Invitation as Guest Speaker-Internet Radio Broadcast Highway2Health.net RE: Carcinogenic Mammograms!

[Guest guest]

Thank you for your e-mail regarding carcinogenic mammograms.

Before my Mother committed suicide on the antidepressants that the FDA is

now requiring a lable for suicide to avoid the slow painful death by breast

cancer after being prescribed a carcinogenic psychotrohpic drug while the

psychiatrists violsted her civil right to sign an Authorization to Release

Medical Information for me to be informed that she was being prescribed a

drug that could cause cancer after she'd been turned into a dysrunctional

zombie by the drugs, she dutifully went annually to get her breast squashing

mammogram before the failed chemotheraepy and mastectomy.

 

I decided then that I'd not endanger my breasts to mammograms and have

quietly refrained from communicating this fact as it's considered just about

as antisocial and neligent of your health as the hormone replacement therapy

that I wisely failed to endanger my body to before they stopped the clinical

trials because so many women were getting cancer from that during

menopause.

 

After the Mental Health Center of Madison County Alabama conspired with

Madison COunty Probate Judge Tommy Ragland to violate my legal right to have

letters of adminstration of my Mother's estate that would give me the right

to have title to my Mother's house where I would practice in competition

with Judge Ragland's non-D.C. employer wife's CHiropractic Care Center,

direct access to the possibly embezelled investment evidence in violation of

43-2-312 and my Mother' medical records at the Mental Health Center while

they were medicating her to suicide when she just went there to talk to

someone for counseling, I felt the need to have public exposure outside

Alabama to protect my life and health. I feared that the public corruption I

was investigating could possibly send some public officials not only out of

office but to prison and needed a way to expose this corruption while I

still could. I didn't even know who to build a website let alone do voice

broadcasting.

 

When I sent out an e-mail regarding President Bush's agenda to coherse all

Americans to be evaluated for " Mental Health " i.e. involuntary psychiatric

medications it found it's way to Peter Kawaja of Highway2Health.net.

 

Because my Mother courageously saved herself in her medicated state from

slowing suffocating from the breast cancer metastisizing into her lungs

while the " specialists " at Emory couldnt' even diagnose the lung cancer that

was biopsied by the Fulton County Medical Examiners to rule me out as her

murderess by suffocating herself with three plastic bags over her head and

panty hose around her neck and committed suicide by cancer by stopping

taking her Tamoxifen rather than commit suicide by jumping over the

Tennessee River Bridge while the psychiatrists circumvented my attempts of

medication compliance by failing to provide me faxed noticesof her

medication changes when the side effects were more pronounced in the

preceeding months after dutifully paying for her annual mammograms annually,

I am especially thankful to recieve you e-mail in support of my very private

decision not to get mammograms.

 

Highway2Health.net. The broadcasts are archived permantnely for 24/7 viewing

worldwide.

 

Last week our guest was reporting on COngressman Ron Paul's amendment to defeat

Bush's mental " health " agenda.

 

Potentially next week's guest is a woman who has been attending teh

congressional hearings on the 200-300% increase incidence of suicide in our

children that is deceptively being reported as a 2-3% incidence.

Because I could never find anyone that would help me get my Mother off these

drugs and everytime seh tiredto get of tthem ot no longer have the side

effects she would ahve terrible withdrawal symptoms that they would blame on

her as the " progress of the disease " if you have any experience in getting

psychiatric medication addition victims off these drugs this would also be a

good topic to discuss.

 

I don't want any other family to suffer the pain and trauma of

having to watch their loved one's quality of live be destroyed like my

Mother's was while her iatrogenic cancer failed to be treated to save her

life.

The mercenary incentives when Medicare and BC/BS can pick up the tab without

any accountablity for actual results is clear.

Only with public outcry when the public is armed with knowledge and

encouraged to rebell against these genocidal practices will we start to

illicit effective research that saves lives and quality of life.

 

My Mother believed and put her trust in traditional medical care.

Now she is dead and suffered for many years before her death.

Now she can never know her great grandchildren or express her creativity.

I can never rest until I have done everything I can to warn others to avoid

the same tragic fate.

 

Thank you very much,

 

Dr. Sandra Lance, D.C.

 

 

 

-

" califpacific " <califpacific

 

Saturday, September 25, 2004 11:18 AM

Hooray - fewer mammograms!

 

 

" WC Douglass " <realheath

 

Hooray - fewer mammograms!

Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:37:12 -0400

 

Daily Dose

 

Friday September 24, 2004

 

**************************************************************

 

Good news in breast cancer screening

 

As you know, I've been one of America's most outspoken critics

of the diagnostically useless, tumor-promoting mammogram. And

now, finally, I've got some reason to rejoice.

 

A new survey recently released by a government advisory panel

called the Institute of Medicine (a pro-mammogram group, by the

way) reports an 8% DECREASE in the number of breast-

squashing - er, I mean mammogram - facilities in the United

States over the last 4 years. Now this is a trend in mainstream

medicine that's worth trumpeting!

 

According to a recent New York Times online piece, the likely

reasons more than 800 mammography clinics have closed up shop

range from low reimbursement rates from Medicare and insurance

companies and the skyrocketing cost of malpractice coverage.

Also, a fear of lawsuits as a result of missed tumors may be

contributing to reluctance among doctors and clinics that once

offered mammogram services to continue doing so.

 

Funny, isn't it, how mainstream medical advisory bodies like the

Institute of Medicine can't put two and two together: If more

mammograms equal more lawsuits and higher premiums, it must

be because they AREN'T RELIABLE. If they were really

beneficial, accurate diagnostic tools, they'd have a good enough

track record that no one would be suing, right?

 

But whatever the reason, the end result is that fewer breasts under

the Stars and Stripes will be compressed and irradiated, and that's

a GOOD thing.

 

In case you haven't been with me very long, the reason for my

staunch opposition to routine mammography is twofold: One,

because mammograms can't detect tumors much smaller than what

a good conventional breast exam can (they often miss tumors that

are quite large, in fact); and Two, because evidence shows that the

extreme compression of a cancerous tumor can actually cause it to

FRAGMENT AND SPREAD.

 

Think I'm crazy on this last point? Read this.

 

 

Opening up a can of " I told you so "

 

To all those out there - doctors, lawyers, butchers, bakers or

candlestick makers - who think I'm off my rocker for believing

that to disturb a cancerous breast tumor by compression is to cause

it to spread, I offer this recent item from Reuters Health.

 

A recent study of 663 cancerous women published in the Archives

of Surgery reveals that those subjects whose cancerous breast

tumors were needle biopsied - in other words, intentionally

ruptured for diagnostic purposes - were 50% more likely to

subsequently develop cancer of the lymphatic nodes located under

the armpit than women whose tumors were removed outright (also

not something I'd always recommend, but that's another story).

 

For those in the back row (or those with their fingers in their ears,

like mammographers), I'll shout: That's TWICE AS LIKELY to

develop lymphatic cancer after disruption of the cancerous tumor.

 

Now, I ask my critics, in light of this startling (but not to me)

finding, is it really so unreasonable for me to maintain that extreme

compression of the breast might possibly cause cancerous growths

to release malignant cells into nearby tissues that might otherwise

have remained contained in a tumor until such time as detection

and treatment could occur?

 

Let me ask another question: Does this sound unreasonable to

YOU?

 

 

Always reasonable, and always " rupturing " the mainstream's

myths,

 

William Campbell Douglass II, MD