Guest guest Posted October 27, 2004 Report Share Posted October 27, 2004 Vitamin D Deficiency Linked to Pain and Disability in Knee Osteoarthritis http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/491598?src=mp Jane Salodof MacNeil Oct. 19, 2004 (San Antonio) — Results from a 30-month study of 221 elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the knee suggest that remedying a vitamin D deficiency can reduce disability and possibly pain as well. David T. Felson, MD, MPH, from Boston University Medical Campus in Massachusetts, reported that patients with low baseline vitamin D levels had significantly more pain compared with patients with higher levels: 8.0 on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scale compared with 6.6 for patients with sufficient vitamin D levels (P < .0001). They also had significantly higher scores on the WOMAC disability scale: 26.9 vs 21.7 (P < .0001) but were not substantially weaker in tests of muscle strength. In patients whose low serum vitamin D levels showed correction over 30 months, disability scores improved significantly, from 26.9 to 21.8 (P = ..05). While trends toward reduced pain and weakness were also documented, they did not reach statistical significance. Dr. Felson urged physicians to look for and treat vitamin D deficiency in all elderly patients complaining of knee pain. " I may be right or wrong, but the vitamin D deficiency is a problem in those patients.... It needs to be replenished, " he said yesterday during a press conference at the 68th annual scientific meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. Patients in the study were an average age of 67 years and were recruited from the Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Center and surrounding community. Almost two thirds of patients were men. Nearly half (48%) had deficient baseline vitamin D levels defined as 20 ng/mL or less. Although vitamin D deficiency is believed to be more common in northern states where sunlight is less pronounced and the elderly spend less time out of doors, Dr. Felson advised that it should not be ignored in lower latitudes. " We're talking about everybody [age] 60 and over in the United States above the Mason-Dixon line and maybe even below the Mason-Dixon line. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is extremely high, " he told Medscape in an interview. Raising vitamin D levels is relatively easy, according to Dr. Felson. He recommended three methods: at least 800 international units of vitamin D (two 400 IU pills) in a daily vitamin supplement, drinking milk, and/or going out for up to 15 minutes of sun exposure a few times a week. Asked whether tanning was an option, he called the question a " provocative and controversial area " he would rather not explore. " There are very difficult issues of when sun exposure is enough to give vitamin D sufficiency and when it is too much, so that you put people at risk of getting cancer, " he said during the press briefing. Afterward, in the interview, he added the caveat that physicians should ask patients whether they have kidney stones or a history of kidney stones in their families, because high doses of vitamin D are thought to cause kidney stones, according to Dr. Felson. He also cautioned that vitamin D is not a panacea. " The effect of vitamin D on symptoms is relatively small, " he said. " This is not going to make someone with a lot of knee pain feel all better usually. It's a minor contributor, but it's such an easy correctible, it would be silly not to pursue [it]. " Press conference moderator Joseph Flood, MD, FACR, president of Musculoskeletal Medical Specialists Inc. in Columbus, Ohio, and a faculty member at Ohio State University, said the study adds weight to a small but growing number of reports supporting treatment of vitamin D deficiency in arthritis. " I think you should first ascertain whether [patients] have a problem with vitamin D — I do it, " he said. A practical problem, according to Dr. Flood, is that the cut-off for a low vitamin D level has not been agreed upon. The standard test uses a scale of 8 to 40 ng/mL. " I think [a patient's vitamin D level] should be at least 25, " he said. ACR 68th Annual Scientific Meeting: Abstract 1755. Press briefing held Oct. 18, 2004; presented Oct. 20, 2004. Reviewed by Gary D. Vogin, MD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.