Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Talk To Me

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:34:40 -0500

HSI - Jenny Thompson

Talk To Me

 

Talk To Me

 

Health Sciences Institute e-Alert

 

June 14, 2004

 

**************************************************************

 

Dear Reader,

 

When a clinical study is described by The New York Times as

a " landmark government-financed " study, that's a pretty good

tip off that we're all supposed to give a respectful bow and

accept the results as gospel. After all, landmarks stand for

the ages, and government financing, well, that's the gold

standard of impartiality... right?

 

All of my skeptical alarm bells started clanging earlier

this month when the Times and other mainstream media outlets

reported that a National Institutes of Health (NIH) study

showed that Prozac was more effective than counseling

(or " talk therapy " ) in helping teens overcome depression.

 

And just as I suspected, there's a cow in the ointment,

because: A) Drawing conclusions from the current results is

ridiculously premature, and B) If you insist on jumping to

conclusions, then the real headline is not about the

effectiveness of the drug, its about the drug's danger.

 

There's your landmark right there.

 

-----------------------------

The kids are alright

-----------------------------

 

The new study won't be published until this summer. But

drawing on reports from several news outlets we can piece

together the basic nuts and bolts.

 

The NIH enlisted about 440 kids, aged 12 to 17, who were

diagnosed with moderate to severe depression. The subjects

were then assigned to four groups:

 

* Daily dose of Prozac

* Daily placebo

* Talk therapy with no medication

* Prozac and talk therapy combined

 

Treatments lasted for 36 weeks, but during the first 12

weeks, 61 subjects dropped out of the study for reasons

unreported at this point. Using a common psychological

measurement scale, the combined talk therapy and Prozac

group had the best outcome, with 71 percent responding well

to treatment. Among those who received only Prozac, 61

percent responded well, while 43 responded well to talk

therapy alone. In the placebo group, 35 percent responded

well.

 

" Case closed, " was the general tone of the news reports.

Combine Prozac with counseling, and well over two-thirds of

the kids improve, they said. Don't want to bother with

therapy? No problem - just back up the Prozac truck and

plenty of kids will be chipper again in no time.

 

Unless they decide to harm themselves.

 

-----------------------------

High stakes

-----------------------------

 

As I mentioned above, these results are far too premature

for the Times or anyone else to start throwing around a term

like " landmark. "

 

The subjects in the study were tested for 36 weeks, but the

reported results are only based on an analysis of the first

12 weeks. So since we don't know what the analysis of the

remaining 24 weeks might bring, maybe we should keep the

corks in the champagne bottles for just awhile longer. Or at

the very least, the NIH shouldn't deliver thumbs-up

information that doctors and parents of young patients may

act on.

 

But what received even less attention was the rate of

attempted suicides among the subjects. Buried deep in the

Times report is the information that among those who

finished the study but didn't take Prozac, there was one

suicide attempt. And among those who did take the drug: five

attempts.

 

If I'm a parent with a depressed teen, I can't like those

odds.

 

-----------------------------

Pass it on

-----------------------------

 

Most people never lay eyes on a drug company study - they

get their information about studies from the mainstream

media. And it's been obvious for a long time that some of

the gritty and most revealing details of most of these

studies never make the 6:00 o'clock news.

 

Of course, the media isn't completely to blame for this.

When drug companies conduct studies that produce unwanted

outcomes, the results may end up as part of the FDA's public

record, but only the studies that deliver positive

conclusions are promoted for high-profile publication and

then given a big shove into the mainstream spotlight.

 

That's one of the reasons why New York State is suing

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), makers of the antidepressant Paxil.

The NY suit charges that GSK suppressed four studies that

concluded the drug was ineffective in treating adolescents.

The suit also claims that the studies draw a possible link

between Paxil use and suicidal thoughts among adolescent

users.

 

Did you hear about those four studies on the news? Nope. Not

a peep. Not until the NY attorney general decided to do

something about them. And although the outcome of this

lawsuit will be a long time coming, I'm hoping that the

notoriety of it will be enough to create my favorite kind of

regulation: Water Cooler Regulation. When people start

talking about the dangers of antidepressants for kids around

the water cooler, that will do more to inform the public

than any number of government-mandated warning labels.

 

**************************************************************

 

To start receiving your own copy of the HSI e-Alert, visit:

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/freecopy.html

Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to

receive their own copy of the HSI e-Alert.

 

**************************************************************

 

.... and another thing

 

You could probably use some meat on your bones. Literally.

 

For many years there was a misconception in the nutrition

community that protein intake compromised bone mass density

(BMD). This idea stemmed mostly from the fact that increased

protein may prompt a discharge of calcium into the urine.

Based on this, many doctors and nutritionists jumped to the

conclusion that protein must have a negative effect on BMD.

 

But times have changed. In the e-Alert " Good to the Bone "

(11/6/03), I told you about a study in the American Journal

of Clinical Nutrition that showed how postmenopausal women

with the highest protein intake may actually have a

significantly higher BMD compared to women with low amounts

of protein in their diets.

 

Now a new study in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &

Metabolism confirms those results. US Department of

Agriculture researchers recruited 32 men and women over the

age of 50 whose diets contained the recommended daily

calcium intake of 800 mg. For nine weeks, subjects followed

either a high-protein or low-protein diet, and were advised

to decrease carbohydrate intake to balance calorie levels

with the increase in protein.

 

At the end of the study period, researchers found that

urinary calcium excretion was statistically the same in both

groups. But when a bone growth factor was measured, those in

the high-protein group had higher levels of the factor.

 

Contrary to the conventional wisdom that a high-protein diet

may contribute to osteoporosis, the UDSA team concluded that

such a diet " may have a favorable impact on the skeleton in

healthy older men and women. "

 

Mainstream nutritionists who refuse to let go of the low-fat

diet mindset often talk about the health hazards of low-

carb/high-protein diets. Little by little we see that

argument eroding, and this study just adds to that erosion.

 

To Your Good Health,

 

Jenny Thompson

Health Sciences Institute

 

**************************************************************

To start receiving your own copy of the HSI e-Alert, visit:

http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/freecopya.html

Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to

receive their own copy of the HSI e-Alert.

 

**************************************************************

 

Sources:

" Antidepressant Seen as Effective in Treatment of

Adolescents " Gardiner Harris, The New York Times, 6/2/04,

nytimes.com

" Prozac Use by Teen Seen as Effective " Reuters, 6/2/04,

msnbc.msn.com

" Prozac 'Best for Children' " Mark Sage, The Journal, 6/3/04,

icteesside.icnetwork.co.uk

" NY State Sues Drug Giant " CBS News, 6/3/04, cbsnews.com

" Effect of Dietary Protein Supplements on Calcium Excretion

in Healthy Older Men and Women " Journal of Clinical

Endocrinology Metabolism, Vol. 89, No. 3, March 2004,

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

" Higher Protein Levels Could Strengthen Bones "

NutraIngredients.com, 4/5/04, nutraingredients.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Messenger

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...