Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Ultrasound-off

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Fri, 28 May 2004 21:18:07 -0500

WC Douglass

Ultrasound-off

 

Daily Dose

 

May 28, 2004

 

**************************************************************

 

Sounding the alarm on hazardous ultrasound - again

 

It's been a year since I've written anything about this, but

a recent Associated Press article has spurred me to weigh in

again on this traditionally hot-button topic: Prenatal

ultrasound.

 

As you may know, I'm vehemently opposed to this all-too-

common procedure the vast majority of conventional doctors

regard as harmless. Why? Because evidence shows that it can

cause subtle damage to the prenatal brain. In past Daily

Doses and in issues of my newsletter, I've exposed various

bodies of research that point to a causal link between

prenatal ultrasound and:

 

* Lower birth weights

* Delayed speech development

* Subtle changes in brain chemistry

* False positive diagnosis of brain defects

 

Also, one large-scale Swedish study showed a link between

ultrasound scanning and left-handedness (believe it or not,

often the result of subtle prenatal brain damage). The study

revealed a 32% greater chance of left-handedness among the

ultrasound group when compared to an un-scanned " control "

group. Need more proof of this correlation? Since 1975,

when doctors started aggressively ultrasound scanning late

in pregnancy (usually to determine the baby's sex), rates of

left-handedness have increased dramatically - especially

among male babies. Look it up.

 

Yes, there's lot's of evidence out there that ultrasound is

harmful to unborn children. Yet despite the fact that

respected medical journals like the Lancet, The Canadian

Medical Association Journal, and the New England Journal of

Medicine have all written about this topic, the mainstream

has all but ignored the negative evidence.

 

Even the lethargic, quick-to-turn-the-other-way FDA has

commented on the dangers of ultrasound. According to the AP

story, their position on the technique is this: " Ultrasound

is a form of energy, and even at low levels, laboratory

studies have shown that it can produce physical effects in

tissue, such as jarring vibrations and a rise in

temperature... prenatal ultrasounds can't be considered

innocuous. "

 

Remember, non-natal ultrasound is often used to super-heat

and soften damaged muscle tissue after surgery or injuries.

Despite all of this, nearly every conventional doctor out

there continues to grant this sonic bombardment - which can

reach the equivalent of nearly 100 decibels (as loud as a

subway train!) - the thumbs up, and now, it's being made

available to parents AT THE LOCAL MALL. Keep reading...

 

**************************************************************

To start receiving your own copy of the Daily Dose, visit:

http://www.realhealthnews.com/dailydose/freecopy.html

Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to

receive their own copy of the Daily Dose.

 

**************************************************************

 

Prenatal " portrait studios "

 

In upscale suburban shopping malls all across the country,

dozens of unregulated ultrasound centers have opened in just

the past two years. Sporting cute monikers like Fetal Fotos,

Womb with a View, and Prenatal Peek, these boutiques use

even more powerful ultrasound to show expectant

mothers " portraits " of their unborn babies...

 

Not for bona-fide medical diagnostic reasons, but for mere

ENTERTAINMENT!

 

You read that right: There are a growing number of virtually

unregulated prenatal ultrasound centers out there operating

under the gray umbrella of " non-medical " usage - therefore

dodging the strict regulation that accompanies medical

ultrasound (which still doesn't prevent fetuses from being

damaged, mind you).

 

For around $200 a session, expectant mothers can take a

break from shopping for maternity clothes at the local mall

and " bond " with their babies using the latest in " 4D "

ultrasound technology. Never mind that the folks handling

the sound " gun " might be under-trained - and completely

protected from any medical liability whatsoever.

 

How do doctors feel about this? According the AP article,

some MDs and medical groups are against it, but many seem to

think it's perfectly harmless. How does the FDA feel about

it? Technically, it's illegal, according to them. And

they're considering action against the studios - including

sending some of these centers a HARSH LETTER or two to make

their point!

 

Atta' boy, bureaucrats!

 

According to the FDA, more than 90 problems have been

reported to them specifically with regard to ultrasound

machine use (though not all of them were units designed for

prenatal use). Of these incidents, 63 involved serious

injury.

 

Hope incident number 64 isn't your granddaughter...

 

 

Guarding my readers (current and future) against mainstream dangers,

 

William Campbell Douglass II, MD

 

**************************************************************

To start receiving your own copy of the Daily Dose, visit:

http://www.realhealthnews.com/dailydose/freecopya.html

Or forward this e-mail to a friend so they can sign-up to

receive their own copy of the Daily Dose.

 

**************************************************************

 

Copyright ©1997-2004 by www.realhealthnews.com, L.L.C.

The Daily Dose may not be posted on commercial sites without

written permission.

 

**************************************************************

Before you hit reply to send us a question or request,

please visit here

http://www.realhealthnews.com/questions.shtml

 

**************************************************************

If you'd like to participate in the Dr. Douglass' Real

Health Breakthroughs Forum, search past e-letters and

products or you're a Dr. Douglass' Real Health Breakthroughs

r and would like to search past articles, visit

http://www.realhealthnews.com

 

**************************************************************

 

 

 

 

 

Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Messenger

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...