Guest guest Posted August 5, 2004 Report Share Posted August 5, 2004 > > Wed, 04 Aug 2004 08:37:33 -0700 > Progress Report: The Commission Strikes > Back > " American Progress Action Fund " > <progress > Center for American Progress - Progress Report by David Sirota, Christy Harvey, Judd Legum and Jonathan Baskin August 4, 2004 9/11 The Commission Strikes Back ABU GHRAIB The Blame Game UNDER THE RADAR 9/11 The Commission Strikes Back This week, President Bush claimed he was embracing the bold institutional changes proposed by the 9/11 Commission by creating this national intelligence director. In reality, he is resisting key elements of the proposal, such as putting the new position in the Cabinet (and thus ensuring the new director would stay in the loop), giving the director the power to hire and fire, or granting the director control of his budget. The result? A weak figurehead without power to effectively oversee the 15 agencies in the U.S. intelligence community. Key 9/11 Commissioners joined members of Congress yesterday to argue that the proposed national intelligence director must have the power to hire, fire, and control a budget. Period. NO PICKING AND CHOOSING: Commissioners John Lehman, a Republican, and Bob Kerrey, a Democrat, expressed their disapproval to the House Government Reform Committee yesterday. " The person that has the responsibility needs the authority, " Kerrey told the Committee. " Absent that, they're not going to be able to get the job done. " Lehman was blunt: " Our recommendations are not a Chinese menu. I would strongly recommend that these be viewed as a whole, that the powers needed to carry out these recommendations be enacted as a whole package. " Former Republican Sen. Slade Gorton of Washington, a member of the Commission, agreed: #160;''No one is going to listen to this individual'' #160;absent his or her ability to hire and fire and control budgets. BUDGET FUNDING: President Bush does not want the new intelligence director to control his own budget. Without the power of the purse, the job lacks the necessary clout to be effective. Lehman flatly stated, " Those powers must be given. " And senators yesterday agreed. Sen. Jay Rockefeller, (D-WV), vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, questioned Bush's decision, saying that " if the new director cannot control the budgets of intelligence agencies, this new position will be no more than window dressing. " Republican lawmakers backed him up. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) said: " We ought to take the bull by the horns, create this new national director . . . and really provide some authority, including budget authority. " Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), a former chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, agreed, charging the new director must be " someone with total control and accountability. That's the budget too. " HIRED AND FIRED: President Bush's approach would not allow the new director to have the power to hire and fire. Lehman said yesterday, " He has to have hiring and firing power, and not just budget coordination authority but budget appropriations and programming authority. " True, said Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA). " If you don't have the authority to pick the people, isn't a national director just a shell game and a shell operation? " Sen. Henry Waxman (D-CA) heartily agreed: " in this city, if you have a fancy title but you are not in the chain of command and you don't control the budget, you are a figurehead, and another figurehead is not what the 9/11 Commission recommended and what our nation needs. " RUMSFELD THE ROADBLOCK: Much of the opposition to an effective director of intelligence can be chalked up to a turf war. Bush's decision to limit the proposed intelligence chief's authority came after lobbying by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who has been adamantly against the creation of a centralized intelligence czar. In his testimony before the Commission in March, Mr. Rumsfeld said then that an intelligence czar would do the nation " a great disservice " by creating reliance on a single, centralized source of information. It would also reallocate funds; currently, 80% of the estimated $40 billion spent on intelligence in the U.S. is under the control of Rumsfeld's Department of Defense. Democratic Commissioner Bob Kerrey didn't mince words, saying since the Defense Department opposed the proposal, " next time there's a dust-up and there's a failure, don't call the director of Central Intelligence up here. Kick the crap out of DOD because they're the ones with the statutory authority over budget. " FIRST DO NO HARM: Creating a director of intelligence while hamstringing his power would be counterproductive to overall intelligence efforts. The 9/11 Commission Staff Director Philip D. Zelikow #8211; who served on Bush's 2001 transition team for the National Security Council #8211; #160;says there's no room for compromise when it comes to national intelligence: " Creating a national intelligence director that just superimposes a chief above the other chiefs without taking on the fundamental management issues we identify, is a step that could be worse than useless. " The Director of the Intelligence Policy Center at the RAND Corporation agreed: #160; " If it's set up correctly it has the potential to be a good idea. Otherwise it will be more harmful if we had not done it at all#8230;Because it will create another layer of bureaucracy which will add to the already complex structure that already oversees intelligence. " EDITORIAL PAGE: The New York Times this week sided with lawmakers and 9/11 Commissioners in chastising President Bush's foot dragging. " At a time when Americans need strong leadership and bold action, President Bush offered tired nostrums and bureaucratic half-measures#8230;He wanted to appear to be embracing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, but he actually rejected the panel's most significant ideas, and thus missed a chance to confront the twin burdens he faces at this late point in his term: the need to get intelligence reform moving whether he's re-elected or not, and the equally urgent need to repair the government's credibility on national security. " LAWMAKER, HEAL THYSELF: While Congress is rightly pressing the administration to implement the Commission's recommendations, Republican lawmakers are also reluctant to make any internal changes. The New York Times reports, " The Senate leadership has yet to identify members of a select working group who are supposed to map a plan for streamlining Congressional oversight. The Republican chairmen of the House and Senate armed services committees - two panels that might have to relinquish significant power - have not offered their views. " Several lawmakers admonished their colleagues not to let political considerations play a part in internal restructuring: #160; " We have to make sure we are driven more by 9-11 than by 11-2, " said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL). At least one congressional Republican promises he'll fight for the overhaul, however. Rep. Chris Shays (R-CT) said, " I will not vote for any rules of the House next year that don't create this strong oversight. " ABU GHRAIB The Blame Game The mainstream media #8211; after splashing their front pages with salacious photos #8211; has largely lost interest in the prison abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib. The administration and high-ranking military officials, however, have continued their efforts to pin all the blame on " a few bad apples. " The strategy continues with the military hearing of Pfc. Lynndie England, famously depicted in many of the photos, which began yesterday. Special Agents Paul Author and Warren Worth's testimony mirror the administration's talking points: " the abuse was the work of a small group of prison guards. " But as top officials play the blame game, official investigations into who was responsible are still ongoing. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said " there are some serious unanswered questions. " SCHLESINGER REPORT MAY BLAME RUMSFELD: A commission headed by former Defense Secretary and CIA director James Schlesinger investigating the Abu Ghraib scandal is expected to issue its final report in mid-August. Newsweek reports, " the Schlesinger panel is leaning toward the view that failure of command and control at the Pentagon helped create the climate in which the abuses occurred. " Among the Commission " there is strong sentiment to assign some responsibility up the line to senior civilian officials at the Pentagon, including Rumsfeld. " Rumsfeld is expected to be criticized " for failing to provide adequate numbers of properly trained troops for detaining and interrogating captives...not setting clear interrogation rules and for neglecting to see that guidelines were followed. " Prior to being tasked with detaining prisoners in Abu Ghraib, the 372nd Military Policy Company served as traffic cops. CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SHOW RESPONSIBILITY GOES TO THE TOP: Classified documents detailing the abuses obtained by Rolling Stone Magazine make clear that responsibility for the abuses " extends to several high-ranking officers still serving in command positions. " According to a secret report, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller #8211; now in charge of all military prisons in Iraq #8211; recommended that military police be " actively engaged in setting in conditions for successful exploitation of the internees. " After his plan was adopted, " guards began depriving prisoners of sleep and food, subjecting them to painful 'stress positions' and terrorizing them with dogs. " A former Army intelligence officer said the intent of Miller's order was clear: " It means treat the detainees like sh*t until they will sell their mother for a blanket, some food without bugs in it and some sleep. " Miller told Col. Thomas Pappas that military dogs " were effective in setting the atmosphere for which, you know, you could get information. " Read the full article for the all the gory details. THE ARMY'S 300-PAGE WHITEWASH: The most disgraceful attempt to date to deflect blame was a 300-page " investigation " released in July by the Army's inspector general. Astoundingly, the report found no " systemic " problems with the treatment of detainees by the military. The inspector general reached that conclusion " even though there were 94 documented cases of prisoner abuse...even though only four prisons of the 16 they visited had copies of the Geneva Conventions...even though the military police were improperly involved in interrogations; even though young people plucked from civilian life were sent to guard prisoners...with no training. " The so-called investigation " did not dig into the abuse cases, but merely listed them. " The report also " made no attempt to find out who had authorized threatening prisoners with dogs and sexually humiliating hooded men. " The inspector general was satisfied with merely reviewing the official Army field manual and noting those techniques in the manual.#160; WITHHOLDING RED CROSS REPORTS FROM SENATE INVESTIGATORS: For months, the Pentagon refused to share Red Cross reports documenting the conditions in American military prisons. In July, they finally agreed to show the reports " briefly to senators and a few members of the Armed Services Committee staff after the senators' personal aides were ushered out. " The reports were then brought back to the Pentagon. CIVIL LIBERTIES #8211; RACIAL PROFILING ALIVE & WELL: Three separate episodes this week make clear that, unfortunately, racial profiling is alive and well in America. First, President Bush's campaign demanded to know the race of a photo-journalist before allowing her to get press credentials. Then, according to the Boston Globe, a Boston College student leader who wears a turban and full beard in accord with his Sikh religion " was detained and interrogated for seven hours Saturday night by Secret Service agents for doing nothing more than taking photographs of the campus. " Now AP reports, " Iraqis visiting on a civil rights tour were barred from [Memphis] city hall after the city council chairman said it was too dangerous to let them in. " The seven Iraqi civic and community leaders are in the midst of a three-week American tour, sponsored by the State Department. The Iraqis were scheduled to meet with a city council member, " but Joe Brown, the council chair, said he feared the group was dangerous. " #160; Brown said, " We don't know exactly what's going on. Who knows about the delegation, and has the FBI been informed? We must secure and protect all the employees in that building. " Brown told the group's host he would " evacuate the building and bring in the bomb squads " if the group entered. MEDIA #8211; LAURA BUSH COMPLAINS ABOUT BIAS ON O'REILLY: First Lady Laura Bush granted a rare interview to Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, and in an ironic exchange, complained about media bias. As she confided to O'Reilly, " I think that a lot of times the media sensationalize or magnify things that really shouldn't be#8230;I do think there's a big move away from actual reporting, trying to report facts. It's in newspapers and everything you read #8212; that a lot more is opinion. " Of course, she did not mention that O'Reilly has one of the longest track records of distorting the facts and inserting opinion into news. For his part, O'Reilly " suggested that journalists were out of sync with most of the country. " RELIGION #8211; BUSH HAS NO FAITH IN THE LAW: A new article by the Progress Report's Judd Legum takes a look at the gap between the Bush administration's high-minded rhetoric on religious freedom and its noncompliance with the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, meant to promote religious freedoms around the world. In particular, the State Department has disregarded " the recommendation of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom -- an independent body created by the IRFA -- to list Saudi Arabia as a country of 'particular concern for religious freedom.'#8230;The State Department also turned a blind eye to its own findings on Pakistan, Eritrea and Turkmenistan and failed to list them as countries of 'particular concern.' " Legum concludes: " For all the White House's talk about religious freedom and its open appeal to religious constituencies in the election campaign, Bush's record in this area is stunning for its lack of interest, consistency and results. " #160;#160;#160;#160; MEDIA #8211; KNIGHT RIDDER WINS ACCOLADES FOR WMD COVERAGE: This month's American Journalism Review documents the courageous reporting done by the newspaper chain Knight Ridder in the run up to the Iraq war. The chain's Washington bureau is racking up accolades for its coverage of the Bush administration's faulty use of intelligence, even as more widely-respected outlets like the New York Times have had to apologize for their own reporting. Knight Ridder Washington reporters Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay were honored with the Raymond Clapper Memorial Award from the Washington Press Club Foundation in February, for a series of stories " that explored the accuracy of Bush administration claims about Iraq's weapons capabilities. " In American Journalism Review, Strobel and Landay describe the Bush administration's attempts to bully journalists: " I think this administration may have a fairly punitive policy when it comes to journalists who get in their face. And if you talk to some White House reporters, there is a fear of losing access. " CONGRESS #8211; MOON'S RISING INFLUENCE: The Hill reports The Rev. Sun Myung Moon, owner of a media empire which includes The Washington Times, " is undertaking an ambitious and diffuse campaign to influence members of Congress, their top foreign-policy staffs and United Nations ambassadors with an ongoing series of seminars and junkets in New York and Jerusalem and on Capitol Hill. " Moon, who called himself " humanity's Savior, Messiah, Returning Lord and True Parent, " at a congressional reception arranged by Sen. John Warner (R-VA) in June, is now luring lawmakers to symposiums co-sponsored with secular organizations, often under false auspices. " At one conference, billed as a symposium between congressional staffers and U.N. ambassadors, Hill aides were somewhat surprised to be greeted at the New Yorker hotel by a gaggle of non-English-speaking Korean women. " #160;Don't Miss DAILY TALKING POINTS: Failures at Abu Ghraib Go All The Way to the Top FOREIGN POLICY: Writing for American Progress, Sara Kupfer explores the nexus of terrorism and nuclear proliferation by looking at America's fragile relationship with Pakistan. LABOR: American Progress Senior Fellow Maria Echaveste's Orlando Sentinel op-ed exploring how Bush's labor policy adversely affects Hispanics. ENVIRO: Former President Clinton says Bush's new forest initiative will damage America's wilderness. TEIXEIRA: Public Opinion Watch Contact The Progress Report. #160;Daily Grill In an interview with The Associated Press, Donald Rumsfeld called Undersecretary Douglas Feith " without question one of the most brilliant individuals in government. " #8211; AP, 8/3/04 VERSUS Gen. Tommy Franks, the top U.S. commander in the Iraq war, wrote in his autobiography " American Soldier " that Feith was " getting a reputation around here as the dumbest (expletive) guy on the planet. " #8211; AP, 8/3/04 #160;Daily Outrage Laura Bush complained about the news media being too opinionated to Bill O'Reilly, the king of inserting opinions into news segments. #160;Archives Progress Report #160;Opportunity The Center for American Progress is now accepting intern applications for the fall semester. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.