Fw: Did Bush Lose the Election?

[Guest guest]

" georgewbush_is_a_moron " <georgewbush_is_a_moron

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:17:10 -0000

 

Subject:Re: Fw: Did Bush Lose the Election?

 

 

Yeah, Bush lost. He's a liar and a cheat, and he stole this

election. I hope he does does get kicked out of the White House.

Nothing would make me happier. I never wanted this stupid moron in

office to begin with. I voted for Gore in the 2000 election. Four

years of Bush was pretty horrible, but another four years of Bush is

intolerable.

 

 

 

anti_bush_2004 , " D. Cinelli " <d.cinelli@v...>

wrote:

>

>

>

> http://baltimorechronicle.com/112204MargieBurns.shtml

>

> COMMENTARY:

> Did Bush Lose the Election?

> by Margie Burns

>

> As things stand right now, it seems unlikely that Mr. Bush won the

election.

> There are two major categories of problems. One affects the

electoral vote. Release of the final exit polls conducted in all

states shows a pattern that cannot be explained away. The exit polls

were released (not to the general public) at 4:00 p.m. on Election

Day by polling consultants Edison Media Research and Mitofsky

International.

>

> These are the genuine exit polls for all 50 states and the

District of Columbia, taken before the outcome was known in any

particular state. These are not the " exit polls " that organizations

including CNN went back and retroactively changed after the

election, making them conform more to vote tallies.

>

> The exit poll results are laid out straightforwardly in a very

clear list (tabulation). Compared to the vote tallies given the

public, they seem amazing. Contrary to results in every election for

the past twenty years, the variance between exit polls the published

vote tally was more than two points--in other words a swing of 4% or

5% or more to Bush, in 33 of 51 jurisdictions. Regardless of which

candidate won in those states, a big variance, always in the same

direction, allegedly occurred in every single exit poll in all of

them.

>

> Exit polls from the next nine states down the list were also

reversed by a smaller swing toward Bush in the published vote tally,

including in the District of Columbia and Maryland. Thus, to sum up,

a four-out-five-state swing to Bush is alleged in an election where

every indication showed new voters, independent voters, and younger

voters trending toward Kerry and/or away from Bush, and in an

election where turnout increased, even though increased voter

turnout generally favors the challenger against the incumbent.

>

> Furthermore, this crucial swing occurred in all the close states:

Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio,

Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Iowa all allegedly had the same " red

shift. " Most seemingly shifted more than two points, in other words

a swing of 4% or 5%, regardless of the size or region of the state,

or whether it went for Bush or Kerry.

>

> A paper titled " The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy " has been

published by Dr. Steven F. Freeman, whose Ph.D. in organizational

studies came from MIT and who holds professorships at the University

of Pennsylvania and at an international MBA program founded by

Harvard. According to Professor Freeman, the swing between exit poll

and vote tally is an anomaly even if you take just the key

battleground states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida. " The

likelihood of any two of these statistical anomalies occurring

together is on the order of one-in-a-million, " he says. " The odds

against all three occurring together are 250 million to one. "

>

> See the rest of the story at

http://baltimorechronicle.com/112204MargieBurns.shtml

>

>

>

 

>

> " If all that Americans want is security, they can go to prison.

They'll have enough to eat, a bed and a roof over their heads. But

if an American wants to preserve his dignity and his equality as a

human being, he must not bow his neck to any dictatorial government. "

> - - Dwight D. Eisenhower

>

> " I'd rather be Don Quixote than another statistic. " - -Douglas L.

Wilson

>

> " To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or

that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only

unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American

public. "

> -- Theodore Roosevelt