Attorney for 9/11families sues Bush for 9/11 involvement--listen on-line

[Guest guest]

> n

> Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:45

> Attorney for 9/11families sues Bush for

9/11 involvement--listen on-line

>

> Attorney for 9/11 families sues Bush for 9/11

> involvement--listen on-line-Alex Jones

>

> Listen to Stanley Hilton's interview with Alex

> Jones...Amazing breakthrough..

>

> .He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11...Please

> do your part and forward this to all possible

>

> Interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 9/11

> taxpayers¡¯ lawsuit -

>

> Bob Dole's former chief of staff-- Stanley said>

> Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice

> and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all

> involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but

> in actually ordering it to happen.

>

> Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some

> very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush

> personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political

> advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and

their deluded thinking in the Middle East.

>

> I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I

> went to school with some of these neocons.

>

> Listen Here>>> : Alex Jones Interviews

> Stanley Hilton or paste in your browser>>>

> http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm

>

> Alex Jones Radio Show

> September 10, 2004

>

> Transcript of interview>>>

>

> AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole's

> chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds

> of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement

> in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out ¨C half of New Yorkers think the

government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into

the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it¡¯s great to have you on with us.

>

> SH: Glad to be on.

>

> AJ: We¡¯ll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just

> in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you¡¯ve deposed a lot of

> military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what

> is your case alleging?

>

> SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney

> and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved

> not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually

> ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very

> incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered

> this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus

> political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the

> Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school

with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with

> Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people

personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the tim e. And I did my

senior thesis on this very subject ¨C how to turn the U.S. into a presidential

> dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this

has been in the planning at least 35 years.

>

> AJ: That¡¯s right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like

> professor. And now they are setting it up here in America.

> Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you¡¯ve got your $7 million

dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim¡¯s families involved¡­.

 

> SH: 7 billion, 7 billion

>

> AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating

evidence you¡¯ve got of them ordering the attack?

>

> SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers¡class action lawsuit as well

> as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they

> violated the Constitution by ordering this event.

> And secondly that they [garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of

> the U.S. Code in which Bush presented false and fraudulent evidence to

Congress to get the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it to

9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.

>

> AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we¡¯ve got to break.

> Let¡¯s come back and get into the evidence.

 

> BREAK

>

> AJ: Alright my friends, second hour, September 10th, 2004, the anniversary of

> the globalist attack coming up tomorrow. It¡¯s an amazing individual

> we have on the line. Bob Dole¡¯s former chief of staff, political scientist, a

> lawyer, he went to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about

> how to turn America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor attack. He's

> suing the U.S. government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the

> victim's families signing onto it ¨C it¡¯s a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is

Stanley Hilton. I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles

> and Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap

> what you were just stating and then let¡¯s get into the new evidence. And then

> we'll get into why you are being harassed by the FBI, as other FBI people are

> being harassed who have been blowing the whistle on this. So, this is really

> getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about it.

>

> SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleeza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc.

> for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering

> it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of

> them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid

> by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were

> controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places.

> And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George

W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well

as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence ¨C in spite of

> the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew

> about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he

> appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th ¨C when those

videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words

> about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought

> this was another rehearsal. These people had dress rehearsed this many times.

He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a

few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote,

¡°seen on television the first plane attack the first tower.¡± And that could

not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated

> video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government ordered

thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for violating American¡¯s

> rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent Claims Act, for

> presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify the bogus Iraq

> boondoggle war, for political gains.

> And also, under the RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization

> Act, for being a corrupt entity.

> And I've been harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal court who

> is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened to kick me off the

> court, after 30-years on the court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My staff

has been harassed and threatened. My office has been broken into and this

> is the kind of government we are dealing with.

 

> AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out ¨C five separate drills of flying

> hijacked jets into buildings that morning ¨C which you told us about

> before it even broke in the Associated Press. They were trying to get out

ahead of you. You talked about how you interviewed military people

> who were told it was a drill that morning. Then to get out ahead of that,

> the news finally reported on it. Now, we've learned that all these operations

¨C I want to get into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence

of ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the bunker

> controlling this.

> That has even come out in the mainstream news but they won't release the

> details of that, Stanley. But what type of FBI harassment are you going

through?

 

> SH: First of all, my office was burglarized in San Francisco several months

ago. Files were gone through and some files were seized ¨C particularly

> the ones dealing with the lady that was married to one of the hijackers.

> Fortunately, I had spare copies in a hidden place so nothing disappeared

> permanently. But more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of

> my staff members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats

> of indicting them. And it's just total harassment. They have planted a spy, an

> undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently discovered. In

> other words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the kind of government

you have in this country. This is what Bush is all about.

 

> AJ: Stay there Stanley, Bob Dole¡¯s former chief of staff. We'll come back

> after this quick break. Please stay with us.

 

> BREAK

 

> AJ: Alright, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley Hilton,

> political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole's former chief of staff, is suing the

> government for 7 billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering.

And he joins us now. During the break, I first really did the big interview with

> Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News.

> And that interview got massive attention. And then he kind of went underground

for a while because a judge, we're going to talk about that, ordered him

> to not do any more interviews. And now he's back doing interviews.

> He's had his office broken into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he

> has deposed military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name it, it was

> a government operation. It has even come out in mainstream news, a piece here,

> a piece there.

> They had drills on 9/11, that¡¯s why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control

> of the whole thing. Stanley Hilton has now gotten documents about

> how Bush ordered the whole operation. And I'll tell you right now, his life is

in danger, folks.

> And he's got so much courage. He went to school with these neocons at the

> University of Chica go. He wrote his thesis on how the government could use

> terrorist attacks to set up martial law. He is the man for the time and folks

> wondered why he disappeared for a while and just did his lawsuit and wasn't

> doing interviews, it was because he was ordered to.

> Stanley, can you get into that for us?

 

> SH: I did an interview with you, Alex, back in March of 2003, about a year and

a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary

of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was

warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline.

And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air

> on some programs and some publicity and¡­ July 1st, I was threatened directly

> by the chief judge here, threatened with court discipline.

> This particular judge has been circulating communiqu¨¦s to the other federal

> judges seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline

me after I've been on the court here for 30-years with no disciplinary problems

at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the

> committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and

threatened me directly.

> They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to

dismiss this. What's this? She doesn't like the content of it.

> This is politically incorrect. This is outside the norm. I said I represented

> more than 400 plaintiffs, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they

> threatened me directly and they said, the next time you'll be disciplined.¡±

> And also they've threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just

outrageous¡­.

 

> AJ: It is all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.