The Children's Vaccination Room: Viruses, toxins and good health.

[Guest guest]

http://www.vaccines.plus.com/Templates/index-vaccines.dwt

 

The Children's Vaccination Room

 

Viruses, toxins and good health.

 

The author of this website is Janine Roberts. She has written front-page

articles on vaccine issues for the Independent and Independent on Sunday UK

newspapers and produced (with Rosie Thomas) for 'Dispatches', a Channel 4

program, an investigative documentary on the polio vaccine called 'Monkey

Business' in 1998. In the course of her research, she has interviewed leading

scientists, attended scientific meetings, and completed several years of

research. She holds a Summa Cum Laude in Philosophy, a Master's in Theology and

an Honours degree in Sociology (specialising in White Collar Crime and

Industrial Sociology) from the London School of Economics. (for more about her -

see sidebar on left)

 

her latest work is

 

Polio - the wrong virus, the wrong diagnosis, the wrong vaccine and the wrong

cure

 

Press here for a press release - and link to The Ecologist.

 

Click here to download her ground-breaking May 2004 special section on Polio -

as printed in the Ecologist.

 

Some Statistics

 

Read what scientists observed and said during the polio epidemics. (click 'polio

re-thought' button above to find the links)

 

Channel 4 TV Press Releas for 'Monkey Business '- On links between cancer and a

monkey virus found in the polio vaccine - a 'Dispatches' TV Investigation

co-produced by Rosie Thomas and Janine Roberts..

 

I hope to find time to put up in this website much data on poisons, viruses and

vaccines during the first week of May 2004 -and to very soon make available a CD

for purchase containing much new information, much research - and a film on this

vaccine- again, all this will be under the 'Polio-rethought' button above.

 

During the infamous 20th century North American epidemics of Infantile

Paralysis, a disease then scientifically known as poliomyelitits, or polio for

short, the pulic health authorities were so convinced that the disease must be

caused by a virus, that they ignored the many medical reports of severe cases of

the disease being cured by the use of antitoxins - for if these were true, then

the disease must have been caused by toxins, not by a virus - perhaps by the

lead arsenate then used to spray fruit and to wash dairy cows. All the heatth

authorities could did was to research a vaccine useless against toxins, while

advising parents to wash and clean their homes and children. This proved useless

to stop the disease. .

 

Investigating Vaccines. By Janine Roberts.

 

There were few interviews that amazed me more, during my investigation into MMR

and the other childhood vaccines, than that with Michael Steward, Professor of

Immunology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London

University's leading immunologist, I was talking to him for " The Independent " in

1996. I told him

 

" " Some parents have told me their children fell ill after having MMR with such

serious illnesses as meningitis. "

 

I was astonished to receive the response, " What else would you expect?' He then

explained,

 

" We know the vaccines based on living viruses are risky. Why else do you think I

head a team of immunologists working on new safer vaccines? . "

 

Another amazing interview was when I phoned one of the major MMR manufacturers,

Merck. They put me in touch with their leading scientist, a man that played a

key role in developing the MMR vaccine, Dr Maurice Hilleman. I asked him

 

" The MMR vaccine is based on the attenuated [weakened] viruses for measles,

mumps and rubella. How do you weaken these viruses? "

 

He explained they did so by transplanting the virus from cell to cell again and

again, perhaps some 24 times, until it was sufficiently weakened.

 

I then asked

 

" I understand that you must weaken the virus so as to prevent unwanted

side-effects such as illness- but you cannot weaken it too far otherwise it will

not give sufficient immunity. How do you judge how much to weaken the virus?

 

He replied

 

" Exactly, that is the principal issue. The only way to judge this is by

experimenting with children. "

 

I then asked " Do you have a guideline for this work? "

 

He replied " Yes, 20%. "

 

" What do you mean? "

 

" That only 20% of the vaccinated children fall ill. "

 

When I exclaimed with surprise, he hurried to add " Oh, not seriously ill. They

all get better quickly. "

 

If the views of these experts were more widely known, it would create a very

different attitude towards vaccination. Many parents are utterly unaware of what

leading scientists are saying. It is not helped when a Prime Minister does not

give both sides of what is a scientific debate.

 

Parents are not helped when a government insists that there is no risk - while

it at the same time quietly pays out compensation to many parents because their

children fell seriously ill after vaccination or even died. It cannot have it

both ways. The manufacturers of vaccines do not claim that there are no risks

involved in taking their product. They give doctors a list of warnings that

notes that in some rare cases serious illnesses might result. No wonder that

Tony Blair's UK Government has lost credibility on this issue.

 

The issue for parents is a balance of risks. They need an honest assessment of

the risks. The government needs to acknowledge that there are some risks to

taking the " living virus " vaccines as do the manufacturers and leading

scientists. Only if it does so, will it be able to regain public confidence and

genuinely help parents make up their minds..

 

.. I myself found that whenever I interviewed UK government scientists that

specialised on vaccines, I was warned that I should not publicly criticise the

vaccines - for " it could put parents off vaccination " . It seemed that

questioning accepted government policy would be a " heretical " act.

 

Making an Assessment of the Risks.

 

A Member of Parliament asked questions at my request after the MR (Measles and

Rubella) national campaign in 1996 in the UK. The campaign had injected some 8

million children because of a " claimed " danger of a national measles epidemic.

My first question was how many " Yellow-Cards " were sent in by doctors reporting

illnesses following vaccination that they suspected could have been caused by

the vaccine. The answer was that there were over 2,500 yellow-cards sent in - of

which over 500 cases were of serious illnesses requiring hospitalisation. My

next question was " What was the Government's estimate for the number of cases of

measles prevented by the vaccination campaign? " The answer came back that it

estimated between 180-190 case of measles were prevented! This was an estimate

for measles - of which only a few, less than one in ten, would have been

serious. So the vaccine had seemingly caused nearly 30 times more cases of

serious illness than it had prevented. This was simply gross

medical incompetence.

 

AUTISM, CHRONIC BOWEL SYNDROME

 

and SINGLE VACCINE JABS

 

There is currently much public pressure to relieve the pressure on a child's

immune system by separating out the elements of the MMR vaccine and giving the

measles, mumps and rubella vaccines as separate jabs administer several days

apart. There is said to be a great shortage of single vaccine jabs - although it

could be relatively simple to provide them if the government was willing. (The

MMR vaccine is stored as three separate vaccines that are only combined near the

time of use.)

 

Separate administration puts less stress on the child - but it does not remove

all risk. These vaccines are all " living virus " vaccines. These all entail a

risk even if it is small. When living viruses are injected, there is always a

risk that the virus can mutate or even travel around causing unwanted

side-effects or even infecting others. By injecting these viruses, we have

by-passed many of the body's natural defenses. The vaccine manufacturers warn

that childr.en should not be injected at a time when their immune system is

weakened by even a cold or flu. The Professor I mentioned above, Michael Steward

at London University, told me he was trying to develop alternative safer

vaccines precisely because such vaccines are risky.

 

When I interviewed some years ago Doctor Andrew Wakefield, the scientist at the

centre of the storm over MMR, he had just made his key discoveries. Since then I

have followed his work. He has now presented his results at a US Congress

Hearing and other scientists have replicated his work. It has also been

published in peer-reviewed medical journals. But he did not start out as a

vaccine specialist. He is a stomach and guts specialist. He was investigating

the epidemic of bowel disease that currently affects many thousands - namely

Chrone Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome - when he found inside inflamed

bowel tissue a virus infestation. He isolated the virus and took it around to

other specialists to have it identified. It turned out to be a measles virus.

 

He was surprised. Wild measles virus is now comparatively rare in the UK - - so

how could it be turning up in so many cases?

 

He knew there was another form of measles virus that was not so rare. It was the

type given in the MMR vaccine. This living virus lives on inside the vaccinated

- and is passed on from them to others. This form of the measels virus has been

weakened ('attenuated " ) to make it unable to cause measles. But, what if it

could cause other diseases? Wakefield wondered if the measles virus in the

vaccine was now causing an epidemic of bowel disease?

 

Since then his research has indicated that there could well also be a link

between MMR and autism. This finding is still highly controversial. Some labs

claim they cannot replicate his findings, but other labs have confirmed the

presence of measles virus.

 

Dr.Wakefield's latest paper was co-authored by Professor John O'Leary and

published in the Journal of Molecular Pathology. It reported finding the DNA of

the measles virus in the guts of 75 out of 91 children with bowel disease,

compared to in only 5 of the 44 control subjects. Dr.Wakefield said in a later

interview " We were responding to the concern of parents - several thousand

parents saw their children develop problems, they felt, after having the vaccine

- we think their fears have been substantiated ... The study was designed to

detect the measles virus and whether it was present in the diseased intestinal

tissue of children with inflammatory bowel disorder. There was a highly

significant difference in the rate of measles in these children compared to the

control group. The only exposure these children have had to the measles virus

was in the vaccine.

 

On the face of it, this means that having a jab of the measles vaccine by itself

puts the child at risk - for it is the measles virus, not the mumps or rubella

viruses, that is found in damaged bowel tissue. Thus a parent should perhaps

avoid this vaccine completely - either as a single jab or as part of MMR. This

seemed also to be the opinion of Dr Wakefield at the time when I interviewed

him.

 

However he has moved on somewhat since then - in order to explain why the

incidence of autism rose sharply when MMR was introduced in 1988 - many years

after the introduction of the single measles jab.

 

When he was asked if the single measles vaccine might cause the bowel disease

just as much as MMR, he relied; " T heoretically yes, however the trend in the

dramatic rise of autism in developed countries since MMR was introduced [1988 in

the UK] raises concerns that the combination [of 3 vaccines] might make the

measles component behave differently " (The Independent, 8 February 2002). He was

concerned that receiving three different lots of viruses, measles, mumps and

rubella, in a single jab, might make the measles virus even more dangerous.

 

At the moment his research only shows that measles virus seemingly flourishes in

cases of bowel disease. It does not show why this happens - and it leaves

unclear the relationship between bowel disease and autism. Viruses are also

attracted to toxically damaged tissues - so toxins might also play a key role.

It could also be that the virus helps weaken the walls of the gut; letting

toxins into the body which in turn might cause autism.

 

Another scientist has pointed out that 70% of autism cases are in boys - yet

boys and girls are equally exposed to the measles virus. He suggested a genetic

cause might be involved - but, if true, this does not exclude the measles virus.

Diseases can be caused by a cocktail of different elements working together

disastrously

 

If there is any suspected risk in taking the current vaccines, then I believe it

is most important that the government urgently invests in developing safer

vaccines or in alternative ways of treating illnesses than it invests billions

in military hardware. I believe the risk to our children from unsafe vaccines is

in reality much greater than that currently posed by terrorism.

 

 

MORE RESOURCES

The articles below reveal much about government policy, scientific opinion and

vaccination. Some are some years old - but as far as I can see, nothing has

changed. We are still using the same living virus vaccines - and hearing the

same arguments.

 

 

Report on Vaccine Safety issued by the highly authoritative 13 professor-strong

Vaccine Safety Committee of the American Institute of Medicine,

 

The following are mostly based on articles and newstories written by the author

of this website for " The Independent " and the " Independent on Sunday. "

 

 

The Child Victims of Vaccination

" Epidemic " that put at risk 8 million children.

The MR vaccination campaign.

What an Oxford University Professor of Pediatrics had to say.

Rubella, the government and pregnant girls.

Families denied doctors' care

Safety fears over meningitis vaccine

 

 

The Monkey Campaign - Hundreds of wild monkeys are currently being killed so

human vaccines can be grown in their corpses - and vaccines are thus becoming

monkey virus contaminated. Yet this is not necessary, according to the World

Health Organisation. It approves two other ways of making the polio vaccine that

do not involve the capture and killing of wild monkeys. It also approves the

wild monkey method - but warns this is the most dangerous because of the risk of

monkey virus infection of vaccine doses. But the drug companies have chosen to

use this more hazardous method because it is the cheapest. It is now known that

hundreds of millions of polio vaccine doses have been contaminated with monkey

viruses because the pharmaceutical companies chose to take this risk.

 

Leading scientists are now finding viruses from these monkeys in the brains of

ME victims and in many common cancers - e.g. in 70 percent of bone cancers - and

over 80% of childhood brain tumors. . Campaign Page.

 

 

List of Useful Websites

 

You need a useful book on vaccination written for parents? Click here for the

Vaccination bookshop

 

 

(Note - All purchases through this site will help fund educational work on

vaccines )

 

 

Other Health Issues including information on GM Potatoes and Mad Cow Disease

 

To Contact the Author, click Janine Roberts

 

Search The Web Inquirer's 500,000+ words on topics such as vaccines and measles,

polio and more

 

the photographs on this page are by the author Janine Roberts, and are the

children of low-paid diamond miners working for De Beers in South Africa. - to

see her Diamonds and Human Rights website Click HERE

 

 

IMPORTANT! PLEASE NOTE.

 

If you suspect your child may have become ill due to vaccination - please use

the online Suspect Adverse Reaction database on the JABS website to report

whatever facts you wish to make public. All the data entered will automatically

become a public resource. Hopefully over time it will become a valuable

international resource. It was started in July 2000. It has its own vaccination

chat room and a link to the JABS support group. On the Jabs website there is

analysis of figures for some vaccine side effects.

 

An excellent article on MMR can be found on the Jabs website, written by the

woman who inspired the JABS group, Jackie Fletcher. It is very factual and

straightforward. It gives more details on how the US and UK governments have

paid large sums in compensation to many parents because of suspected vaccine

damage - including deaths - so why now are the authorities acting as if MMR is

entirely safe?

 

To access the parent's support group JABS

 

for support, to report reactions to the vaccines and for further information

 

 

CLICK here for JABS

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

This is really groundbreaking investigative journalism. It's on par with

Fast Food Nation. Let's hope this gets as much media coverage, becuase

it's really important.

 

http://www.vaccines.plus.com/dowloadpolio-Frameset-2.html