Guest guest Posted August 27, 2004 Report Share Posted August 27, 2004 > SSRI-Research > Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:51:49 -0400 > [sSRI-Research] Glaxo & NYS Attorney > General agree to Court enforced Consent Order > > ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION (AHRP) > Promoting openness and full disclosure > http://www.ahrp.org > > FYI > New York State Attorney General has reached an > agreement with > GlaxoSmithKline. At issue in the case, was > concealment of data about the > safety of the antidepressant drug, Paxil, for > children and adolescent. In > the suit GSK was charged with fraud. > > While acknowledging that the settlement, requiring > public disclosure of > clinical study data summaries is not a panacea for > drug safety, Eliot > Spitzer announced: " This settlement holds GSK to a > new standard of > disclosure about studies concerning its drugs, a > standard that helps to > ensure that doctors and patients have access to > all scientifically sound > information so doctors can prescribe appropriate > medication for their > patients. By agreeing to release both positive and > negative studies about > the safety and efficacy of its drugs, GSK has set > an example for the entire > pharmaceutical industry. " > > The agreement calls for the establishment of an > online " Clinical Trials > Register " disclosing summaries of safety and > efficacy information " for all > GSK-sponsored clinical studies of drugs conducted > after December 27, 2000 > (the date Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKlineBeecham > merged) and any earlier > studies that may be relevant. " > > The Consent Order establishes court enforced, drug > safety disclosure > standards beyond any required by the FDA. The case > underscores FDA's > neglence and failure to set disclosure standards > to improve safe use of > drugs. Effectively, Eliot Spitzer's lawsuit > against GSK was a catalyst for > challenging the pharmaceutical industry's > secretive modus operandi. By > challenging GSK's concealment of safety data, it > became embarassingly clear > that the FDA failed to establish and enforce drug > safety disclosure > requirements. > > See: > http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2004/aug/aug26a_04.html > > The New York Times reports that " Mr. Spitzer > sharply criticized the Food and > Drug Administration for failing to require such > disclosures years ago. " > > Effectively, the case swept aside FDA's claims of > pre-emption--which rested > on the agency's claim of superior expertise. > > " Just like with the [securities and Exchange > Commission ] S.E.C., we're > asking where has the F.D.A. been all these years > when clinical data has been > hidden from public scrutiny? They have simply > failed to confront the > problem. " > > Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav > Tel: 212-595-8974 > e-mail: veracare > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/26/business/26CND-DRUG.html?ex=1094539557 & ei= > 1 & en=b5e0eacae077a2e7 > > THE NEW YORK TIMES > > August 26, 2004 > Maker of Antidepressant Drug to Release All Trial > Results > By GARDINER HARRIS > > In a settlement that the New York State attorney > general said would > transform the drug industry, GlaxoSmithKline > agreed today to post on its Web > site the results of all clinical trials involving > its drugs. > > " This settlement is transformational in that it > will provide doctors and > patients access to the clinical testing data > necessary to make informed > judgments, " the attorney general, Eliot Spitzer, > said. > > While the case involves only GlaxoSmithKline, the > British drug maker, Mr. > Spitzer predicted other companies would soon > follow its lead by posting the > results of their own studies online. Eli Lilly, > for example, has said it > will create a Web site on which it will list the > results of clinical tests > of approved drugs, including trials of those drugs > for new uses. Several > other companies, including Johnson & Johnson and > Merck, have said they > support the concept of a publicly available > database that would list trial > results. > > If the drug makers do not take action, Mr. Spitzer > threatened more lawsuits. > " We have ongoing inquiries, " he said. > > And in comments reminiscent of his battles with > the Securities and Exchange > Commission and its former chairman, Harvey Pitt, > Mr. Spitzer sharply > criticized the Food and Drug Administration for > failing to require such > disclosures years ago. > > " Just like with the S.E.C., " Mr. Spitzer said, > " we're asking where has the > F.D.A. been all these years when clinical data has > been hidden from public > scrutiny? They have simply failed to confront the > problem. " > > Mr. Spitzer filed suit in June against > GlaxoSmithKline, contending that it > committed fraud by publicizing the results of only > one of five trials > studying the effect of its huge-selling > antidepressant, Paxil, in children. > That single study showed mixed results. The others > not only failed to show > any benefit for the drug in children but > demonstrated that children taking > Paxil were more likely to become suicidal than > those taking a placebo. > > Mr. Spitzer said that GlaxoSmithKline's selective > disclosures, which have > long been common in the drug industry, constituted > a form of consumer fraud. > But it is unclear whether posting clinical trial > results on a Web site will > entirely solve the problem. > > In the case of Paxil, for instance, > GlaxoSmithKline's original analysis of > its trials simply found an increased level of what > the company termed > " emotional lability " among children given the > drug. Only after a reviewer at > the F.D.A. asked the company to offer more > information about this category > did it become clear that the children and > teen-agers given Paxil were more > suicidal than those given placebos. > > Mr. Spitzer acknowledged that postings of clinical > trial results online was > not a cure-all. > > " Nobody should believe that we think this is a > panacea and that there will > be perfect understanding of testing and clinical > variables, " Mr. Spitzer > said. But he said such postings would allow > academics and doctors to ask the > right questions about drugs. > > Spokeswomen for GlaxoSmithKline and the F.D.A. did > not immediately return > phone messages. > > FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C ) > material the use of which > has not always been specifically authorized by the > copyright owner. Such > material is made available for educational > purposes, to advance > understanding of human rights, democracy, > scientific, moral, ethical, and > social justice issues, etc. It is believed that > this constitutes a 'fair > use' of any such copyrighted material as provided > for in Title 17 U.S.C. > section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material > is distributed without > profit. > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.