Florida numbers vs 2000 - something is wrong

November 5, 2004

by BuckMulligan

Wed Nov 3rd, 2004 at 02:22:13 PST

2000 2004

Bush 2,912,790 Bush 3,836,216

Gore 2,912,253 Kerry 3,459,293

Nader 97,421 Nader 32,035

Other 40,193 Other 28,382

= 7,355,296 (2004) - 5,963,657 (2000) = 1,392,639 new voters (99%

precincts counted, no provisionals or absentees).

So, we have 1.39 million new voters, and Kerry loses by 376,923 votes?

Thus, he lost an overwhelming majoirty of them, or he lost an

overwhelming majority of regular voters - much, much more than Gore lost.

We have 77,197 fewer third party votes, but Kerry loses the vast

majority of these?

Exit polling numbers show that Kerry had more Hispanic and Cuban

support than Gore did, and Kerry lost?

Most exit polls in Florida showed Kerry leading, yet he loses by a

massive 5%?

Diaries :: BuckMulligan's diary ::

All this after an incredibly failed presidency?

After looking at these numbers, I can come to only one conclusion. The

Diebold machines were rigged.

There is no way provisional or absentee ballot are going to make up

the 376,923 votes - unless a LOT of people were challenged in the

urban areas and had to fill out provisionals.

These Florida numbers JUST DON'T MAKE SENSE!

Recommended Posts