Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 > S > Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:37:46 -0700 (PDT) > WAKE -UP CALL To All Senior Citizens > > > > WAKE -UP CALL To All Senior Citizens > > September 05, 2004 >http://www.independent-media.tv > > By: Evelyn Pringle > Independent Media TV Independent Media TV --> > > > > Material by: > Evelyn Pringle > > Material from: > Independent Media TV > > Material about: > The Bush Prescription: 4 Part Series > > Material about: > Bush Administration Lies and Deceit > > Material about: > Legislation and Policy > > Material about: > Health > > In December 2003, Bush signed the new Medicare > Prescription Drug and Modernization Act into law. > Many seniors expected it to provide much needed > relief from escalating health care costs. That has > not happened and it will not happen until we get > Bush and his cronies in the health care industry out > of the White House. > The new law was supposed to be a boost for Bush's > reelection campaign. However, it is now being > criticized by Democrats and Republicans alike, and > by just about every senior citizen advocacy group in > the country. > Bush tries to portray the law with its prescription > drug benefit as a windfall for seniors; when in fact > it is nothing but a scam that benefits insurance > companies, drug makers and health care providers. > Largest Premium Increase In History Of Medicare > According to a September 4, 2004 article by the > Associated Press, Medicare premiums for Part A, > which covers doctor visits and other non-hospital > expenses will rise by 17% in 2005. It will be the > largest increase is the program's 40-year-history. > Monthly payments will jump to $78.20, up from > $66.60. > Mark McClellan, administrator for the federal > Centers for Medicare and Medical Services, said the > increase reflects rapidly rising health costs and > last year's Medicare overhaul. > Well Bush and his allies in Congress can take full > credit for the increase that resulted from the > " overhaul " because they are the ones responsible for > pushing through the health care industry's favored > version of the bill that got seniors into this mess > to begin with. > This latest rise should come as no surprise anyways. > Medicare premiums have skyrocketed ever since Bush > took office. They rose by 8.7% in 2003, and 13.5% in > 2004. > In addition to the rise in premiums, the deductible > for Medicare Part A will also rise to $912 in 2005, > up from $876; and the deductible for Part B will > rise to $110. > Bush chose an odd time to release this news. > According to the NYTs, " In years past, the premium > increases have been announced in October at the same > time that cost-of-living increases to Social > Security checks are announced. The twin > announcements allow the elderly to calculate how > much they will be receiving the following year. " > I wonder why Bush didn't wait until October to make > this announcement? Or better yet, why didn't he give > senior citizens the good news during his convention > speech while he was bragging about his efforts to > help the elderly cope with increased medical costs? > True to form, Bush released the bad news in his > usual manner, on a Friday afternoon, and this time > with the added benefit of a holiday weekend and a > news cycle dominated by stories about a hurricane. > " This is a cynical attempt to bury bad news by > leaking it out when you hope no one is watching, " > said Rep Pete Stark, D-Calif. " This administration > has had four years to improve Medicare and instead > have made it worse. Today's news reflects the > reality, not rhetoric, of this administration's bad > record on Medicare. " > Robert Hayes, president of Medicare Rights Center, > called the increase " a body blow to millions of > older Americans living on fixed incomes, " and said > the increase will be especially painful because > Social Security payments are expected to rise by > less than 3%. > Every dime counts for people on fixed incomes. The > median annual income for senior citizens aged 65 and > older was only $23,048 in 2003, or less than $2,000 > a month, according to an August 26, 2004 report by > the US Census Bureau. > According to the Washington Post, when the new > Medicare law is fully implemented in 2006, the > typical retiree who purchases traditional Medicare > coverage and the drug benefit will pay more than > $115 in monthly premiums, a $110 annual deductible > for outpatient care, and co-payments for physician > visits and medications. > McClellan claims that most of the increase will > cover the program's new prescription drug coverage > and preventive services, including an initial > physical exam and other tests. And Bush spokesman, > Scott Stanzel said " President Bush has worked to > increase health care access and affordability, > including guaranteeing Medicare recipients > prescription drugs. " > Wait a minute here. If the money is going to pay for > the new prescription drug benefit, how are seniors > saving any money? Let me get this straight, seniors > are supposed to get a discount on drugs, but now > Bush says that Medicare will pay for the discount > with a rise in their monthly premiums. > Will somebody please explain the new " prescription > drug benefit " to me because just like with so many > of Bush's helpful policies, I don't get it. > On Top Of Rising Prescription Drugs Prices > The 17% increase in premiums comes on top of the > escalating cost of prescription drugs. Experts say > the elderly cannot withstand such a large increase > on top of rising drug costs. > According to President of Medicare Rights Center, > Robert Hayes, " Older Americans already are > staggering under the relentless increases in the > cost of prescription drugs, " he said. " More older > Americans will face harsh choices in meeting basic > human needs--health, food and housing. " > The Kerry campaign is blasting Bush. " After doing > nothing about the record increases in the cost of > healthcare over the last four years, George Bush is > presiding over a Medicare system that is socking > seniors with the largest premium hike in the > program's 40-year history, " said spokesman Phil > Singer. > In the Salt Lake Tribune, Darrell Butler, manager > with Salt Lake County Aging Services, said " if it > was a 5 to 8% rise, it wouldn't have surprised me as > much, " he said. " But 17% is overwhelming. What it > will end up doing is force a lot more people into > making tough decisions about whether to buy food or > spend their money on prescription drugs. > " They'll take their medications every other day or > cut them in half to try to make ends meet, " Butler > said. " This is terrible news. " > Kerry spokesman Singer says, " When it comes to > helping seniors, George Bush has proven that he's > taking us in the wrong direction by giving billions > to the drug industry while keeping seniors from > accessing cheaper prescription drugs. " > Astronomical Increases In Prescription Drug Prices > Seniors will not see cheaper prescription prices > when the full bill goes into effect in 2006, because > it does nothing to control the rising cost of drugs. > In fact, according to Consumers Union, " most > beneficiaries will face higher out-of-pocket costs > for prescription drugs after full implementation, > despite the benefit. " (Consumers Union, 11/17/03) > In June 2004, the advocacy group, " Families USA " > released the results of a study that tracked price > changes for the top 30 brand name drugs prescribed > to seniors, in a report called: " Sticker Shock: > Rising Prescription Drug Prices For Seniors. The > study concluded that, " Like used car buyers drawn by > the promise of a rebate#26784;nly to find that the > base price has risen dramatically#26789;eniors > purchasing a new drug discount card may succumb to > #25618;ticker shock.? > In determining the most frequently used drugs, the > study used data from the Pennsylvania Pharmaceutical > Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE) program, > the largest prescription drug program for senior > citizens in the country. Price histories were > obtained from MDDB Select, a Medi-Span database. > Since 1999, Families has continuously monitored > price increases of the 50 most popular drugs used by > seniors. All of the 30 brand-name drugs selected for > its Sticker Shock study were in the top 50. Its > report provides a framework for determining whether > the discounts cards make prescription drugs more > affordable. > According to the report, between January 2001 and > January 2004, the prices of the top 30 drugs > increased by nearly 22%. On average, the cost of the > drugs increased by 6.5%, while the overall rate of > inflation, excluding energy, was only 1.5% for the > same period. > Of these 30 drugs, 28 increased in price by 2 or > more times the rate of inflation; 21 increased by > three or more times the rate, and 14 increased in > price by more than 5 times the rate of inflation. > With some drugs the rate of increase was even > higher. For instance, the cost of Combivent, used to > treat respiratory conditions, increased by 13.2 > times the rate of inflation. Alphagan P, used to > treat glaucoma, and Evista, an osteoporosis > treatment, each increased by 10.3 times the rate. > Diovan, used to treat high blood pressure, increased > by 8.6 times the rate. Detrol LA, a treatment for > overactive bladder, increased in price by 8.5 times > the rate. Xalatan, used to treat glaucoma, increased > in price by 6.8 times the rate. > The cost of the following 8 drugs went up by more > than 5 times the rate of inflation: Lipitor, used to > lower cholesterol; Plavix, used to prevent blood > clots; Norvasc, used to treat high blood pressure; > Celebrex, used for arthritis and joint pain; > Protonix, used for gastric reflux; Cozaar, used for > high blood pressure; and Celexa, used to treat > depression. > Prices of the drugs also increased often. Fifteen of > the 30 had more than one price increase in the 1 > year period from January 2003 to January 2004. > Two-thirds of the drugs increased in price more than > 3 times. The price of Toprol XL increased 7 times, > Combivent 6 times; and Celexa 5 times. > Bush claims that by using Medicare's new > prescription discount cards, seniors would receive a > discount of 10 to 25%. That's bull. The truth is > that after combining the 22% increase in drug costs > over the past 3 years with the steady rise in > premiums (8.7% in 2003, 13.5% in 2004, and 17% in > 2005), seniors will get a minus % discount. > 0% Discount - Card Prices Verses Non-Card Prices > Because the new Medicare bill contains provisions > that bar the importation of drugs from other > countries and bans Medicare from negotiating lower > prices like the Veteran's Administration does for > vets, seniors who use a prescription drug discount > card will save little, if any, money on the cost of > drugs. > In April 2004, the minority staff of the House > Government Reform Committee, released a study that > compared prices available to seniors who would pay > the $30 to buy a card, against prices available to > seniors who did not. > The study used prices from 3 card providers, > ExpressScripts, Advance (Advance is owned by > Bush-buddy Halbert who was allowed to craft major > portions of the bill), and Walgreens. Prices of > these companies were similar to all others. The > drugs used in the study represent a month's supply > of the top 10 brand-name drugs used by seniors. > The study compared the card prices to (1) prices in > Canada; (2) prices negotiated by the Department of > Veterans Affairs; and (3) prices charged by internet > outlets Drugstore.com and Costco.com. > The study found card prices much higher than prices > in Canada. A month's supply of the 10 drugs in > Canada cost $596, while prices were $972 with > Walgreens, $1,046 with Advance, and $1,061 with > Express. The average card price was 72% higher than > in Canada. > The Committee found that the difference for some > drugs exceeded 100%. For instance, Celebrex, costs > $81.28 at Walgreens, but only $38.69 in Canada; > Prevacid was $129.68 with Express, but only $56.54 > in Canada. > The comparison to drugs purchased by the VA, also > found card prices much higher. With the VA the10 > drugs cost $587, while the average price with the > cards was $1,026, more than 75% higher. > A month's supply of the drugs even costs less on > internet sights Drugstore.com and Costco.com. While > the average card price is $1,026, the drugs would > only cost $959 at Drugstore.com. Specific drugs like > Lipitor, show Walgreens at $67.44, and Drugstore.com > at $62.99; Prevacid costs $129.68 with Express, but > only $122.57 at Costco.com. > Prices for generic prices were also spiked. The Wall > Street Journal found pharmacies buying generic drugs > for a few cents and marking them up nearly 200%. For > example, a 90-day supply of generic Prozac costs > only $4, and is sold for $14.94 at Costco.com. Yet > the Medicare website showed one card sponsor > charging $84.15. > The cold hard truth is that senior citizens were > conned into believing that Bush wanted to help them, > when in reality the much touted prescription > discount card program is nothing but a scam. Why do > I say this? For starters, multiply the $30 price per > card by Medicare's 43 million members and see how > much it comes to. > Seniors Forced To Pick Up Tab For Advertising > Increased spending for advertising is driving up > drug costs and seniors are being forced to pick up > the tab. AARP has been tracking how much drug > companies spend advertising the drugs most used by > seniors. It found dramatic increases in the price of > drugs being advertised, a fact that ARRP says, " begs > the question of who#25263; picking up the tab. " > For a quick answer to that question, check out how > much advertising was done right before the card > program went into effect in June. In the first 5 > months of 2004, Bristol-Myers Squibb spent about $35 > million advertising the blood thinner Plavix, and > the price for Plavix rose by 7.9%. Bristol-Myers > also spent about $7.2 million to advertise the > cholesterol drug Pravachol; its price rose 7%. Merck > spent $42 million to advertise Zocor, another > cholesterol drug, and the price to wholesalers rose > 25.8%. > The drug Nexium (used to treat heartburn), is a good > example of how well advertising pays off. Last year > the drugmaker AstraZeneca spent $411 million > promoting it. In return, Nexium sales reached $3.3 > billion, making it the 7th largest selling brand > name drug in the US, according to the trade > publication Pharmaceutical Executive. Democratic Rep > Henry Waxman recently released a study that showed > that in one month between May 3 and June 3, 2004, > the price of Nexium increased by 13%. > Make no mistake, the elderly are paying the > advertising bills for drugmakers. > WAKE-UP CALL > The Kerry campaign is blasting Bush. " After doing > nothing about the record increases in the cost of > healthcare over the last four years, George Bush is > presiding over a Medicare system that is socking > seniors with the largest premium hike in the > program's 40-year history, " said Kerry spokesman > Singer. > Bloomberg.com says Medicare patients have already > paid $720 million more in out of pocket expenses for > premium and deductible increases this year than in > 2003, according to the annual report by Medicare's > trustees. Enough is enough! > Seniors need a Wake-Up call before they head to the > polls on November 2, 2004. If Bush gets reelected > they better prepare for more assaults on their > retirement nest eggs. Look at what his cronies in > the health care industry managed pull off even while > Bush was facing reelection. Who knows what new scams > they have planned for the next 4 years. > By Evelyn Pringle e.pringle > > > Original Link: http://www.independent-media.tv > > © Copyright 2004 Independent Media TV > Printer Friendly Version > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.