Guest guest Posted May 19, 2004 Report Share Posted May 19, 2004 http://www.theecologist.org/archive_article.html?article=458 & category=76 Polio Special Part 3 : The hidden epidemic Date Published: 01/05/2004 Author: Janine Roberts The World Health Organisation (WHO) confidently predicts that polio epidemics are all but over and that the poliovirus itself will become extinct by the end of 2004. Who is it trying to fool and why? The hidden epidemic The disease that struck down so many in the 20th century epidemics was then known as infantile paralysis, or poliomyelitis. It was this disease the polio vaccines were intended to eliminate. But today infantile paralysis is renamed as Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP). How could the WHO be claiming to have nearly eliminated this disease when, by its own figures, epidemics of AFP are not ending but rapidly getting worse. Take the WHO's figures for the east Asian/Pacific region as an example. They reveal that the incidence of AFP went up between 1994 and 1998 by 50 per cent in China, 400 per cent in Malaysia, and 1,500 per cent in the Pacific islands. But other than providing these statistics, WHO pays little attention to any of these cases in which the poliovirus is absent - meaning nearly all of them. These cases are left without a cure -and even without a vaccine! They become effectively a hidden epidemic. WHO makes even bolder claims for Europe and the Americas. It states that they are now free of both polio and AFP. On closer inspection, WHO's figures do not bear much scrutiny. It declares that there is `no data' for the number of cases of AFP in the UK and the US. It then interprets `no data' as if it means `zero'.(41) But the US government's Centres for Disease Control (CDC) does not agree The CDC records that many thousands of cases of AFP occur in the US every year. It reports that AFP can have many causes. For example, it says that Guillain-Barré disease causes 17 cases of AFP per 100,000 of the US population. That translates into around 50,000 cases annually. The CDC also says that every year there are some 30,000 to 50,000 cases of aseptic meningitis serious enough to require hospitalisation. Both Guillain-Barré disease and aseptic meningitis were diagnosed as polio during the US epidemics prior to 1957. If you use the pre-1957 definition, then there are many more cases of poliomyelitis occurring in the US today, than there were in 1952 - at the height of the US polio epidemics. To this tally of `Acute Flaccid Paralysis' one could add the many more cases of AFP reported by the CDC as occurring in an epidemic that has swept across the US over the past five years, and which is attributed to the `West Nile' virus (WNV). The CDC states that WNV can cause a `polio-like' paralysis. Many scientists have been less ambiguous. They say WNV is clinically indistinguishable from poliomyelitis.(42) A paper recently published by the British Medical Journal suggests WNV may be `rapidly evolving to fill new ecological niches'.(43) In 2003 there were 9,389 cases of this disease in the US, of which 2,773 showed damage to the nervous system and 246 were fatal. Some researchers think WNV has links to pesticides and other pollutants. A legal action is currently underway in New York to stop the aerial spraying of the city with Malathion, an organophosphate pesticide first used in the 1950s. The city authorities want to use it to kill the mosquitoes it blames for WNV. The litigants maintain that the pesticide is more likely to cause the disease than prevent it. How does WHO distinguish the very few cases of AFP it says are caused by polio from other cases of AFP? It cannot do this easily - as there is no distinguishing symptom. It instead instructs doctors to send two samples of excrement from AFP patients to one of the scores of laboratories it has set up around the world. These inspect the excrement for poliovirus. If it is present, then they register this as a case of poliomyelitis. If they don't find the virus, then it is registered as a case of `Non-Poliomyelitis AFP'.(44) But this WHO test is in effect meaningless. The poliovirus is by definition a type of enterovirus, which means a stomach bug. Its presence in excrement is thus natural - and does not indicate that it has damaged nerves. WHO actively discourages doctors from looking for the poliovirus themselves in cases of AFP, because `the virus is very hard to find' and research shows that `there was no relationship between finding the virus and the course of the disease'. It adds that presence of the virus in the central nervous system (CNS) `appeared to have no diagnostic significance.' (45) And yet this is the very reason given for the need to vaccinate against the poliovirus. The Sabin polio vaccine has been chosen by WHO to finally eradicate the poliovirus. It hopes to achieve this by inspecting the excrement from every case of AFP reported. Should it find a case in which the poliovirus is present, then the polio vaccine will be administered on a national scale so as to eliminate the risk of its spreading. This has happened now so many times that in countries like India children have received up to 10 doses of the vaccine. But this is the strangest tool for the WHO to choose to eradicate the poliovirus with. Sabin's vaccine, unlike Salk's, contains living mutated poliovirus. This will breed in the vaccinated. WHO recommends this vaccine for the developing world for this very reason, for the vaccinated widely spread the virus, to infect and immunise those who have refused vaccination. WHO is thus strangely choosing to spread a poliovirus in order to eliminate it! WHO shows little concern over replacing the natural poliovirus in the environment with an `unnatural' laboratory-made mutated poliovirus bred in monkey cells. This is astonishing, given that this synthetic virus does not remain stable, but continues to mutate. Poliovirus contains RNA - a type of genetic coding that allows rapid mutation - and the vaccine's mutated poliovirus has acquired a reputation among researchers for the speed with which it does this. The virus can also reside inside humans for more than 20 years, making it practically impossible to exterminate. And what is more shocking, but not surprising given the nature of viruses, it is now reappearing in more mutated forms in outbreaks on several continents.46 The danger now is that these might now evolve to present a threat that the natural virus never did. But why do we still have epidemics of infantile paralysis/AFP? Organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides are back in widespread use. They may be better regulated, but their toxins still accumulate in body fats until they reach dangerous levels. The level of pesticide pollution on farmland in America is now so bad that the US Environmental Protection Agency `estimates that there are 10,000 to 20,000 cases of physician-diagnosed pesticide poisonings' every year among agricultural workers. The CDC reports that approximately one billion pounds of pesticides are now used every year in the US. The global market for pesticides was estimated at $1,761 billion in 1989; it would surely be bigger today. The fact is, the victory won against pesticides in the early 1950s was very short-lived. In 1955, the very year that Salk's vaccine was launched, organophosphate pesticides were introduced into the US in partial replacement for organochlorines like DDT. The organophosphates were perhaps less dangerous than the organochlorines, but they were still highly neurotoxic. It was only after the publication of Rachel Carson's sensational book Silent Spring in 1962, telling how pesticides were endangering the survival of America's symbolic bald eagles, that more meaningful restrictions were put on organophosphates and the remaining organochlorines. They were banned in the US in 1972, but not for long. In 1983 organophosphate pesticides were reintroduced. During the ban, US pesticide manufacturers simply shifted markets. They redirected most of their sales to the developing nations as infantile paralysis ceased to be the `American disease'. The first polio epidemic in Manila happened in 1972. Today the WHO encourages developing nations to use cheap DDT to kill malaria-spreading mosquitoes, while it organises vaccination campaigns in the same countries to fight the polio that DDT may cause. Effectively, the pesticide companies are now partners to the WHO in its war against viruses. It's safer for them to blame a virus for polio than pesticides: viruses can't be sued. WHO is now raising over a billion dollars, not to cure those still suffering from the original disease, not to look to see if toxins caused the children's paralysis, but solely as a matter of pride to try to win for the polio vaccine a seeming victory by eliminating a practically harmless virus. It states on its website: `There is no cure for polio: its effects are irreversible.' This is only so because public funds have been wasted on an ineffective and wrongly targeted vaccine that cannot cure a single case of AFP. This is nothing other than tragic for the thousands of children involved. And finally, why is the WHO ignoring the possible role of pesticides, and sticking with its vaccination assault? Is it because in our increasingly specialised, non-holistic world, the virologists involved with vaccines have not been talking to the toxicologists involved with chemicals? Despite the fact that there are literally hundreds of papers produced by the latter documenting how pesticides can harm our immune systems, dramatically lower the number of our vital illness-fighting `T-cells', and cause numerous other diseases as well as paralysis (47), this research unfortunately does not seem to be filtering through to the vaccine industry, which is still based on the theory that viruses must be the principal cause of all paralytic epidemics. One hopeful sign of progress was a recent report by the US National Academy of Sciences, documenting how current levels of food contamination by organophosphates can cause `acute poisoning in children'.(48) Another ground-breaking piece of recent research focused on treating individuals suffering from paralysis up to 40 years after becoming ill with poliomyelitis. A group of 17 individuals were placed into an environment from which most toxic substances had been removed, and were treated with antidotes to toxins. `Long-term follow-up of the 14 improved patients showed general return of wellbeing and renewed vigour,' and `eight became totally pain-free'. The researchers concluded that `post-polio syndrome' was due to an `overload of environmental pollutants on wounded target organs'.(49) The evidence thus strongly suggests that the infantile paralysis (polio) epidemics of the past were man-made disasters caused primarily by the gross overuse of very dangerous pesticides, and that these epidemics are continuing. The poliovirus, along with other viruses, may play a role, but it seems it is a far smaller role than that given to it by the vaccine industry. The weight of evidence also strongly suggests that the search for this virus, and for a vaccine, was and is based on a flawed theory. This has tragically distracted the medical establishment from the science that might have cured a large number of children - and which could still do so. The consequence of the campaign to spin the polio vaccine as a great success is not simply that the public has been deceived. If toxins are the primary cause of this disease, then countless thousands of paralysed children have never been treated correctly. Many could have had their pain removed. Many might have been able to walk again. This is not some abstract academic issue: it affects real people, enduring real suffering and real paralysis. This is a story of a hidden epidemic. It is surely time to cast aside the fog of doctrine and urgently consider what can be done to cure such people. SBC - Internet access at a great low price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.