Guest guest Posted August 25, 2004 Report Share Posted August 25, 2004 > POSTED AS A COURTESY FOR: > WORLD NATURAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION > <http://www.wnho.net>http://www.wnho.net > > Beware of vaccine bullies > > By Michelle Malkin > > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/mm20040204.shtml > > > Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby > against Hepatitis B -- a > virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous > drug use and sexual > contact? That is the question my husband and I had > for the doctors and > nurses at the hospital where our son was born two > and a half months ago. > > We didn't get very good answers. It was > " convenient, " > " recommended " and " routine, " the medical staff > assured us. We wanted more > information. A nurse gave us a brochure, which > explained that babies whose > mothers had the Hep B virus were at high risk of > developing acute Hep B > infections. Well, I tested negative for Hep B. The > Centers for Disease > Control named unprotected sex, IV drug use and being > stuck with a needle on > the job as the likeliest routes of Hep B > transmission. Well, my husband and > I both work primarily from home, our two children > stay at home, and neither > we nor our 3-year-old daughter nor our baby (for > heaven's sake!) live the > Kid Rock-and-Pamela Anderson Lee lifestyle. > > When we told the hospital staff that we simply > wanted more time to think > about giving the Hep B shot to our son -- doesn't > " informed consent " mean we > should be truly informed? -- we were badgered > aggressively. Some lectured us > about the need to " get on the proper vaccination > schedule. " Others warned > that Maryland, like more than 40 other states, > requires all schoolchildren > to be vaccinated for Hep B. Teachers, however, are > not subject to the > mandate, which is driven not just by altruistic > concern for children's > health. Ohio legislator Dale Van Vyven snuck the Hep > B mandate into a 1998 > hazardous-waste bill at the behest of > profit-maximizing vaccine > manufacturers' lobbyists. > > The " everybody does it " and " for the greater good " > arguments worked when we were overcautious, > over-trusting, first-time > parents who submitted our daughter to every single > vaccine without question. > This time, we resolved not to be rushed or bullied. > We declined to give our > son the politically correct Hep B shot, decided to > do more research, and > then took up the issue with our pediatrician. > > Boy, were we in for a rude awakening. Our doctor > parroted the American > Academy of Pediatrics line and mindlessly emphasized > the efficacy of > vaccines in eradicating childhood diseases. Well, we > weren't questioning > their collective efficacy. We questioned what the > individual health benefits > and health risks to our newborn were. Physicians > have blindly plied vaccines > before that have done more harm than good. A > childhood rotavirus vaccine, > for example, was approved for widespread use in 1998 > and withdrawn from the > market less than a year later after causing an > increase in the incidence of > painful bowel obstruction among infants. > > Our doctor, however, pooh-poohed our inquiries about > potential side effects. > He seemed to have no idea what those risks were and > no interest in finding > out. He was also incredibly condescending: " 95 > percent of what you read on > the Internet " is unreliable, he sermonized, as if we > were too dumb to > separate scientific fact from fraud. > > In the end, we concluded that some of the vaccines > were more worth the risks > than others. At my son's two-month checkup, the > pediatrician expected him to > receive a triple-combination shot called " Pediarix " > (consisting of Hep B, inactivated polio, and DTaP, > which covers diphtheria, > tetanus and acellular pertussis), as well as HiB > (for certain bacterial > infections) and Prevnar (for meningitis and blood > infections). I reiterated > my refusal of Hep B, accepted DTaP and HiB, and > asked to put off polio and > Prevnar. In response, I received a threat: Get all > the vaccines or get out > of our practice. > > " Informed consent " ? Ha. This was uninformed > coercion. > > We're leaving for another practice, a little bitter > but wiser. The > strong-arm tactics of the medical establishment > mustn't intimidate parents > from challenging the universal vaccine orthodoxy. > When it comes to > protecting our children's health, skepticism is the > best medicine. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.