Dems Pocket $52 Million, CNN Ignores Evidence, and Officials Stonewall...What V

[Guest guest]

A

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:31:24 -0500

What Vote Fraud?

 

 

 

 

It's the Media, Stupid!

 

 

 

http://www.BreakForNews.com/articles/WhatVoteFraud.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dems Pocket $52 Million,

CNN Ignores Evidence,

and Officials Stonewall...

What Vote Fraud?

 

by Bev Harris, BlackBoxVoting.org

in posts on Democratic Underground

 

BreakForNews.com , 24th Nov 2004

 

We saw Ukrainian presidential election coverage on CNN last night.

It was surreal They were saying that in the Ukraine elections aren't

transparent. 'Scuse me?

 

This, after CNN said they weren't interested in filming 59

orange-tagged records from Volusia, Florida showing that our elections

have not been at all transparent, and are missing one-third of the key

documents entirely. Psst. Don't look here. Look there.

 

The screen shots of the NETWORKED (!) Volusia County GEMS server

alone, along with the logs showing attempts to access it remotely ,

should have hit the national press.

 

According to a statement by the Supervisor of Elections on

November 17, 2004, the GEMS computer is not networked, and is " stand

alone. " The furnished computer logs show evidence of at least two

attempts to remotely access the GEMS central tabulator, which is

claimed to be secure. A computer screen shot printout on November 17,

2004 (found in the trash) shows that the GEMS computer at that time

had two networked hard drives.

 

I showed the logs to CNN cameramen yesterday, along with 59

orange-tagged poll tapes that were missing signatures, zero tapes,

sometimes missing results altogether! No interest in getting a shot of

that smoking gun at all.

We intereviewed poll workers. On camera. Showed them the poll

tapes we were given by Volusia County. To a person, they said, with

great concern, " That is NOT what we submitted to the county. "

 

One remembered the results on his poll tape. What he remembered,

before ever seeing the results tape or hearing what was on our copy,

was not the same. His memory for a precinct with a tad over 400 voters

had 60 more votes for Kerry. Of course, that's not legally binding,

since he hadn't written it down.

And don't forget that in Volusia, poll workers were told to bring

their memory cards and poll tapes off to 'drop offs' or 'depots', and

it was there that the modem- ing occurred. We have no information

whatsoever on who was in those depots, or what they were doing, or

what equipment was there.

 

Meahwhile a completely irresponsible Kerry Campaign holds on to a

$52 million litigation war chest accumulated from citizen donations

for that purpose.

If they were the slightest bit interested in either voting system

integrity or actually winning, they would have litigated the Black Box

Voting records requests to apply some real muscle into prompt

disclosure of audit materials, at least in Ohio and Florida. Failure

to comply with sunshine laws is against the law, yet a citizens group

like Black Box Voting cannot claim legal urgency, forcing immediate

compliance, in the same way that a campaign can. There is no question

that if the campaign had enforced the sunshine laws, analyzing the

audit data, two things would have happened:

1) records would have been produced

2) auditing would have been enabled, and we all know that would

have produced hard evidence of irregularities.

You have to wonder. The purpose of our audits is to get some real

answers, so we don't have to wonder any more.

 

 

We are a consumer protection group, not a political schmoozing

group. We are getting support from many elections officials who are

just as concerned as we are. Many officials are very accomodating and

their audit diagnostics check out.

Election officials only have to survive 10 days, or, in some

places, 20 days. That's all they have to stall. After that, wrong

results cannot result in candidates being removed from office unless

there is evidence that the candidate himself was involved in the

fraud. Of course, there will be insulation of the candidate, as this

stuff is performed by operatives, not candidates.

Public records laws are already sufficient, in most cases, but

need litigation and injunctions to back them up when public officials

don't comply. Stay tuned for actions shortly that will help put an end

to stonewalling.

Remember, some of the records we requested were already public on

election night -- such as the interim summary results reports and the

poll tapes. There is no reason whatsoever to withhold these.

Proving fraud after it is too late to put the wrongs right is just

not an option. It is a simple matter to put this right, but it

involves getting the audit diagnostics in a timely manner (by the way,

it is not just " Bev, " but a nationally recognized nonprofit 501c(3)

group).

 

Now, if the head of the League of Women Voters came in and asked

for records, are you saying it's just fine not to give them over until

it's too late?

Note also, that the lawsuit filed yesterday targets the supervisor

of elections position. Think carefully about the implications of this.

Patricia Northey was a candidate who had pledged to clean things up,

beginning with housecleaning a few employees who have been habitually

obstructive. She was favored to win. The candidate who in fact became

the new supervisor of elections was hand-picked by the current regime.

It isn't okay to wait until it's too late to put the right

candidates in, the ones people actually voted for. That includes local

as well as national races. And yes, it is now too late.

 

 

The Dems did nothing to help themselves, let me clarify. As a

nonpartisan nonprofit 501c(3), we cannot get involved in campaigns,

recounts and the like. However, by sending the records request to

every county in the nation, and publishing the exact documents needed

on the web site by midnight Nov. 2, this put ALL parties on notice

what was needed in order to properly audit.

We made ourselves available for consultation on exactly what

records to request and how to use them for auditing.

Other political parties have used information from our public

records request to set up their own recounts and audits. Citizens

groups have also done so on a local basis.

Therefore, the road map for the Kerry campaign was right there.

Though we could not accept, and they certainly did not offer,

assistence on securing our own request, they certainly should have

filed an identical request themselves, litigated and muscled counties

into compliance in Ohio and Florida, and it would have been easy for

them to get teams of computer people to examine the logs and teams of

auditors to match up the records. This all could have been done in a

matter of three days...at most, 5 days, with the muscle they had.

Instead, they rebuffed our attempts to provide expertise, advice,

or evidence, and they made no effort whatsoever to do any auditing at

all, nor even to obtain the records needed for simple, quick, diagnostics.

More recently, we have had overtures, but I admit I've been pretty

rude and completely without patience with them. Too late, and far too

little emphasis on what really needs to be done.

The Kerry attorney in Volusia, by the way, came by but asked not a

single question, never asked to look at any evidence, and told one of

the producers of Votergate that he thought Black Box Voting was just

here to " stir up trouble. "

We were very open about the problems we anticipated with this --

the Election Protection effort, which was admirable, was focused

solely on watching the casting of the vote, rather than the counting

of the vote. When concerned people with access to decisionmakers tried

to bring this huge ommission to the attention of people who could take

corrective action, they said they were not interested and, in some

cases, refused to even take the phone to talk with Black Box Voting.

After the election, everyone came to us asking what we can do.

Many people expected Black Box Voting, an organization held together

only by the grit of volunteers and the efforts of three full time

investigators and a board of directors, with a shoestring budget, to

overturn the national election. Not only was this the expectation

unrealistic (though our nonpartisan charter would prohibit us from

seeking a recount anyway), but the clock had already been run out.

 

 

 

There's a loophole that we'll need to get corrected in elections

law, because it is blocking reasonable efforts to audit, confirm, or

litigate elections in the U.S. In most states, you can't request a

recount or contest an election based on statistics. Even in Florida,

where statistical evidence is permitted, the use of statistics is iffy

in a court challenge. As soon as one expert sets it up, another can be

counted upon to knock it down.

Recently, for example, attorney Lowell Finley came to Florida to

pursue the option of contesting the Florida election. According to

Florida law, contesting the Kerry election in Florida would require

evidence that over 380,000 votes would be in doubt. Statistical

evidence cited 260,000 votes in question -- but that study, the

Berkeley study, is now being refuted by the Irvine study, and

likelihood of prevailing in court on back-and-forth statistics is

unlikely.

Even if that statistical information had been sufficient to prove

260,000 votes at risk, this would need to be supplemented by another

120,000 votes from other counties in the study. This kind of

information could have been available, had counties complied with the

Nov. 2 public records request filed by Black Box Voting.

Unfortunately, most counties did not comply in a timely manner, and

many refused to provide the information at all.

The audit data we obtained in Volusia County is another matter.

Here, we have established plenty of evidence sufficient to take an

election into contest. Volusia County, by itself, may have put some

30,000 presidential votes in question.

To get evidence comparable to what we have in Volusia County,

basic audit diagnostics must be provided by the county in a timely

manner. (To view the audit diagnostics we sent to every county in the

country on Nov. 2, just after the polls closed, go to

http://www.blackboxvoting.org and scroll down to an article titled

" Are we insane? Voting without auditing? " )

Now, here's the problem: All of the largest Florida counties

stalled the records request past the filing deadlines. Some did it

skillfully, by being out of the office, saying they didn't receive it,

saying people were out of town...some did it clumsily, telling us to

go jump in the lake.

The bottom line is: Most votes in Florida, and nearly all votes in

Ohio, could not be audited because the secretary of state (Ohio) or

the key county officials (Florida) would not part with the basic

public information needed to launch a proper audit. While we will get

the records, we will not get them in a timely manner.

This needs to be changed. Black Box Voting is in the process of

setting up voting machine citizen audit protocols, and we plan to

launch a major national citizen education effort to show people how to

do both diagnostic audits and fraud audits using the public records

tools available to all of us.

National elections cannot be compromised very easily without

problematic local officials. A true cleanup is going to have to take

place county by county, and we will need all of you to do it.

I know we have been slow to put some of our volunteers to work on

real auditing. That is because, if you don't know exactly what you're

doing, you'll get your butt kicked.

A citizen audit group is now working on Holmes County, Florida,

and of course Volusia is in full swing (I'm about to do another post

on the lawsuit filed yesterday requesting that the Volusia County

election be set aside).

This is a problem that can be solved, but we need more teeth in

legislation to require counties to produce audit materials immediately

after elections, so that citizens groups can have at least 7 days to

analyze the information and follow up on discrepancies and ommissions.

Right now, elections officials can stonewall and there are no

consequences, if they do it skillfully.

(For those who do it unskillfully, stay tuned. We aren't done with

'em.)

For those of you waiting on Ohio, it is certainly frustrating.

Kenneth Blackwell is certainly the 2004 equivalent of Katherine

Harris. He has set a state policy of obstructiveness, making it almost

impossible to get the kind of information needed to prove the counting

was correct.

Doing the auditing correctly, especially in coordination with

local citizens groups, can produce fireworks. Volusia County now has

its hands full.

 

We have consistently been ahead of the curve on this. We

identified the problems with voting machine reliability and

nontransparency way back in 2002; we have stressed since 2003 that the

problems are not just touch screens, but with all computerized

systems, including optical scans and punch cards, and we have focused

on auditing as the solution since mid-2003.

While everyone else was focusing on getting a " paper trail "

(without making any efforts to ensure that something meaningful was

done to USE the paper to audit), we were focusing on auditing

ommissions, both with the machines and with election procedures. While

40,000 people charged off to watch votes being cast, we published

guidelines to create human audit logs for the central tabulator, the

machine that COUNTS the votes.

In short, the time to set things up to contest this election on a

national basis was a few weeks BEFORE the election. No one in a

decisionmaking capacity bothered to do that, though we had been

publicly calling for this, even going to Washington D.C. in September

to meet with people and hold a press conference, in September.

Now, after the fact, people are realizing the mistakes.

1. Focusing on touch-screens and computer solutions, instead of

focusing on basic auditing and bookkeeping

2. Focusing on touch screen machines instead of the central

tabulator and the optical scans and punch card computers as well.

3. Failing to put any procedures in place to audit elections

properly on a county by county basis

And now, failing to use the legal muscle of the party to enforce

production of audit documents, and failure to do any auditing at all.

The result is that the American People are left with uncertainty

on a nationwide basis.

 

Stay tuned for an upcoming national conference which will be put

on by Black Box Voting, called " Help America Audit, " in which we will

teach citizens groups, political parties, candidates, and private

citizens how to conduct citizen audits of elections on a county by

county basis, the only method available to us, really.

 

Stay tuned, also, for an action we'll be taking soon to beef up

compliance with the public records requests needed for election auditing.

 

Bev Harris

Executive Director

Black Box Voting