New World ORder

October 15, 2004

-COMRADES, SEND THIS TO YOUR FRIENDS CURRENTLY PLANNING TO VOTE FOR THE 5TH

REIGHT (SP " )

REMORSEFULLY UPON WITNESSING THE DEATH OF AMERICAN LIBERTY & FREEDOM,

THIS IS NOT A JOKE. Dr. Sandra Lance, D.C.800 309 6560

(and when the election is over we need to " discuss " Alabama's Mental Health

(Thought Police SS) Officers "

-International Criminal Tribunal findings: George W. Bush guilty of war

crimes

-Now they're arresting entire platoons of guardsmen.

A 17-member Army Reserve platoon with troops from Jackson and around the

Southeast deployed to Iraq is under arrest for refusing a " suicide mission "

to deliver fuel, the troops' relatives said Thursday.

The soldiers refused an order on Wednesday to go to Taji, Iraq -- north of

Baghdad -- because their vehicles were considered " deadlined " or extremely

unsafe, said Patricia McCook of Jackson, wife of Sgt. Larry O. McCook.

-Bush To Screen Everyone For 'Mental Illness'

http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=57813;title=APFN

-How would you like to have the equivalent of a barcode built into

your arm?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3742684.stm

Security under the skin

By Sean Coughlan

BBC News Online Magazine

A US company has been given the green light to implant microchips in

humans. It's intended to provide medical information ... but will it

turn into a surveillance system?

How would you like to have the equivalent of a barcode built into

your arm?

It would be convenient. A quick scan could save the need to show

passports or ID cards. It would be handier than carrying cash or

producing medical records.

And a particularly clever barcode would let people find you if you

were lost or abducted.

Would it mean less hassle and more security? Or would it make you

feel like a DVD tagged in the supermarket? Or like a criminal being

monitored everywhere you went?

These are the questions being raised by the emergence of microchips

that can be implanted in people's arms - with the technology moving

from geeky future-gazing to a mainstream proposition.

VOTE

Would you want a chip in your arm?

Yes

For medical records only

No way

Results are indicative and may not reflect public opinion

This week, the United States Food and Drug Administration gave its

approval for an implantable chip which can be used for medical

purposes.

A microchip the size of a grain of rice can be inserted below the

skin - and will carry an individual's medical records which can be

read by a scanner.

The makers of the VeriChip say it will carry information that can

save a patient's life during an emergency - such as details of

medication, blood groups and allergies or if they have conditions

such as diabetes.

In the UK, the British Medical Association says that it would see no

ethical reason for not allowing such an implanted device, as long as

it was proven to be safe and there was no coercion.

Security device

But there are other applications which are likely to be more

contentious.

The implanted chip is about the size of a grain of rice

In a question and answer session, following the announcement of the

FDA's approval, the Florida-based company behind the chip, Applied

Digital, pointed to other commercial uses.

Security, which remains high on the US domestic agenda, is likely to

be a key area for such microchips - offering the chance both to

identify and track anyone carrying this type of implant.

Military bases, federal offices, prisons or nuclear plants were

mentioned as places where the technology could be applied.

These internal microchips would be checked to regulate entry to

secure locations. And once inside, scanners placed around the site

would precisely locate the movements of each individual.

There would be no passes, ID cards or dog-tags, because all the

information would be held on the chip lodged invisibly below the

skin.

If this sounds far-fetched, access to a high-security crime database

in Mexico is already being limited to the staff who have had a chip

implanted.

While there might still be consumer resistance to getting part of a

computer stuck in your arm - the underlying technology is already

moving from the laboratory into the High Street.

Pet theory

" Radio frequency identification " chips have been attached to

products in the supermarket to monitor shopping patterns.

Implanted chips could control entry to secure buildings

And in response to fears about child abductions, several schools in

Japan have experimented with tracking chips being put into pupils'

clothing.

Even if we don't want to put microchips into ourselves, we're not

squeamish about animals. Following the same basic principle, chips

have been injected into millions of pets and farm animals.

But there have been concerns about how such technology could be

abused and become a form of undisclosed surveillance, with movements

and activities electronically monitored.

Last week, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged lawmakers

in Virginia not to put such trackable chips into drivers' licences -

arguing that it would breach people's privacy.

Such devices would allow the authorities " to sweep up the identities

of everyone at a political meeting or protest march, " says the ACLU.

In considering the potential threat to civil liberties, the UK's

data watchdog, the Information Commissioner, says it is important to

look at the underlying principles, rather than only the technology.

Threats to privacy

And a spokesperson says that much of the capacity to track people

already exists - the question is how this information is used.

This " chipped " cat was registered in the US, but found in

Oxfordshire

If anyone wanted to introduce such a system into the UK, there would

need to be assurances that the information was not being used for

any purpose other than clearly declared.

The Information Commissioner's office pointed to the current example

of delivery drivers who are tracked using their mobile phones. This

is deemed acceptable, as long it is being used for very specific

business purposes.

But civil liberties campaigners, Liberty, warn that the arrival of

such tracking chips needs to be matched by a tougher legal framework

to protect people's privacy.

Spokesperson Barry Hugill says the law is lagging behind this

accelerating technology - and that more questions need to be asked

about how the information gathered will be used and protected.

" When the technology is so powerful it seems wrong that it should be

left to multi-nationals to decide how it should be controlled. "

Even though tracking chips are intended for legitimate commercial

purposes, there are concerns about how this detailed information

about people's movements could be collated and who might have

access.

In the wrong hands it would be the " stalkers' dream " , he says.

Please note my new e-mail address. Thank you. Dr. Sandra Lance, D.C.

Bush To Screen Everyone For 'Mental Illness'

http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?disc=149495;article=57813;title=APFN

Bush To Screen Everyone For 'Mental Illness'

All 'Disruptive' Children To Be Forcibly Medicated?

By Jeanne Lenzer

British Medical Journal

6-19-4

http://rense.com/general53/screen.htm

NEW YORK -- A sweeping mental health initiative will be unveiled by

President George W Bush in July. The plan promises to integrate mentally ill

patients fully into the community by providing " services in the community,

rather than institutions, " according to a March 2004 progress report

entitled New Freedom Initiative

(http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/newfreedom/toc-2004.html). While some

praise the plan's goals, others say it protects the profits of drug

companies at the expense of the public.

Bush established the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health in April 2002

to conduct a " comprehensive study of the United States mental health service

delivery system. " The commission issued its recommendations in July 2003.

Bush instructed more than 25 federal agencies to develop an implementation

plan based on those recommendations.

The president's commission found that " despite their prevalence, mental

disorders often go undiagnosed " and recommended comprehensive mental health

screening for " consumers of all ages, " including preschool children.

According to the commission, " Each year, young children are expelled from

preschools and childcare facilities for severely disruptive behaviours and

emotional disorders. " Schools, wrote the commission, are in a " key position "

to screen the 52 million students and 6 million adults who work at the

schools.

The commission also recommended " Linkage [of screening] with treatment and

supports " including " state-of-the-art treatments " using " specific

medications for specific conditions. " The commission commended the Texas

Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) as a " model " medication treatment plan

that " illustrates an evidence-based practice that results in better consumer

outcomes. "

Dr Darrel Regier, director of research at the American Psychiatric

Association (APA), lauded the president's initiative and the Texas project

model saying, " What's nice about TMAP is that this is a logical plan based

on efficacy data from clinical trials. "

He said the association has called for increased funding for

implementation of the overall plan.

But the Texas project, which promotes the use of newer, more expensive

antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs, sparked off controversy when Allen

Jones, an employee of the Pennsylvania Office of the Inspector General,

revealed that key officials with influence over the medication plan in his

state received money and perks from drug companies with a stake in the

medication algorithm (15 May, p1153). He was sacked this week for speaking

to the BMJ and the New York Times.

The Texas project started in 1995 as an alliance of individuals from the

pharmaceutical industry, the University of Texas, and the mental health and

corrections systems of Texas. The project was funded by a Robert Wood

Johnson grant - and by several drug companies.

Mr Jones told the BMJ that the same " political/pharmaceutical alliance "

that generated the Texas project was behind the recommendations of the New

Freedom Commission, which, according to his whistleblower report, were

" poised to consolidate the TMAP effort into a comprehensive national policy

to treat mental illness with expensive, patented medications of questionable

benefit and deadly side effects, and to force private insurers to pick up

more of the tab " (http://psychrights.org/Drugs/AllenJonesTMAPJanuary20.pdf).

Larry D Sasich, research associate with Public Citizen in Washington, DC,

told the BMJ that studies in both the United States and Great Britain

suggest that " using the older drugs first makes sense. There's nothing in

the labeling of the newer atypical antipsychotic drugs that suggests they

are superior in efficacy to haloperidol [an older " typical " antipsychotic].

There has to be an enormous amount of unnecessary expenditures for the newer

drugs. "

Olanzapine (trade name Zyprexa), one of the atypical antipsychotic drugs

recommended as a first line drug in the Texas algorithm, grossed $4.28bn

(£2.35bn; Euro3.56bn) worldwide in 2003 and is Eli Lilly's top selling drug.

A 2003 New York Times article by Gardiner Harris reported that 70% of

olanzapine sales are paid for by government agencies, such as Medicare and

Medicaid.

Eli Lilly, manufacturer of olanzapine, has multiple ties to the Bush

administration. George Bush Sr was a member of Lilly's board of directors

and Bush Jr appointed Lilly's chief executive officer, Sidney Taurel, to a

seat on the Homeland Security Council. Lilly made $1.6m in political

contributions in 2000ó82% of which went to Bush and the Republican Party.

Jones points out that the companies that helped to start up the Texas

project have been, and still are, big contributors to the election funds of

George W Bush. In addition, some members of the New Freedom Commission have

served on advisory boards for these same companies, while others have direct

ties to the Texas Medication Algorithm Project.

Bush was the governor of Texas during the development of the Texas

project, and, during his 2000 presidential campaign, he boasted of his

support for the project and the fact that the legislation he passed expanded

Medicaid coverage of psychotropic drugs.

Bush is the clear front runner when it comes to drug company

contributions. According to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP),

manufacturers of drugs and health products have contributed $764 274 to the

2004 Bush campaign through their political action committees and

employeesófar outstripping the $149 400 given to his chief rival, John

Kerry, by 26 April.

Drug companies have fared exceedingly well under the Bush administration,

according to the centre's spokesperson, Steven Weiss.

The commission's recommendation for increased screening has also been

questioned. Robert Whitaker, journalist and author of Mad in America, says

that while increased screening " may seem defensible, " it could also be seen

as " fishing for customers, " and that exorbitant spending on new drugs " robs

from other forms of care such as job training and shelter programmes. "

But Dr Graham Emslie, who helped develop the Texas project, defends

screening: " There are good data showing that if you identify kids at an

earlier age who are aggressive, you can intervene... and change their

trajectory. "

===============================================================

To those who have taken the Oath, Remember the Oath!

To those who have not and believe in the Constitution,

Take a similar Oath now to the Constitution!

Remember that those who make laws contrary to the Constitution,

Those who enforce laws contrary to the Constitution,

And those who give orders contrary to the Constitution,

Have become domestic enemies of the Constitution!

It doesn't take a Judge or a lawyer to know the difference!

" I DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR (OR AFFIRM) THAT I WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC;

THAT I WILL BEAR TRUE FAITH AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE SAME; AND THAT I WILL OBEY

THE (CONSTITUTIONAL AND LAWFUL) ORDERS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

AND THE (CONSTITUTIONAL AND LAWFUL) ORDERS OF THE OFFICERS APPOINTED OVER

ME, ACCORDING TO REGULATIONS AND THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. SO

HELP ME GOD. "

Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a

snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become

nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey. -- Pat Buchanan

Vote for Michael Peroutka,Constitution Party, for President

http://www.peroutka2004.com/

Want to be on our lists? Write at Molon4labe for a menu of our

lists

or for copy of Declaration of Independence, and Constitution

on MS Word! Write to same address to be off lists!

Bill's Memorial Page

http://www.geocities.com/wjpbr1/index.html

===============================================

Unclear Muqrin killed after beheading US hostage

Middle East Online, UK - 17 hours ago

... Following the lies... ... US Vice President Dick Cheney said after the

execution that the murderers " have no shame, not a shred of decency " and

vowed " America will ...

Saudis Search for Johnson's Body

Saturday, June 19, 2004

PHOTOS VIDEO PHOTO ESSAYS

Photo Essays:

.

Praying for Paul Johnson

.

The Paul Johnson Kidnapping

STORIES BACKGROUND

.

Al Qaeda Confirms Death of Al-Muqran

.

Johnson's Hometown Mourns Loss

.

World Leaders Condemn Killing

.

U.S. Workers Not Fleeing Saudi Arabia

.

Family: Johnson Loved Saudi Arabia

.

Saudi TV Shows Slain Terrorists

.

Web Site Denies Cell Leader Killed

.

Bush: U.S. Won't Be Intimidated by 'Extremist Thugs'

.

Fast Facts: Recent U.S. Hostages

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Saudi security agents searched homes in the capital

and surrounding deserts Saturday for the body of slain American hostage Paul

M. Johnson Jr. (search), while Saudi officials hailed as a victory their

slaying of his executioner, the top Al Qaeda figure in the kingdom.

The Order of the Skull and Bones

Everything you always wanted to know, but were afraid to ask.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/Skull_ & _Bones.htm

2=War Crimes+Military Civil Disobedience

THIS E-MAIL CONTAINS 2 E-MAILS-BUSH AS WAR CRIMINAL + AMERICAN SOLDIERS

" JUSTIFIED "

DOES ANYONE HAVE A WAY TO GET THIS INTERNATION CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL TO THE

WIVES?

In the final findings, the court said: " The Defendant [George Walker Bush]

is a convicted war criminal consequently unfit to hold public office ;

citizens ,soldiers and all civil personnel of the United States would be

constitutionally and otherwise , justified in withdrawing all co-operation

from the Defendant and his government ; and in declining to obey illegal

orders of the Defendant and his administration ;including military orders

threatening other nations or the people of the United States on the basis of

the Nuremberg Principle, that illegal orders of Superior must not be

obeyed " .

Michael Berglin

George W. Bush guilty of war crimes

Thu Sep 23, 2004 17:50

64.140.158.5

International Criminal Tribunal findings: George W. Bush guilty of war

crimes

EXCERPT:

The court has also introduced a new word into the vocabulary of court

proceedings and that is: " omnicide " - in relationship to the US's use of

depleted uranium that retains it's radioactive threat for approximately 4.5

billion years. Not only are the present victims of American hostilities

directly suffering the after effects of radioactive poisoning, but future

generations will suffer equally.

------------ article follows:

09/22/2004 01:47

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Afghanistan-Criminal-Tribunal10mar04.htm

In the final opinion of the court, Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, rules against

Bush.

Citing: George Walker Bush, President of the United States and

Commander -in-Chief of US military forces for serious crimes ; waging a war

of aggression on Afghanistan, war crimes and crimes against humanity against

the Afghan people, against prisoners of war ; and the use of radioactive

depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction , against the people of

Afghanistan ; with serious fall out effects on the military personnel of the

United States ,UK and other forces deployed ; and on countries, in and

around the region.

In a court action not seen since Nuremburg, 1946, the court issued its

ruling in no uncertain terms that the US has used weapons of mass

destruction, protracting an illegal military conflict, and crimes against

humanity. Very serious allegations indeed.

The entire ruling can be found at:

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Afghanistan-Criminal-Tribunal10mar04.htm.

Bush has never acknowledged this ruling, nor was the American people ever

informed of it. Is the concealment an effort by Bush to keep the American

people in the dark about what is really happening in the world?