Guest guest Posted June 10, 2004 Report Share Posted June 10, 2004 (Numerous reports in this message, first from the Globe and Mail, second from The Toronto Star, third the earlier 'generic' one from Canadian Press - note the similarities ) Report details medical error horrors http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040610/ERRORS10\ /TPHealth/ Adverse events have led to 1.1 million added days in hospital per year, researchers say By ANDRÉ PICARD PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTER Thursday, June 10, 2004 - Page A21 Treating people who fall prey to medical errors gobbles up more than 1.1 million hospital days and adds a whopping $750-million to the country's health-care bill each year, a new study suggests. The news follows on the heels of a groundbreaking study revealing that one in every 13 medical/surgical, acute-care hospital patients suffers from an " adverse event, " and that these failings, avoidable and otherwise, kill up to 24,000 Canadians annually. The new report, released yesterday by the Canadian Institute for Health Information, provides graphic details on the woes befalling patients. The data show that: one in nine adults contracts an infection while in hospital, ranging from pneumonia to SARS; one in nine patients receives the wrong medication, or the wrong dose; one in 20 women suffers severe tearing during childbirth; one in every 81 babies born vaginally suffers trauma, emerging with injuries such as a broken shoulder; one in every 299 patients receiving a blood transfusion will have a reaction; one in every 1,124 adults over the age of 65 suffers a broken hip during a hospital stay; one in every 6,667 surgery patients will have a foreign object left in his or her body after the procedure. " Like nuclear energy and aerospace, health care is a complex environment where errors can maim and even kill, " said Jennifer Zelmer, vice-president of research and analysis at CIHI. She said about one-third of adverse events are preventable. While the vast majority of patients recover quickly, Ms. Zelmer said the additional resources required to deal with medical errors is substantial. Patients who suffer harm often have their hospital stays prolonged. While unable to provide a detailed cost breakdown, she said a conservative estimate of the cost of 1.1 million hospital days of care would be about $750-million. Adverse events are unintended injuries or complications caused by health-care management, not by the underlying disease. Sav Rosenberg, 61, of Laval, Que., knows all too well the cost. On Feb. 26, he was admitted to Jewish General Hospital for a routine prostate operation but, just before discharge, he contracted a bacterial infection, Clostridium difficile. " I was supposed to stay, originally, for three days. I ended up 24 days in the hospital and I'm still sick, " Mr. Rosenberg said. He has only recently been able to return to work, driving a cab. Still, he was a lucky one; at least 79 patients have died of the virulent infection in recent months. Mr. Rosenberg said he had " no idea " he could get sick in hospital. John Wade, chairman of the new Canadian Patient Safety Institute, said this anecdote demonstrates there is a lot of work to be done in improving both patient safety and patient education. " This report provides us with valuable information on the incidence and magnitude of adverse events. Now it's time for action, " he said. But Dr. Wade, an anesthesiologist, cautioned that patients have to be realistic. " We're aiming for zero, but we will never get to zero; we will never eliminate error or adverse events completely. " He also said the numbers have to be kept in perspective. There are about 2.5 million admissions to acute care hospitals in Canada annually. About 187,000 patients suffer from adverse events. Of that number, between 9,250 and 23,750 died in 2000 after a failure in their treatment. (This does not imply that the medical error was directly responsible for their death, because many hospital patients are already acutely ill.) Michael Decter, chairman of the Health Council of Canada, said that reducing the number of adverse events must be a priority because it undermines faith in the health system, and adds substantial costs. He also suggested that the Canadian public is too tolerant of failings in the health system. " Were we in any other industry, facing a problem of this magnitude, I suspect there would be enormous public consternation, " Mr. Decter said. But he was quick to add that the solution is to give health professionals the tools to improve care, not persecute them when things go wrong, often inadvertently. " This is a massive problem that's going to have to be dealt with by thoughtful effort, not by blaming people, " he said. Mr. Decter said one approach that should be seriously considered is no-fault insurance for patients who suffer from adverse events. The new research on adverse events was just one element of the fifth annual report of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The CIHI is an independent, not-for-profit organization mandated to improve the health of Canadians and the health-care system by providing quality health information. Frequency of complications in hospital There are roughly 2.2 million patients discharged from hospital a year in Canada. A national estimate of the average number of Canadians who receive care or are exposed to a risk per adverse event: 1 in 9 adults with health problems reported being given the wrong medication or dosage by a doctor, hospital or pharmacist in the past two years. 1 in 16 reported an adverse event for themselves or a loved one in the past year. 1 in 152 deaths are associated with preventable adverse events for medical/surgical patients in acute care hospitals. 1 in 1,124 people over age 65 suffered in-hospital hip fractures. 1 in 6,667 had a foreign object left in their body after a surgical procedure. 1 in 72,046 got infected with hepatitis B from a blood transfusion. 1 in 10 million got infected with HIV from a blood transfusion. SOURCE: CANADIAN INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH INFORMATION ================================================================ http://thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1\ & c=Article & cid=1086819011142 & call_pageid=968867505381 & col=969048872038 Drug errors affect 1 in 9 patients Report details health care statistics Electronic prescribing eyed as solution Jun. 10, 2004. 10:33 AM KAREN PALMER PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTER Canadians put themselves at risk of infection, broken bones or drug mix-ups every time they set foot in hospitals, doctor's offices or local pharmacies, according to a report released yesterday by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. " I think anytime anybody enters a hospital or they seek care, there's a potential for infection and there's a risk. Some of it is very minor, some of it is major, but there's always a potential risk, " said John Ward, chair of the Canadian Patient Safety Institute. " We will never eliminate error or adverse events completely, but we can certainly reduce the incidence, " he said. The report found that one in every nine Canadians received the wrong medication or a drug overdose while getting medical care in the past two years. Graphic: What can go wrong About 5.2 million Canadians also say they or a family member were harmed while receiving medical help, resulting in injuries that sent them to hospital, prolonged their stay or ended in disability or death. " No matter how you slice it, it's a very high number and it's one that causes great concern, " said Dr. Michael Decter, chair of the Canadian Health Council. The report builds on a ground-breaking study released last month, showing that one in every 13 patients treated in hospital falls victim to a medical error. Yesterday's report paints an even more detailed picture of medical mishaps that can happen in hospital, at the doctors' office or the local pharmacy. The report found that one in every nine adult patients and one in every 11 pediatric patients treated in hospital picked up an infection like pneumonia. One in every 20 mothers giving birth suffered a third- or fourth-degree tear while delivering and the babies themselves suffered traumatic events, like a dislocated shoulder, at a rate of one of every 81 deliveries. -- One in every 11 children pick up an infection like pneumonia while in hospital -- The report also looked at falls and fractures amongst elderly patients and the number of times a foreign object, like a sponge or surgical instrument, was left inside a patient. The human cost is enormous, Decter said, and the health system suffers as well. Experts are looking to electronic solutions, including electronic patient records that would store information on drug allergies, as well as electronic prescribing, which would better track drug history and help prevent overdoses. " No drugs are absolutely safe. There's a risk associated with all drug therapy, " said Jeff Poston, executive director of the Canadian Association of Pharmacists. However, he said health care providers like doctors, nurses and pharmacists need to talk to each other and include each other in the decisions made about a patient's care. More important, Decter said, hospitals and health workers need to move away from a culture where every mistake could mean a lawsuit. " This is a massive problem which is only going to be dealt with by very thoughtful effort, not by blaming people but by finding a way of bringing the errors out into the open so we can find better ways of doing things, " he said. Hilary Short, president of the Ontario Hospital Association, agreed. " The key is that they are trying to create a culture in hospitals where you don't assign blame when something happens. You want a situation where people don't cover up adverse events. You find the problem and fix the system so it does not happen again, " she said yesterday. Short said she had not yet seen a copy of the study, but had heard reports. " Patient safety is job number one in hospitals, " she said. " Yes, adverse events do occur, but hospitals are learning more each day how to prevent such events from happening. With files from Philip Mascoll =================== The generic " Canada Press " article: Medical errors consuming up to 1.1 million hospital bed days a year: report HELEN BRANSWELL Canadian Press Wednesday, June 09, 2004 TORONTO (CP) - Patients who have experienced medical errors are clogging up a huge number of hospital beds every year in Canada, potentially absorbing as many available beds as all women going through pregnancy and childbirth, a new report suggested Wednesday. As many as 1.1 million hospital days may be attributable to correcting problems caused by so-called adverse events, the Canadian Institute for Health Information said in its annual report. In addition to endangering the lives and health of people, adverse events are draining badly needed resources from the overtaxed system, said Dr. John Wade, the chair of the Canadian Patient Safety Institute. " I think there's a huge economic argument to be made that that's costing the system billions of dollars and that if we could prevent some of that, rather than patient safety (initiatives) costing the system, it should save the system, " Wade said in an interview. " And those monies could be reinvested in (reducing) wait lists or whatever. " The number of hospital days was calculated using data taken from a recently released landmark study which sought to establish for the first time the rate at which things go wrong in hospitals and what impact that has on the patients. That study, by Prof. Ross Baker of the University of Toronto and Dr. Peter Norton of the University of Calgary, found that one in 13 people experienced an adverse event while in hospital and that the medical error added on average six days to their hospital stay. The CIHI report extrapolated that to reach the 1.1 million hospital days figure. The Baker-Norton report also found that preventable errors may be contributing to between 9,200 and 24,000 deaths a year - a range the experts at Wednesday's report release admitted they found surprising. " No matter how you slice it, it's a very high number. And it's one that causes great concern and . . . it's urgent to attack it, " Wade said. Michael Decter, who was chair of the institute of health information when it agreed to co-fund the Baker-Norton study, said he'd initially hoped it would show the long-accepted estimate of 10,000 preventable deaths was an exaggeration. " So this is a massive problem which is only going to be dealt with by very thoughtful effort. Not by blaming people but by finding a way of bringing the errors out into the open so that we can find better ways of doing things, " Decter said. The institute helped shed more light on the scale of the problem by analysing some of its own data, gathered from hospitals across the country, as well as the released Baker-Norton data and information from other sources. Its analysis suggests: - One in nine adults contract an infection while in an acute care hospital. The number among children is one in 11. Urinary tract infections, surgery site infections and pneumonia are the most common of these. - One in 20 women experience third or fourth degree tears during childbirth. - Birth trauma occurs in one in every 81 births. Trauma can range from a dislocated shoulder to much more serious problems. - One in 1,100 seniors break a hip by falling while in hospital. - One in 6,700 people who have surgery have a foreign object, things like a sponge or a surgical instrument, left in them during surgery. Some measures are being adopted in efforts to reduce medical errors. Some hospitals, for instance, require a surgeon to sign a patient's body in a pre-surgical visit so they'll be sure to cut in the right spot when the patient reaches the operating room. And studies have shown that electronic record keeping - using computer programs designed to flag potentially dangerous drug interactions - can reduce the rate of medication errors. But electronic records have not been widely adopted as yet. Still, experts believe a culture shift needs to occur in hospitals before major progress can be made. Surveys suggest health-care professionals are aware of the problem, but feel pressure to hide mistakes because they fear being sued. Norton said members of the public have to have the right to sue if they sustain serious harm from medical errors. But the system needs some adjustment to ensure that health professionals can openly address the problem so that they can seek solutions. " In some sense we need to have a correction, a steering correction, " he said from Calgary. Wade agreed, noting the patient safety institute believes provincial evidence laws should be changed to allow medical workers to discuss errors in a " privileged " environment where their comments could not be used against them later in court. The institute is drafting a template for that legislative change, he said. That doesn't mean hospitals should be able to hide errors, he insisted. Most provincial regulatory bodies require errors to be noted on patient charts and discussed with patients and their families. There's an advantage to hospitals in that, Decter noted. Studies suggest people who have been told they were the victim of an error are less likely to sue than those who were not told. Until medical professionals feel free to reveal and discuss errors, the goal of improving patient safety will remain elusive, Wade said. " If we don't change the culture from one of blame and shame to one of information sharing and solving the problems, we won't make much headway. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.