Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Smoke and Mirrors

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

" HSI - Jenny Thompson " <HSIResearch

 

 

Smoke and Mirrors

Tue, 05 Oct 2004 08:49:43 -0400

 

Smoke and Mirrors

 

Health Sciences Institute e-Alert

 

October 05, 2004

 

**************************************************************

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

Turn on the smoke and bring in the mirrors...

 

It must have made for a bummer of a Friday happy hour. On

Friday, September 24th, an e-mail was sent out to all National

Institutes of Health (NIH) employees announcing a proposed

moratorium that would ban as many as 5,000 NIH scientists from

accepting any consulting money from drug companies for at least a

year.

 

Impressive! It seems like NIH administrators are getting tough on

the unseemly cash-cow cahoots between researchers and the

companies that develop drugs that are studied by those researchers.

But let's take a peek between the lines for a reality check.

 

---------------------------

Moving at the speed of bureaucracy

---------------------------

 

In the e-Alert " Back to the Island " (12/29/03), I told you about a

five-year investigation into the inner workings of the NIH by

David Willman, a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter for the Los

Angeles Times. Mr. Willman's painstaking reporting revealed that

more than $2.5 million of drug company consulting fees had been

paid to top NIH officials and scientists who oversee the clinical

trials of drugs.

 

Uh oh. Not great news if you're an NIH honcho.

 

In his investigation, Mr. Willman found a 1998 legal opinion that

provides a loophole by which more than 90 percent of NIH

officials are allowed to keep their consulting income confidential.

A pretty sweet deal... until Congress got wind of it.

 

This past June, NIH director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., told a

Congressional committee that he had finally seen the light! His

conclusion: The NIH ethics rules and procedures needed " drastic

changes. "

 

So here's the timeline:

 

* December 2003: The LA Times drops the bomb and reveals all

* June 2004: Dr. Zerhouni confirms that the situation needs drastic

changes

* September 2004: NIH proposes a moratorium on drug company

consulting fees

 

Things aren't moving along too swiftly, are they? Well, this is,

after all, a huge bureaucracy. It's easier for an ocean liner to make

a u-turn than it is for a " national institute " to revise a key policy.

Especially a beloved policy that's responsible for millions of

dollars in perks.

 

---------------------------

That was then...

---------------------------

 

But things are moving along now, right?

 

Well... sort of. Notice that the moratorium is a " proposed "

moratorium. Which means that before it can go into effect, it

requires the approval of Tommy G. Thompson, secretary of the

Department of Health and Human Services, AND the approval of

the Office of Government Ethics (OGE). So now we've got

THREE different bureaucracies involved. That ought to speed

things up!

 

But here's the best part: Information about the proposed

moratorium went out to NIH employees and the press on 9/24. And

when was the proposal delivered to Secretary Thompson and the

OGE? According to The Scientist magazine, as of 9/24, " NIH had

not submitted the proposal, officials said, and no date for doing so

had been established. "

 

These guys are something, aren't they?

 

In his 9/24 e-mail, Dr. Zerhouni stated, " We have identified

vulnerabilities in our system that give us pause. " The key word

here: " pause. " Those vulnerabilities didn't make them stop. Nope.

They're pausing.

 

---------------------------

Eye of the beholder

---------------------------

 

Any amusement we may get from this bureaucracy's double-speak

and snail-like pace disappears quickly when you consider the

important work of the NIH. Last year, the NIH annual budget was

nearly $28 billion. And many millions of that are devoted to vital

research that includes complementary and alternative medicine.

 

Given that, I'm not sure which makes me angrier: the fact that NIH

officials and scientists are so comfortable in accepting huge

" consulting " fees from drug companies, or the fact that this

proposed moratorium seems to be giving drug companies plenty of

notice that they need to make sure consulting fees are spread

liberally before any sort of ban actually takes effect.

 

According to The Scientist, Dr. Zerhouni told Congress last June

that in retrospect, " there was not a sufficient safeguard against the

perception of conflict of interest. " Once again, when we read

carefully, we can see that the concern was not over a conflict of

interest, but the PERCEPTION of a conflict of interest.

 

It's almost as if Dr. Zerhouni were trying to tell us something.

 

**************************************************************

 

....and another thing

 

If you've got a passion for kiwifruit, your heart may love you for

it.

 

Kiwifruit is packed with nutrients, including plenty of vitamins C

and E and polyphenols; the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory

plant compounds that have been shown to provide cardiovascular

benefits. So researchers at the University of Oslo designed a test to

evaluate the effect of kiwifruit on heart health.

 

During a 28-day trial, cholesterol, platelet activity and triglyceride

levels were measured in healthy volunteers who ate two or three

kiwifruits each day. Subjects who ate kiwifruit didn't have any

changes in cholesterol levels, but platelet aggregation was reduced

by nearly 20 percent, and triglyceride levels were lowered by 15

percent, compared to a group that didn't eat kiwifruits.

 

And an added bonus: A UK research institute recently reported that

a daily intake of kiwifruit may provide protection from cancer-

causing DNA damage, while also stimulating DNA repair.

 

Most of us who live outside of New Zealand probably don't eat 15

to 20 kiwifruits each week. But it seems that adding this nutrient-

dense item to a diet that already includes plenty of fruits and

vegetables may provide a welcome boost to heart health benefits.

 

To Your Good Health,

 

Jenny Thompson

Health Sciences Institute

 

**************************************************************

 

Sources:

" Zerhouni Proposes 1-Year Moratorium After Finding

'Vulnerabilities in System' " Ted Agres, The Scientist, 9/27/04,

biomedcentral.com

" NIH Proposes Moratorium on Collaborations " The Associated

Press, 9/24/04, ap.org

" NIH Needs 'Drastic Changes' " Ted Agres, The Scientist, 6/23/04,

biomedical.com

" Stealth Merger: Drug Companies and Government Medical

Research " David Willman, The Los Angeles Times, 12/7/03,

latimes.com

" Effects of Kiwi Fruit Consumption on Platelet Aggregation and

Plasma Lipids in Healthy Human Volunteers " Platelets, Vol. 15,

No. 5, August 2004, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" Kiwis Make for Healthier Arteries " NutraIngredients.com, 9/8/04,

nutraingredients.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...