Guest guest Posted July 8, 2004 Report Share Posted July 8, 2004 > JustSayNo > Thu, 08 Jul 2004 02:53:05 -0000 > [sSRI-Research] Cong Hearing Re: Disclosure > Pediatric SSRI Trials > > > ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION (AHRP) > Promoting openness and full disclosure > http://www.ahrp.org > > FYI > > A hearing has been tentatively set for July 20th by > the House > subcommittee on oversight and investigations, > chaired by Congressman > James Greenwood. The hearing will address issues of > disclosure > involving pediatric antidepressant drug trials--or > more accurately, > non-disclosure of adverse findings. The unpublished > evidence comes > from concealed company data. > > Questions, will no doubt be raised about the > responsibility of drug > manufacturers (ie., trial sponsors), of those who > conducted the > trials, and prominent psychiatrists whose names > appear in published > reports that fail to disclose negative > findings--neither the drugs' > failure to demonstrate a benefit nor the most severe > adverse effects. > > Recently, concealed findings have been brought to > public attention, > such as, evidence of severe drug withdrawal > symptoms, evidence of > drug-induced agitation/ aggression / hostility / > mania/ and even a > two-fold suicidal behavior in children /adolescents > testing an SSRI > antidepressant compared to those given a placebo. > > As disturbing as company suppression of vital > information about drug > safety and benefit is, the uncovering of suppression > by FDA officials- > -who are paid to protect the public health--is a > stunning betrayal of > public trust. > > On February 1, 2004, Rob Waters of the San Francisco > Chronicle > revealed that senior FDA officials were suppressing > the agency's own > medical expert, Dr. Andrew Mosholder, a child > psychiatrist, from > presenting his analysis of the unpublished company > data and > recommendations at a public FDA advisory committee > meeting ( February > 2, 2004) that had convened for that purpose. > > The advisory committee heard compelling testimony > from more than 50 > families whose children had suffered because the > risks have been > concealed from physicians and the public. Their > testimonies > corroborated the data analyzed by Dr. Mosholder. His > analysis and > recommendations were in harmony with those of the > British Medicines > authority. Although the advisory committee did not > hear Dr. > Mosholder's recommendations, they reached the same > conclusion, urging > the FDA to issue " Black Box " warning labels. > > As noted, the suppression of Dr. Mosholder's report > was first > revealed by the San Francisco Chronicle, Feb. 1--the > day before the > advisory committee meeting. I personally informed > the committee of > the report and its suppression in my comments. Not > a single reporter > present at the meeting saw fit to enquire of FDA > officials why Dr. > Mosholder was prevented from presenting his > findings. Two months > passed before someone in the major media understand > the significance > of such suppression of vital information. On March > 30, Sharyl > Attkisson of CBS evening News reported the issue. > See: > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/30/eveningnews/main609491.shtml > > > > Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav > Tel: 212-595-8974 > e-mail: veracare > > > > http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer? > pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory & c > =StoryFT & cid=1087373496224 > > Financial Times > > Anti-depressant hearings set for this month By > Christopher Bowe in > New York > Published: July 5 2004 18:41 | > > A House of Representatives subcommittee is planning > to hold hearings > in the first half of this month to address questions > on the potential > for anti-depressants to cause suicidal behaviour in > children. > > The Oversight and Investigation subcommittee, led by > James Greenwood, > the Pennsylvania Republican on the House Energy and > Commerce > committee, intends to gather information on the use > of anti- > depressants by children, potential safety > consequences and US > regulatory research into safety issues. > > Also, the subcommittee will gather information on > the circumstances > of an internal recommendation made by a Food and > Drug Administration > researcher. > Considerable interest has focused on allegations > that FDA senior > officials barred Dr Andrew Mosholder, an FDA > scientist, from > releasing his recommendation that anti-depressants > increased the risk > of suicidal tendencies in young people. He also > recommended immediate > further regulatory warnings about their use by > minors. > > Dr Mosholder found that the drugs, particularly > selective serotonin > reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), continue to pose > questions about risk of > side- effects, especially in children. > > He also raised questions about the regulators' > review of trial data > and safety warnings from such data. > > In May, Columbia University's Division of Child and > Adolescent > Psychiatry released a study showing parents' worries > about depression > medication. > About 68 per cent of parents feared that > anti-depressants were over- > prescribed to young people, according to the study > conducted by the > Carmel Hill Center for Early Diagnosis and Treatment > at the > university. > > However, while 31 per cent of parents considered > anti-depressants > harmful to adolescents, 69 per cent thought the > drugs were not > harmful or did not know. More than half the parents > responded that > teenagers received treatment for depression without > being clinically > depressed. > > Prior to a February regulatory advisory committee > meeting to weigh > the risks of anti-depressants and suicide, Dr > Mosholder completed a > review of clinical trials. He concluded that > anti-depressants could > be linked to increased suicidal tendencies in > children and > recommended regulators act. > > But he was prevented from presenting that view to > the advisory panel. > Senator Charles Grassley, Republican from Iowa, > wrote to regulators > that Dr Mosholder was given a " script to read " . > > The FDA began an investigation aimed at identifying > the leak of the > Mosholder report, according to a congressional > source. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.