Guest guest Posted September 19, 2004 Report Share Posted September 19, 2004 http://www.cchr.org/doctors/eng/page14.htm " Blaming the Brain " The Great Chemical Imbalance Swindle " The advent of the psychotropic drugs has also given rise to a new biological language in psychiatry. The extent to which this has come to be part of popular culture is in many ways astonishing.... This triumph, however, is not without its ambiguities. It can reasonably be asked whether biological language offers more in the line of marketing copy than it offers in terms of clinical meaning. " 71 — Dr. David Healy, The Anti-Depressant Era, 1999 The cornerstone of psychiatry's disease model today, is the concept that a brain-based, chemical imbalance underlies mental disease.72 While popularized by heavy public marketing, it is simply more wishful psychiatric thinking. As with all of psychiatry's disease models, it has been thoroughly discredited by researchers. BOGUS BRAIN THEORY: Presented in countless illustrations in popular magazines, the brain has been dissected and labeled and analyzed while assailing the public with the latest theory of what is wrong with the brain. What is lacking, as with all psychiatric pontificating, is scientific fact. As Dr. Valenstein explained, " [T]here are no tests available for assessing the chemical status of a living person's brain. " Valenstein is unequivocal: " [T]here are no tests available for assessing the chemical status of a living person's brain. " 73 Also, no " biochemical, anatomical, or functional signs have been found that reliably distinguish the brains of mental patients. " 74 Dutch psychiatrist Hermann van Praag, whose 1993 book, " Make-Believes " in Psychiatry, details how researchers thought they had discovered a deficiency in a chemical cousin to serotonin in the cerebrospinal fluid of some depressed patients. " In the end, the deficiency proved neither diagnostic nor specific for any psychiatric condition. Still, patients are often given the impression that a definitive serotonin deficiency in depression is firmly established " when none has been found.75 While there has been no shortage of biochemical explanations for psychiatric conditions, Glenmullen is emphatic: " ...not one has been proven. Quite the contrary. In every instance where such an imbalance was thought to have been found, it was later proven false. " 76 According to Valenstein, " The theories are held on to not only because there is nothing else to take their place, but also because they are useful in promoting drug treatment. " 77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.