Guest guest Posted October 3, 2004 Report Share Posted October 3, 2004 Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:41:54 -0700 Progress Report: Abstinence-Only Puts Ideology Over Science " American Progress Action Fund " <progress The Progress Report by Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin OCTOBER 1, 2004 EDUCATION Abstinence-Only Puts Ideology Over Science ELECTIONS The Great Debate ETHICS DeLay Violates House Rules UNDER THE RADAR Go Beyond The Headlines EDUCATION Abstinence-Only Puts Ideology Over Science The White House has consistently advocated and lavishly funded " abstinence only " sex education, gutting funding for programs which included information on other ways to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy. To support this position, the administration has distorted the scientific evidence about what works in sex education. Two new studies by Advocates for Youth (AFY) on the long-term impact of federally funded abstinence-only programs on teen sexual behavior confirm recent literature on the subject: the programs have no long-term effect on teens' intentions to have sex, but sour them on contraception, making it less likely they will take responsible measures to protect themselves if they do engage in intercourse. ABSTINENCE-ONLY DOESN'T INCREASE ABSTINENCE: AFY's evaluation of eleven state abstinence-only programs, ten of which were funded federally, found there were " few short-term benefits and no lasting, positive impact. " Overall, programs were moderately successful at improving participants' short-term attitudes towards abstinence but highly unlikely to positively affect participants' sexual behaviors. Five programs measured long-term impact on sexual behavior: " No evaluation demonstrated any impact on reducing teens' sexual behavior at follow-up, three to 17 months after the program ended. " ABSTINENCE-ONLY DISCOURAGES SAFE SEX: In at least two states, AFY Evaluators noted that abstinence-only programs' emphasis on the failure rates of contraception, including condoms, " left youth ambivalent, at best, about using them. " The results are consistent with a Columbia University study by sociology chair Peter Bearman. Bearman's study, which tracked the sex lives of 12,000 adolescents between 12 and 18 years old over a five-year period, " found unsafe sex much greater among youth who'd signed pledges to abstain from sex " until marriage. The " virginity pledge " is a key component of many abstinence-only education programs. ABSTINENCE-ONLY TEACHES BAD SCIENCE, MISINFORMS TEENS: In place of effective, disease-preventing safe-sex education, the administration wants to fund programs that denounce condom use, and mislead teens about the risks and effects of sexual intercourse. Much of the money proposed for the abstinence programs, Salon reports, " would be given in grants to Christian organizations such as Youth for Christ and to…school programs that teach kids that premarital sex leads to psychological maladies and that sex with condoms is a kind of viral Russian roulette. " In Texas, where Bush pushed for an abstinence-based sexual education curriculum as governor, one textbook under review " advises that a good way a teen-ager can prevent a sexually transmitted disease is to get plenty of rest so he or she can have a clear head about sex and choose abstinence. " ABSTINENCE-ONLY HAS HAD NO IMPACT ON NATIONAL BEHAVIOR: There is no national data to suggest abstinence-only has had any positive effect on sexual attitudes or behaviors. From 1991 to 1997, sexual experience (the proportion of 9th through 12th graders reporting that they have ever had sexual intercourse) decreased significantly by 11 percent. But from 1999 to 2003, the period coinciding with the triumph of the abstinence-only agenda, changes in sexual experience leveled off. BUSH PUTS ABSTINENCE-ONLY AHEAD OF DOMESTIC NEEDS: Despite its ineffectiveness, when it comes to abstinence education, " money seems to be no object. The administration's 2005 budget recommends $270 million for programs that try to dissuade teenagers from having sex, " double the amount spent last year. Even as it guts proven HIV-prevention programs, the administration continues funneling money into abstinence-only programs proven to be, at best, grossly ineffective. Read this new American Progress column to see how HIV-prevention funding cuts have affected Washington, D.C. ELECTIONS The Great Debate President Bush and Sen. John Kerry squared off in Miami last night for the first presidential debate. The result was a solid hit for Kerry. This morning's papers describe the scene: Bush is described as coming off as " petulant, " " tight-mouthed, " and " frustrated. " Meanwhile, Kerry was " presidential, " " in control, " " serious and substantive. " As the New York Times writes, " if the question was whether Senator John Kerry would appear presidential, whether he could present his positions clearly and succinctly and keep President Bush on the defensive when it came to the critical issue of Iraq, Mr. Kerry delivered the goods. " The Boston Globe agreed, saying, " Last night, John Kerry won as clear a debate victory as we've seen since Ronald Reagan outdueled Jimmy Carter in 1980. " And, the NYT writes, " Kerry's confident, calm manner may have paid off. CBS was one of several news organizations that conducted instant focus group surveys during the debate. A few minutes after the candidates finished their closing statements, CBS News said 51 percent of the 200 uncommitted sample voters thought that Mr. Kerry had a clear plan for Iraq. Only 38 percent thought the president did. " Research by Democracy Corps details Kerry's " significant gains among likely voters who watched the debate, " including major gains in " personal favorability, the security issues that dominated the debate, and key leadership attributes. " STICKING TO THE WRONG COURSE: Bush tried to assail Kerry's leadership last night, saying nine different times that Kerry's " mixed messages " and " mixed signals " mean he's not steadfast enough to lead. Bush, however, has confused bullheadedness with leadership. In Iraq, for example, he is clinging to the precept that staying the course is more important than being on the right course. Slate's William Saletin writes that Bush's stubbornness means a disconnect from the reality on the ground in Iraq: " Ignore the evidence that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs had deteriorated. Ignore the evidence that Saddam had no operational relationship with al-Qaida. Ignore the rising casualties. Ignore the hollowness and disintegration of the American-led 'coalition.' " Kerry last night said, " It's one thing to be certain. But you can be certain and wrong. " MISSTATING IRAQI SECURITY FORCES: Bush last night repeated his claim that we have 100,000 Iraqi security forces trained. It's not true. Last Monday, the Pentagon said that " only about 53,000 of the 100,000 Iraqis on duty have now undergone training. " According to Pentagon documents obtained by Reuters, of the 90,000 in the police force, " only 8,169 have received full training. " " Many police lack equipment or vehicles. Army Lt. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the U.S. official in charge of training, has been unable to fill his staff needs. " MISSTATING AL QAEDA CAPTURES: Last night, Bush repeated his oft-stated claim that three-quarters of known al Qaeda leadership has been captured. What this ignores: " al-Qaida is still considered a mortal danger in part because it refills its ranks and leadership. " MISSTATING THE RATIONALE FOR WAR IN IRAQ: Bush tried to rebut Kerry about the prewar need for more patience on Iraq, saying diplomacy wouldn't have persuaded Saddam to disarm. Writes the Boston Globe, " It was almost as though the president has forgotten that no stockpiles of forbidden weapons have been found in Iraq. " MISSTATING VOTER REGISTRATION SUCCESS IN AFGHANISTAN: Bush stated, " 10 million people have registered to vote in Afghanistan. " The problem: most sources agree there aren't even 10 million eligible voters in the country. Human Rights Watch this week released a report showing that figure included " multiple registrations of many voters. In a lengthy report, the respected organization also documented how human rights abuses are fueling a pervasive atmosphere of repression and fear in many parts of the country, with voters in those areas having little faith in the secrecy of the balloting and often facing threats and bribes from militia factions. " MISSTATING NORTH KOREA DIPLOMACY: Bush inexplicably claimed Kerry's proposal to have direct talks with North Korea would end the six-nation diplomacy that the administration has pursued over Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions, claiming it would also " drive away China, a key player in the negotiations. " He was unable to explain this charge, however: " He never said why, and there are many examples in which the United States has negotiated with a nation in several different forums at the same time. " In reality, " each of the other four countries in the talks has held direct talks with North Korea during the six-party process – and China has repeatedly asked the Bush administration to talk directly with North Korea. " MISSTATING BRINGING KHAN TO JUSTICE: Bush last night stated, " The A.Q. Khan network has been brought to justice, " referring to the leader of a Pakistani nuclear smuggling ring. Not true. Khan was pardoned by President Pervez Musharraf. In fact, reports the Washington Post, " not a single person involved in his network has been prosecuted anywhere. " Yesterday, the International Atomic Energy Agency complained Pakistan is blocking all access to Khan. MISSTATING NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION EFFORTS: Last night, Bush said he'd increased spending by " about 35 percent " on nonproliferation efforts since he took office. The Washington Post points out that in his first budget, " he proposed a 13 percent cut – about $116 million – and much of the increases since then have been added by Congress. " WATCHING TELEVISION IS HARD WORK: The New York Times reports Bush was " unnerved " by Kerry's reference to his personal military service. " Mr. Kerry repeatedly referred to his first-hand experience sending men into battle in Vietnam, " leading the president to repeat that " he understood that fighting was hard work and added, 'I see on the TV screens how hard it is.' " ETHICS DeLay Violates House Rules Quick…look over there! Last night, as all eyes turned to Miami for the first presidential debate, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives released the findings of a six-month investigation into whether Majority Leader Tom DeLay broke House rules by trying to buy a fellow congressman's vote. The 62-page report found he in fact did offer to endorse the congressional bid of Rep. Nick Smith's son in exchange for the lawmaker's vote on the Medicare prescription drug bill. That's a direct violation of House rules, as " it is improper for a member to offer or link support for the personal interests of another member as part of quid pro quo to achieve a legislative goal. " Here's hoping his slapped wrist recovers – beyond last night's rebuke, DeLay's penalty for violating House ethics and trying to unduly influence a colleague is…nothing at all. (If you think it's time to bring the hammer down on DeLay, take a stand and tell the members of the House Ethics Committee.) Under the Radar IRAQ – BUSH ADMINISTRATION SUPPRESSES FACTS, SPREADS 'GOOD NEWS': The debate proved President Bush has no plan for dealing with the real war in Iraq, but as usual his administration has got lots of plans for fighting the propaganda battle here at home. The Washington Post reports the Bush administration is " sending Iraqi Americans to deliver what the Pentagon calls 'good news' about Iraq to U.S. military bases, and has curtailed distribution of reports showing increasing violence in that country. " The administration says it will specifically restrict distribution of reports by contractor Kroll Security International, showing that the number of daily attacks by insurgents in Iraq has increased. After the Post ran a front page story on the data earlier this week, a USAID official sent an e-mail to congressional aides stating: " This is the last Kroll report to come in. After the WPost story, they shut it down in order to regroup. I'll let you know when it restarts. " ENVIRO – EPA RULE CHANGE DISTORTS DATA, FAVORS POLLUTERS: " In a rebuke of the Bush administration, " the Environmental Protection Agency's inspector general said in two critical reports that the agency has " exaggerated the nation's air quality and undermined court cases against big electric utilities by devising a rule change that lets them prolong the life of pollution-prone plants. " The revised rule, made final last year, " has not been put in effect yet because of legal challenges. But the report concludes that just by issuing the rule, which scuttled the enforcement approach of the Clinton administration, the agency has 'seriously hampered' its ability to settle cases and pursue new ones. " In a report on smog, " Inspector General Nikki Tinsley disputed recent comments by EPA Administrator Mike Leavitt that the nation's air quality has steadily improved. " The rules change has stalled legal actions against major polluters. Read more on the Bush administration's rollback record. HOMELAND SECURITY – IF THEY CAN'T GET THIS ONE RIGHT…: A new government report finds efforts to protect U.S. borders by consolidating terrorist watch lists are woefully behind. According to the Wall Street Journal, " The inspector general of the Homeland Security Department, in the sometimes scathing report, cites poor cooperation among many agencies and says his own agency failed 'to play a lead role' in oversight. " Instead of coordinating one muscular, updated list, " dozens of agencies, from the Federal Aviation Administration to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, continue to use different lists that sometimes contain outdated or incorrect information and even contradict each other. That can hamper the sharing of vital data and identifying of suspects – and make it easier for terrorists to slip through cracks in the system, officials say. " Daniel B. Prieto, research director for the Homeland Security Partnership Initiative at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, charges this " has been the one project that is the most straightforward; the most defined, the most politically accepted idea, supported by every investigative commission since 9/11. If they can't get this one right, then shame on them. " HEALTH – STUDY URGES CAMPAIGN TO CONFRONT OBESITY: In a comprehensive assessment of what the country should do to counter the explosion of obesity among American youngsters, the National Academy of Sciences called yesterday for " an unprecedented national campaign " to fight childhood obesity. The panel issued more than a dozen recommendations, including giving consumers " more and better nutritional information on packaged foods and in restaurants, " and convening a national conference to draft new guidelines aimed at curbing advertising and marketing of junk food to children. Earlier this year, the Bush administration signaled its opposition to such measures, " watering down " new dietary guidelines recommended by the World Health Organization and adopted by most European nations. Administration officials claimed there was " no proof " fast food leads to obesity and that " further discussion was needed before a final plan was approved. " A Food and Drug Administration spokesperson reiterated the administration's failed policy of asking the food industry to take voluntary action. MEDICARE – PFIZER EXECUTIVE INVESTIGATED AFTER ENDORSING IMPORTATION: Apparently, telling the truth about drug importation is a risky move. A drug company executive who endorsed a local plan to import drugs from Canada " said yesterday that his company has launched an investigation into his political activities. Peter Rost, vice president of marketing for Pfizer Inc., said the company has hired a New York law firm to find out what elected officials and media organizations he has spoken with in the past month. " Rost was one of the first drug industry executives to come out in support of reimporting drugs from Canada, a practice the Bush administration opposes, despite not being able to " name a single American who has been injured or killed by drugs bought from licensed Canadian pharmacies. " Pfizer's political action committee has contributed $525,700 to Congressional Republicans in the 2004 election cycle. MILITARY – ARMY LOWERS RECRUITMENT STANDARDS: Facing a steady decline in recruitment and reenlistment rates, the Army has announced plans to relax requirements facing new recruits for the first time in six years. The new criteria will allow for increases in the number of recruits without a high-school diploma and in those who received the lowest acceptable scores on a service aptitude test. The shift in standards comes " amid allegations by Iraq war veterans near the end of their enlistments at Fort Carson, Colo., and other Army bases, that they had been forced to choose between re-enlisting or being sent back to Iraq with another unit, " and is one in a series of signs that the U.S. military is becoming critically overstretched. Last week, the Army National Guard said it would fall 5,000 soldiers short of recruitment aims, failing to meet its goal for the first time since 1994. Additionally, " more than 35 percent of nearly 3,900 former soldiers mobilized for yearlong assignments in a little-used wartime program have resisted their call-up, seeking delays or exemptions. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.