Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Methods of Wealth Transfer

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Z

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:19:52 -0800 (PST)

Methods of Wealth Transfer

 

 

 

Methods of Wealth Transfer

by Zoltan Abraham

November 28, 2004

 

Back in the 1950's most of the wealth of our nation was held by the

middle-class, who made up the majority of the population. Sounds

reasonable, right? Well, not if you're a corporation. Not if you're a

super-rich guy who wants even more. So how can all that wealth be

transferred from the middle-class to the dirt rich? Let me count the ways!

 

Taxes: When a politician says, " I will cut your taxes, " what do you

say? " Hurray! Hurray! Thank you! Thank you! " Most likely. But then the

Bush tax cut, for example, primarily benefits those who make $200,000

a year, or more, much more, which is a very small segment of our

society. They are paying much less in taxes proportionally than the

middle-class and the poor. But, hey, that doesn't matter, as long as I

can save a few thousand or hundred dollars a year. Right? Well, no.

The reduction in taxes also means a reduction in social services, such

as education, road repair, health care coverage, police protection.

You will either have to go with less, or you will have to pay out of

pocket – which, I can guarantee you, will cost much more than the few

thousand or hundred dollars you saved.

 

But won't the rich also be going without these social services? Well,

yes, but they have more money to pay out of pocket. They have no

problem paying for the best healthcare, the best education for their

children. They can afford to live in gated communities, and hire their

own guards to protect their homes. Don't worry. They won't be lacking

anything. Plus, to the extent that they do enjoy public social

services, you can rest assured that they didn't have to pay for them.

The middle-class and the poor did. But then, perhaps the easiest way

for the rich to increase their wealth is simply not to pay taxes,

thanks to tax cuts and a variety of loopholes. The middle-class and

the poor will pick up the tab, come April 15.

 

No income tax: The federal government, of course, has an income tax,

but some states do not. Cool! Fewer taxes. But, no. When a state

doesn't have an income tax, it finds other ways to collect, especially

through the sales tax. But the sales tax isn't so bad, is it? The

trouble is that the wealthy spend much less of their income

proportionally than those who are barely getting by from paycheck to

paycheck. So the middle-class and the poor once again pay more in

taxes, proportionally, than the rich. Not bad if you a millionaire.

But kind of depressing if you're having a hard time buying clothes for

your kids and paying for their medications.

 

Corporate tax brakes: In the last 15 years, 65% of American

corporations have paid zero taxes. 95% have paid 5% or less, well

below the mandatory 35%. Corporations, therefore, barely pay taxes, if

at all. No taxes means greater profits – which means more money for

the wealthy CEOs, who then in turn pay little to no taxes themselves.

 

But, you might say, is this not illegal? I mean, won't the feds come

after you for tax evasion? Oh, but Republicans like to keep government

small and weak. Just make sure that the agency prosecuting tax evasion

is under-funded and under-staffed. That way they'll never catch up

with you. You can commit corporate crimes right outside their windows,

and they will not have the resources or the personnel to go after you.

That's what I can public service!

 

No more estate tax: The estate tax, renamed by the Republicans as the

" death tax, " had the goal of returning to the public at least a

portion of the immense fortunes accumulated by the extraordinarily

wealthy. The estate tax was not threatening the inheritance of farm

owners or small business owners. Instead, it helped to counteract, at

least to some extent, the aristocratic stratification of wealth in

American society. The elimination of the estate tax, one of the most

cherished victories of the Republican Party, has helped to make sure

that the rich can keep their wealth untouched for many generations to

come.

 

Military spending: Of all global military expenditures, the United

States spends 40%. Why does such a small percentage of the world's

population need so many weapons? The US already has the capability of

wiping all human life off the face of the earth several times over. So

why spend so much? Because the corporations associated with the

military make an incredible amount of money off of military spending.

 

War: War has several advantages. A lot of weaponry and ammunition get

used up, so the government has to buy more – from the corporations

profiting the most from the military. Also, deployment of troops and

combat require a long list of supplies, which the corporations are all

too happy to provide, for a handsome profit. One way to make a killing

is through no-bid contracts, which are given to the friends, that is

to say, the greatest campaign contributors, of the war-time

administration. Requesting bids for a contract is like shopping

around; you want to make sure that you get the best for your money.

But a no-bid contract simply accepts whatever terms the company in

question names, even if the price is outrageous. The company can

overcharge for anything, like $60 for a roll of duct-tape. No problem.

No questions asked.

 

Another way to cash in is through subcontracting. Remember that clip

in Fahrenheit 9/11? If the government pays you $1,000,000 for a

certain task, and you subcontract it to a smaller company, paying them

only $60,000 for that same task, you make a pretty nice profit. Is

this illegal? Is this war-time profiteering? No. It's just good business.

 

Oh, yes. Since it's usually the poor who do the serious combat, war

can also kill off a lot of the good-for-nothing riffraff in your

society. Thus, you reduce overpopulation, and you bring down the

number of people relying on social services. You save.

 

Slash veterans' benefits: If the rank-and-file soldiers do not die,

they can become a serious monetary burden, especially if they are

wounded. So slash their benefits. Close veterans' hospitals. Refuse

treatment when possible. That way, more of the war budget can go

toward making the war-friendly corporations rich.

 

The Federal Debt: Why is it good for the federal government to borrow

money? Because then we have a federal debt. The federal debt comes

with huge interest payments. We're talking hundreds of billions of

dollars. Where do the interest payments come from? From the taxpayers.

Who do the interest payments go to? To the debt holders. Who are the

debt holders? That's a good question. Much of the US debt is owned by

foreigners. But is it possible that somehow, in some way, the interest

payments on the debt find their way to the coffers of some of the

super-rich in our country? Is it possible that the national debt is

really a cleverly disguised form of wealth transfer from the middle

class to the extraordinarily wealthy of our nation? Just a thought…

 

But there is another good reason for the federal debt. You see, our

spending has gotten completely out of control. We cannot maintain all

this money being thrown about indefinitely. Sooner or later we must

reign things in – and start setting aside some cash to pay off the

debt. Which means that we'll have to work on austerity programs. Which

means that we have to cut out all the wasteful stuff from our budget.

Especially those pesky social programs. We can't afford them anymore!

Healthcare, schools, domestic violence prevention – we can't fund that

sort of stuff anymore. Of course, such austerity programs cannot

impinge on the military budget, because we are still under threat by

(name your favorite global evil-doer). Never mind that, as mentioned

before, our military spending is already 40% of all military spending

in the world, combined. That's barely enough!

 

Technology at public expense: The US has a long history of spending

public money to develop new technologies, and then handing each

technological achievement over to private corporations, allowing them

to reap all of the profits. The railroads, the air travel

infrastructure, computers, and the Internet are just some of the

examples. The public pays, while corporations get the trademarks, the

copyrights, the patents – and the big bucks. Not bad!

 

Bail-outs: When corporations fail or falter through mismanagement or

extravagant CEO remuneration, not to worry. The government will often

step in to bail them out, using taxpayers' money to help the companies

in question get back on their feet. Cool! This way CEO's can go

through all sorts of money, knowing that everyday taxpayers' will pick

up the slack later. Who said that welfare societies were bad?

 

Public buildings for private profit: Does the following scenario sound

familiar? A community raises taxes, often in the face of serious

objections, to build a sports field. When construction is complete,

the field is handed over to a company or a particularly wealthy

individual. The profits then go not to the community, but to the new

owner. Thanks, guys! That was so generous. Please keep working hard,

to keep corporate welfare chugging along just fine.

 

College loans: Three or four decades ago, a high school diploma was

often enough to secure a fairly well-paying job, one which could help

you raise a family. You probably know quite a few older men and women

who have done pretty well financially over time, but never went to

college. However, in today's world, a college diploma is essential for

even a moderately well-paying job. Furthermore, in many fields, a

simple BA is not sufficient; you need the MA, or even the PhD.

 

But this stuff is expensive. Sure, there are those who get fabulous,

full-ride scholarships, but their number is small. Most people have to

pay out of pocket. So, if you're not rich, you have to borrow. How

much? From $10,000 to about $60,000, or even more, depending on your

field, the school, and how far you want to go. Add to that compound

interest, and you are looking at paying about twice the amount that

you originally borrowed.

 

But not to worry. A good education guarantees that you'll have a high

paying job, right? Possibly, if you can get a job in the first place.

But a college loan will also guarantee that you'll be paying a good

chunk of your paycheck to your lender every month. Not bad for the

lender. Of course, the lenders' kids will never have to worry about

this sort of stuff. Their families are pretty well off, thanks to you.

 

Subsidized loans: Subsidized loans are cool. After the repayment

starts, you can return to school, put the load on hold (if you're

enrolled at least half-time), and no interest is collected. That's

wonderful! But does that mean that the company lending you the money

doesn't get any interest payments? No, that would be unfair. What it

means is that federal government picks up the tab, using taxpayers'

money. So, don't worry, the lender still gets rich. Thank God!

 

Insurance: Insurance companies love to collect your premiums, but they

don't like to pay out money. No, that would be bad for business. So,

after you have dutifully paid your premiums for years, if you actually

have to ask the company for some coverage, they might just raise your

fee. After all, they have to recover the cost of what they paid out to

you, so that your previous premiums can just be pure profit. And, if

you're too much trouble, if you are too needy, repeatedly applying for

coverage, they might just drop you. They like the customers who pay,

pay, and pay, but don't actually pester them for money.

 

More roads, more cars: European cities tend to have excellent public

transportation systems, allowing people to move to and fro without

much hassle, at low cost, often without even needing to own a car. But

that's socialism. Here in the States, we are more advanced. Only those

weird New Yorkers have the public transportation thing. The rest of

the country just builds more roads, which is great business for the

companies that make them. Then, to travel on the roads, we buy more

cars, which is great for the companies that make them. To fuel our

cars, we buy gas, gas, gas! That's wonderful for the tremendously rich

oil companies. What is more, car dealers tend to push the big,

gas-guzzling vehicles, not the puny little energy efficient ones,

which just reek of European socialistic notions. Cool! More oil profits.

 

All these companies might be found lobbying against the creation of an

efficient public transportation system. You see, that public

transportation business would just crash the great party they're

having. So, instead, let's continue with things as they are. Your tax

dollars pay for more roads. Your paycheck pays for the car you need –

and the gas you also need. And what else do you need to drive your

car? Insurance! Which brings us back to premiums…

 

Low pay: Paying employees can really cut into your profit. Plus there

are the socialist ideas, such as sick leave, vacation, mandatory

holidays, overtime, comp time. Yikes! Does the government not think

about your bottom line? I mean, you as an employer have a living to

make. In Europe, that den of socialism, the CEO of a company does not

make more than about 25 times what his lowest ranking employee makes.

But here, in the land of opportunity, a CEO can make over 400 times

what the little guy makes.

 

How? You know. For starters, you've gotta cut out ludicrous stuff like

vacations, sick time, family leave, and the like. Take away medical

benefits. Keep the pay as close to the minimum wage as possible. Lobby

like hell against raising the minimum wage. Ensure high turn-over in

your workforce, so that employees do not advance to higher pay

brackets and do not stick around long enough to unionize. Wage war on

unions. Union members are the socialist evil-doers who forced

companies to give in to all this bleeding heart stuff in the first

place. Fire anyone who tries to organize a union. Yes, that's illegal,

but don't worry. First of all, you can always come up with an excuse,

like she was five minutes late, or dropped something and broke it. But

what is even sweeter is that even if you give no excuse, the feds

won't come after you. The agency investigating wrongful union-related

firings is so under-funded and slow to work that you have very little

to worry about.

 

Also, lobby against the 40-hour work week. The President says it's

bad, so it must be bad. Pretty soon, Republicans will have it so

employers will no longer have to pay overtime if they force people to

work more than 40-hours per week. Way cool!

 

Plus, pay women less than men. Almost everywhere in our country, women

routinely make about 75% or less, often much less, of what equally

qualified and experienced men make. Let's keep things that way. Less

pay, more money in the bank.

 

So, aim high. Keep the profits in focus. To hell with the schmucks who

work for you.

 

Outsourcing: The problem with the US is that the minimum wage is far

too high. Plus, even after you've cut out all the namby-pamby,

socialist, pro-worker stuff you can, there are still far too many

labor-related rules and regulations to contend with – like safety

standards, and that sort of bleeding-heart, anti-business nonsense. Of

course, it's every capitalist's sacred duty to lobby against such

prohibitive restrictions. But in the meantime, you still have a

business to run and a profit to make.

 

What's the answer? Outsourcing. There are lots of countries in the

world that have not been infected with European socialism. Imagine a

place where you can set up a factory without environmental

regulations, without worker safety standards, without medical

benefits, days off, vacation time, overtime pay, and all that. Imagine

if you could pay your workers just 23 cents an hour, an extremely low

wage even by standards of the poorest countries. Surely, this is

paradise. You have died and gone to heaven.

 

But where do you find such a land flowing with milk and honey? Lots of

places in the third world, especially Latin America and Asia. In fact,

many third-world governments will vie with each other to offer you the

best business environment – that is to say, if you grease the pockets

of the corrupt leaders a little. A comparatively small payoff at the

top, and you've got a country at your disposal. Third-world workers,

here we come! Let's hope you don't get sick, or tired, or want to

celebrate family occasions, or wish to get away into the mountains for

a few days now and then. You'll be much too busy for all that. Give me

sixteen hours of your day, every day of the week, every week of the

year, and I'll be spending my time jetting around in the Bahamas,

enjoying the fruits of your hard work.

 

But, you might ask, why would anyone choose to work under such

conditions, when they get far less pay than they need to live on?

Easy. Let's just make sure that there is plenty of unemployment in the

country. Not hard to do. Just pull the right economic levers, and,

bingo, you've got a workforce eager for any work. Come on in. My

factory is waiting.

 

Slave labor: How did the American South of the 19th century come by

its fabled wealth? Easy – slavery. The trouble with most workers is

that you have to pay them. 23 cents an hour can add up after a while.

So, don't pay them. Of course, some would say that workers paid no

more than a few cents an hour are already slave laborers, but that's

just the socialist bleeding-hearts talking.

 

How can you have slave laborers? One of the easiest ways is to force

parents to bring their children with them to work. Don't pay the

child, and threaten to fire the parents if the child stays home. So

you get sixteen hours of unpaid work out of the kid. The parents win

because they don't have to worry about childcare while at the factory.

Plus, everyone wins because you don't have to spend money on schools.

 

Another way to have slave laborers is to employ illegal aliens in the

US. When it comes time to pay them, just call the feds on them, and

they'll be deported. They have no legal voice, so you don't have to

worry about any ramifications.

 

The stock market: Throughout the 90's the stock market went sky high.

The profits were amazing. All Americans were encouraged to invest, not

just their extra pennies, but their life savings and their retirement

funds. But the party had to come to an end. As the new millennium

began, the wealthy CEOs of companies quietly started dumping their

stocks. Then, when the big players had safely pulled their money out,

stocks started to plummet. The plunge was horrific. People throughout

America lost their investments, their savings – lost all their money.

But not the CEOs. They laughed all the way to the back, as they say.

Was this a conspiracy? No, how could you be so paranoid? It was just

bad luck.

 

Fashion: How long do clothes last? One year? Five years? Ten years? Do

you ever wear something from a previous decade? If not, why not?

Because you look stupid? Who says you look stupid? Oh, the fashion

police. Who are the fashion police? The people who make new clothes.

 

If well-made and well cared-for, a lot of clothes could last a long

time. But then we wouldn't be giving money to the clothes companies to

buy new outfits. Profits would be down. Bad. So why not just make

people believe that they must wear the newest clothes, or they'll look

like dorks.

 

Or take this example. A couple of decades ago, women in Eastern Europe

tended not to wear bras. Sometimes they did, but often they did not –

not because they were morally depraved, but because they usually felt

no need for them. Today, after over ten years of Western presence in

Eastern Europe, women wear bras. Why? Because bras are big business.

Make them fashionable, and the money starts rolling in.

 

Defrauding Women: Women are officially working now. They have been

doing the bulk of the work of civilization since the dawn of humanity,

but now it's official. They are actually working. That's good. Except

now you have to pay them. That's bad. Even if you give them less than

half of what an equally qualified and experienced man makes, that's

still money they get to keep. How can you get all that green stuff

back from them? Let's look at just two strategies.

 

1) No child care: Now that women are often outside the home, working

full-time, they need someone to watch their kids. Will husbands do it?

Probably not, especially if they are working. Will relatives do it?

Possibly, if they are available, but chances are, they are not. So

what about an affordable, universal child care system, underwritten

with federal funding, that would make it possible for any woman to

have someone watch her child when necessary. Oh, but that would be

another one of those wild-eyed ideas. That socialism thing again. Yikes!

 

Instead, let's keep child care private and expensive. That way, if a

mother wants to earn money, she can give it right back, to pay for

others to watch her kids while she's working. Excellent!

 

2) Clothes: Here is that fashion thing again. Men have to spend a lot

of money on clothes to remain fashionable. But women all the more so.

A man can wear the same suit, slacks, sweater, or whatever, over and

over again. But a woman must have a much more variable wardrobe to

display at work. Otherwise she might be considered slovenly. Bad for

her career! So, spend, spend, spend.

 

Subscriptions: What are some of the services you to? Phone?

Cell-phone? Internet? Cable? Let's say you pay $70 per month for

cable; $50, for Internet; and $80 for phone and cell-phone combined.

That's $200 a month, and $2400 a year. Wow! Do you take home at least

$2400 every month?

 

Of course, these are essential services, which you couldn't live

without. They might be. But the bottom line is that you are paying

perhaps as much as one whole month's paycheck toward your

subscriptions every year. Or, even if you make far more than $2400 a

month, you might be paying half of one whole month's paycheck for your

subscriptions. That's a lot, no matter how you look at it.

 

Christmas: I love Christmas. But let's face it. We have gone nuts with

this holiday. Many, many households spend far more on Christmas than

they can afford. They might save up during the year and then splurge.

They might take out credit card debt and then spend the rest of the

year struggling to pay it off. But it's worth it, isn't it? So what if

people forget what you gave them by Valentine's Day? That's over a

month of joy you've given them!

 

Eating and Dieting: Our society is saturated with high calorie foods.

If you are forced to eat out often, as you might be if you have a busy

life, it is very difficult to find meals that do not make you fat.

Americans are becoming overweight at an alarming rate. At the same

time, a nonstop barrage of media messages tells us that we must be as

fit as an Olympic athlete. So what's the solution? Many companies are

more than happy to sell you low cal food for an extra penny or two. Or

expensive dietary products. Not to mention the bonanza for the health

clubs where people can attempt to work off the extra calories. The

obesity epidemic is not bad. It's great business for the people who

sell the food – and for those who sell slim-down products and services.

 

Drug costs: Drug companies have some of the most fabulous profit

margins in the United States. We're talking up to 23%. So how come

people are not up at arms about the high cost of medications? Easy,

just convince them that pharmaceutical companies need all this extra

profit to do research for future drugs. Never mind that these immense

profit margins come after the cost of research has been factored in.

Shush! Don't let the public find out!

 

Buy and be happy: What could be worse than having a population content

with themselves and with the things they have? I mean, these people

wouldn't buy anything! What we need is an all-out assault of

advertising telling everyone that they are no good, cannot be good –

until they buy our product! You are not fit for this world without the

newest car. Your home is worthless without the latest dishwasher. You

will never have a good relationship without these clothes. Buy my

product and be happy. Of course, the beauty of this approach is that

they'll never be happy with just that product. But now that they are

conditioned to seek their happiness in shopping, they'll be back for

more. The cycle continues, and the merchants make out like bandits.

 

Built-in Obsolescence: The above principle is good, excellent, in

fact. But there are those who are not swayed by it. There are those

people in America who want to hold on to a product for several years,

perhaps even decades. They do not realize the financial damage they

are causing to corporations! But even these diehards can be dealt

with. What's the secret? Built-in obsolescence. Make a product so that

it can last only for just a few years. Then they'll have to buy the

new thing. Forget the old " built-to-last " motto. That was in the years

when merchants obviously were not interested in making money.

 

Changes in technology come in handy too. Just when you have finally

mastered the latest software, the latest gadget, the latest computer –

voila, it's obsolete. Buy the next one. And if you think that you're

VHS tape collection is pretty complete? Here come the DVDs – then,

after them, whatever is next. But first you'll have the chance to

create an extensive DVD library. Why not force people to buy the same

movie at least once a decade! The same goes for music of course.

Records, tapes, CDs, MP3 players. Cool!

 

Credit: Getting people to buy is good. But what's even better is to

get them to buy stuff they can't afford. Give'em plenty of credit!

Send credit offers even to two-year-olds. They'll be paying for the

product, plus for the interest on the credit, so, all-in-all, you can

get them to pay much more than they had bargained for. Sometimes much,

much more. And if they can't make the payments? All the better.

They'll have bad credit, which means that their credit rate will be

even higher in the future. So they'll be forced to pay an even higher

percentage.

 

Conclusion: Whew! Well, this has been quite a trip. Now you can see

how corporate America has solved the problem of too much middle-class

wealth in this nation. In just fifty years, they've made off with most

of the wealth of the middle-class. Not bad! But the game is not over yet.

 

 

Zoltan Abraham

http://home.earthlink.net/~zastar/index.html

progressive/

Kill your television!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...