Guest guest Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 " HSI - Jenny Thompson " <HSIResearch Trading Spaces Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:38:24 -0400 Trading Spaces Health Sciences Institute e-Alert October 06, 2004 ************************************************************** Dear Reader, Move over, USDA Food Guide Pyramid. There's a new pyramid in town. That's right. While a select panel of nutritionists busy themselves with the finishing touches on the USDA's revised dietary guidelines (due to be revealed next January), someone has already beaten them to the punch with a food guide pyramid that actually makes good nutritional sense. And more importantly, it was created without the input of powerful food lobbies. Imagine that. But before we take a look at this alternate pyramid, I'll tell you about a recent study that offers some basic and useful nutritional advice for type 2 diabetics and anyone who would like to avoid type 2 diabetes. And coincidentally, the new pyramid serves as a handy companion to the nutritional guidance this study offers. --------------------------- Potatoes panned --------------------------- For many HSI members, the " news " that a low-carbohydrate diet may help type 2 diabetics manage blood sugar levels won't be news at all. Nevertheless, there are many who are still not aware of this important information. Any diabetic who consults the dietary advice on the web site for the American Diabetes Association (ADA) will find good general advice mixed in with some very questionable carbohydrate advice. For instance, the ADA advises diabetics to eat more starches (such as potatoes), without making the extremely important distinction between refined and unrefined starches. And nearly all our starches today are refined! According to HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D., it's very difficult (if not impossible) to find 100% unrefined pastas, breads or cereals. In the e-Alert " Complex Made Simple " (6/23/04), Dr. Spreen explained that nutrients and fiber are often stripped from starches during food processing. Without those two important elements, the sugars become as concentrated as simple, refined carbs, which diabetics should strictly avoid. And potatoes? Here's Dr. Spreen's take on spuds: " The baked potato is as close to a pure, refined starch as you can get without actually refining it. " --------------------------- In the BAG --------------------------- The new diabetic dietary research comes from the Metabolic Research Laboratory at the VA Medical Center in Minneapolis. Researchers designed a high-protein/low-carb diet they call LoBAG (low-biologically-available glucose) that breaks down like this: 20 percent carbs, 30 percent protein, 50 percent fat. As reported in the journal Diabetes, eight subjects with untreated type 2 diabetes began the test by first eating a high-carb diet (55 percent carbs, 15 percent protein, and 30 percent fat) for five weeks. After this first phase, subjects returned to their normal diets for five weeks, and then began five weeks on the LoBAG diet. The average 24-hour glucose levels were tracked throughout, as were the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) percentages, which measure the severity of hyperglycemia. The result: With the LoBAG diet, circulating glucose concentration was reduced " dramatically. " And the authors of the report add, " Potentially, this could be a patient-empowering way to ameliorate hyperglycemia without pharmacological intervention. " --------------------------- Bottom to top --------------------------- Now to the pyramid. The American Diabetes Association actually has a copy of the USDA pyramid posted on its web site. At the base: plenty of bread, cereal, rice and pasta, eat all you want. At the apex: fats and oils, to be used sparingly. In other words, the ADA is recommending a diet that is nearly the opposite of the LoBAG diet. When the new USDA dietary guidelines are announced next January, we may find that the pyramid has been scrapped in favor of some other graphic metaphor. Which would be just fine, because we now have a much more sensible pyramid to guide food choices, courtesy of the faculty of the Harvard School of Public Health. The Harvard faculty members call their structure the Healthy Eating Pyramid, and here are some of the key ways it contradicts the USDA structure: * At the base: Daily exercise and weight control. (Not a dietary suggestion, but good advice, especially for diabetics) * At the cap: Foods to use sparingly include potatoes, pasta, white rice and white bread * Plant oils: Near the bottom instead of the top Perhaps the most surprising item on this pyramid is the suggestion to take a multi-vitamin, as well as a calcium supplement. I would have added a few more supplements to that list (vitamins C and E, along with some fish oil, just to get started), but the fact that supplements made the list at all is impressive. I don't agree with everything on the Harvard pyramid. For instance, I'd lose the recommendation to use soy and canola oils, and I don't think red meat and butter belong in the " use sparingly " category. But this pyramid has one very important advantage over the USDA pyramid. Using the current USDA guide, you could actually harm your health, especially if you're diabetic. But no more. Bring in the LoBAG renovating crew. Save the genuine whole grains, and then trade the space where fats used to be for rice and pasta and potatoes. ************************************************************** ....and another thing It was the summer of 2002, and the world was a simpler, more trusting place. Way back then, in the e-Alert " Greasing the Skids " (9/9/02), I told you about an announcement from representatives of McDonald's. It was about a new oil to be used for deep frying that would reduce saturated fat by 16 percent, while nearly cutting the content of trans-fatty acids in half. As you may recall, trans-fats are created by the hydrogenation of vegetable oil - a process that gives the oil a longer shelf life and makes it less greasy. But studies have shown trans-fatty acids to be associated with artery damage and a high risk of heart disease. When the McDonald's reps made the announcement about the new oil, the plan was to phase it in over a few months. By February 2003 the phase-in would be complete, and diners would be enjoying fried foods with a somewhat lower risk of heart disease. But then February 2003 came and went, and then February 2004 came and went, and still the new oil had not been phased in. Now – more than 20 months after the target date – the new oil is a no-show and partially hydrogenated oil (PHO) is still used by all U.S. McDonald's. And this has some folks very upset. A California organization called BanTransFat.com, Inc. has launched a lawsuit against McDonald's for not following through on the oil change. And the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI; a nutrition and food-safety watchdog group) recently ran a full-page ad in the New York Times calling for McDonald's to stop using PHO. The motives of CSPI and BanTransFat are basically good: they want to educate and protect consumers. But how much less damage will actually be done to consumer health with the new oil that would only cut trans-fats in half? In the e-Alert " The New Big Oil " (8/20/02) I told you about a National Academy of Sciences report that attempted to set a safe intake level for trans-fatty acids. The report concluded with this recommendation: " The only safe intake of trans-fat is zero. " Not much ambiguity there. If you smoke two packs of cigarettes a day, you could make a case that smoking one pack is healthier. But you would still be a long long way from healthy. In the case of eating McDonald's food cooked in oil with half the trans-fats, you're still ingesting trans- fats, but on top of it you're eating food whose nutritional value is questionable at the very BEST. The efforts of CSPI and BanTransFat to bring the public's attention to this matter is useful in letting people know that there are grave dangers in diets that include lots of fast foods. But to think that McDonald's new oil might actually make the food any more than just marginally healthier is a super sized misconception. To Your Good Health, Jenny Thompson Health Sciences Institute ************************************************************** Sources: " Effect of a High-Protein, Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Blood Glucose Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes " Diabetes, Vol. 53, No. 9, September 2004, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov " Low-Carb Diet Improves Sugar Control in Diabetics " Reuters Health, 9/23/04, reutershealth.com " Food Pyramids – What Should You Really Eat? " Harvard School of Public Health, hsph.Harvard.edu/nutritionsource/pyramids " McDonald's Panned for 'Broken McPromose' on Trans Fat " Center for Science in the Public Interest, 9/24/04, cspinet.org " Frequently Asked Questions About McDonald's Food & Nutrition " McDonalds.com Copyright ©1997-2004 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C. The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without written permission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.