Guest guest Posted November 17, 2004 Report Share Posted November 17, 2004 Yes, the system is working, but it is working for the drug companies and the AMA and against the consumers of allopathic treatment. SSRI-Research@ Tue, 16 Nov 2004 20:27:30 -0500 [sSRI-Research] US FDA: won't change system post-Vioxx [LatelineNews: 2004-11-16] http://dailynews.muzi.com/ll/english/1335796.shtml NEW YORK - U.S. health regulators see no need to tighten government safety standards despite the withdrawal of Merck & Co. Inc.'s arthritis drug Vioxx, a top Food and Drug Administration official told Reuters on Monday, saying current safeguards were working. Dr. Janet Woodcock, the FDA's acting deputy commissioner for operations, said the Vioxx recall was an isolated case and did not signal problems with the agency's safety monitoring or a cozy relationship with drug makers, as some critics have charged. " I don't think (Vioxx) teaches us a lot about other drug classes or raises alarms about the entire system, " Woodcock said at the Reuters Health Summit. Merck withdrew Vioxx in September after a study showed the painkiller doubled the chances of heart attacks and strokes. Signs of heart problems had been mounting for years, but Merck said earlier trials did not provide clear evidence of danger. The FDA concurred but asked Merck to further explore possible side effects, Woodcock said. Lawmakers and other critics say the FDA was too lax in monitoring Vioxx as well as antidepressants, which recently were shown to raise the risks of suicidal behavior in children and teenagers. Woodcock said both cases showed " the whole system is working. " In the case of Vioxx, she said the FDA asked Merck to study the drug's risks. An FDA reviewer was the first to spot a possible link between suicidal behavior and the depression drugs, Woodcock said. " We have safety standards for each class of drugs, and we should continue those, " Woodcock added. The FDA is taking a closer look at drugs like Vioxx in a class of medicines called COX-2 inhibitors. The agency also has ordered an external review of the way it monitors the safety of medicines after they hit the market. A Senate hearing on Thursday will further examine the FDA's handling of Vioxx, including charges that top officials pressured an FDA reviewer to soften his concerns about Vioxx's hazards. Woodcock said the FDA does not suppress its reviewers' findings, but it does aim to give the public a consistent message. " We completely dispute the idea that there's any suppression of reviewers, " she said. Officials have realized the public wants " more information, even though it might be preliminary, " Woodcock said. Legal restrictions often prevent the FDA from releasing confidential information, she said. But companies could register their clinical trials and post the results on a public database, she said. That would also allow the FDA to speak freely about the data, if the company made it public sooner, Woodcock added. Reuters http://latelinenews.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.