Guest guest Posted September 7, 2004 Report Share Posted September 7, 2004 > Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:18:24 -0700 > Progress Report: Soaking Seniors > " American Progress Action Fund " > <progress > #160;#160;DON'T MISS ECONOMY: American Progress CEO John Podesta and Progress Reporter David Sirota on the Late, Great Middle Class. OIL AND ENERGY: What America is saying 9/11: A look back at the day before. ABU GHRAIB: White House memo played critical role. DAILY GRILL " We're calling upon Congress to be wise with the taxpayer's money. We look forward to working with them to bring fiscal discipline to the appropriations process. " - George W. Bush, 2/2/04 " The Congressional Budget Office is projecting that this election-year's federal deficit will reach $422 billion. " - USA Today, 9/7/04 DAILY OUTRAGE While former President Bill Clinton was recovering from quadruple bypass heart surgery, Vice President Dick Cheney accused him of " teaching terrorists that 'they could strike us with relative impunity.' " ARCHIVES Progress Report STUDENTS The Center for American Progress is now accepting intern applications for the fall semester. Get a free DVD of Outfoxed. Sign up here to host a screening on your campus. Combat the right-wing noise machine on your campus. Become a member of our network of campus publications and student journalists. by David Sirota, Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 ECONOMY Labor Day HEALTH CARE Soaking Seniors UNDER THE RADAR Go Beyond The Headlines Sign up | Send tip | Permalinks | Mobile | Print ECONOMY Labor Day A spate of economic reports released around Labor Day show workers are still suffering from ineffective Bush administration policies tilted toward the wealthiest Americans. The Bush administration spent Labor Day touting the 144,000 jobs the economy reportedly added in August " because of our tax relief, " but as Knight Ridder reports, the day was " anything but a picnic for the vast majority of America's 147 million member labor force. " Analysis of Commerce Department and Census Bureau data indicates wage and income gaps are increasing on several levels, causing millions of Americans to forgo health insurance or sink into poverty, even as the president and vice president bombarded Labor Day audiences with news of our " strong economy. " For more on the latest jobs figures, see senior fellow Scott Lilly's statement and senior economist Christian Weller's column. TAX CUTS NOT TRICKLING DOWN: Yesterday, Vice President Cheney said, " Every American who pays federal income taxes benefited from the Bush tax cuts, and so has our economy. " This would be news to most working Americans, only one-third of whom " are willing to say tax cuts helped the economy. " That feeling is backed up by the numbers, which show the tax cuts have provided minimal relief for Americans in the middle of the income spectrum while draining resources from programs utilized primarily by middle-class families. The Baltimore Sun reports, " The latest income, poverty and health insurance data from the Census Bureau belie the Bush administration's insistence that the president's tax cuts for the well-off would trickle down to benefit the whole nation#8230; From 2000 through the end of 2003#8230;real median household income has fallen, poverty has risen, and so has the number of Americans without health insurance. " THE WIDENING WAGE GAP: A look behind the most publicized numbers shows the economy's rising tide is lifting some boats while it drowns others. According to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), Commerce Department data indicates " troubling developments in the current economic recovery. Of greatest concern, wage and salary growth for workers has been exceptionally poor while corporate profits have enjoyed unusually large gains. " In a typical economic " recovery, " CBPP notes, the share of income growth going to wages and salaries easily outpaces the share going to corporate profits. But in the Bush administration's recovery, that share equals about one-third as much as has gone to corporate profits. CEPR Co-Director Mark Weisbrot notes that " the average real wage #8211; that is, adjusted for inflation #8211; has actually fallen over the past year#8230;In other words, even when the economy is growing, most of the people who make it grow aren't getting anything out of it. " Check out American Progress' coverage of our " Upside down " economy. THE WIDENING GENDER GAP: Census Bureau data indicated the Bush administration's uneven recovery has disproportionately affected women. Numbers for 2003 showed the first " statistically significant " decline in women's pay since 1995, with women earning just 75.5 cents to every dollar men earn. The Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) has stated that the 1.4 percent decrease in the gender wage ratio is the largest backslide since 1991. IWPR President Heidi Hartmann said, " No progress on the wage ratio has been made since 2001, and women actually lost ground this year#8230;The economic recovery continues to disadvantage women by failing to provide strong job growth at all wage levels. " FEELING DISPLACED: Even as the Bush administration advertises job gains, evidence demonstrates many Americans are far more insecure in new jobs than they were in old ones. The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) reports that from 2001 to 2003, " about 5.3 million workers or 4.0 percent of the work force were displaced from 'long-tenure' jobs (those held three years or longer). This compares with a displacement rate of 3.6 percent, or 4.5 million workers, in the period from 1991 to 1993. " The economic costs of job displacement are " high and rising. " By 2004, more than two-thirds of displaced workers who had found a full-time job were being paid less than that they had been at their prior job. Over one-third of those had taken a pay cut of 20 percent or more at their new job. HEALTH CARE Soaking Seniors In his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention last Thursday night, President Bush touted his efforts to help the elderly afford health care. What he didn't mention: the very next day, the government announced Medicare premiums were going up a whopping 17 percent. It's the largest increase in Medicare history, raising the monthly expense for millions of elderly and disabled patients by $11.60, to $78.20. (Keep in mind, Social Security, which many seniors rely upon to pay their Medicare premium, is only expected to rise 3 percent this year.) It's a devastating blow for the nation's elderly and a direct result of the administration's mismanagement of health care. Time and again, the White House has rewarded corporate interests at the expense of the nation's seniors, and now the elderly and disabled are paying the price. As Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) put it: " This administration has had four years to improve Medicare and instead have made it worse. Today's news reflects the reality, not rhetoric, of this administration's bad record on Medicare. " EXPLODING COSTS: The Bush White House cites the rising cost of health care as the reason for the wallet-shattering increase in the Medicare premium. Take a look at the White House record on curbing health care costs, though: in a sop to the powerful pharmaceutical companies last year, the White House blocked efforts to allow Medicare to use bulk purchasing power to negotiate lower drug prices. CORPORATE SUBSIDIES: Looking for a way to keep Medicare costs down? Why not start with curbing the massive corporate subsidies? Starting in 2006, the new Medicare program will pay corporations $89 billion to " discourage " employers from dropping retirees from their plans. For example: General Motors Corp. stands to gain as much as $940 per retiree after the program kicks into effect; the chemical giant DuPont stands to pull in $525 million over 15 years; and the parent company of United Airlines said it would save $280 million. The loophole: corporations receive the subsidy even if they cut support for pensioners. And many are doing just that. Of the " Employers' Coalition on Medicare " #8211; an organization made up of corporations that have given President Bush and the RNC more than $47 million since 2000 #8211; at least 10 have either tried in the past or are trying to slash retiree benefits. INSURANCE FRAUD: The White House has it backwards: This new increase is taking money from America's seniors and using it to line the pockets of wealthy insurance companies. The head of Medicare, Mark McClellan, acknowledged this weekend that 15 percent of this premium increase " results from the billions of dollars Medicare is paying insurers to encourage them to offer private plans. " You get what you pay for: The insurance industry has flooded President Bush and his friends in Congress with over $70 million in campaign contributions since 2000. THE REVERSE ROBIN HOOD EFFECT: Medicare recipients are paying to lure insurance companies into offering private health plans. However, private plans have higher administrative costs and thus are more expensive than Medicare, meaning that many of the seniors paying to subsidize these plans won't be able to afford them for themselves, in effect taking money from poor seniors to set up private plans for the wealthier. (American Progress takes a look at how the move toward greater privatization of Medicare has threatened the long term stability of the program.) SURPRISE!: In the past, announcements concerning Medicare premium increases have come in October, " at the same time that cost-of-living increases to Social Security checks are announced. The twin announcements allow the elderly to calculate how much they will be receiving the following year. " This year, however, the White House announced the enormous hike on Friday night, " just as much of official Washington was heading out for a three-day weekend and the Republican convention and a hurricane moving toward Florida were dominating the news. " This administration has perfected the art of burying bad news on a traditionally slow news day, when " fewer people are reading newspapers or watching television news over the weekend. " Among the long list of Friday Surprises are unpopular environmental policies, controversial judicial nominations, and updates on the growing ranks of the poor. Under the Radar INTELLIGENCE #8211; THE SAUDI COVER-UP?: According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, U.S. Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL), who was the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is releasing a new book that details how " the Bush administration and FBI blocked a congressional investigation " into the relationship between the Saudi Arabian government and al Qaeda. The book says at least two of the 9/11 hijackers had a support network in the United States that included agents of the Saudi government. Such a discovery " would draw a direct line between the terrorists and the government of Saudi Arabia . " But according to Graham, when congressional investigators in 2002 uncovered evidence, it " triggered an attempted cover-up by the Bush administration. " Graham " makes clear that some details of that financial support from Saudi Arabia were in the 27 pages of the congressional inquiry's final report that were blocked from release by the administration, despite the pleas of leaders of both parties on the House and Senate intelligence committees. " The Los Angeles Times has previously reported that the 27 classified pages " depict a Saudi government that not only provided significant money and aid to the suicide hijackers but also allowed potentially hundreds of millions of dollars to flow to al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. " HOUSING #8211; TELL FDIC TO DO ITS JOB: The Bush administration is quietly considering weakening the Community Reinvestment Act by relieving some 2,000 banks of their obligation to provide investments and services in low-income areas. Today, banks with $250 million or more in assets must demonstrate the distribution of their loans by geography and income and show that they provide both services and investments that benefit low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods in their communities. But under the Bush rollback, banks with assets of $1 billion or less would be exempted from these rules. According to FDIC data, the states with no institutions with more than $1 billion in assets are: District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho and Wyoming. States with four or fewer such institutions are: Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Oregon, South Dakota, Vermont and West Virginia. To register your objection to these rules, go to the FDIC's website and look for the 8/20/04 Community Reinvestment proposed rule. At the far right column, you can click on " Comments " to submit yours electronically. WAR ON TERROR #8211; ATTACKING A DEAD MAN & A SICK MAN: Despite the recent death of President Ronald Reagan and the fact that President Bill Clinton was on the operating table, Vice President Dick Cheney laced into both men on the campaign trail yesterday. According to the New York Times, Cheney blamed the Clinton and Reagan administrations for being weak on terrorism. Cheney, of course, did not mention how the Bush administration repeatedly declined to go after Abu Musab Zarqawi, one of the top terrorist threats to America today. He did not explain why the Bush administration shifted Special Forces and intelligence resources out of Afghanistan and the hunt for Osama bin Laden in 2002. He also did not explain why when the White House received pre-9/11 warnings about a terrorist attack, the Bush administration " curtailed a highly classified program to monitor al Qaeda suspects in the United States. " IRAQ #8211; SOME CITIES MAY BE EXCLUDED FROM ELECTION: According to Lt. Gen. Thomas F. Metz #8211; operations chief of more than 150,000 mostly U.S. troops in Iraq #8211; " violence could force authorities to exclude hotspots such as the western city of Fallujah from voting " when elections are held in January. Metz's statement was the first by a U.S. or Iraqi official " conceding that the security situation is so perilous that some areas may not be pacified in time for elections. " The plan to exclude unstable cities from the election " could detract from the election's credibility, foment discontent in Iraq and leave other countries reluctant to acknowledge any government chosen in the vote. " IRAQ #8211; THE PROSPECT OF CIVIL WAR: According to a report released by the prestigious Royal Institute of International Affairs, " Iraq could splinter into civil war and destabilize the whole region if the interim government, U.S. forces and United Nations fail to hold the ring among factions struggling for power. " The report called civil war " the most likely outcome " of the situation in Iraq. Read the full report. HEALTH CARE #8211; WHAT IS HE TRYING TO SAY?: " Too many OB/GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country. " #8211; President Bush, 9/6/04 (See the video for yourself.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.