

Finally, a new cell culture is performed with the isolated viral

particles to see if they are indeed infectious. Once again, the cell

fluid is separated, spun and photographed to verify that the same

virus appears. This is what's known as viral isolation.

 

Is this what Montagnier did?

 

Richards: He tried to, but it didn't work. Montagnier took lymph

tissue from a suspected AIDS patient, mixed it with cells from a

healthy blood donor and performed a cell culture. He removed the

liquid and spun it in a centrifuge, but he found no virus. That

didn't stop him. Montagnier repeated the experiment but added a

crucial new step.

 

He took the suspected AIDS tissue and mixed it with a variety of

cells in a culture, including cells from an umbilical cord. Then he

added powerful chemicals called Mitogens that artificially force

cells to replicate. He found, after 2 or 3 weeks, evidence of an

enzyme called reverse transcriptase, a sign of possible retroviral

activity.

 

But he hadn't found any virus?

 

Richards: No. He found an enzyme that retroviruses use. But reverse

transcriptase is found in many other microbes, cellular components

and processes, including umbilical cells, and forced replication.

Montagnier then separated the mitogenically stimulated fluid from the

culture and poured it into another dish of healthy cells and again

found reverse transcriptase activity.

 

He put this through a sucrose density gradient and found reverse

transcriptase activity at the density layer where retroviruses were

known to purify. What he did not find was a virus. When he looked

through the electron microscope at that same density gradient, he

found nothing - but he

didn't acknowledge that until years later.

 

That's what's known as isolation of HIV.

 

How does this prove that an infectious virus was making people sick?

 

 

Richards: It doesn't. This is insufficient evidence to prove that HIV

or any infectious virus exists, let alone that it causes disease.

 

How did Gallo use Montagnier's cells to prove HIV existed and caused

AIDS?

 

Richards: Gallo cultured the cells, but didn't find enough reverse

transcriptase activity to convince him that Montagnier had found a

retrovirus. So Gallo added another step. He mixed cells from 10 AIDS

patients together; then he added those to leukemia T-cells from his

HTLV-1 retrovirus experiment. At that point, Gallo found enough

reverse transcriptase activity to convince him that there was indeed

a retrovirus.

 

That's how he claims to have found HIV.

 

But Gallo had already found reverse transcriptase activity in the

leukemia cells. How did he prove that there was a new retrovirus -

HIV?

 

Richards: Many scientists don't believe that he did prove it.

 

You said Gallo used a T-cell line to grow HIV. Isn't HIV supposed to

kill T-cells?

 

Richards: That's what Gallo initially claimed, but Abbot labs grows

its HIVin human T-cells. It's even called an immortal cell line,

because the leukemia cells don't die. To date, no researcher has

demonstrated how HIV kills T-cells. It's just a theory that keeps

money flowing into the pharmaceutical approach to treating AIDS.

 

Rasnick: Gallo patented the leukemia T-cell mixture the very same day

he announced he'd found the 3probable cause2 of AIDS.

 

What do HIV tests do?

 

Rasnick: They look for antibodies in your blood to proteins that are

taken out of this mixture. Your body produces antibodies as a

response to all foreign material - germs, yeasts, viruses, even the

food you eat. Viruses are DNA or RNA wrapped in protein building

blocks. Antibodies grab onto

these proteins, immobilizing and destroying the virus. When these

antibodies encounter different viral proteins in the future, they'll

very often grab onto them, too. This is called cross-reactivity.

 

Duesberg: Viruses are only dangerous the first time you encounter

them. Once you've made antibodies to a virus, you have immunity for

the rest of your life, and the virus can't get you sick anymore.

This is the opposite of HIV theory, which states: You become

infected; you don't get sick; you make antibodies; and 10 years

later, you get sick and die.

 

Rasnick: There are two common HIV antibody tests. One is the Elisa,

in which a bunch of proteins from the T-cell mixture are stuck in a

series of little plastic wells on a test plate. The other is called

Western Blot. In this test, the proteins are separated onto

individual paper strips. Your blood is added, and if antibodies from

your blood stick to proteins from this mixture, you're said to be

HIV positive.

 

They're assuming the proteins are from HIV; but they never isolated

HIV, so how can they say these tests can diagnose HIV-infection?

 

Rasnick: They can't, and they don't. None of the proteins in the

Elisa and Western Blot tests have been proven to be specific to HIV

or any retrovirus. For this reason the FDA has not approved a single

test for diagnosing HIV-infection.

 

Richards: There are at least 30 tests marketed to test for HIV. None

of them are approved by the FDA to diagnose the presence or absence

of HIV. Not the Elisa, not viral load, not Western Blot, not the P24

antigen test. The FDA and manufacturers clearly state that the

significance of testing positive on the Elisa and Western Blot test

is unknown.

 

AIDS researchers admit that the tests contain at least 80 percent non-

specific cellular material - they're, at best, 20 percent effective.

But in my scientific opinion, they contain no HIV at all. The medical

literature lists at least 60 different conditions that can register

positive on the HIV-test. These conditions include candidas,

arthritis, parasites, malaria, liver conditions, alcoholism, drug

abuse, flu, herpes, syphilis, other STDs and pregnancy.

 

Rasnick: It's very simple to see how you can get false positives.

Antibodies cross-react. The more viruses and germs you're exposed to,

the more antibodies you'll produce, the greater risk you'll test

positive on a non-specific antibody test. If you live in a country

without clean water or sanitary living conditions, you're going to

have constant microbial and parasitic infections that produce

antibodies.

 

You carry antibodies to all the colds, flus, viruses and vaccinations

you've ever had. If you're pregnant, you're producing antibodies that

will react with Abbot's Elisa test. Pregnancy is a known cause of

false positives onthe HIV test.

 

Different races have different ranges of naturally-occurring

antibodies. That's why blacks have a nine times greater chance of

testing positive than white Europeans, and a 33 times greater chance

than Asians. It doesn't haveanything to do with infection or health.

In one study, a tribe of South American Indians was given Elisa

tests. Thirteen percent of them tested HIV-positive, but nobody was

sick. They just had antibodies that reacted with the test.

 

If the tests aren't specific, and we can't find HIV in the blood,

then what is AIDS?

 

Richards: According to the CDC, AIDS works like a formula: If you

have an AIDS-indicator disease like salmonella, tuberculoses,

pneumonia, herpes, or a yeast infection, and you test HIV-positive,

then you're said to have AIDS, and you're treated with toxic AIDS

drugs. If you test negative or don't know your HIV status, you're

spared the toxic drugs and simply treated for the disease you have.

 

In 1993 the CDC expanded their definition of AIDS to include people

who are not sick at all but who test positive and have a one-time T-

cell count under 200. Based on this new criteria, by 1997, about 2/3

of all AIDS cases were perfectly healthy people. As it happens, '97

was the last year the CDC toldus how many people were healthy and how

many were sick. Now they just count

everyone who's HIV-positive as an AIDS patient, whether they're sick

or not. Let me clarify this. When people die of AIDS, they actually

die of a known disease. But if their blood reacts with an HIV-

antibody test, they're no longer said to have the disease, they're

said to have AIDS?

 

Rasnick: That's how it works. And the sick people who test HIV-

positive are put on the most toxic drugs ever manufactured and sold.

What about AIDS in Africa?

 

Rasnick: It's the same story, even worse. Fifty percent of Africans

have no sewage systems. Their drinking water mixes with animal and

human waste. Theyhave constant TB and malaria infections, the

symptoms of which are diarrhea and weight loss, the very same

criteria UNAIDS and the World Health Organization use to diagnose

AIDS in Africa. These people need clean drinking water and treated

mosquito nets [mosquitoes carry malaria], not condoms and lectures

and deadly pharmaceuticals forced on pregnant mothers.

 

We've put 20 years and $118 billion into HIV. We've got no cure, no

vaccine and no progress. Instead we have thousands of people made

sick and even killed by toxic AIDS drugs. But we can't just treat

them for the diseases we know they have because if we do, we're

called 3AIDS denialists.2 Treating them for the diseases they

actually have would be more humane and effective

than forcing toxic drugs down their throats, and it would also save

billions of tax dollars. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. There

are 100,000 professional AIDS researchers in this country. It's as

hard to challenge as big tobacco at this point.

 

What does Luc Montagnier say about this?

 

Rasnick: In 1990 at the San Francisco AIDS conference, Montagnier

announced that HIV did not, after all, kill T-cells and could not be

the cause of AIDS. Within hours of making this announcement, he was

attacked by the very industry he'd helped to create. Montagnier's not

a liar. He's a so-so scientist who's in over his head.

 

Afterword:

 

In a 1997 interview, Luc Montagnier spoke about his isolation of HIV.

He said, 3We did not purify [isolate] ... We saw some particles but

they did not have the morphology [shape] typical of retroviruses ...

They were very different ... What we did not have, as I have always

recognized it, is that it was truly the cause of AIDS.2

 

Robert Gallo hasn't made such large concessions. He has, however,

amended his AIDS death sentence. He now believes that it's possible

to live with HIV 3for 30 years until you die of old age,2 as long as

you live a healthy lifestyle and avoid immune-compromising substances.

 

In 1994 Gallo quietly announced that the major AIDS defining illness

in gay men - Kaposi's Sarcoma, was not caused by HIV but was likely

caused by amyl nitrite poppers, a drug that had been popular in the

gay community. Somehow, this didn't make headlines.

 

Gallo also said that Peter Duesberg's research into a drug-based AIDS

model should be funded. Duesberg's funding has all but evaporated

since he publicly challenged the HIV/AIDS model.

 

 

 

Dr. David Rasnick is a protease specialist and has been in AIDS

research for 20 years. He and Duesberg work in collaboration on

cancer and AIDS research. Rasnick was an advisor on President Mbeki's

South African AIDS panel.

 

Dr. Rodney Richards is a chemist who worked with Amgen and Abbot

labs, designing the first HIV tests from Robert Gallo's HIV cell

line.