Yep, some healing solution, yet...

[Guest guest]

if I had galloping bacterial pneumonia, I would be thankful for

penicillin. And as I have already said, I believe that psychotropic

drugs could have their uses if they were used VERY sparingly, in the

following way, for instance: If a person was so depressed or

so " high " he could not begin to think clearly enough to engage in

conversation, a psychotropic drug might be given for just long enough

to bring him up or down to a point where he could engage in non-drug

treatment to end further attacks of depression or " mania. "

 

But Big Drug Companies cannot spend all the money they do to produce

their drugs only to have them used sparingly. They'd go broke. That's

why they spend millions and millions on advertising, and have their

armies of drug salespeople trooping daily to offices of allopaths all

across the country.

 

It appears to me that over the last decade or maybe two, that drug

company advertising in all media has skyrocketed.

 

Business is booming, and boomERANGING!

 

Best wishes,

 

Elliot

 

, " califpacific "

<califpacific> wrote:

> Dear Elliot,

>

> If a person did not have cancer and wanted to induce it, the

logical

> choices would be the powerfull destuctive chemicals (chemo) or

> radiation. Some healing solution , huh?

>

> The same rational holds true in the majority of the rest of

> allopathic medicine. It just isn't so dramatic or the destruction

so

> fast, but most of the treatments for most diseases are " chemo "

also.

> Allopaths treat headaches with chemo. They treat heart disease with

> chemo. They treat mental illness with chemo. They treat high blood

> pressure with chemo, etc. You get the picture. They treat most

> ailments with chemo.

>

> People will say no, that is ridiculus, they use medicine or

> pharmacueticals not chemo. Well chemo is just short for chemical

and

> that is exactly what pharmacuetical drugs are, a chemical to

suppress

> the symptoms. In most cases the only way that the chemical could

atually rectify the health situation is if the person had a specific

chemical

> deficiency and that was the chemical that was needed and being

> replaced. That can usually only happen with a natural nutrient of

> some type. The chemicals of Big Pharma are destructive to the

health

> of the body over time. That is why there are always toxic side

> effects. Those are toxic side effects from a toxic chemical.

>

> The toxic side effects are usually kept quiet in our society and

the

> people that use the drugs do not know that they are also destroying

> their health in the process and when the patent starts to run out,

> the authorities let out little by little the damaging effects of

the

> drug. That induces everyone to switch to the " New, Improved,

Better,

> More Higher Priced, Drugs " covered by the new Patent which means

> higher profit. It is a shell game that they all have been playing

for

> many years. Why don't the people wake up? Well a lot of them do

> eventually but die off due to age and wrong allopathic treatment,

but

> the economic machinery of the drug corporation rolls one. It

doesn't

> die. It controls the system. It lives on selling it's poisons to

the

> next generation of customers who are naive, trusting and not

> economicaly ruined yet. It gains strength and power every

generation.

> Hopefully the internet with universal access will change that as we

> can communicate and learn from each other.

>

> That is why Big Pharma and government feel that the system has to

be rigged and controlled and to not allow competition from the

natural substances. The natural replacement would almost always win

hands down and they can't let

> that happen from an economic standpoint.

>

> regards,

>

> Frank

[Guest guest]

Elliot,

 

If I had galloping pneumonia I would probably opt for the antibiotic

also. The antibiotics are of the few that do play an important part,

like when fighting invading organisms. Of course when they are used like

the allopaths use them and are passed out like candy, they also cause

damage to the health of the population overall.

 

I think that you only see the problem of psychotropic meds as either

or one of two choices. Either drugs or talk (as before) or unknown

(here you say " non drug treatment " ). The other option is to replace

what is misssing in the brain and allow it to balance the

neurotransmitters as needed. It is the " orthomolecular " approach.

Ortho= repair or needed part to repair + molecular= molecule. The

needed molecule to repair. When that is done the person is not high or

low but balanced.

 

Drugs do not bring this about although they make the person more

managable. Talk does not correct this imbalance. Only finding the

missing needed part and supplying it will effect a " cure " . This can

happen very fast once the deficient part is identified and supplied

in sufficient quantities.

 

When people are in dire straits with " mental illness " a lot of the time

it is not exactly a natural form of mental illness but a chemically

induced or resultant damage form of mental illness from some prior

psychotropic drug use. That is much more difficult to heal than the

original illness. A lot of time the symptoms of that are so bad that

it requires medication to be able to " stand it " . Bottom line, there is no doubt

that these drugs cause mental illness.

 

IF you doubt what I say, there is a lot of information on it as well

as many groups of people who are suffering from the prior use of these drugs.

 

regards,

 

Frank

 

 

, " breathedeepnow "

<aug20@m...> wrote:

> if I had galloping bacterial pneumonia, I would be thankful for

> penicillin. And as I have already said, I believe that psychotropic

> drugs could have their uses if they were used VERY sparingly, in

the

> following way, for instance: If a person was so depressed or

> so " high " he could not begin to think clearly enough to engage in

> conversation, a psychotropic drug might be given for just long

enough

> to bring him up or down to a point where he could engage in non-

drug

> treatment to end further attacks of depression or " mania. "

>

> But Big Drug Companies cannot spend all the money they do to

produce

> their drugs only to have them used sparingly. They'd go broke.

That's

> why they spend millions and millions on advertising, and have their

> armies of drug salespeople trooping daily to offices of allopaths

all

> across the country.

>

> It appears to me that over the last decade or maybe two, that drug

> company advertising in all media has skyrocketed.

>

> Business is booming, and boomERANGING!

>

> Best wishes,

>

> Elliot

>

> , " califpacific "

> <califpacific> wrote:

> > Dear Elliot,

> >

> > If a person did not have cancer and wanted to induce it, the

> logical

> > choices would be the powerfull destuctive chemicals (chemo) or

> > radiation. Some healing solution , huh?

> >

> > The same rational holds true in the majority of the rest of

> > allopathic medicine. It just isn't so dramatic or the destruction

> so

> > fast, but most of the treatments for most diseases are " chemo "

> also.

> > Allopaths treat headaches with chemo. They treat heart disease

with

> > chemo. They treat mental illness with chemo. They treat high

blood

> > pressure with chemo, etc. You get the picture. They treat most

> > ailments with chemo.

> >

> > People will say no, that is ridiculus, they use medicine or

> > pharmacueticals not chemo. Well chemo is just short for chemical

> and

> > that is exactly what pharmacuetical drugs are, a chemical to

> suppress

> > the symptoms. In most cases the only way that the chemical could

> atually rectify the health situation is if the person had a

specific

> chemical

> > deficiency and that was the chemical that was needed and being

> > replaced. That can usually only happen with a natural nutrient of

> > some type. The chemicals of Big Pharma are destructive to the

> health

> > of the body over time. That is why there are always toxic side

> > effects. Those are toxic side effects from a toxic chemical.

> >

> > The toxic side effects are usually kept quiet in our society and

> the

> > people that use the drugs do not know that they are also

destroying

> > their health in the process and when the patent starts to run

out,

> > the authorities let out little by little the damaging effects of

> the

> > drug. That induces everyone to switch to the " New, Improved,

> Better,

> > More Higher Priced, Drugs " covered by the new Patent which means

> > higher profit. It is a shell game that they all have been playing

> for

> > many years. Why don't the people wake up? Well a lot of them do

> > eventually but die off due to age and wrong allopathic treatment,

> but

> > the economic machinery of the drug corporation rolls one. It

> doesn't

> > die. It controls the system. It lives on selling it's poisons to

> the

> > next generation of customers who are naive, trusting and not

> > economicaly ruined yet. It gains strength and power every

> generation.

> > Hopefully the internet with universal access will change that as

we

> > can communicate and learn from each other.

> >

> > That is why Big Pharma and government feel that the system has to

> be rigged and controlled and to not allow competition from the

> natural substances. The natural replacement would almost always win

> hands down and they can't let

> > that happen from an economic standpoint.

> >

> > regards,

> >

> > Frank