Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Washington's secret nuclear war

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/B2E2DF9B-1E0C-43F4-BBF6-074C1367E27C.htm

 

Washington's secret nuclear war

By Shaheen Chughtai

 

Tuesday 14 September 2004, 19:17 GMT

 

Illegal weapons of mass destruction have not only been found in Iraq

but have been used against Iraqis and have even killed US troops.

 

But Washington and its allies have tried to cover up this outrage

because the chief culprit is the US itself, argue American and other

experts trying to expose what they say is a war crime.

 

The WMD in question is depleted uranium (DU). A radioactive by-product

of uranium enrichment, DU is used to coat ammunition such as tank

shells and " bunker busting " missiles because its density makes it

ideal for piercing armour.

 

Thousands of DU shells and bombs have been used in Yugoslavia,

Afghanistan and - both during the 1990-91 Gulf war and the ongoing

conflict - in Iraq.

 

" They're using it now, they're using it in Falluja, Baghdad is

chock-a-block with DU - it's all over the place, " says Major Doug

Rokke, director of the US army's DU project in 1994-95.

 

Scientists say even a tiny particle can have disastrous results once

ingested, including various cancers and degenerative diseases,

paralysis, birth deformities and death.

 

And as tiny DU particles are blown across the Middle East and beyond

like a radioactive poison gas, the long-term implications for the

world are deeply disturbing.

 

DU has a " half-life " of 4.5 billion years, meaning it takes that long

for just half of its atoms to decay.

 

Sick soldiers

 

Only 467 US soldiers were officially wounded during the 1990-91 Gulf war.

 

But according to Terry Jemison at the US Department of Veterans

Affairs (VA), of the more than 592,560 discharged personnel who served

there, at least 179,310 - one third - are receiving disability

compensation and over 24,760 cases were pending by in September 2004.

 

A sixth of the Iraq war veterans

have already sought treatment

This does not include personnel still active and receiving care from

the military, or those who have died.

 

And among 168,528 veterans of the current conflict in Iraq who have

left active duty, 16% (27,571) had already sought treatment from the

VA by July 2004.

 

" That's astronomical, " says Rokke, whose team studied how to provide

medical care for victims, how to clean contaminated sites, and how to

train those using DU weapons.

 

Rokke admits the exact cause for these casualties cannot be confirmed.

But he insists the evidence pointing to DU is compelling.

 

" There were no chemical or biological weapons there, no big oil well

fires, " he says. " So what's left? "

 

Cradle to grave

 

Dr Jenan Ali, a senior Iraqi doctor at Basra hospital's College of

Medicine, says her studies show a 100% rise in child leukaemia in the

region in the decade after the first Gulf war, with a 242% increase in

all types of malignancies.

 

The director of the Afghan DU and Recovery Fund, Dr Daud Miraki, says

his field researchers found evidence of DU's effect on civilians in

eastern and southeastern Afghanistan in 2003 although local conditions

make rigorous statistical analysis difficult.

 

Iraqi and Afghan doctors have

seen a rise in deformed foetuses

" Many children are born with no eyes, no limbs, or tumours protruding

from their mouths and eyes, " Miraki told Aljazeera.net. Some newborns

are barely recognisable as human, he says. Many do not survive.

 

Afghan and Iraqi children continue to play amid radioactive debris.

But the US army will not even label contaminated equipment or sites

because doing so would be an admission that DU is hazardous.

 

This " deceitful failure " , says Rokke, contradicts the US army's own

rules, such as regulation AR 700-48, which stipulates its

responsibilities to isolate, label and decontaminate radioactive

equipment and sites as well as to render prompt and effective medical

care for all exposed individuals.

 

" This is a war crime, " Rokke says. " The president is obliged to ensure

the army complies with these regulations but they're deliberately

violating the law. It's that simple. "

 

No remedy

 

But these blatant violations are practically irrelevant because

Rokke's Iraq mission found that DU cannot be cleaned up and there is

no known medical remedy.

 

US President George Bush and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair used Saddam

Hussein's alleged possession of illegal weapons to justify invading

Iraq. But several prominent jurists hold Bush and Blair guilty of war

crimes for waging DU warfare.

 

The vice-president of the Indian Lawyers Association, Niloufer

Bhagwat, sat on an international panel of judges for the unofficial

International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan.

 

Bhagwat and her fellow judges ruled that the US had used " weapons of

extermination of present and future generations, genocidal in properties " .

 

Friendly fire

 

And not just against defenceless Afghan civilians.

 

Critics say George Bush ® and

Tony Blair are 'war criminals'

 

" Bush was guilty of knowingly using DU weaponry against his own

troops, " Bhagwat told Aljazeera.net, " because the president knew the

effects of DU could not be controlled " .

 

A prominent US international human-rights lawyer, Karen Parker, says

there are four rules derived from humanitarian laws and conventions

regarding weapons:

 

* weapons may only be used against legal enemy military targets

and must not have an adverse effect elsewhere (the territorial rule)

* weapons can only be used for the duration of an armed conflict

and must not be used or continue to act afterwards (the temporal rule)

* weapons may not be unduly inhumane (the " humaneness " rule). The

Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 speak of " unnecessary suffering "

and " superfluous injury " in this regard

* weapons may not have an unduly negative effect on the natural

environment (the " environmental " rule).

 

Illegal weapons

 

" DU weaponry fails all four tests, " Parker told Aljazeera.net. First,

DU cannot be limited to legal military targets. Second, it cannot be

" turned off " when the war is over but keeps killing.

 

Third, DU can kill through painful conditions such as cancers and

organ damage and can also cause birth defects such as facial

deformities and missing limbs.

 

Lastly, DU cannot be used without unduly damaging the natural environment.

 

" In my view, use of DU weaponry violates the grave breach provisions

of the Geneva Conventions, " says Parker. " And so its use constitutes a

war crime, or crime against humanity. "

 

Parker and others took the DU issue before the UN in 1995, and in

1996, the UN Human Rights Commission described DU munitions as weapons

of mass destruction that should be banned.

 

Deceit

 

Despite the evidence, Rokke says Pentagon and Energy Department

officials have campaigned against him and others trying to expose the

horrors of DU.

 

That charge is echoed by Leuren Moret, a geoscientist who has worked

at the Lawrence Berkeley and Lawrence Livermore nuclear weapons

research laboratories in California.

 

White House denials are part of a long-standing cover-up policy that

has been exposed before, she says.

 

President Bush insists warnings

about DU are merely propaganda

" For example, the US denied using DU bombs and missiles against

Yugoslavia in 1999, " she told Aljazeera.net. " But scientists in

Yugoslavia, Greece and Bulgaria measured elevated levels of gamma

radiation in the first three days of grid and carpet bombing by the US. "

 

Moret said: " A missile landed in Bulgaria that didn't explode and

scientists identified a DU warhead. Then, Lord [George] Robertson, the

head of NATO, admitted in public that DU had been used. "

 

Even the US army expressed concern about the use of DU in July 1990,

some six months before the outbreak of the first Gulf war. Those

concerns were later echoed by Iraqi officials.

 

Denial

 

But brushing his own army's report aside - now said to be " outdated " -

US President George Bush has dismissed such warnings as " propaganda " .

 

" In recent years, the Iraqi regime made false claim that the depleted

uranium rounds fired by coalition forces have caused cancers and birth

defects in Iraq, " says Bush on his White House website.

 

" But scientists working for the World Health Organisation, the UN

Environmental Programme and the European Union could find no health

effects linked to exposure to depleted uranium, " he said.

 

Bush can point to a World Health Organisation (WHO) report in 2001

that said there was no significant risk of inhaling radioactive

particles where DU weapons had been used.

 

It said the level of radiation associated with DU debris was not

particularly hazardous, but it accepted that high exposure could pose

a health risk.

 

Scientific studies

 

WHO also commissioned a scientific study shortly before the 2003

invasion of Iraq that warned of the dangers of US and British use of

DU - but refused to publish its findings.

 

The study's main author, Dr Keith Baverstock, told Aljazeera.net that

" the report was deliberately suppressed " because WHO was pressed by a

more powerful, pro-nuclear UN body - the International Atomic Energy

Agency. WHO has rejected his claims as " totally unfounded " .

 

" [WHO's] report was deliberately suppressed "

 

Dr Keith Baverstock,

co-author of WHO report on DU

The study found DU particles were likely to be blown around and

inhaled by Iraqi civilians for years to come. Once inside a human

body, the radioactive particles can trigger the growth of malignant

tumours.

 

Bush's claim that the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP) gives DU

pollution a clean bill of health is also disingenuous.

 

UNEP experts have yet to be allowed into Iraq, its spokesman in Geneva

Michael Williams told Aljazeera.net, citing security concerns.

 

And a scientific body set up in 1997 by Green EU parliamentarians -

the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) - found that DU posed

serious health risks.

 

An eminent Canadian scientist involved with the ECRR, Dr Rosalie

Bertell, says the deadliness of DU derived not just from its

radioactivity but from the durability of particles formed in the

3000-6000C heat produced when a DU weapon is fired.

 

" The particles produced are like ceramic: not soluble in body fluid,

non-biodegradable and highly toxic, " she told Aljazeera.net. " They

tend to concentrate in the lymph nodes, which is the source of

lymphomas and leukaemia " .

 

Known killer

 

The US military and political establishment cannot plead ignorance. As

early as October 1943, Manhattan Project scientists Arthur Compton,

James Connant and Harold Urey sent a memo to their director, General

Leslie Groves, saying DU could be used to create a " radioactive gas " .

 

DU targets human DNA and may

thus affect future generations

In 1961, two nuclear experts, Briton HE Huxley and American Geoffrey

Zubay, informed the scientific community that DU targeted human DNA

and " the Master Code, which controls the expression of DNA " , Moret said.

 

In September 2000, Dr Asaf Durakovic, professor of nuclear medicine at

Washington's Georgetown University, told a Paris conference of

prominent scientists that " tens of thousands " of US and UK troops were

dying of DU.

 

Death sentence

 

" There has to be a moratorium on the manufacture, sales, use and

storage of DU, " geoscientist Moret says, warning that this will not

happen unless more Americans realise what is happening.

 

The Middle East has been severely contaminated, warns Moret. " That

region is radioactive forever, " she says, but worse is yet to come.

 

Moret says the air carrying DU particles takes about a year to mix

with the rest of the earth's atmosphere.

 

Radioactive sites continue to kill

and contaminate Iraqi children

 

The radiation released by DU nuclear warfare is believed to be more

than 10 times the amount dispersed by atmospheric testing.

 

As a result, DU particles have engulfed the world in a radioactive

poison gas that promises illness and death for millions.

 

Rokke went to Iraq a fit and healthy soldier, but the major is now

beset with a variety of illnesses and each day is a struggle.

 

He suffers from respiratory problems and cataracts while his teeth -

weakened by DU radiation - are crumbling. At least 20 of the 100

primary personnel he worked with on the US army's DU project have

died. Most of the rest are ill.

 

Meanwhile, WHO says cancer rates worldwide are set to rise by 50% by

2020, although it does not link this publicly to DU.

 

" They would never say that - they offered various strange

explanations, " said Moret. " But DU is the key factor. People will

slowly die. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...