Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: PATRIOT ACT II IN ALL ITS NAMES AND GUISES

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

d

Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:35

Fwd: PATRIOT ACT II IN ALL ITS NAMES AND GUISES

 

 

9/11 Review

PatriotAct2

PATRIOT ACT II IN ALL ITS NAMES AND GUISES

 

 

 

 

What was previously known as the Patriot Act 2, is now being passed

stealthily under the guise of implmenting the 9/11 Ommission's findings.

 

[WWW]Civil Liberties in Grave Danger; Friends Committee for National

Legislation in DC

 

Scenario: A lengthy, complex, and confusing bill is introduced

in response to public pressure for improved national security.

Congressional leaders warn that the legislation is the only way to

protect against terrorism and that it must be passed within days. The

measure does include some provisions addressing national security, but

it is loaded with, or amended by, sections that severely reduce

precious constitutional protections. Changes to the legislation occur

rapidly behind closed doors without public knowledge, discussion, or

input. Both houses of Congress are under intense leadership and

political pressure for quick and decisive passage of the bill. Sound

familiar? Sound like the USA PATRIOT Act, passed in the fall of 2001?

Yes, it does. But this terrible scenario is being repeated this week

in Washington, D.C. ...

 

 

 

Some of the legislative measures and amendments, particularly S.

2845, a measure introduced in the Senate by Sen. Collins (ME) and Sen.

Lieberman (CT), have been bi-partisan efforts, carefully drafted to

respond to the commission's recommendations. Others, most dramatically

HR 10, introduced by Speaker Hastert (IL) in the House, and amendments

to S. 2845 introduced by Sen. Kyl (AZ) in the Senate, do not follow

the 9/11 Commission's recommendations about security and are freighted

with provisions that diminish civil liberties protections.

 

Taken together, these provisions include (but are not limited to):

 

o establishment of a national ID card, disguised as national

standardization of drivers licensing;

o

o establishment of a national electronic database for birth

and death certificates, with permanent identifying information

assigned to each individual, such as a national ID number;

o

o biometric identifiers - including fingerprints, face

recognition software photos, iris or retinal scans, and other private

physical identification - for travel documents which would be used for

security in domestic air travel as well as overseas travel;

o

o expanded secret eavesdropping and search powers to be used

against individuals suspected of terrorist activity, whether or not

the individual is associated with a foreign power;

o

o further weakening of individual privacy rights in library,

medical, and other personal records, removing all federal court oversight;

o

o enhanced " material support " provisions, allowing guilt by

association with a group targeted by the administration; removal of

habeas corpus relief for those detained under repressive immigration

measures;

o

o approval of automatic detention without bail in

immigration matters at the government's request;

o

o increased secrecy in immigration court matters;

o approval of the use of secret evidence in immigration

courts - secret even to the immigrant being examined;

o

o deportation of immigrants before final appeal;

o allowing the death penalty in terrorism cases (with

" terrorism " as defined in the USA PATRIOT Act);

o

o explicit approval of transfer of prisoners suspected of

terrorism to nations known to practice torture; and

o

o failure to provide for a cross-agency civil liberties

board for oversight and investigation of civil liberties practices and

procedures in the executive branch of the federal government.

o

 

The message to Congress should be straightforward: Legislation

responding to The 9/11 Commission Report must be limited to the core

recommendations of the report. All extraneous law enforcement and

immigration provisions must be stripped from any such legislation

prior to final passage by the House and the Senate.

 

 

 

The Patriot Act trashes precious constitutional protections but the

follow-up laws being drafted goes even further. These are comments on

what was previously known as the Patriot Act 2, but are now being

passed stealthily under the guise of implmenting the 9/11 Omission's

findings.

 

[WWW]Justice Dept. Drafts Sweeping Expansion of Anti-Terrorism Act

Center for Public Integrity Report - Feb. 7, 2003.

 

The Bush Administration is preparing a bold, comprehensive

sequel to the USA Patriot Act that will give the government broad,

sweeping new powers to increase domestic intelligence-gathering,

surveillance and law enforcement prerogatives, and simultaneously

decrease judicial review and public access to information. The Center

for Public Integrity has obtained a draft, dated January 9, 2003, of

this previously undisclosed legislation and is making it available in

full text. The bill, drafted by the staff of Attorney General John

Ashcroft and entitled the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003,

has not been officially released by the Department of Justice,

although rumors of its development have circulated around the Capitol.

 

Dr. David Cole, Georgetown University Law professor and author

of Terrorism and the Constitution, reviewed the draft legislation at

the request of the Center, and said that the legislation " raises a lot

of serious concerns. It's troubling that they have gotten this far

along and they've been telling people there is nothing in the works. "

This proposed law, he added, " would radically expand law enforcement

and intelligence gathering authorities, reduce or eliminate judicial

oversight over surveillance, authorize secret arrests, create a DNA

database based on unchecked executive 'suspicion,' create new death

penalties, and even seek to take American citizenship away from

persons who belong to or support disfavored political groups. "

 

 

 

[WWW]Patriot Act II Versus United States Constitution by James P.

Tucker Jr.

 

Attorney General John Ashcroft, with the blessings of President

Bush, is drafting a follow-up to the Patriot Act that would do even

more violence to the Constitution.

 

The 80-page Justice Department draft of the Domestic Security

Enhancement Act of 2003 is labeled " confidential " but a copy was

obtained by the Center for Public Integrity,

 

The Justice Department went to extreme lengths to hide its work,

although the draft legislation is not classified information.

 

Viet Dinh, deputy attorney general for legal policies and

principle author of the Patriot Act, said there is " an ongoing process

to continue evaluating and re-evaluating authorities we have with

respect to counter-terrorism. "

 

While the draft is dated Jan. 9, the House and Senate Judiciary

committees were falsely told nearly a month later that no such

legislation was being planned. When the center acquired and shared a

copy of the draft, Barbara Comstock of the Justice Department

explained lamely that they had " not presented any final proposal. "

 

Under Section 201, a federal court decision requiring the

government to reveal the identities of people it has detained since

the 9-11 terrorist attacks can be overturned. The draft reads:

 

" The government need not disclose information about individuals

detained in investigations of terrorism until . . . the initiation of

criminal charges " --no matter how long it takes.

 

If passed by Congress, it would be the first time in history

that secret arrests are specifically permitted under American law.

 

Under Section 501, an American citizen who provides " material

support " to a group the government has designated a " terrorist

organization " can be stripped of his citizenship. Now, an American can

lose his citizenship only by declaring a clear intent to abandon his

country.

 

The proposed bill says an " intent to relinquish nationality need

not be manifested in words, but can be inferred from conduct. " It is

unclear which bureaucrats would do the " inferring. "

 

" This section of the bill means that if you were to send a check

for the legal activities of an organization and, unbeknownst to you,

it has been labeled as a terrorist group, then you could be deported, "

wrote syndicated columnist Nat Hentoff.

 

" Deportations of American citizens are not `phantoms of lost

liberty,' " Hentoff wrote, referring to an Ashcroft comment that his

critics are scaring " peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty. "

 

Under existing law, the FBI can collect DNA identification

records of persons convicted of various crimes. But under Section 302

of the draft proposal, the attorney general or secretary of defense

would be empowered to collect, analyze and maintain DNA samples of

" suspected " terrorists.

 

All Americans would be in jeopardy as faceless bureaucrats label

groups " terrorists " and grab citizens who may have the slightest

association with a labeled group, according to Dr. David Cole, a law

professor at Georgetown University in Washington.

 

The proposed law " would radically expand law enforcement and

intelligence-gathering authorities, reduce or eliminate judicial

oversight over surveillance, authorize secret arrests, create a DNA

database on unchecked executive `suspicion,' create new death

penalties and even seek to take American citizenship away from persons

who belong to or support disfavored political groups, " Cole said.

 

Many rational observers predict that President Bush's planned

attack on Iraq will result in a dramatic increase in terrorist crimes

in America. This, in turn, will provide Congress with a plausible

excuse for additional legislation to " combat terrorism. "

 

 

 

(!) See our pages: CanadasPatriotAct3 and TotalInformationAwareness.

 

Links:

 

* [WWW]Patriot Act II: Final Piece of Police State Puzzle Ready By

John Tiffany

* [WWW]'Big Brother' House Bill Morphs 911 Advice

* [WWW]House 911 Bill Creates Database On All American And A

National ID Card

* [WWW]With A Whisper, Not A Bang By David Martin, December 24,

2003. Bush signs parts of Patriot Act II into law - stealthily.

* [WWW]U.S. Patriot Act raises Canadian privacy fears Reuters, 29

Sep 2004.

* [WWW]RED ALERT - Dagger at Democracy

* [WWW]Federal Court Strikes Down Patriot Act Surveillance Power

As Unconstitutional September 29, 2004.

* [WWW]Infowars.com -- Talk Radio's Alex Jones v. the New World Order

* [WWW]News Alert! The Secret Patriot Act II Destroys What Is Left

of American Liberty

* http://www.stopthepatriotact.org

* [WWW]The USA PATRIOT Act: What's So Patriotic About Trampling on

the Bill of Rights? by Nancy Chang, Center for Constitutional Rights,

November 2001.

* http://www.sevenstories.com/book/index.cfm/GCOI/58322100208840

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...