Guest guest Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:06:09 GMT " BushGreenwatch " <info Coalition Sues Administration for Illegal Change to Pesticide Reviews October 5, 2004 | Coalition Sues Administration for Illegal Change to Pesticide Reviews A coalition of fishing and conservation groups has challenged a recent administration regulatory change that significantly weakens protections for endangered species. The coalition's lawsuit charges the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), as well as their parent agencies, with violating the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by delegating their authority to offer scientific opinions on pesticide impacts to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA is responsible for reviewing and approving pesticides. The Bush administration claims the rule change will " streamline " the pesticide review and approval process. But conservationists note that such " streamlining " is actually a way for the administration to evade its responsibility to protect endangered animals and plants. The new regulation, announced in late July, allows EPA to approve pesticides without consulting the two services to determine possible harm to wildlife. As reported by BushGreenwatch, EPA changed the rule following a successful suit against the agency by the environmental advocacy group Earthjustice. In that case, the court found that EPA had to complete required consultations with the NFMS on how pesticide uses would affect threatened and endangered Pacific coast salmon. " The Act requires the services to play that role because they have the best scientific information about the needs of the species, " said Patti Goldman, an attorney with Earthjustice, which is representing the coalition in the new lawsuit. " They list the species, designate their critical habitat, develop recovery plans, and consult on all the other activities, " she said. " And, they serve as an independent check on agencies like EPA. " David Wright, a conservation biologist who formerly worked for FWS, says the EPA is the wrong agency to handle the assessments. " A scientist always likes to look at the data. And the data on EPA's treatment of endangered species is very poor, " Wright told BushGreenwatch. " Why would you turn over these kinds of assessments--about whether or not a pesticide is going to affect endangered species--to an agency that has a track record of failing to determine that pesticides were going to have bad effects, when in fact they do? " Wright said it is a significant conflict of interest for EPA to conduct the wildlife assessments, when the agency also approves 20 to 30 pesticides every year, as well as over 300 pesticide products or uses. Earthjustice's Goldman noted that because the new regulation weakens the ESA's pesticide review process, farm worker health and safety are also at greater risk, because the standards under the ESA are stronger than the standards for agriculture. Under current laws regulating pesticide use in agriculture, " EPA can allow pesticide uses as long there isn't an unreasonable adverse health or environmental effect, " said Goldman, " but then it balances those risks against the benefit of the pesticide to crop production. " EPA may then approve a pesticide if the cost of rejecting it is considered too high. As reported by BushGreenwatch, 14 chemical companies were heavily involved in writing the new rule. However, the Bush administration was not required to release records of those meetings to the public. " We sued to try to get them...we asserted that this body was acting as a federal advisory committee, " Goldman told BushGreenwatch. But the district judge in the case ruled that because the administration had not formally invited the industry to advise it, no disclosure was required. ### SOURCES: " Government Rule Cutting Wildlife Experts out of Pesticide Reviews Illegal, Says Coalition of Conservation and Fishing Groups, " Earthjustice press release, Sept. 23, 2004. Spread the Word | Back Issues BushGreenwatch | 1320 18th Street NW 5th Floor Washington, DC 20036 | (202) 463-6670 Web site comments: info Copyright 2003 Environmental Media Services Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.