Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 > Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:27:27 -0700 > Progress Report: Troubling Troop Tactics > " American Progress Action Fund " > <progress > Center for American Progress - Progress Report by David Sirota, Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin August 17, 2004 MILITARY Troubling Troop Tactics EDUCATION Gov. Bush Gets Schooled Under the Radar Sign up | Send tip | Permalinks | Mobile | Print Correction: Yesterday's Progress Report mistakenly indicated Porter Goss was a House Representative from Pennsylvania. He is from the state of Florida. MILITARY Troubling Troop Tactics President Bush yesterday announced the massive overhaul of the structure of the U.S. military, outlining a vague restructuring of deployment which would " bring home about 60,000 to 70,000 uniformed personnel. " #160;It's true #8211; the Pentagon has been striving to become lighter, more agile. And a look at the overseas configuration of U.S. troops after the Cold War is worth consideration. But Bush took this sensitive national security issue and divorced it from a complex, even-headed debate about the future of the U.S. military. The announcement skirted addressing any of the crucial details and questions. The result? An empty proposal which runs counter to America's economic, military and strategic interests. IN A LAND FAR, FAR AWAY: The New York Times writes, " the troop redeployment plan announced yesterday by President Bush makes little long-term strategic sense. " It takes time to deploy troops from the United States and, as former Defense Secretary Les Aspin once said (which was quoted in the 2/26/03 St. Louis Post Dispatch), " The pros all say that you have to get there in the first few hours, because if you lose the ground, it's hard to get it back. " John White, former deputy secretary of defense, says, " I don't understand how we gain strategic ability to respond by moving people to the U.S., further away from the likely trouble spots#8230;I don't get it. " The Washington Post concurs: " The conflicts of the past decade have been in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq; Africa is of increasing concern; none of these is closer to Kansas than to Germany. " REWARDING NORTH KOREA: Pulling troops from South Korea right now while North Korea is pushing for nuclear capability is sending exactly the wrong message. Gen. Wes Clark, who served as the former North American Treaty Organization supreme allied commander, " said reducing troops in Europe and Asia also would signal to North Korean leader Kim Jong Il that the United States had weakened its resolve against that country's nuclear weapons program. " The Washington Post opines, " North Korea has pressed for U.S. troop withdrawals for years; now that it is misbehaving in the nuclear field, it receives a reward, and for no concessions. " As one former Army officer put it, " It seems like preemptive concession. " IGNORING THE REAL PROBLEM: The New York Times writes that repositioning troops stationed in Germany, South Korea and Japan does " nothing to address the military's most pressing current need: relieving the chronic strain on ground forces that has resulted from failing to anticipate the long, and largely unilateral, American occupation of Iraq. " President Bush has refused to support a permanent increase in the size of the Army, causing American troops to have to endure longer and longer deployments in battle-torn Iraq and Afghanistan. EXPENSIVE OVERHAUL: Such a major restationing of troops is an expensive undertaking, as bases will have to be expanded to handle the incoming flux of service members. At the moment, any overseas bases are subsidized by the countries in which they are located. Germany continues to contribute nearly $1 billion each year to U.S. bases; South Korea and Japan also contribute hefty sums. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated in May that restationing troops could cost about $7 billion up front. And the payoff would be small. " Restationing Army forces would produce, at best, only small improvements in the United States' ability to respond to far-flung conflicts, " the CBO said. FAMILIES BACK HOME: An estimated 70,000 troops return to the United States, bringing 100,000 family members with them. President Bush, however, has cut funding for military families numerous times in the past. The Bush administration has tried to cut $1.5 billion out of funding for military housing and medical facilities; proposed closing commissaries; tried to roll back increases in monthly imminent-danger pay (from $225 to $150) and family-separation allowance (from $250 to $100) for troops in combat; cut $174 million from schools near military bases while eliminating aid to military base schools; and left out one million children living in military and veteran families from the child tax credit passed last year. EDUCATION Gov. Bush Gets Schooled In Florida yesterday, a state appeals court struck down a law backed by Gov. Jeb Bush which used taxpayer money to subsidize students attending religious schools. The development further undermines cases being made in several states for siphoning funds from public schools and granting them to privately run institutions. The decision was a victory for those opposed to the blurring of lines between church and state and could call into question federal proposals along similar lines. THE CASE AGAINST VOUCHERS: Yesterday's 2-1 decision by the Florida State appeals court invalidated " the centerpiece of Gov. Jeb Bush's education policies, " striking down a 1999 law allowing students from failing schools to attend private schools using taxpayer money. Though Bush has argued his program merely provides lower-income students with more choices regarding their education #8211; reasoning used by his brother's administration to justify similar programs on a federal level #8211; the court pointed out that the " 'vast majority' of students with vouchers used them to enroll in the kind of 'sectarian institutions,' or religious schools. " The ruling affirmed Gov. Bush's program ignores " the clear language of the Constitution, which prohibits tax revenues from being used 'in aid' of any religious institution. " It comes less than two months after Colorado's Supreme Court made a similar decision, declaring unconstitutional under state law the implementation of a law that would have provided private and religious school vouchers to qualifying students in Colorado. CHOICE INCENTIVE FUND: The Florida ruling may have an impact on federal proposals along similar lines. In January, Bush Education Secretary Rod Paige announced the president's 2005 budget would propose " $50 million for a Choice Incentive Fund to ensure America's parents have more choices for their children. " The Fund would provide competitive awards to states, school districts and community-based nonprofit organizations, which could then be used to help parents transfer their children to high-performing public, private or charter schools. Since the National Education Association (NEA) estimates 85 percent of private schools are also religious schools, such a proposal may meet similar opposition. Meanwhile, even as it proposes incentives for voucher-like programs, the administration promises to cut funds for Head Start and continues to underfund its own public school initiatives. ADMINISTRATION BURIES INCONVENIENT STUDY: In a session of " Ask the White House " earlier this summer, Education Under Secretary Nina Rees explained to a questioner that " people who attack charter schools are not well informed about them. " Perhaps the reason so many people are uninformed is that the Bush administration fails to publicize relevant data on the issue. According to the New York Times, " The first national comparison of test scores among children in charter schools and regular public schools shows charter school students often doing worse than comparable students in regular public schools. " The public may be excused for not knowing the results, however, since " the findings [were] buried in mountains of data the Education Department released without public announcement. " One would think the Bush administration would be more careful about publicizing data on an issue that is central to the president's No Child Left Behind program. " I guess that was poor publicity on our part, " said Robert Lerner, the federal commissioner for education statistics. Under the Radar HEALTH CARE #8211; ILLINOIS TAKES ANOTHER STEP: USA Today reports " Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D), abandoning a months-long bid to first get federal approval, will announce today that his state will help Illinois residents buy prescription drugs from pre-screened pharmacies in Canada, England and Ireland. " The program will be the first to assist residents with drug purchases from Europe, a move made necessary in part by the drug industry's increasingly successful effort to cut off supplies to Canadian pharmacies that provide drugs to U.S. residents. The White House/GOP leadership continues to oppose legislation giving seniors access to lower-priced, FDA-approved medicines from abroad, employing ever-more ridiculous arguments to protect the profits of the same drug companies who fund their political campaigns. Last week, the administration deployed its FDA chairman to claim, without any proof, that reimported medicines are a top al Qaeda target. Five other states, the District of Columbia and several cities offer programs to help residents or employees purchase drugs from pharmacies in Canada, where prices are generally lower than in the U.S. IRAQ #8211; TROOPS GET FIGHT AT HOME: AP reports, " increasing numbers of National Guard and Reserve troops who have returned from war in Iraq and Afghanistan are encountering new battles with their civilian employers at home. Jobs were eliminated, benefits reduced and promotions forgotten. " Since 9/11, the Labor Department reports receiving greater numbers of complaints under a 1994 law designed to give Guard and Reserve troops their old jobs back, or provide them with equivalent positions. Benefits and raises must be protected, as if the serviceman or servicewoman had never left. POLITICS #8211; CONTROLLING EXPOSURE: AP reports that the Bush campaign is exerting more and more control over exactly who President Bush interacts with in supposedly public events on the campaign trail. Specifically, Bush-Cheney officials make sure " dissenters and would-be hecklers are turned away. " On several occasions in recent weeks, citizens have been ejected from Bush events simply " because they wore pro-Kerry T-shirts. " The AP report follows an earlier report from the AP which found that citizens had to sign pledges of allegiance to the Republican Party before they were allowed to hear Vice President Dick Cheney speak. AP notes that " by contrast, most of Kerry's events are open to the public. " IRAQ #8211; VICE PRESIDENT 'COWARD': With Vice President Cheney continuing his attacks on his opponent's commitment to U.S. national security, some are fighting back by pointing out that Cheney's credentials in standing up for his own country are suspect. Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), a Navy pilot during Vietnam, said " When I hear [attacks] coming from Dick Cheney, who was a coward, who would not serve during the Vietnam War, it makes my blood boil. Those of us who served and those of us who went in the military don't like it when someone like a Dick Cheney comes out and he wants to be tough. Yeah, he'll be tough. He'll be tough with somebody else's blood, somebody else's kids. But not when it was his turn to go. " Cheney received five deferments to avoid serving in Vietnam. Cheney's first child, Elizabeth, was born nine months and two days after childless men were deemed eligible for the draft, allowing Cheney to receive a special deferment and avoid service. Meanwhile, President Bush has refused to release documents proving his whereabouts when he was supposed to be serving in the Texas Air National Guard. POLITICS #8211; CHENEY USES 'SENSITIVE' IN SAME INTERVIEW: Last week, Vice President Dick Cheney attacked Sen. John Kerry (D) for using the word " sensitive " in discussing war combat. Cheney went on the conservative Hugh Hewitt radio show and said, " I don't think any of the wars we've won, were won by us being quote sensitive. " Yet, minutes later in the very same interview, Cheney invoked the word " sensitive " to describe how the war in Iraq should be fought. He said of fighting in Najaf, " Obviously it is a sensitive area, and we are very much aware of its sensitivity. " See more examples of how Cheney and other top administration officials use the word " sensitive " to describe war, yet continue their attacks on Sen. Kerry for doing the same. FeaturesDON'T MISS DAILY TALKING POINTS: The Trouble With Troop Realignment TERRORISM: Salon looks at how subcontracting hunt for bin Laden to Pakistanis hurts America's national security. MEDIA: Why is a congressional candidate, who is " widely expected to lose, " raking in so much cash from telecom industry? POLITICS: Cheney desperately twists language in effort to attack opponents. DAILY GRILL " One group run by industry lobbyists, called the Sport Utility Vehicle Owners of America, says on its Web site that it is a myth that SUVs guzzle gas. " - NY Times, 8/17/04 VERSUS SUVs get, on average, less than 21 miles per gallon, with some getting less than 15 miles per gallon. By contrast, many hybrids already on the market get over 40 miles per gallon. - Detroit News, 12/13/02; ABC News, 4/25/01 DAILY OUTRAGE The Bush administration has sunk to invoking the fear of terrorism to prevent seniors from purchasing lower priced, FDA-approved medicines from Canada. Archives Progress Report Opportunity The Center for American Progress is now accepting intern applications for the fall semester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.