Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Draft Info.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:41:17 -0800 (PST)

D

Subject:Draft

 

The Draft that was defeated was the one introduced by Senator Charles

Rangel, and he didn't ever vote for his bill. Everyone knew that

proposal was going to be defeated.

 

There is a new Draft in the working and the age limit has been raised

from 18 to 44. The original Bush draft bill was 18 to 34, so he uped

it 10 more years. And there are 2 parts to the new Draft. One is a

skills draft and the other is a combat draft. The skills draft is

going to take place first. Persons from 18 to 44 will have to register

all their skills and newly aquired skills that they learn. This is

going to be mandatory. Anyone who does not register will subject to a

fine and or imprisonment for up to 5 years. That law has not changed

from the old draft. Also if you learn a new skill and fail to report

it to your local draft board you will subject to a fine and or

imprisonment. The prison camps are already exist and are just wiating

to be occupied.

 

Rangel's bill was H R 163. The new draft is much different.

 

You can read all about the new draft on this website.

 

http://blatanttruth.org just look for the links to the new draft and

it will explain everything you need to know much better than I can at

this time.

 

You are all corrrect in what you said. Bush said that he is reaching

out to the 55 million people who voted to get him out of the White

House must; have shaken him up considerably. He did not realize so

many people did not like him, but he knows now. He said he will work

with anyone who sees things his way. In other words if you don't see

things my way take a hike we don't want to talk to you.

 

I mentioned that some top level people are leaving his cabinet and

they are. They weren't as loyal as he expected them to be.

Condo-sleazy Rice must have screwed up somewhere for her to get fired.

Maybe hedged on a question she was asked when she should not have. But

all the interviews I saw with her; she lied for Bush very well.

Covered-up what needed to be covered-up. Hmm. So, I don't kow the

reason she's going.

 

Robert Novak from CNN said it best when he said, " Bush's 3.5

million-vote edge reflects a party out of touch with the county on

social issues, the role of government and the war against terrorism.

Democrats face the bitter reality of minority party status and what to

do about it. "

 

The entire south was once Democratic, but it has now become fully

Republican becuase of the issues of gay marriage, Pro-choice and any

other immoral thing you can think of. This is where Family values came

into play plus the far Christian right. If Bush had lost they would

have blamed Karl Rove for enlisting the far Christian right. The KKK

and WASP's are alive and well and living in the deep south...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...