Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 23 Jun 2004 05:00:01 -0000 The Weekly Spin, Wednesday, June 23, 2004 weekly-spin-admin THE WEEKLY SPIN, Wednesday, June 23, 2004 --- sponsored by PR WATCH (www.prwatch.org) --- The Weekly Spin features selected news summaries with links to further information about current public relations campaigns. It is emailed free each Wednesday to rs. SHARE US WITH A FRIEND (OR FIFTY FRIENDS) Who do you know who might want to receive Spin of the Week? Help us grow our r list! Just forward this message to people you know, encouraging them to sign up at this link: http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/_sotd.html --- THIS WEEK'S NEWS 1. Thompson Spreads 'Gospel of Personal Responsibility' 2. Not Wrong, Just Misunderstood 3. Exxon's Secret Sponsorship of Climate Skeptics 4. Industry Warned of Activist Threat 5. Fact-checking Michael Moore 6. What the President Said 7. War Is Still Sell 8. Clamping Down, Down Under 9. The CIA's Secret Failings 10. 'NRA News' Seeks to Pistol-Whip McCain/Feingold Law 11. Mac Attack Down Under 12. A Load of Manure 13. Another Setback for the E-voting Lobby ---- 1. THOMPSON SPREADS 'GOSPEL OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY' http://www.informedeating.org/newsletters/040615.htm The media giants have taken interest in America's obesity epidemic - recently sponsoring a three-day conference - but the food industry appears to be calling the shots when it comes to dealing with the issue. " What I found most striking at the [Time/ABC News Obesity Summit] was the utter lack of leadership from our federal government officials, " writes Center for Informed Food Choice's Michele Simon. Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson's keynote speech " had all the cheerleading you might expect, but none of the substance. He was long on showing off government programs ostensibly addressing the problem, but short on acknowledging how they could do better. The chilling call to go out and 'spread the gospel of personal responsibility' is still ringing in my ears. Just as disturbing was the glowing praise for industry, including at least one mischaracterization of their promises. Contrary to Thompson's statement, Coca-Cola has not vowed to end exclusive contracting in schools, and certainly has not done so. Moreover, the secretary's glee over the increasing 'low-carb' menu options in restaurants (he referenced this 'good news' more than once) was especially startling for its nutritional dubiousness, " Simon writes. SOURCE: The Informed Eating Newsletter, June 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2004.html#1087940682 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1087940682 3. EXXON'S SECRET SPONSORSHIP OF CLIMATE SKEPTICS http://www.exxonsecrets.org/ Despite the best PR efforts of industry, global warming is a growing concern to an increasing number of people in the world. That's because corporate propaganda addresses only the perception of climate change, distorting science and corrupting regulatory processes, and not the reality. The new website ExxonSecrets.org explores the links between Exxonmobil, think tanks, corporate friendly scientists, and government officials. The interactive website, sponsored by Greenpeace and based on the research of CLEAR (Clearinghouse on Advocacy and Environmental Research), illustrates how Exxonmobil has funneled over $12 million dollars since 1998 to influencing the global debate on climate change. For example, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works chair James Inhofe (R-OK), who once suggested that global warming " could be the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people, " has ties to both the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the Annapolis Center for Science-Based Public Policy, which jointly account for over $2 million of Exxonmobil largess since 1998. More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2004.html#1087858783 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1087858783 4. INDUSTRY WARNED OF ACTIVIST THREAT http://www.prweek.com/news/news_story.cfm?ID=214332 & site=3 " One of the most compelling speakers at the recent Biotechnology Industry Organization conference ... wasn't a researcher or a venture capitalist, but a representative of a special agency with the FBI, " Paul Holmes writes for PR Week. Conference attendees were warned that " most of their companies were on a list of more than 1,000 potential corporate targets circulating among activists " and urged " to take a more public stand on the issue. " Radical animal rights groups were described as " the country's leading domestic terrorist threat. " While industry trade groups like BIO are confronting activists, Holmes writes, they " are often reduced to responding to angry rhetoric and graphic images with dry facts about the benefits of research. To counter the emotional appeal of the activists, the industry needs individuals - both researchers and the patients whose lives they have saved - to tell their equally powerful stories. " Corporate activist and PR guru Ross Irvine suggests that PR people have taken the " easy way out " by avoiding confrontations with activists. Ross advises PR folks to take a look at how " activists take a much broader and more complex approach to communicating issues than corporate PR folks. ... It shows what can and needs to be done to if corporate PR folks want to battle activists successfully. " SOURCE: PR Week, June 21, 2004 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1087790400 8. CLAMPING DOWN, DOWN UNDER http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/minister1.nsf/content/government_ngo_relationshi\ p.htm The Australian government is using a report by the right-wing think tank Institute for Public Affairs to determine " the most effective ways to ensure that the transparency of the growing engagement between Government and Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) is maintained. " The report, titled " Managing Relations with Non-Government Organisations, " maintains that NGOs enjoy " privileged positions which are not accorded to other members of the community. " It suggests that " information [be] made public about both the relationship itself, and about the NGO with which the Department has a relationship. " Report co-author Gary Johns wrote in an opinion piece, " If the far more complex matter of corporate performance can be presented in simple terms, the same can be achieved for charitable NGOs. " SOURCE: Press release, Australian Family and Community Services, June 16, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2004.html#1087358403 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1087358403 11. MAC ATTACK DOWN UNDER http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/13/1087065034025.html In Australia, McDonald's launched an unprecedented, multi-million dollar advertising and PR campaign to counter the release of the US documentary " Super Size Me, " which follows filmmaker Morgan Spurlock on a month long McDonald's binge. Until recently, the fast-food giant chose to ignore the hit movie. But McDonald's now fears for its reputation. Its advertisements feature McDonald's Australia chief Guy Russo, saying Spurlock's 30-day McDonald's diet is " stupid. " SOURCE: The Age, June 14, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2004.html#1087185604 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1087185604 12. A LOAD OF MANURE http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/6/prweb133293.htm A university study comparing the amount of bacteria on conventionally-grown and organically-grown produce found that the level of the common bacteria E. coli on certified organic produce was " not statistically different from that in conventional samples. " Alex Avery, of the right-wing Hudson Institute's project the Center for Global Food Issues, attacked the researchers for their pro-organic " bias " in an editorial posted on the USDA's Food Safety Research Information Office's website. Avery claims, " The concern about manure and bacterial contamination of organic foods was originally raised in 1997 by a physician with the Centers for Disease Control. " That would be Dr. Robert Tauxe, who told the New York Times in August 2000, " The big question is how to properly compose manure ... but our concern applies to both organic and conventional farms. " SOURCE: June 14, 2004, PR Web More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2004.html#1087185603 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1087185603 13. ANOTHER SETBACK FOR THE E-VOTING LOBBY http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-06-14-leagu\ e-women-voters-redux_x.htm Bowing to the demands of hundreds of angry members, the League of Women Voters has rescinded its support of paperless voting machines. About 800 delegates who attended LWV's biennial convention in Washington voted overwhelmingly in favor of a resolution that supports " voting systems and procedures that are secure, accurate, recountable and accessible. " SOURCE: Associated Press, June 14, 2004 More web links related to this story are available at: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/June_2004.html#1087185602 To discuss this story in the PR Watch Forum, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1087185602 ---- The Weekly Spin is compiled by staff and volunteers at PR Watch. To or unsubcribe, visit: http://www.prwatch.org/cmd/_sotd.html Daily updates and news from past weeks can be found at the Spin of the Day " section of the PR Watch website: http://www.prwatch.org/spin/index.html Archives of our quarterly publication, PR Watch, are at: http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues PR Watch, Spin of the Day and the Weekly Spin are projects of the Center for Media & Democracy, a nonprofit organization that offers investigative reporting on the public relations industry. We help the public recognize manipulative and misleading PR practices by exposing the activities of secretive, little-known propaganda-for-hire firms that work to control political debates and public opinion. Please send any questions or suggestions about our publications to: editor Contributions to the Center for Media & Democracy are tax-deductible. Send checks to: CMD 520 University Ave. #310 Madison, WI 53703 To donate now online, visit: https://www.egrants.org/donate/index/ _____________ Weekly-Spin mailing list Weekly-Spin http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/weekly-spin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.